Recommended Posts

Unless you have personally seen one I think people are skeptical. Even if the government is covering this up (and understandably so) you would think there would of been a leak of information, physical evidence at some point. I do think allot of people think we have UFO evidence. One of the best scenes in a movie was in Independence Day when even the president of the United States wasn't aware of a captured UFO. I do believe they are real even though allot are faked especially now with the technology we have. Some of these sightings of UFO's I believe are remote controlled by either military or high tech gadget developers. I just wonder what aliens that are flying the UFO's around want with Earth. Are we being monitored, do they want to capture humans, do they want our minerals. Gutted cattle, crop circles. One thing you can count on is those bills will keep coming to my mailbox and we'll all be dead someday. Evidence of UFO's ever ? Someday we'll make contact.

Unless you have personally seen one I think people are skeptical. Even if the government is covering this up (and understandably so) you would think there would of been a leak of information, physical evidence at some point.

^ There have been many 'leaks' -- and physical evidence.

And now that I have seen the 'whole of the Moon', I understand why governments are covering up Alien craft.

Why does everyone automatically jump to aliens when the term UFO is used. Stealth bombers were UFO's at one point. So instantly, these images are fakes because UFO = alien = fake. UFO does not instantly mean alien. Stop derailing. If the government was working on a craft that capable of moving any direction like some reports have claimed, it would be in the shape of a circle/sphere just to have a half decent airflow around it in any direction.

So, I guess these UFO's are so magical they're not subject to the same chromatic aberration as everything else in the photo.... well it's either that or they're fake and have been added in later.

take a guess which one it is. physics of light waves vs fake

lol. Yes, Hum, tell us, where is this physical evidence of aliens? May I see it?

Hum keeps ALL discovered evidence of aliens hidden from authorities in a small re-enforced bunker, in a location known only to 2 beings, Hum, and Hums little green friend

Got any interesting articles to read on the moon business?

I wasn't referring to the Moon, literally.

I meant I have seen much more of the big picture, than most people care to look for.

However, I suggest reading Ralph Rene's book, NASA Mooned America.

th?id=H.4747516040382064&pid=15.1&H=160&W=160

It is on the internet, if not in your local library.

Why does everyone automatically jump to aliens when the term UFO is used. Stealth bombers were UFO's at one point. So instantly, these images are fakes because UFO = alien = fake. UFO does not instantly mean alien. Stop derailing. If the government was working on a craft that capable of moving any direction like some reports have claimed, it would be in the shape of a circle/sphere just to have a half decent airflow around it in any direction.

No -- not every flying object in the skies is an Alien craft -- but some are.

There's no reason to assume every object seen must be 'natural', or man-made, or that it just isn't possible to be from elsewhere.

And to those who want 'physical' proof, you will have to define what is proof ...

Are radioactive burn marks in the grass and fields proof ?

How about the soil depressions left behind from landing gear ?

How about the unexplained dead animals ?

What about the witnesses who have been burned by microwave radiation ?

There are numerous witnesses to landed craft and strange beings.

Are all of them made up by mental people ? Hardly seems reasonable.

Many witnesses do not want their names used, and have nothing to gain.

Many are police, military, even astronauts reporting their encounters.

These days nearly everyone will not believe photos and video --- 'Anything I choose not to believe must be 'photoshopped'.

People have to first want to know what is true, be open to look at the evidence.

If you have already predecided that something is 'impossible', you will never find any evidence.

Your human ego will explain it all away.

The real facts are, We are not alone, and We are not the first ....

And to those who want 'physical' proof, you will have to define what is proof ...

Are radioactive burn marks in the grass and fields proof ?

How about the soil depressions left behind from landing gear ?

How about the unexplained dead animals ?

What about the witnesses who have been burned by microwave radiation ?

There are numerous witnesses to landed craft and strange beings.

Are all of them made up by mental people ? Hardly seems reasonable.

Many witnesses do not want their names used, and have nothing to gain.

Many are police, military, even astronauts reporting their encounters.

These days nearly everyone will not believe photos and video --- 'Anything I choose not to believe must be 'photoshopped'.

proof

noun

1. evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth.

2. anything serving as such evidence: What proof do you have?

3. the act of testing or making trial of anything; test; trial: to put a thing to the proof.

4. the establishment of the truth of anything; demonstration.

5. Law. (in judicial proceedings) evidence having probative weight.

There simply isn't any proof that aliens exist, let alone that they have ever visited us. There is some evidence that could support the existence of aliens but it is just as easily explained by terrestrial means - it certainly doesn't qualify as "proof". Some people just desperately want to believe in something bigger, which is why so many people believe in religion, ghosts, aliens and conspiracy theories.

Some people just desperately want to believe in something bigger, which is why so many people believe in religion, ghosts, aliens and conspiracy theories.

O.k, not taking sides here and not saying aliens exists or not but taking what you said here i can say -

"Some people just desperately DONT want to believe in something bigger"

?Now i'm a simple guy, i believe in what i see and not what others tell me. This is why i dont believe in god for example. I want to think that this universe is too big for us to be alone but who knows.

What i find funny/weird/ridiculous is people that desperately (as you said) believe in god, a something/someone that they have never saw (and probably never will) but at no circumstances will want to discuss aliens. What's the difference?

Redundant title is redundant. If they were explained, they wouldn't be U-FO's.

Yes, it would be pretty ignorant to believe there is no other life in the universe... but it isn't ignorant to believe that it wouldn't be smart life. The odds of something becoming very intelligent is very slim compared to the billions of ways something can evolve. Especially for galatic travel.

O.k, not taking sides here and not saying aliens exists or not but taking what you said here i can say -

"Some people just desperately DONT want to believe in something bigger"

No, because one is supported by reason (i.e. there is no credible evidence to support the existence of God, ghosts, aliens or most conspiracy theories) and the other is predicated on faith / assumptions. I am open to the possibility that all of those things are true / exist but without any credible evidence they should be treated with scepticism, especially when there are more credible explanations.

O.k, not taking sides here and not saying aliens exists or not but taking what you said here i can say -

"Some people just desperately DONT want to believe in something bigger"

Yeah where have we heard that before, pretty much anytime anyone rejects a claim based on lack of evidence

"oh you just don't want to believe youll be judged when you die

oh you just don't want to believe the government could kill 3000 of their own citizens

etc etc etc"

No, because one is supported by reason (i.e. there is no credible evidence to support the existence of God, ghosts, aliens or most conspiracy theories) and the other is predicated on faith / assumptions. I am open to the possibility that all of those things are true / exist but without any credible evidence they should be treated with scepticism, especially when there are more credible explanations.

I'm with you on this but what i meant was something else -

Take the really religious people (any faith), they really dont want to believe in aliens just due to the fact that having aliens could potentially give explanation to some of gods doing and that would be catastrophic for the faith.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • BrowserOS 0.46.0 by Razvan Serea BrowserOS is a free, open-source Chromium-based browser that runs AI agents natively, offering a smarter, more productive browsing experience. It supports Chrome extensions and integrates AI agents to automate tasks, fill forms, and streamline workflows. Your data stays on your computer: you can use your own API keys or run local models via Ollama, making it a privacy-first alternative to tools like Perplexity, Comet, or Dia. With built-in productivity tools and app integrations, BrowserOS boosts efficiency while keeping control firmly in your hands. Being Chromium-based, BrowserOS lets you effortlessly import your bookmarks, passwords, and Chrome extensions in just a few clicks. BrowserOS works with OpenAI GPT models, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, and local AI models via Ollama or LMStudio. You can use your own API keys and effortlessly switch between providers. BrowserOS Agent Your AI productivity assistant that organizes and manages your browsing effortlessly Quickly list, group, or close tabs Save and resume browsing sessions Search your history and organize bookmarks Switch instantly to the tab you need BrowserOS Navigator – Automate web tasks with ease Navigate websites and search automatically Interact with pages without manual effort Handle repetitive tasks in seconds What makes BrowserOS special Feels like home - same familiar interface as Google Chrome, works with all your extensions AI agents that run on YOUR browser, not in the cloud Privacy first - bring your own keys or use local models with Ollama. Your browsing history stays on your computer Open source and community driven - see exactly what's happening under the hood MCP store to one-click install popular MCPs and use them directly in the browser bar (coming soon) Built-in AI ad blocker that works across more scenarios! BrowserOS 0.46.0 changelog: Run Claude Code & Codex right in your browser — We've extended the agent harness to bring full coding agents into BrowserOS. Claude Code and Codex now come bundled and plug straight into the assistant, so you can drive your browser with the agent — and the subscription — you already use. A brand new experience — A redesigned new tab, a calmer composer, and a rebuilt command center for switching between agents. The whole assistant is cleaner, faster to reach, and easier to live in. New MCP tools — We rebuilt the browser tool surface from the ground up — a tighter, more reliable set of tools for agents to drive the browser. Plus one-click install of BrowserOS as an MCP server into the agents you already run, with automatic URL sync. Chromium 148 — Updated to the latest Chromium base with all recent upstream fixes and security patches. Streamlined — We've pulled back a few features that weren't getting much use — Skills, Soul, and Memory — so we can focus and ship better versions of them soon. Download: BrowserOS 0.46.0 | 181.0 MB (Open Source) Download: BrowserOS for macOS | 485.0 MB Links: BrowserOS Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!