Recommended Posts

ColorOfChange has asked Fox not to renew its unscripted law-enforcement show and is calling upon advertisers to withdraw support, The Hollywood Reporter has learned exclusively. On Wednesday morning, the group is sending supporters an email in which it asks them to sign a petition to that effect.

"Although marketed as unbiased, Cops actually offers a highly filtered version of crime and the criminal justice system ? a 'reality' where the police are always competent, crime-solving heroes and where the bad boys always get caught," the email reads in part. It goes on to charge Cops and shows like it with over-representing whites as police officers and under-representing minorities as authority figures. According to ColorOfChange, Cops glosses over issues such as police misconduct and broadcasts "dehumanizing portrayals" of suspects.

"We're sending the message to Fox and to advertisers that Cops is not worth saving," says Rashad Robinson, executive director of ColorOfChange.

A Fox rep tells THR the network has not made a decision on Cops and said it would not comment on the petition.

Cops, now in its 25th season, has long delivered strong ratings for the network at a relatively low cost.

more

You want to ban "Cops" because it artificially raises the competence of an Officer (which work their asses off) to give people a deterrence to committing Crime? Would you rather they show a bunch of useless idiots trying to subdue a Kitty Cat, nothing strikes fear into would-be criminal watching the show like saying, "You can get away with anything, look how dumb these Cops are".

Also, as for the racial stereotyping... I see quite a lot of white criminals and black cops on that Show, it varies a lot by what area they are in, but it seems relatively on track with statistics. There just happens to just be more black criminals and more white cops by ratio. This isn't racism, it's... reality.

Bias Warning: My very good friend is a Cop and I hear some crazy stuff. He works his ass off like you wouldn't believe.

You want to ban "Cops" because it artificially raises the competence of an Officer (which work their asses off) to give people a deterrence to committing Crime? Would you rather they show a bunch of useless idiots trying to subdue a Kitty Cat, nothing strikes fear into would-be criminal watching the show like saying, "You can get away with anything, look how dumb these Cops are".

A reality show should depict reality, not the agenda of the network executives. If that makes cops look incompetent then so be it.

A reality show should depict reality, not the agenda of the network executives. If that makes cops look incompetent then so be it.

It's hard to argue the logic without pushing it into a grey area. If I make a specific case then everything else is meaningless. So, I'll go as far (as willing) to say I disagree but for reasons that I believe are 'good'. I don't encourage any 'agenda' of the Network which as far as I can tell would purely to be to make money, not enforce racial stereotypes.

They can't make a show about cops sitting around eating doughnuts all the time. :p

Or executing suspects, like the numerous times cops have shot people upwards of twenty times (including those who were unarmed).

A reality show should depict reality, not the agenda of the network executives. If that makes cops look incompetent then so be it.

IRL Reno 911, Count me in.

Even ignoring the conviction rate, the arrest rate still shows black people are significantly more likely to commit crimes than white people.

It's a cultural issue that the culture refuses to take responsibility for itself, and passes onerous responsibility on to others, while living in blissful ignorance and denial under the guises of political correctness and affirmative action. When a black person becomes successful in the "white world", said is applauded for overcoming adversity and the inherent obstruction incurred by simply being black. When the same black person speaks out and says what the black community should do to bolster itself and move beyond the stereotypes, said person is derided as being a sell-out, Uncle Tom, and a few more derogatory names I will omit.

It's sad, and even pathetic though I offer no sympathy to the ignorant, when the role models a society needs are shunned by said society in favor of the role models that perpetuate the mal-informed and embedded preconceptions.

  • Like 2

A reality show should depict reality, not the agenda of the network executives. If that makes cops look incompetent then so be it.

probably the criminals to cops ratio is based upon crime statistics, the reality of the criminal element versus where there's enough crime to post a show.

Can't shoot a cops show in mayberry unless Aunt Bee gets busted for meth.

It's a cultural issue that the culture refuses to take responsibility for itself, and passes onerous responsibility on to others, while living in blissful ignorance and denial under the guises of political correctness and affirmative action. When a black person becomes successful in the "white world", said is applauded for overcoming adversity and the inherent obstruction incurred by simply being black. When the same black person speaks out and says what the black community should do to bolster itself and move beyond the stereotypes, said person is derided as being a sell-out, Uncle Tom, and a few more derogatory names I will omit.

They like to perpetuate the problem under the guise of inferiority to 'whites' which, in an ironic turn of events, help establish that which they are trying to overcome. White people are no better, it's just a different side of the fence. You think by reinforcing these indirect solutions to minorities that you are somehow helping tear down said 'fence'; in actuality you're continuing an obligation to hate you, which to me is entirely justifiable. So who is right, and who is wrong? Neither, we are both stubborn idiots. We think we're doing the 'right thing' and we're not.

I'm just as racist as any other normal (read: White, Black, Purple) person. The only difference is I can see beyond the naive introspection and admit that I'm furthering nothing by bettering anyone... in that respect.

tl;dr Racism exists because we don't want it to.

Edit: At least in my opinion.

Edited by astropheed
"We're sending the message to Fox and to advertisers that Cops is not worth saving," says Rashad Robinson, executive director of ColorOfChange.

Seriously?

This country has shows like Honey Boo Boo, Dance Moms, Teen Mom, 16 and Pregnant, Obese and Pregnant etc etc etc. And this is the one they choose to complain about?

Cops may be biased but it's nowhere near as terrible as those shows.

1) if blacks, Asians, latinos etc. are on the show more than other groups maybe it's because black-on-black, white-on-white, Asian-on-Asian and latino-on-latino crimes are the way they usually occur, and in this example the minority groupings outnumber whites 3 groups to 1.

2) sitcoms make white people look stupid enough to make up for ANY disparity in minority representation in 1)

3) if Cops goes off most local affiliates will probably put on even more infomercials or un-reality shows as listed above by -Razorfold. NO, NO, and HELL NO!!!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!