Eric Schmidt calls Apple a 'tremendous technology innovator'


Recommended Posts

Google's Eric Schmidt sees Apple as a "tremendous innovator," even if he's not above taking some digs at the iPad. At Google's Big Tent event in India, Schmidt briefly assessed his competitors in a question and answer session. "I'm a BlackBerry user, because I like the keyboard," he said, though he acknowledged that BlackBerry was "slowly in trouble." But while he'd pick a BlackBerry over a Kindle, he says, Amazon is in better shape. "Amazon has well passed any of the expectations of its ability to change distribution and marketing. They're an important Google partner, and I think compete with us as well."

"Apple will continue to be a tremendous technology innovator... regardless of the market share."

His tone towards Apple was more cautious: while it's easy to praise the failing BlackBerry or a partner like Amazon, Apple is Google's biggest competitor in mobile. "Apple will continue to be a tremendous technology innovator and build beautiful products, regardless of the market share of the products, and that's a great strength ? they will continue to be the innovator," he said. When asked about the iPad and iPad mini, though, he said he preferred the iPad (the mini being "too small") but asked the host to consider Android instead. "Frankly, if you take a look at the Samsung 10-inch tablet, called the Nexus 10? More apps, more scalable, more secure."

Regardless of whether you prefer iOS or Android, Schmidt's apps comparison isn't a particularly helpful metric. Google counted about 700,000 total apps as of October, with Apple saying it had somewhat more than 700,000. Most Android apps are technically compatible with tablets, and Schmidt is almost certainly correct to say that's a bigger number than Apple's 300,000 native iPad apps. But Google has long struggled with app optimization for tablets, which often end up with scaled-up versions of phone apps.

Schmidt also weighed in on just what we'll be doing on all those apps. He remains optimistic about the future of newspapers, despite difficulties moving to digital, and he sees Twitter's model as "more distinct" than that of Facebook, which he says is in a state of flux. "I don't know enough about what they're transitioning to," he says. "I will tell you that if you have a billion users, you can make money." Google's most recent controversial decision got a few words too. "I do love Google Reader," he said, when pushed about its impending shutdown. So why did the company kill it? "Priorities."

http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/21/4131250/eric-schmidt-talks-apple-blackberry-amazon-at-big-tent-india

His tone towards Apple was more cautious: while it's easy to praise the failing BlackBerry or a partner like Amazon, Apple is Google's biggest competitor in mobile. "Apple will continue to be a tremendous technology innovator and build beautiful products, regardless of the market share of the products, and that's a great strength ? they will continue to be the innovator," he said

I think he is being kind about them continuing to be an innovator. However, he is right that they will continue to build beautiful products regardless of the market share. Market share has never been Apple's thing. And they do build beautiful stuff.

I think he is being kind about them continuing to be an innovator. However, he is right that they will continue to build beautiful products regardless of the market share. Market share has never been Apple's thing. And they do build beautiful stuff.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Remember, Apple also built this hideous monstrosity below, so beauty certainly isn't a constant!

imac_lc_side.jpg

Innovate -

1. to introduce something new; make changes in anything established.

2. to introduce (something new) for or as if for the first time

- Dictionary.com

1: to introduce as or as if new

- Mirriam-Webster

To begin or introduce (something new) for or as if for the first time.

- The Free Dictionary

Posted this mostly to clear up the confusion people seem to have with the word in every conversation. Carry on.

^ In that case, everyone else is innovating just as much, if not more than apple.

Why are you turning this into a competition? There doesn't have to be just one innovator. Just because Schmidt said Apple innovates doesn't mean nobody else does.

Must every thread go down the crapper with this incessant competitiveness?

Why are you turning this into a competition? There doesn't have to be just one innovator. Just because Schmidt said Apple innovates doesn't mean nobody else does.

Must every thread go down the crapper with this incessant competitiveness?

Of course! It's no different than when we have browser wars and you have that one Opera die-hard fan who's basically shouting "FIRST FIRST FRIST!!" when it comes to inventions as if that's going to somehow change the outcome of where Opera stands. It's a big circle jerk of stupid really. :ermm:

(and certainly no offense to Opera users, but if you've been on Neowin a while, you know it's true heh)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I and many others did not vote to get out of the E.u because of Putin or Farage, we did so for our own reasons. You don't have to tel me what my own did or did not do when it comes to the E.U. The EEC is or was the European Economic Community, a different beast to what the E.U is now.The EEC was a mainly about trading, the E.U have gone far beyond that and as I have said before, is now more of a United States of Europe. The U.K did not vote to join a United States of Europe. Anyway, they did not want us in there in the first place, Charles de Gaulle stopped us joining as he claimed we didn’t agree with the core ideas of integration. He was not wrong and that is why we voted out of the E.U when the time came. I was not old enough to vote the first time. My only regret is that we did not have the referendum years ago and got out years ago. If we rejoined, we would have to agree to join the Euro and no doubt Schengen, agree with freedom of movement, we have enough problem with people coming over here as it is. i have no problem with people coming over here if they work and don't try to push their way of life onto us. The E.U has a currency, freedom of movement, an anthem a flag, a parliament, well they are there, not sure if they do anything. Don't sound like something that is just for trading. Oh yeah, also wanted a euro Army. How many stupid rules have the E.U made that we had to follow? I doubt I will see the Uk rejoin the E.U, which suits me. Oh yeah, my partner is Polish, she came over here before Poland joined the E.U and she got fed up of people just coming over here with ease, while she had to struggle. She is now a British citizen and have been for a fair few years
    • Saluton, Paŭlo. Dankon pro la ĉefartikolo. Ĝi estis interesa. Mi esploros pli pri la aplikaĵo kaj ĝia koncepto. Kompreneble, se vi konas min entute, vi scias, ke mi dirus, ke viaj artikoloj bezonas iom da redaktado! Mi ĉiam faras tion, ĉu ne? Ekzemple, la artikolo foje mencias koncepton antaŭ ol difini ĝin, ekzemple, relajsoj.
    • Screamer is 50% off on Steam, making it £24.99 here in the UK: https://store.steampowered.com/app/2814990/Screamer/ You might remember the series from the mid 90s / early 2000s, this new game is also by Milestone who created the older games.
    • U.S. partially reverses Anthropic AI ban for Mythos but keeps Fable 5 off the market by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic says that the U.S. government has finally allowed it to restore Claude Mythos 5. But of course, there's a catch. The rollout is again for a limited set of U.S. organizations that operate and defend critical infrastructure. The company announced this in a post on X (formerly Twitter). This does not mean that Anthropic's latest frontier models are back to normal availability. Fable 5, which was a tuned version of Mythos 5 for public release, remains unavailable. Anthropic said that it is still working with the government to expand Mythos 5 access and make Fable 5 available again, but there's no timeline. Reports from Bloomberg and Reuters say that this decision actually came through a letter from the U.S. Commerce Department. According to Reuters, this would allow more than 100 companies and institutions access to Mythos 5. Reuters also reported that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick’s letter removes the need for export licenses for approved companies’ non-US citizen employees, as well as Anthropic’s own non-US citizen employees, while restrictions remain for organizations outside the approved list. Anthropic isn't alone with this kind of controlled rollout. OpenAI's newest model family, GPT 5.6, was announced just yesterday, but isn't available for everyone yet. In its announcement, OpenAI also said that access to these models is initially limited to a select group of trusted partners and organizations, with broader access planned later this year. Both of these cases show that frontier AI launches are no longer just ordinary product releases and more like slow and vetted deployments shaped heavily by the U.S. government.
    • Sol, Terra, Luna - aren't those the names of failed crypto coins? 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!