Restore Start menu but limit it to Pro edition


Recommended Posts

they did ti with win 3.11 to 95, u didnt have a start menu back then and then wulla u have it, people were furious about it and didnt like it

Yes because comparing windows 3.11 and 95 to windows 8 is exactly the same thing!

/s

FFS... The amount of crying over the Start Menu is rather hilarious. You guys act like you're 2 years old after mommy says no to getting a toy...

And the amount of crying by the zealots who side with a company, one that is deliberately trying to FORCE a user-hostile interface onto their long-time and new customers, can be comparable to a 2 year old crying because his friends have left him to play by himself with his new toys that nobody likes or wants anything to do with.

Nobody HAS to get used to the user-hostile ui of windows 8, just stick with windows 7 like most people are doing, obviously.

And that is a problem *how*?

The majority of critics of Windows 8 seem to have NOT realized that Windows 7 isn't going anywhere until 202x - in other words, it's not going away for quite a stretch.

Basically, Windows 8 and Windows 7 are meant to co-exist - side by side.

Other than the Start menu, Windows 8 is a SUPERset of Windows 7 - just as XP MCE was a superset of XP Professional. (What was missing by design in MCE was domain support - just as Windows 8 is missing the Start menu.)

Geeze.

Yes because comparing windows 3.11 and 95 to windows 8 is exactly the same thing!

/s

And the amount of crying by the zealots who side with a company, one that is deliberately trying to FORCE a user-hostile interface onto their long-time and new customers, can be comparable to a 2 year old crying because his friends have left him to play by himself with his new toys that nobody likes or wants anything to do with.

Windows 8 isn't trying to force anything on anyone - where, exactly, has Windows 7 gone?

Windows 7 will be supported until, at minimum, 2020 - that tells me that it's not going anywhere.

Nobody is *insisting* that you MUST use Windows 8 - and Microsoft definitely isn't.

Why must developers undermine their mission just to make a few luddites happy? Microsoft isn't going to bring that back. There is no reason to bring back old, deprecated features. The Start Menu reached it's max potential, and now it's time to move on or die out. Simple as that.

The start menu is FAR from being an old and depreciated feature and is not even close to reaching its max potential and works just as well today as it did yesterday.

The so-called "statistics" that microsoft/Ballmer have claimed to have done to try and show that people are not using the start menu are extremely laughable and reek of dishonesty.

You can buy into the lies and crystal ball mythical predictions based purely on arrogance and money by those at microsoft regarding what the future holds for computing all you want, meanwhile people on windows 7 and previous versions who have work that needs to be done will merrily continue to get it done on an os that just plain works like windows 7 for example, an os that just works and is user friendly, unlike 8.

they did ti with win 3.11 to 95, u didnt have a start menu back then and then wulla u have it, people were furious about it and didnt like it

And replacements for it abounded - including a clone of the WorkPlaceShell for OS/2 2.x.

The Start menu is gone, dead, buried and left behind. The handful of fanatics who cling to it like it was the second coming will have to deal. MSFT removed the hooks which are used by the gazillion hacks so they won't work in Blue any more Good riddance,,

Few years back everyone used UUencode on Usenet, then some guy came up with a little thing called yEnc and a handful of fanatics went nuts over it and how no one would use it and it would be dead in a year and it was horrible. Now UUencode is in the history books and yEnc is what everyone uses and accepts. Not that many of you will have a clue what I am on about here as you are probably too young to know and many may not even know what Usenet is as most will have grown up looking at pictures on your screen.

Point in case, move on... The Start menu will not be back... ever..

  • Like 3

The start menu is FAR from being an old and depreciated feature and is not even close to reaching its max potential and works just as well today as it did yesterday.

The so-called "statistics" that microsoft/Ballmer have claimed to have done to try and show that people are not using the start menu are extremely laughable and reek of dishonesty.

You can buy into the lies and crystal ball mythical predictions based purely on arrogance and money by those at microsoft regarding what the future holds for computing all you want, meanwhile people on windows 7 and previous versions who have work that needs to be done will merrily continue to get it done on an os that just plain works like windows 7 for example, an os that just works and is user friendly, unlike 8.

How exactly does a full screen start menu prevent you from getting work done? I've seen this BS excuse a lot lately and am wondering how it came about. Also I think that as screens have gotten bigger and resolutions gotten higher the tiny little window in the corner of the screen that is the start menu has gotten harder to use.

As far as I'm concerned I don't get why people are begging for feature that's been in Win8 since the beginning.

  • Like 2

The start menu is FAR from being an old and depreciated feature and is not even close to reaching its max potential and works just as well today as it did yesterday.

The so-called "statistics" that microsoft/Ballmer have claimed to have done to try and show that people are not using the start menu are extremely laughable and reek of dishonesty.

You can buy into the lies and crystal ball mythical predictions based purely on arrogance and money by those at microsoft regarding what the future holds for computing all you want, meanwhile people on windows 7 and previous versions who have work that needs to be done will merrily continue to get it done on an os that just plain works like windows 7 for example, an os that just works and is user friendly, unlike 8.

Are you not bored of writing the same thing over and over again every time there is a news item or new thread about Win8?

  • Like 3

The start menu is ...not even close to reaching its max potential and works just as well today as it did yesterday.

That is one point of optimism, its omission has generated innovation in its own right. Something the following poster is only too happy to trade away. Sad really.

The Start menu is gone, dead, buried and left behind. The handful of fanatics who cling to it like it was the second coming will have to deal. MSFT removed the hooks which are used by the gazillion hacks so they won't work in Blue any more Good riddance,

Why do you need to celebrate it so when trading away the preference of another? Or worse, create a system where such tweaks were no longer possible. An OS should be broader than 'formats'.

How exactly does a full screen start menu prevent you from getting work done? I've seen this BS excuse a lot lately and am wondering how it came about. Also I think that as screens have gotten bigger and resolutions gotten higher the tiny little window in the corner of the screen that is the start menu has gotten harder to use.

Its not a BS excuse. If you can't put yourself in a place to figure that question out, the discussion isn't worth having. Most reviewers I think have done an adequate job explaining why. It isn't about 'preventing' or any other such silly absolute.

What resolution do you run at? Win7 start isn't 'tiny' or hard to mouse (or even touch by and large) at 22"@1080 so I just don't understand that complaint. It has also been resized a since classic Start to compensate. Or are you just chasing Retina?

Even NeoWin's poll's have proven that almost 50% of the people that have tried Windows 8 don't like the interface / start button.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1081755-do-you-like-or-hate-windows-8/page__hl__windows

Microsoft needs to offer a choice. I'm going over all my reasons for hating it again, anyways, its not like the fanboi's even read my responses in the first place.

  • Like 2

That is one point of optimism, its omission has generated innovation in its own right. Something the following poster is only too happy to trade away. Sad really.

Why do you need to celebrate it so when trading away the preference of another? Or worse, create a system where such tweaks were no longer possible. An OS should be broader than 'formats'.

Its not a BS excuse. If you can't put yourself in a place to figure that question out, the discussion isn't worth having. Most reviewers I think have done an adequate job explaining why. It isn't about 'preventing' or any other such silly absolute.

What resolution do you run at? Win7 start isn't 'tiny' or hard to mouse (or even touch by and large) at 22"@1080 so I just don't understand that complaint. It has also been resized a since classic Start to compensate. Or are you just chasing Retina?

It is BS because, as someone who's actually used the OS daily since the Developer Preview (ie. more than a large portion of the whiners in the majority of "win8 sux" threads), I've found that I didn't have to change the way I used my desktop or laptop at all. I mean sure things that were moved, like for instance the shutdown button, that I had to get used to, and for my laptop I don't even bother with it, because I've set it to hibernate/turn off when I close it.

Also there's no way you'll ever convince me the smallish window that was old start menu that after WinXP couldn't expand to make viewing nested folders easier, is better than one that fully uses the available screen space. At 1080p (which my main monitor runs at) a full screen start menu IMO is makes it a lot easier to find things in the list, on the off chance I don't have it pinned somewhere or don't use the search function.

Also the post I was quoting actually did use the word "prevent" which is why I used it.

Even NeoWin's poll's have proven that almost 50% of the people that have tried Windows 8 don't like the interface / start button.

http://www.neowin.ne...ge__hl__windows

Microsoft needs to offer a choice. I'm going over all my reasons for hating it again, anyways, its not like the fanboi's even read my responses in the first place.

Why does one have to be a "fanboi" for not wanting to bring back the old start menu?

Even NeoWin's poll's have proven that almost 50% of the people that have tried Windows 8 don't like the interface / start button.

http://www.neowin.ne...ge__hl__windows

Microsoft needs to offer a choice. I'm going over all my reasons for hating it again, anyways, its not like the fanboi's even read my responses in the first place.

NeoWin != 100% of the Windows user base.

Microsoft doesn't need to do anything. The Start Menu isn't part of what they want to do, and a few people crying over it isn't going to change a thing.

Do you want the start menu back in windows 8?

Yes 55.02% (318)

No 44.98% (260)

http://www.neowin.ne...u-in-windows-8/

That's techy people, people here on Neowin don't represent the whole population, only a small fraction

Restoring something that works in favor of something that clearly doesn't work is not the same as "living in the past", far from it actually.

Clearly doesn't work for who? You?

Works just fine for me, but then again, I can actually adapt to change.

Works just fine for me, but then again, I can actually adapt to change.

This is a common refrain, but why is it the case? I mean, some people simply prefer having the start menu. Have a preference is different than not adapting to change. We all have own our tastes, don't we?

On the other hand, I really don't see what all the fuss is about from those who rail against Windows 8 in terms of the Start Menu issue. There are start menu replacements for Windows 8 for those who want them, or people can simply choose to use another OS.

Oh well, I'm sure the debate will rage on. And on. And on...

The intent of the start screen is to phase out older devices that still rely on screen resolutions of less then 1024*768. Most users now use a screen size of 1366*768. on most systems the small menu wasn't using the space of a full screen so it was in fact leaving a dead space. Lets use windows 95 as an example it was the first computer system to use the start menu as time went on it improved and changed to adapt with what was currently needed over time it improved and changed at the same-time that very code was being left unchanged and used for exploits and virus's. Microsoft design choice was to change to it from the ground up rather then keeping it the old code. Instead choose to Clean up older code by removing it which is key to improving any product and closing any bugs or holes that could be used as zero day exploits or for virus's

This is a common refrain, but why is it the case? I mean, some people simply prefer having the start menu. Have a preference is different than not adapting to change. We all have own our tastes, don't we?

Thank you! I'm tired of hearing this idea. I prefer the start menu and apparently that makes me a dinosaur, but you don't see me calling people pre-schoolers for preferring the start screen. It's just a preference.

  • Like 2

It wouldn't work. First and foremost because there are free start menu replacements out there that work on all versions of Windows 8, so Microsoft including a start menu only in the Pro version wouldn't be an incentive for people to pay.

Businesses that do not want to retrain people and use third party OS tweaks.

Why didn't they at least include such options in the enterprise edition?

Businesses that do not want to retrain people and use third party OS tweaks.

Why didn't they at least include such options in the enterprise edition?

Because sooner or later businesses *have* to pay training costs. It's unavoidable. Windows 8 (even Windows 9) will be on the market for quite some time before the majority of businesses upgrade, many people will learn on their own how to use the OS, mitigating some of the costs.

It is BS because, as someone who's actually used the OS...blah blah blah

Also there's no way you'll ever convince me the smallish window that was old start menu that after WinXP couldn't expand to make viewing nested folders easier, is better than one that fully uses the available screen space. At 1080p (which my main monitor runs at) a full screen start menu IMO is makes it a lot easier to find things in the list, on the off chance I don't have it pinned somewhere or don't use the search function.

If you still don't get its not about you or even, again, why they find it jarring, you are just being obtuse. Its not about I can hit button A to do action B, its much more subtle than that. Take off your gloves and find some empathy. How is it virtually every reviewer has noticed it but you have not? Maybe that is the BS you should focus on.

We get it, you won't be convinced people prefer different things and their choice doesn't impede your progress. Please, explain how SS makes finding listed items (ie All Programs) easier, because that does dumbfound me. Annihilating nested folders isn't expanding to make their view and nav easier.

The intent of the start screen is to phase out older devices that still rely on screen resolutions of less then 1024*768. Most users now use a screen size of 1366*768. on most systems the small menu wasn't using the space of a full screen so it was in fact leaving a dead space. Lets use windows 95 as an example it was the first computer system to use the start menu as time went on it improved and changed to adapt with what was currently needed over time it improved and changed at the same-time that very code was being left unchanged and used for exploits and virus's. Microsoft design choice was to change to it from the ground up rather then keeping it the old code. Instead choose to Clean up older code by removing it which is key to improving any product and closing any bugs or holes that could be used as zero day exploits or for virus's

WTFGibberishBSIsThis?!? Are we back to just throwing anything we want at the page to see what sticks? Dead space? Start Menu viruses? I'm praying to Jesus English isn't your first language.

Because sooner or later businesses *have* to pay training costs. It's unavoidable. Windows 8 (even Windows 9) will be on the market for quite some time before the majority of businesses upgrade, many people will learn on their own how to use the OS, mitigating some of the costs.

What strikes me as laughable (though the point for once is valid) is that training costs in businesses and enterprises are a BIG reason not to change out an operating system - the reason why it strikes me as laughable NOW is that originally heard it coming from businesses running NT4WS that didn't want to upgrade to Windows 2000 Professional.

Fellow Neowinians, I was in an enterprise (specifically, a broadband-support call center for Big Cable Company) that DID such a changeover; the changeover was the entirety of the eastern US' operations. Every single desktop. (The servers were involved as well - they would upgrade to Windows 2000 Server once all the desktops got upgraded.) Despite the alarums from the IT types, the biggest issues were, in fact, applications - not training. Why? We, as users, pretty much helped each other through the rough patches (the biggest *rough patch* for users was printing - however, once users figured out how to use print-queue browsing to select un-backlogged network printers, it actually got EASIER than NT4WS did). Why would users not help each other through a 7->8 upgrade? Are you implying that users are, in fact, MORE selfish today?

For the average user, the difference is that the Start menu is missing - period. In terms of how to maneuver around the OS, there is NO other difference. How many users - even those still using Windows 7 - center all their operations around the Start menu? Now, if you are a user that does, in fact, center most of how you get to things around the Start menu, its excision is going to be massive. (That is something that I have pointed out going back to the Developer Preview.)

However, other than that, nothing really changed from a user-operations POV between 7 and 8. The Superbar is still there. Taskbar pinning is still there. (In fact, both have gained additional teeth due to applications that launch on startup now appearing on the Taskbar, in addition to the TaskTray - this was not in Windows 7.)

What I am seeing is those that miss the Start menu deliberately calling attention to it - in hopes of staving off a final demise when support for Windows 7 goes away in 202x.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AdGuard Family lifetime deal now only $14.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 91% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $14.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $14.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      469
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      165
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!