Restore Start menu but limit it to Pro edition


Recommended Posts

using SVJN as a reference for anything MS is just silly.

The man hates MS with a passion, and will say anything to discredit them.

Oh yes of course, the reference is never credible in the eyes of a zealot regardless of how 100% verifiable and factual it may be.

But if this same guy says anything positive about windows 8 then he will be praised.

Kinda reminds me of when Forbes called windows 8 a failure, the zealots attacked the source and declared it non credible, but when Forbes said something negative about Apple, Forbes was declared the golden and irrefutable source.

  • Like 1

Oh yes of course, the reference is never credible in the eyes of a zealot regardless of how 100% verifiable and factual it may be.

But if this same guy says anything positive about windows 8 then he will be praised.

Kinda reminds me of when Forbes called windows 8 a failure, the zealots attacked the source and declared it non credible, but when Forbes said something negative about Apple, Forbes was declared the golden and irrefutable source.

You're talking about someone who still clings to XP like it's a life vest. Someone who decried Vista, decried 7 before it was even released, ran away with the secured boot FUD, and wrote Windows 8 off without even running the damn thing for himself.

The man is a buffoon.

its not the same old desktop, it has been bastardized, you click on various icons and you have giant metro prompts jumping out. In stock windows 8, you can't even use desktop normally, when you want to open a app you have to flip-flop between desktop and that horrible hostile metro ui.

Right, because pinning an app to a fullscreen launcher is hostile. Ok. You can also pin to the taskbar, and be done with it.

  • Like 2

First, it absolutely changes how they maneuver, isn't that what this is all about? Change for the better, change for the future? It changes workflow the first time they open almost anything and changes navigation to find their way back. If you can't see the many pitfalls that are already hitting the help desk, you're blind.

Your other statement was spot on, I'm just not sure how you sweep a mammoth like that under the rug. If you heavily used the Start Menu, you will feel it more than most should not be a point of argument.

You are saying that it changes how the user gets around. If they are fixated on the Start menu, yes - it will. (That is something I stipulated.) You are, in fact, basically saying that ALL users are fixated on the Start menu - that is something that is not only not provable, but not even true; there are users that run Windows 8 - sans a Start menu bring-back - on desktop computers (not just me). The very fact that there ARE users like me out in the wider world means that the Start menu is NOT a universal need. (The forty-plus percent in that poll you sited also says that I have a lot of company - not a majority, but still quite a significant number of Neowinians.)

I'm not even TRYING to sweep the elephant under the rug - amusingly, neither is Microsoft, for all the complaining by Windows 8's detractors. Windows 8 is a superset of Windows 7 - it supports (except for the Start menu) everything that Windows 7 does PLUS. If anything, it's an alternative to Windows 7 for those that need support for features that Windows 7 lacks - if you don't, Windows 7 is still available, and still usable. Better touch support IS part of the superset - however, it's not the ONLY plus that Windows 8 has that Windows 7 does not; because of ModernUI, it's simply the most obvious.

ModernUI apps - just like standard Windows applications, each ModernUI app has to justify itself to build up a user base; to blanket-dismiss ALL ModernUI apps would be ridiculous. (I criticized DotMatrix when it appeared he was trying to dismiss all *standard* Windows applications. Usage cases can be made for each type of application - however, it's up to the applications themselves to make them.) Here's something I want the detractors to chew on - are there ANY traditional Windows applications that you run full-screen, as opposed to windowed? If there are, then such an application CAN be replaced by a ModernUI variant - for the simple reason that such an app can't run windowed. (There are ModernUI apps that are NOT games that I have installed because there are usage cases for them - and I have a 23" FP display. That's right; some applications I run full-screen because it's how that application works best for me. Such an application can be replaced by a ModernUI version - therefore, why not? It's not about touch (this is a desktop - no support for touch at all); it IS, however, about application usability. Just because an application supports touch does not make it unusable by keyboard/mouse users.) If there are full-screen standard Windows applications in your toolbox, at least TRY a ModernUI version, if one exists. I'm not saying you have to adopt it - just give it an honest hearing.

By a room full of an infinite number of monkeys, perhaps.

Monkeys are better at clicking large candy colored tiles. /s

Seriously, is this necessary, just visit another thread if you can't constructively and intelligently respond to the OP's question.

You're talking about someone who still clings to XP like it's a life vest. Someone who decried Vista, decried 7 before it was even released, ran away with the secured boot FUD, and wrote Windows 8 off without even running the damn thing for himself.

The man is a buffoon.

Right, because pinning an app to a fullscreen launcher is hostile. Ok. You can also pin to the taskbar, and be done with it.

How many millions of those are there again? Now how many 7's. Perhaps they cling to what works for them. Microsoft wants them to go to what works for Microsoft. Cuz it's not working for a whole lot o' people at the moment.

Ignoring the issues, inconsistencies and limitations of Windows 8 (rather the Modern UI) is as ignorant as ignoring all of the benefits/improvements of Windows 8 (specifically the Windows 8 Desktop Environment).

Just musing here, but I wonder what the correlation is between the amount of people who are resistant to adopting the new Start Screen to people who are resistant to adopting UAC and keep UAC disabled.

As for Windows N and KN versions, you'll never see those offered in the United States. They are custom, sometimes stripped-down editions offered in some overseas markets. It's a little similar to back in the days of Windows 95 there was an edition of Windows called Windows 95 OSR2. You couldn't buy it in any store as it only shipped on OEM PCs, which was a shame because that was the edition everyone wanted. Microsoft doesn't always make every edition of every OS available to every distribution channel.

I can respect the view of someone only wanting to use MS built and approved tools. It's akin to a lot of people only using WHQL-certified drivers. However, sometimes a company won't give you that tool you want or that WHQL-certified driver you need and that's when you need to start thinking about widening the search. At the end of the day all that's important is that you are enjoying your computing experience & sometimes that means using freeware/shareware apps that come from unexpected sources.

I don't think arguing for or against the Start Screen is going to do anyone any good. Even if you took your arguments directly to Redmond and debated them in front of the Windows design team I don't think it'd do any good. Microsoft has proven time and time again they are going to do what they are going to do no matter anyone's opinion.

If you enjoy the Start Screen, then enjoy it. You got lucky this time because let's face it. Microsoft is fickle with their designs. What appeals to one person one day doesn't mean the next design is going to have equal appeal. If you don't enjoy the Start Screen, well...you got the short straw this time. Maybe Microsoft's fickle nature will favor you next go-around. In the meantime, it's your job to make lemonade out of lemons. Whether it's bolting a third-party program or two onto Windows 8 or dropping back to Windows 7 for a bit, at least you have options.

OEM Service Release 2 was *the version everyone wanted* because it included features that Service Pack 1 lacked - at no additional cost in terms of hardware. (Despite attempts at FUD to the contrary, OEMSR2 had the same hardware requirements as the original Windows 95 upgrade and OEM versions - 386DX-25 with 4 MB of RAM and VGA graphics support.) The *big feature* everyone wanted from SR2 was *font smoothing*; surprisingly; it was something that would, in fact, later be released as a standalone patch for all versions of Windows, and would become part of Windows with Windows 98. Why was font-smoothing such a biggie? Font smoothing took off because non-interlaced displays (CRTs, of course) dropped in cost and became FAR more prevalent since the launch of Windows 95 and Windows NT 3.51 - jagged-looking type just plain looked AWFUL! I would know because I went from 1024x768 NI to 1280x1024 NI when OSR2 hit RTM (I was working in a computer shop - local, not "big box") and had purchased a copy of OSR2+Plus (AKA 'OSR2 Kitchen Sink Edition') for an upgrade I was working on - in the meantime, we had OSR2 in our "display" systems. The font smoothing impressed folks; small feature with monster impact. Microsoft certainly didn't expect that - after all, font smoothing had originally been part of Microsoft Plus! - which didn't exactly knock lots of socks off sales-wise. However, entirely due to user demand, it went from cost-plus option to no-cost option to standard feature - and in a mere three years.

Again, if the Start Menu is a problem, and the Start Page cannot replace the efficiencies of the Start Menu for users who utilized it, I recommend a start menu replacement. I prefer Start8 and it won't be broken as updates to Windows are released. Those relying on old code within Windows, will.

I would just like someone to stick a foot up Stardock's arse, inexcusable not to have a native 64-bit version.

If you are not happy with Windows 8, then I suggest that you make your own mod (or find a mod/tweak) so you will have customized Windows 8. If not, then find alternative OS that you might like such as Linux, Mac..

Microsoft makes no promise about bring the start menu back because the OS is not yours... it is belong to Microsoft. You are licensed to Microsoft Windows. You have the right to make changes to it as long as you don't sell your stuff with OS.

Hence, there is lot of third party stuff/tweaks on the internet to make your Windows look better.

Microsoft can do whatever they want whatever they think for the future for the best. If you don't like it, then feel free to leave Windows and find alternative OS you might like.

Same thing you make changes to your car when you got the car... you put after-market stuff on it such as tinted windows, big rims, racing seats, etc. I have see people have no complaints when buying the car but now you have a complaint about missing start menu on Windows. There is 3rd party tweaks on the internet.

People make changes to almost everything, such as cars, houses, OS, so they can be happy with.

That's why there are developers around the world to make Windows better instead of the default version of Windows.

Wake up!

Again, if the Start Menu is a problem, and the Start Page cannot replace the efficiencies of the Start Menu for users who utilized it, I recommend a start menu replacement. I prefer Start8 and it won't be broken as updates to Windows are released. Those relying on old code within Windows, will.

I would just like someone to stick a foot up Stardock's arse, inexcusable not to have a native 64-bit version.

What would the 64bit version give you over the 32bit version?

Again, if the Start Menu is a problem, and the Start Page cannot replace the efficiencies of the Start Menu for users who utilized it, I recommend a start menu replacement. I prefer Start8 and it won't be broken as updates to Windows are released. Those relying on old code within Windows, will.

I would just like someone to stick a foot up Stardock's arse, inexcusable not to have a native 64-bit version.

and that would be fine if all the metro crap would not be spilling over to desktop.

That's why there are developers around the world to make Windows better instead of the default version of Windows.

Problem is that if you ask people in store, most will tell you they don't like the new metro interface. it generally not well accepted UI.

at this point if MS was smart they would correct this, and return the start menu, separate metro from desktop, prevent metro from being intrusive and replacing basic desktop functions.

reason why MS keeps pushing this metro crap because they are having their asses kicked left and right in mobile world, so they decided to screw over millions of PC users hopping that some of them will like metro and buy their pathetic phones.

Problem is that if you ask people in store, most will tell you they don't like the new metro interface. it generally not well accepted UI.

at this point if MS was smart they would correct this, and return the start menu, separate metro from desktop, prevent metro from being intrusive and replacing basic desktop functions.

reason why MS keeps pushing this metro crap because they are having their asses kicked left and right in mobile world, so they decided to screw over millions of PC users hopping that some of them will like metro and buy their pathetic phones.

There is a desktop in Windows 8. If you don't want Metro, then use the desktop apps on the desktop. There is a tweak to disable the Metro features/functions, simple.

If the desktop is removed at later date, people will be upset, and might go to Mac or Linux. But I am sure they use Metro on their tablets.

Feel free to use Windows 7 for daily work such as photoshop, whatever they use for.

I have 2 laptops, one of them has Windows 8 while other laptop has Windows 7. Windows 7 is my primary workstation. Windows 8 on my laptop is tweaked already.

The phones are useful when on the go, such as check email, text, video conferencing, etc. That way, you don't have to stop by your house to make a call or send email, then head back out to meet some friends for fun.

I don't think the desktop will be removed from OS. They will stay for ahwile since they use it for heavy work such as video editing, photoshop, etc. If desktop removal is planned, then there is iMac/Linux for that. My brother has iMac .. he use it for his photos.

I understand that Microsoft will lose customers over the start menu and desktop removal. It is Microsoft's problem... Just wait until Micrsosoft will realize that their sales/stock go down. Then they might do something about it and get their customers back.

If they want to keep their customers, then Microsoft can do something about it for their next windows release such as Windows 9. They plan to keep the desktop in it. If they don't listen to us, then we can not do something about it unless you sign up to join a petition for desktop/start menu request.

That's why Microsoft keep the desktop in Windows 8 so the users can use the desktop instead of Metro... it will last for awhile... Not sure when their support ends for 8... I know the support for 7 that ends in 2020.

Have people considered a petition or some kind of contact to Microsoft at this about the start menu. I personally don't mind it being gone, mainly because of the redundancy between having apps there, on the start menu side bar, and the task bar. I do think however, Microsoft has the potential to really improve the OS by listening to the users and making changes. Now I am not saying that people should contact them saying their hatred towards the changes, but merely suggestions on what could be improved to make the desktop work better. Maybe reducing the functionality or making the menu more minimal, like the Apple Menu in OS X. Just the simple options of Settings, Shutdown/Restart/Log off, Applications link, Start Screen

<p>

OEM Service Release 2 was *the version everyone wanted* because it included features that Service Pack 1 lacked - at no additional cost in terms of hardware.??(Despite attempts at FUD to the contrary, OEMSR2 had the same hardware??requirements as the original Windows 95 upgrade and OEM versions - 386DX-25 with 4 MB of RAM and VGA graphics support.)??The *big feature* everyone wanted from SR2 was *font smoothing*; surprisingly; it was something that would, in fact, later be released as a standalone patch for all versions of Windows, and would become part of Windows with Windows 98

Yes, 'font smoothing' was included, but it wasn't the reason OSR2 was so desirable. Like you said, 'font smoothing' was a feature that could be gained through the Plus! Pack. However, what OSR2 included that couldn't be added onto vanilla Windows 95 through any add-on was support for USB devices. If you couldn't find a copy of OSR2 you had to wait for Windows 98 in order to use USB devices.

Hopefully by the next major version this discussion has finished. It gets old so fast.

It doesn't get old to the people that have a problem with it. It's not old enough for you to avoid the thread. The fact that it's still an issue and MS is already working on the next major update and version release means it won't go away for a whole lot of folks.

MS isn't bringing the Start Menu back, but they can address some of the efficiencies it provided many users that were quite happy with it, and try to build those efficiencies into the Modern UI. People who are unhappy will simply express themselves by keeping their wallets closed or buying alternatives. MS can do better, within the Modern UI.

What would the 64bit version give you over the 32bit version?

Do you believe the only advantage to compiling 64-bit code is access to a larger memory address space?

Well there is that, what else does it give you?

I'm going to let you research that on your own, then get back to me. If you think arguing the merits of the Start Menu is an exercise in futility, try the benefits of 64-bit code with someone who thinks all it does it give you a larger memory address space.

FWIW, 64-bit refers to the size of the instructions, not the address space.

I'm going to let you research that on your own, then get back to me. If you think arguing the merits of the Start Menu is an exercise in futility, try the benefits of 64-bit code with someone who things all it does it give you a larger memory address space.

FWIW, 64-bit refers to the size of the instructions, not the address space.

Well i'm searching and finding the benefits of 64bit Windows which I already knew. As far as benefits of 64bit software. Not finding a lot other than memory allocation.,

Well i'm searching and finding the benefits of 64bit Windows which I already knew. As far as benefits of 64bit software. Not finding a lot other than memory allocation.,

I'm debating if I want to engage in this or not ;>. I'm definitely interested in watching it, particularly with LogicalApex as a participant, though I have no idea his thoughts on the subject. I just don't know if I want to participate in it. I don't think it will be enjoyable. :/

Well i'm searching and finding the benefits of 64bit Windows which I already knew. As far as benefits of 64bit software. Not finding a lot other than memory allocation.,

Uh, well... yeah. What you can do with that extra memory is a fairly vast topic, however.

Why restrict such a basic feature to a professional edition?

You can charge more money for it!

There are some horrible arguments for the start menu.

A: In this situation something new came and it was better. Some people didn't like it, but now its used everywhere, thus because that one thing was good, the start screen MUST be good.

B: The start menu is old, but the start screen is new and of course, newer is ALWAYS better. If you disagree you're a ludite!

C: People are now using touch based devices, thus the start screen is better for ALL users.

D: Remember when people were upset at a different OS? That OS was good, so Windows 8 must also be good!

E: You're old (which I really don't know. I'm just going to assume so) so you're dumb and hate technology! Therefore **** your argument!

... but what should I expect really?

And instead of scrolling through them in a tiny menu on the side of the screen

Wait, you actually scrolled through the start menu instead of just searching?

Quit acting like you're two. You have other options. You're wasting more energy complaining, than downloading and installing a third party app.

Having an opinion is being two now? If a two year old could form that kind of thought, I'd be damn impressed.

Microsoft has other plans, and if that doesn't suit you, then too bad so sad. You are not Microsoft, they don't need to check in with you before they go and develop Windows.

Correct, but he doesn't have to like it. Are you arguing that customers of products can't have opinions of them? Can't say anything negative about it? (Also if a company wants to stay in business it should listen to its customer base)

Kinect for PC? It won't be long before FPS games start utilizing that.

Lol. Now thats just funny.

Why is it so horrible to get more input choices?

Because its not more input choices. Its replacing input choices.

Maybe because what I say is an objective and useful conversation? Not simply "MS is so awesome it is you that is the problem" or "just deal with it" as others have put it.

I mean what I say is the truth. You cannot deny that MANY MANY people would be happy if MS would have provided such options. Most of the bad press would go away as well. If it is only the techies that want it back, fine but MS should have provided options.

If nobody says anything, what kind of world is that? We have the right as consumers to voice our opinions.

Why do people protest? Would you tell them the same thing? "Just deal with it"? Why do we have any sort of product reviews? Companies do make bad decisions you know - and if we just sit here with our mouths shut MS would not do anything. My whole point is companies are not immune to mistakes.

Oh and BTW, I did not make this topic, so why don't you complain about that instead of me for participating in a start menu discussion.

What you are saying is anything but objective, it's only your opinion! Just like what Dot says is his opinion.

It doesn't make what you say truth or right, it's only YOUR opinion.

I also did not complain about anything you said, I commented on what Warwagon replied to you.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sadly "beats Steam Machine" isn't much of a brag.
    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!