Ranking of the 4 Modern Windows OSs


Recommended Posts

Windows 7 - Fast, stable, secure, easy to use.

Windows 8 - Buggy apps, weak navigation, weak search and share tools, but overall still has overall features first seen in Vista/7 that make it better than XP.

Windows XP - Becoming increasingly outdated, I don't look forward to using an XP machine, but at least I know I can tailor it to my liking.

Windows Vista - There is no enjoying this OS. Half the crap still never worked because many of the machines I worked on COULDN'T GET THE DAMN SERVICE PACK due to an issue with the updater. Worst experience ever, horrid load times, etc.

My rankings

7 -> Best by a long shot, improved upon Vista has an awesome UI Glass, Rounding, Shadowing, there is no changes I would make the the OS and UI At all

XP -> While it had bugs and issues it was still a solid OS and an awesome step up from ME which I ran prior to it. I still run XP at work today, albeit some bugs it works fine

Vista -> I prefered the longhorn alphas, but the end result with start search, dark interface. Only issues I ever had were resource related.

8 -> I feel they took stuff out of 7 to make 8. The interface returns back to a blocky, solid color that I think feels old. The lack of standard features present in all windows dating back to 95, no the start screen is NOT a start menu. It's a tablet UI on a Desktop...(or so they say) OS.

If 8 has full Aero w/ glass or a theme that enabled it fully and paired with startisback I would consider using it, but there are just too many things with it that I don't like and with 7 being as great as it is, there is no need to "workaround" stuff if I don't have to.

4. XP: a security nightmare on release and takes a good few years(SP2) to stabilize (I have seen too many "infected" F&F PCs around me). All new features shadowed by security problems.

3. Vista: Drastically improves on security over XP, takes SP1 to solve major problems. SP2 makes it almost as good as 7.

2. 7: Not major performance improvements over Vista SP2 but good new features and UI enhancements. Dramatically improves usability by adding new system wide keyboard shortcuts.

1. 8: Drastic performance improvements, introduces few UI quirks that needs fixes (jury is still out as to when). Mostly missing fit and finish.

So there, in my opinion: XP was the worst of the lot and 8 is current leader in my books.

Compared to 7 and 8...sure...I can agree. I just find it funny that you think Windows XP, which is still largely used today.... completely trashed the Windows brand name. Maybe you meant Windows 8?

I'm sure he really meant Vista trashed the Windows brand name, as it surely did, just as Windows 8 is trying to do!!

XP and Windows 7 are the kings of how an OS should work. Why do you think XP has hung on as long as it has?

1st - Windows 8

1st.5 - Windows 7

3rd - Windows XP

4th - Windows Vista

I really like Windows 8, and honestly, it's faster than 7 in a number of areas. All MS has to do with a future update is allow users to boot-to-desktop AND bring back the Start menu when in desktop mode.

  • Like 1

XP - Came along when we all had so many issues with 9x. The changes meant some of our old software and hardware didn't work but it didn't matter because there were so many new technologies coming out at the same time.

7 - Good stable OS, didn't offer much that I needed over XP but it was a good performing upgrade.

Vista - It came along with nothing to offer and the rumour mills destroyed it.

8 - I have three copies and dont use any. The UI made me feel MS had no idea about anything its customers wanted and the push toward basic tablet style apps felt like MS was ready to turn its back on its users that wanted any detail in their OS - all to be popular.

7 - Great interface, easy to use, very compatible.

Vista - Same as 7 except for the compatibility part which it was what really diminished this great OS.

XP - Theming was good, programs were alright, had to have it upgraded always though...

8 - total abomination, only has the "compatible" part of 7 while disregarding everything else (exactly the opposite as vista, note that 7 is an upgrade, not the opposite to vista)

1. Windows 8- fast, best UI (i got used with metro and now i like it a lot, found some good apps that i use in the background) a lot of features, best security

2. Windows 7- fast, big improvement over vista, it just works.

3. Windows Vista- better UI for that time than XP, a lot of new features, but poorly optimized.

4. Windows XP- ugly UI, cartoonish, isn't really a modern OS, it still works for some but it's like an old car, it works, but you just want a new one.

1. Windows Blue

2. Windows 8

3. Windows 7

4. Windows Vista

5. Windows XP

Actualy, Blue I boot more to Blue for simple tasks and to Windows 8 when I want to work... :)

However, Blue is just a service pack. You might as well split the other OS's in line, as Windows Vista was quite bad performance wise pre-SP and Windows XP was a lot more stable with SP2+.

Personally I favor 7.

1: Windows 7. Windows 7 was what Vista should have been. Fast, and beautiful with great features.

2: Windows XP. Feels dated now on modern hardware but it has served the IT industry extremely well

3: Vista. Once the performance issues were fixed not as bad of an OS as people seemed to think

4: Windows 8. Great performance but unfortunately for me that doesn't negate the horrible UI, horrible visual theme and the start screen. A big step backwards IMO.

Here's an honest evaluation from a Windows 8 lover:

1: Windows 7 - Great OS, everything just works, a polished product.

2: Windows 8 - Brings Windows to 21st century hardware, fast, stable, and includes everything that makes Windows 7 great. But the UI it introduced needs polish, same with the new apps.

3: Windows XP - For many, it was their first OS, and to many others, their introduction to the stability of Windows NT. But the UI didn't really improved that much from previous versions of Windows, it was just prettier.

4: Vista - Many improvements over XP but very heavy on the hardware when it launched. Was only properly fixed after SP1, until then, XP was a much better alternative.

  • 6 years later...

1. Windows 7- It works and its fast

2. Windows 8 - UI was horrible (i used a start menu app) and it was fast

3. Windows Vista - It was ok

3. Windows XP- Works, but clunky 

 

But.. I miss windows 2000. :) 

 

Overall List

 

1. Windows 2000

2. Windows 10

3. Windows 7

47 minutes ago, Coater4 said:

1. Windows 10- Its the best!

2. Windows 7- The 2nd best!

3. Windows 8- The 3rd best!

4. Windows Vista- The Worst!

 

 

 

OS: Windows 10

Mobile:Android

The only older than XP i tried was 95.

 

Edited by Coater4
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meta announces a major leadership change at WhatsApp by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta has announced a major leadership change at WhatsApp, with Will Cathcart stepping down after seven years of leading the world's largest messaging platform. CRED CEO and founder Kunal Shah will take over as the next global head of WhatsApp. CRED is an Indian fintech company focused on creditworthy consumers. As part of the transition, Meta is also making a minority investment in CRED through its Series H funding round. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Will Cathcart will remain at Meta and move into a new role focused on building new products from the ground up. Cathcart led WhatsApp during a major growth phase, helping the app reach more than 3 billion users worldwide. He also played a key role in expanding WhatsApp’s business offerings while keeping privacy and end-to-end encryption central to the product. Meta’s Chief Product Officer, Chris Cox, said Kunal Shah was selected after a search for a leader who understands WhatsApp’s global scale and future potential. In a leaked internal memo, Cox described Shah as a “serial founder” and one of India’s most respected entrepreneurs, adding that he brings “entrepreneurial energy” and a strong product mindset to the role. As part of the Series H funding round, CRED is raising ₹8,550 crore, or about $900 million, in a round led by Meta. The funding values CRED at ₹43,239 crore, or about $4.5 billion, on a post-money basis. It is important to note that this investment will not give Meta access to CRED customer information. Kunal posted the following on X regarding his new role at Meta: Although Kunal Shah will be stepping away from his operating role as CRED CEO, he will retain his personal shareholding in the company.
    • It wouldn't be hard for me to turn off my TV, if I had one. For one thing, I never scroll Instagram. The only reason I have an account is because Meta created one when it merged the account systems for its various services.
    • OpenAI's new GPT-5.5-Cyber tops Claude Mythos 5 in vulnerability benchmark by Pradeep Viswanathan OpenAI today announced a major expansion of Daybreak, a cybersecurity initiative designed to help defenders find, validate, and fix software vulnerabilities earlier in the development process. The availability of powerful AI models has definitely changed the cybersecurity landscape by making vulnerability discovery much faster. However, the bigger bottleneck for the industry is now patching those vulnerabilities. Impacted software teams need to validate the discovered issues, understand their impact, develop fixes, test them, and deploy patches. Back in March, OpenAI launched a preview of Codex Security, which uses agentic reasoning with automated validation to discover high-impact issues and actionable fixes specific to the codebase. Since then, it has scanned more than 30 million commits across over 30,000 codebases; more than 70,000 findings were marked as fixed by human reviewers, while over 500,000 findings were automatically determined to be fixed. Now, OpenAI is releasing an updated Codex Security plugin that can run deep scans, review recent code changes, generate security reports, trace attack paths, validate findings, and create codebase-specific patches for human review. It can also triage findings from existing scanners, advisories, bug bounty reports, and ticketing systems. OpenAI says the plugin can export results to vulnerability management systems and integrate with workflows using SARIF files, CodeQL queries, the Codex CLI, and the Codex app. Back in May, OpenAI announced the preview of GPT-5.5-Cyber, a new model built on top of the recently released GPT-5.5, designed for specialized cybersecurity work. Today, OpenAI launched the full version of GPT-5.5-Cyber through a limited release for verified defenders. On CyberGym, GPT-5.5-Cyber scored 85.6%, compared with 81.8% for GPT-5.5 and 83.8% for Claude Mythos 5. It also scored 39.5% on ExploitGym, compared with 25.95% for GPT-5.5, and 69.8% on SEC-bench Pro, compared with 63.1%. OpenAI also announced the new Daybreak Cyber Partner Program, which will allow security vendors and service providers to use GPT-5.5 with Trusted Access for Cyber in their products and services. Accenture, Akamai, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, IBM, Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, SentinelOne, Wiz, Zscaler, and others were listed as initial partners for this program. OpenAI is also launching Patch the Planet with Trail of Bits, HackerOne, Calif, researchers, and maintainers. More than 30 open-source projects have committed to participate, including cURL, Go, Python, Sigstore, and pyca/cryptography.
    • AMD confirms 26.6.2 FSR driver breaks on many Windows PCs by Sayan Sen Earlier today AMD released a major graphics driver update as it brings support for FSR 4.1 to Radeon RX 7000 series GPUs. The new update, version 26.6.2, also brings support for Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and more. And while the driver technically supports Windows 10 version 21H2 and newer, the tech giant has confirmed that there is a major issue with the new driver on non-Windows 11 PCs as it fails to launch properly on such systems. The error message says, "The version of AMD Software that you have launched is not compatible with your currently installed AMD graphics driver." Therefore on the surface it looks like a compatibility problem. AMD has also confirmed that the device manager will display the yellow bang or yellow exclamation sign alongside your GPU under the Display adapters dropdown. Here is what the Radeon team's official advisory recommends to affected users: "Users Running Windows 10 and AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 May Encounter Yellow Bang in Device Manager Affecting AMD Radeon RX Series Graphics ... Our Engineers are currently investigating this issue and will provide a fix once it is available. Affected users may revert to AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.1 as a temporary workaround." As such you should revert back to the previous 26.6.1 driver which was released earlier this month. In case you were looking to play Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced and DOOM: The Dark Ages | Revelations you will probably have to wait a while if you want the driver to support those games officially. You can find the support article here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      208
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      100
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!