Ranking of the 4 Modern Windows OSs


Recommended Posts

I wouldn't call XP or Vista "modern" anymore. XP is 12 years old, and Vista is 7. At these ages, they're dinosaurs, even more so after recent changes in consumer trends. Hell, XP isn't even 64bit capable (Well, it is, but it's ****, and no ever used it).

In any case:

1) Windows 8 (Setting the base for the next 20 years).

2) Windows 7 (Classic Windows all grown up, ready to take the next step in life).

3) Windows Vista (Set up a solid foundation that Windows badly needed).

4) Windows XP (Unstable, unsecured, ancient pile of junk, that no consumer or business should have been forced to run as long as they did. It completely trashed the "Windows" brand name).

4) Windows XP (Unstable, unsecured, ancient pile of junk, that no consumer or business should have been forced to run as long as they did. It completely trashed the "Windows" brand name).

hehe...what? Trashed the "Windows" brand name? Maybe you are confusing XP with Windows ME?

hehe...what? Trashed the "Windows" brand name? Maybe you are confusing XP with Windows ME?

No. I just don't see XP as the poster child everyone else does. XP was inherently unstable, wholly unsecured (and suffered many malware attacks, buffer overflows, etc), and had horrible resource management.

No. I just don't see XP as the poster child everyone else does. XP was inherently unstable, wholly unsecured (and suffered many malware attacks, buffer overflows, etc), and had horrible resource management.

Compared to 7 and 8...sure...I can agree. I just find it funny that you think Windows XP, which is still largely used today.... completely trashed the Windows brand name. Maybe you meant Windows 8?

Compared to 7 and 8...sure...I can agree. I just find it funny that you think Windows XP, which is still largely used today.... completely trashed the Windows brand name. Maybe you meant Windows 8?

No, I meant Windows XP. I watched a lot of people buys Macs because they were fed up with being compromised by drive bys, or having to constantly restore their system. XP was a cesspool of poor code, and sloppy practices.

No, I meant Windows XP. I watched a lot of people buys Macs because they were fed up with being compromised by drive bys, or having to constantly restore their system. XP was a cesspool of poor code, and sloppy practices.

Mmm can somewhat agree with this; never had much issue with the malware (safe computing habits, not running as an admin, etc) but it was unstable as all hell, could get Explorer to crash just by looking at it funny, poor multitasking and resource management, x64 was a crapshoot, etc. Probably my longest usage of a Linux desktop was during the XP days, back with 7 though, much better. (Not meant as a bash against Linux in general, just prefer 7's desktop.) Wouldn't call XP a failure by any stretch of the imagination, still having a big following is a testament to that, but it got more than it's share of bad rep from all its problems. Really no reason to be used nowadays though unless you got some dinosaur software that somehow fails to run on a newer version and a VM (or an upgrade..) isn't viable.

Windows 7 - Best OS

Windows XP - Was great OS for 10 years, great to run on VM now

Windows 8 - Half disaster (personally). It's very close to W7, but it's not as good

Windows Vista - Never used it very much, I was on OS X for 4 years when it was released

Hard to rank without a more specific criteria or context, such as what modern is supposed to mean.

WinXP (2003) for longevity

Win7 (2008R2) for polish, though could easily take the longevity crown long term.

Win8/Vista (2012/2008) are about a tie right now but both serve as important 'bridge' OSs. Neither executed particularly well though.

I watched a lot of people buys Macs because they were fed up with being compromised by drive bys, or having to constantly restore their system. XP was a cesspool of poor code, and sloppy practices.

Holy Flamebait! More proof you're an Apple plant to weaken Microsoft!

Windows 8/Windows Vista - I like them equally, surprisingly.

Windows XP

Windows 7

The reason I rank Windows 7 the lowest is due to the high amount of bugs which I've experienced when rolling it out.

The folder redirection issues have been an absolute joke and there have been various hotfixes and things which had be rolled out for it over time, sometimes folder redirection would fail all together for no real reason.

Offline files have never worked correctly until recently, the cache become out of date on various machines and a FixIT had to be applied to various machines, this was a known bug which now has a hotfix.

The way it updates the desktop.ini's on folder redirection which meant that it gave all user home drives on the fileserver an alias of "My Documents", no real fix for this, just workarounds apparently this is "by design", one of the workarounds (Blocking desktop.ini) caused up to 15 minute logon times.

Until a recent patch logging on with cached credentials could take up to 10 minutes to log on, this in addition to offline files bugs caused home laptop experiences to be rubbish initially.

There have been various hotfixes which have fixed the above issues now but these sort of issues weren't really prevalent over the course of using Vista & XP and the few Windows 8 machines which have been rolled out so far have been much smoother.

No, I meant Windows XP. I watched a lot of people buys Macs because they were fed up with being compromised by drive bys, or having to constantly restore their system. XP was a cesspool of poor code, and sloppy practices.

You're my new favorite poster. :laugh: Not sarcasm btw. Hated XP too. Remember this fun stuff?

RPC_terminate_blasterworm.jpg

1.- Windows 8 -> Like the Start Screen, like to see all the updates (news, weather, etc), fast reliable and the improved search

2.- Windows 7 -> Reliable

3.- Windows Vista -> The misundertood one (it required the latest hardware in his time 2006-2007)

4.- Windows XP -> The unified kernel and .NET philosophy , ended the DLL inferno, so it was the first truly reliable Windows

  • Like 2

1. Windows 7 - Fast and rock-solid

2. Windows XP - Reliable and compatible

3. Windows Vista - Nothing really wrong with it, but it was a quickly abandoned OS

4. Windows 8 - Disorganized and the UI gets in the way. With Start8, I'd move it up to #2 though.

1. Windows 7 - Best OS ever.

2. Windows Vista - Had a few issues with it before SP1, but it was pretty solid for the most part.

3. Windows XP - Fast when it first came out but by SP2, it was slow and bloated. Didn't play nice with my card reader for some reason.

4. Windows Blue M1 Leak - Look's nice...Metro's starting to evolve into a usable platform. Hope more improvements are made.

5. Windows 8 - Liked it at first, ran it as my main OS during the betas, but I seriously thought Microsoft was going to listen to our feedback like they did in the Windows 7 betas. The whole OS is under cooked, missing core/killer features. I don't see a need to upgrade. Incompatible with some hardware like sound cards.

1) Windows 7 - Good and stable OS much like XP back in the days

2) Windows 8 - It has a lot of potential

3) Windows Vista - It has its issues but made manufactures create better drivers

4) Windows XP - Still a good OS but showing its age

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

1) Windows 6.2: many improvements, including: the Start Screen, Live Tiles (at-a-glance info like weather and news), built in email (killer feature for me) and calendar, notifications, better performance and less memory usage compared to Win7, IE10, built in antivirus, better task manager, improved file manager, App Store, faster startup times, free unlimited music streaming with Xbox Music, sytem-wide spell checking (it even works for Desktop apps, there's a COM-based API for that), & more.

2) Windows 6.1: the new taskbar (killer feature), Aero Snap & Peek, jump lists, fine-tuned Aero, Direct3D 11, Thumbnail Toolbars, multiple minor improvements.

3) Windows 6.0: beautiful Aero theme, much better security compared to XP (UAC), newer hardware support, live taskbar previews, Gadgets were cool at the time, new Start Menu with search, .NET included, new Windows Explorer, SuperFetch, Direct3D 10.

4) Windows 5.1: first consumer oriented version of NT-based Windows, much more stable than Windows Me (not much changed from Win2000), gorgeous Luna theme & variations (I still love them), new Start Menu, very low memory usage, ClearType, built in WiFi support (SP2+), many other performance improvements.

Every single version of Windows has a special place in my heart, but as Bill says, "higher is better". :)

  • Like 1

Personally, I think it got better with every version. Never had any problems with Vista, though they definitely tidied things up in Win7. I expect I'll say the same thing about 8 ("Never had any problems with 8, though they definitely tidied things up with 8.1/Blue")

1. Windows 7- Stable, fast, bug-free, largest modern and popular support for the remaining of this decade

2. Windows XP - Vintage/lacks some support in modern graphics area, otherwise OK

3. Windows Vista - Usable after SP1, slower and not as snappy as 7.

4. Windows 8 - Metro sucks, the performance improvement isn't luring me or the millions of win7 users.

1.) Windows 8 - I haven't found anything that this OS can't do out of the box that I need. It's saved me from installing a gazillion drivers/programs.

2.) Windows XP - I used it for so long because it was a big turning point for Windows

3.) Windows 7 - It's improved over Windows XP and fixed many of the nagging things about Vista

4.) Windows Vista - A fine OS in retrospect but living through it was terrible

  • Like 1

1) Windows 8 - Can't live without the start screen, going back to 7 feels to me now like 7 to XP felt.

2) Windows 7 - Despite that, Windows 7 is an amazing, rock solid OS. The first MS I used and thought "Hey, this is really cool".

3) Windows XP - Loved that I could change the fisher price interface :p It had its quirks, I upgraded from 98 SE to XP and a lot of the annoyances went away but there were still plenty

I never used Vista so I can't rank it.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
    • If I were them, I'm gonna hold out until the prices of these semiconductor parts normalize. $1,049 for a ~5 year old hardware is DoA, more so for gamers. On a deeper note, if Steam Machine is priced like this, we are soo effed up for the next gen Xbox console and PS6. With great AAA titles releasing at the end of the year, this just creates more demand...and more tears for me. Lol.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!