Recommended Posts

PC sales certainly haven't been good over the past year or so, but this past quarter was record-setting bad.

Shipments of PCs fell 14% worldwide last quarter, according to IDC. It was the worst yearly decline since IDC began tracking the data in 1994.

The drop in PC shipments was nearly twice as bad as the 7.7% decline IDC expected, and it marked the fourth consecutive quarter in which PC shipments fell year-over-year.

Gartner, another technology consultancy, posted similar figures on Wednesday. The analysis firm said 79 million PCs were shipped worldwide in the first quarter -- the fewest number of shipments since the second quarter of 2009.

PC industry titans have tried to innovate themselves out of their sales slump, but recent attempts have failed. Ultrabooks, super-thin notebook computers, debuted to great fanfare in 2011. But sales disappointed, and firms quickly slashed their ultrabook sales forecasts.

In October 2012, Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) debuted Windows 8, which received mixed reviews, and sales have been muted compared with past Windows launches.

Bob O'Donnell, a vice president at IDC, said in the company's report that "the Windows 8 launch not only failed to provide a positive boost to the PC market, but appears to have slowed the market."

He slammed WIndows 8's "radical changes" to the user interface, particularly the removal of the iconic start button, and intimated that the switch is confusing for customers.

"Microsoft will have to make some very tough decisions moving forward if it wants to help reinvigorate the PC market," O'Donnell said in the report.

Microsoft and its rivals felt the crunch in after-hours trading.

more

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1146454-worst-pc-sales-drop-in-history/
Share on other sites

This could be Linux's moment to pick up MS's tab in PC sales

It was stated by another member that the failure of Windows 8 prompted Dell to sell Alienwares with Ubuntu preinstalled, it's a worthy risk to assess any potential benefit even though the market for Linux games is growing, there needs to be that "killer app" to make that homerun. It'll happen but the execution has to be right for people to take notice.

The thing about Windows 8 wasn?t just [Microsoft's] distribution. As somebody who participates in the overall PC ecosystem, it?s totally great when faster wireless networks and standards come out, or when graphics get faster. Windows 8 was like this giant sadness. It just hurts everybody in the PC business. Rather than everybody being all excited to go buy a new PC, buying new software to run on it, we?ve had a 20+ percent decline in PC sales -- it?s like "holy cow that?s not what the new generation of the operating system is supposed to do." There?s supposed to be a 40 percent uptake, not a 20 percent decline, so that?s what really scares me. When I started using it I was like "oh my god..." I find [Windows 8] unusable.

:whistle:

I don't think Windows 8 is to blame, at least on the PC side. I think the main reason PC sales have dropped are smartphones, tablets, and the fact that PC hardware lasts longer now than 10 years ago. I bought my laptop in 2008 and aside from a dead battery, it's still good enough to run Windows 7/8. I plan on buying a tablet in the near future for convenience. If I want to watch videos on YouTube, I'd want to do it conveniently and I want to be able to move around while doing it. I can do it on my phone but a 4" screen isn't big enough for comfortable viewing.

  • Like 3

So, what is this article saying? They're pointing fingers every which direction here. What we're seeing a shifting market, something that's been happening for years.

Partially what the IDC is saying is true, PC last longer than they did 10 years ago. My desktop has been as is since circa 2007, yet runs Windows 8 like a champ.

I don't think Windows 8 is to blame, at least on the PC side. I think the main reason PC sales have dropped are smartphones, tablets, and the fact that PC hardware lasts longer now than 10 years ago. I bought my laptop in 2008 and aside from a dead battery, it's still good enough to run Windows 7/8. I plan on buying a tablet in the near future for convenience. If I want to watch videos on YouTube, I'd want to do it conveniently and I want to be able to move around while doing it. I can do it on my phone but a 4" screen isn't big enough for comfortable viewing.

You are so right. I use my phone for many of the things I once used a PC for. My tablet I use to watch movies and TV shows, something I once used my PC for. In fact, I rarely use my PC anymore. And like you said, the things last a long time now so I am good to for several years. I doubt I am alone either. That is not helping Microsoft's bottom line.

Windows 8 needed to compete with tablets while holding onto the desktop segment; unfortunately it did neither. Windows RT has significantly underperformed in the market place (the Surface RT and third-party offerings) and Windows 8 has been plagued with bad press. It's not a bad product but, like with Vista, once you build a bad reputation it's hard to shift it. Numerous major companies?including Dell, Samsung and Valve?have heavily criticised Windows 8 and users remain divided.

Is Windows 8 entirely to blame for the downturn? No, but it's a major factor. Now Microsoft needs to focus on Windows Blue and Windows 9, making sure to respond to criticism from users and critics.

Windows 8 needed to compete with tablets while holding onto the desktop segment; unfortunately it did neither. Windows RT has significantly underperformed in the market place (the Surface RT and third-party offerings) and Windows 8 has been plagued with bad press. It's not a bad product but, like with Vista, once you build a bad reputation it's hard to shift it. Numerous major companies?including Dell, Samsung and Valve?have heavily criticised Windows 8 and users remain divided.

Is Windows 8 entirely to blame for the downturn? No, but it's a major factor. Now Microsoft needs to focus on Windows Blue and Windows 9, making sure to respond to criticism from users and critics.

Microsoft should have picked up the slack others made and promoted the Hell out of the Surface RT. Personally, I think it's time for Microsoft to abandon some of these OEMs. They're inability to compete could be is a contributing factor to the declining market.

I'm not surprised. Windows 8 has nothing to do with it. My five year old PC still has plenty of power to meet all my needs. Hence, there is absolutely no reason why I should upgrade. Same with my laptops, and same for generally every consumer who has bought a PC over the last few years.

Perhaps Microsoft should make Windows 9 more resource hungry and force users to upgrade, like Apple does with Mac OS X. Just kidding, they won't.

You are so right. I use my phone for many of the things I once used a PC for. My tablet I use to watch movies and TV shows, something I once used my PC for. In fact, I rarely use my PC anymore.

Explains all those typos ... :shifty:

A lot of the article wants to point the blame at Windows 8. This is a contributing factor, but look at it that way, Windows ME and Vista both have/had some very serious negative feedback, did PC sales drop that much then because of word of mouth? However, many other factors play into this, mobile phones are on the rise, Dell/HP shakeup, poor PC designs, and the biggest thing of all, I think its partly due to less people needing to upgrade their current computer. PCs these days are not upgraded to new ones as often because the hardware specs are good enough now. This all can't be about Windows 8, look at the whole picture.

Windows 8 needed to compete with tablets while holding onto the desktop segment; unfortunately it did neither. Windows RT has significantly underperformed in the market place (the Surface RT and third-party offerings) and Windows 8 has been plagued with bad press. It's not a bad product but, like with Vista, once you build a bad reputation it's hard to shift it. Numerous major companies?including Dell, Samsung and Valve?have heavily criticised Windows 8 and users remain divided.

Is Windows 8 entirely to blame for the downturn? No, but it's a major factor. Now Microsoft needs to focus on Windows Blue and Windows 9, making sure to respond to criticism from users and critics.

I've started noticing, I'm doing more with my mobile devices, than with my PC nowadays too.

If you want to take that case farther, I have a room mate who uses nothing more than her iPhone.

A lot of the article wants to point the blame at Windows 8. This is a contributing factor, but look at it that way, Windows ME and Vista both have/had some very serious negative feedback, did PC sales drop that much then because of word of mouth? However, many other factors play into this, mobile phones are on the rise, Dell/HP shakeup, poor PC designs, and the biggest thing of all, I think its partly due to less people needing to upgrade their current computer. PCs these days are not upgraded to new ones as often because the hardware specs are good enough now. This all can't be about Windows 8, look at the whole picture.

Me and Vista were not in the situation where the market is at this time. Apple is a major influence when we look at their offerings and their sales. They've sold more Macs than in any other quarter in the worst economic climate. Me and Vista were in periods before the economic collapse where people were consumers at their peak in technology adoption.

Everyone was buying computers and getting involved. As stated earlier, phones act in place of the PC for basic function on the web. Windows 8 was not well recieved and has a stigma that is Metro. Compared to 8, Vista never forced users to "adapt" to functionality that wasn't necessary.

Microsoft acted out of impulse because of the success of Apple's iPad and they thought they could wrap around an interface for all devices by hitting multiple targets with one stone.

The sales reflect the outcome.

  • Like 2

Is Windows 8 entirely to blame for the downturn? No, but it's a major factor. Now Microsoft needs to focus on Windows Blue and Windows 9, making sure to respond to criticism from users and critics.

Yes! People don't buy new PCs because they don't have one all the time, nor because the one they had didn't perform well. They bought new ones because they perceived newer was cooler and could do new stuff. There's nothing new Windows 8 presented other than a touch-centric UI with limited lasting appeal, and limited usage scenarios.

It's really all about the software. The MS Core apps shipped with Windows 8 RTM were amateurish at best. Makes Linux apps look high quality. Disastrous. And slick high-end Modern UI Zune like client that synced Surface RT Tablets and Phones would have resonated with consumers. Instead, nothing. Everything is disconnected with nothing great to install or run on it. There's no "Runs better on ..." or "Designed for ..." Windows 8 applications.

The WP8 phones don't have the apps the others do, do not support the peripherals the others do. The Surface RT is the same plus just doesn't perform as reliably as the others do. Sometimes on the tablets you can't update all your app, you have to try, retry. That's just unacceptable for a tablet.

Yeah, there's lots of reasons including the economy but to say that the Windows 8 fiasco is not a major cause is total denial.

The **** must have really hit the fan if even you posted something that could even be considered

as negative toward windows 8.

My reaction to that post:

VeP2Jay.gif

Where am I being negative? I've said nothing here I haven't said before.

EDIT: That gif is rather creepy...

Microsoft should have picked up the slack others made and promoted the Hell out of the Surface RT. Personally, I think it's time for Microsoft to abandon some of these OEMs.

Don't blame the OEMs. Just for kicks, tell me, how would you promote Surface RT to those considering an iPad or Android Tablet right now? Go for it, use bullet point, promote away, tell me why right now, Surface RT is the tablet anyone should buy. 1, 2, 3, go .... (make sure you cover performance, reliability, available applications, gaming, stability, ease-of-use):

Don't blame the OEMs. Just for kicks, tell me, how would you promote Surface RT to those considering an iPad or Android Tablet right now? Go for it, use bullet point, promote away, tell me why right now, Surface RT is the tablet anyone whould buy. 1, 2, 3, go .... (make sure you cover performance, reliability, available applications, gaming, stability, ease-of-use):

Personally, I'd start by publicly announcing Windows 8 "Blue". Something they should have done from the start.

A lot of the article wants to point the blame at Windows 8. This is a contributing factor, but look at it that way, Windows ME and Vista both have/had some very serious negative feedback, did PC sales drop that much then because of word of mouth? However, many other factors play into this, mobile phones are on the rise, Dell/HP shakeup, poor PC designs, and the biggest thing of all, I think its partly due to less people needing to upgrade their current computer. PCs these days are not upgraded to new ones as often because the hardware specs are good enough now. This all can't be about Windows 8, look at the whole picture.

All of those things have some impact. I will believe thy have more impact that the simple fact Windows 8 has no sex appeal when:

- Tablet sales meet or exceed PC sales.

- The situation remains the same when, if ever, MS gets decent Modern UI Apps, including the weak core apps.

MS thought they could force everyone to do things their way, because that works best for them, and it's just not working. People may in fact choose a tablet (and not a Windows tablet) in lieu of what MS is putting forth with their hybrid UI. People don't want to, "start over" nor "wait" for features and apps. There are alternatives if they can settle for a Tablet.

Just curious, how are Mac sales doing right now? Since iPad is still doing relatively well ...

Personally, I'd start by publicly announcing Windows 8 "Blue". Something they should have done from the start.

1) You have just conceded that Windows 8 is a failure and people are going to continue to not buy it and wait to see what "Blue" has to offer, and the expectations will be high and we all know it has relatively minor to moderate changes.

2) Your promo list is as sparse and Microsoft's is, basically empty. And keep this in mind, no one on Neowin is a bigger evangelist for Windows 8 than you, and your promo list is ........... That I believe, is the major problem and why Windows 8 is not helping PC sales.

the problem is not windows8 or what. mostly, people don't need PC when the tablets got enough options to do things. emails, news, internet, skype or chats, basic word processing / excel. then you don't need a pc anymore for most families. PCs need to reinvent themselves to do more. else they will be used only by people that need more, like video/audio/image editing, coders, etc.

All of those things have some impact. I will believe thy have more impact that the simple fact Windows 8 has no sex appeal when:

- Tablet sales meet or exceed PC sales.

- The situation remains the same when, if ever, MS gets decent Modern UI Apps, including the weak core apps.

MS thought they could force everyone to do things their way, because that works best for them, and it's just not working. People may in fact choose a tablet (and not a Windows tablet) in lieu of what MS is putting forth with their hybrid UI. People don't want to, "start over" nor "wait" for features and apps. There are alternatives if they can settle for a Tablet.

Just curious, how are Mac sales doing right now? Since iPad is still doing relatively well ...

1) You have just conceded that Windows 8 is a failure and people are going to continue to not buy it and wait to see what "Blue" has to offer, and the expectations will be high and we all know it has relatively minor to moderate changes.

2) Your promo list is as sparse and Microsoft's is, basically empty. And keep this in mind, no one on Neowin is a bigger evangelist for Windows 8 than you, and your promo list is ........... That I believe, is the major problem and why Windows 8 is not helping PC sales.

Windows 8 is hardly a failure. Announcing updates hardly concedes "failure".

Windows 8 is hardly a failure. Announcing updates hardly concedes "failure".

failure is relative. relative to the current climate and the relative youthfulness of Windows 8, promoting basically "we're fixing" it, is conceding failure given the expectations of such a significant (as promoted by MS) upgrade.

failure is relative. relative to the current climate and the relative youthfulness of Windows 8, promoting basically "we're fixing" it, is conceding failure given the expectations of such a significant (as promoted by MS) upgrade.

Like you said, "failure" is relative. "fixing" denotes a broken product, "improving" would be a better word. Updates aren't a bad thing, everyone else updates their products, so why is "Blue" denoting a bad thing?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!