Rumor: Xbox 720 always-online false, is backwards compatible


Recommended Posts

I'm not sure how I feel about the Nextbox running Windows 8. The Xbox TV sounds interesting, if true. I still hate Kinect, and I still hate the fact that it's required. Again, if the online-only rumor is true, I won't be getting the console all together.

Too bad Microsoft postponed their announcement for no reason. It would have been nice to know whether these things are true or not.

My guess? Most likely will be binary compatible with WinRT and nothing more.

I have a life outside of Neowin, I don't exist to be anyones posting boy. You can probably buy one of them from Thailand if you are so inclined.

You damn better hope this is true, always online would be an awful awful decision.

I think they were pretty much re-compiling games for 360 IIRC so BC was available as long as the game was re-compiled. (I might be completely wrong though)

I don't think 360 SoC will be cheap enough to be included as standard :/ it has to be an add on.

Considering the vastly different CPU arch. between the original xbox and the 360...that's really the only viable way to do it. Unless you take the route of the nexbox and just include the last gen's SoC.

I have a life outside of Neowin, I don't exist to be anyones posting boy. You can probably buy one of them from Thailand if you are so inclined.

You damn better hope this is true, always online would be an awful awful decision.

Depends on what "always online" applies to. So far only the doomsayers have made the leap to overarching DRM. Otherwise it would make sense for certain features to require an online connection, say Netflix for example.

"This means it?ll be running the new WinRT framework, which as a side effect also means that contrary to popular belief MS will be the most indie friendly of all the big 3 next gen. This is because any app/game that is created for the Windows app store will (after adding controller support of course) be playable on Durango."

This is rather interesting. Now if only MS hadn't killed XNA, they're doing some interesting with DirectX but I've always disliked the DirectX syntax, I'd rather do OpenGL. Meh, can't have everything I suppose. Still good news if true.

It won't run Windows 8, the OS might be based on Windows 8 including the Kernel. I'd be very surprised if it ran Windows RT or it's apps.

Funny, I was thinking the same thing, well almost....

I guess this rumor just happened to slip by AB radar.

I never said I didn't believe it, was just wondering why people who didn't believe the always on rumours are so inclined to believe this considering they both come from sources "close to Durango development"

It won't run Windows 8, the OS might be based on Windows 8 including the Kernel. I'd be very surprised if it ran Windows RT or it's apps.

I certainly wouldn't be surprised if it ran RT apps. I have said it could and should since the start, and if it did it would be a major win for MS and it would be fairly easy to do, it has the kernel and adding the RT layer to it wouldn't be easy, RT also handles the multitasking they need and uses EXTREMELY little resources, perfect to run next to a game.

I'm not sure they will do it. but they should, and as I said it wouldn't surprise me as it would be a major home run for them. and it fits in with their whole unification process.

I never said I didn't believe it, was just wondering why people who didn't believe the always on rumours are so inclined to believe this considering they both come from sources "close to Durango development"

See my experience from these forums is that, we the people you accuse of not believing those rumors, don't believe in any of the rumors until we have proof. However you have the other camp you absolutely believe every negative rumor but throw away all rumors like these.

  • Like 2

I'm still waiting for something official before I make any decisions.

Hush now, with your common sense. This is an Internet forum, no place for such malarkey!

  • Like 3

I'm more inclined to believe these rumors simply because they make sense (Especially since I've been saying the Next Xbox should run Windows 8 for a while), while always online and blocking used games are stupid ideas (Especially because the current system solves those "issues" in much better ways)

Why would any publisher want used games blocked, when they can use the online pass model instead? Not only does that allow used game sales (Making customers and stores happy) it also lets the publisher get money from every resale. You'd be crazy to say that's a worse idea than blocking used games if you were a publisher.

Edit: But obviously wait until it's all made official, etc.

I certainly wouldn't be surprised if it ran RT apps. I have said it could and should since the start, and if it did it would be a major win for MS and it would be fairly easy to do, it has the kernel and adding the RT layer to it wouldn't be easy, RT also handles the multitasking they need and uses EXTREMELY little resources, perfect to run next to a game.

I'm not sure they will do it. but they should, and as I said it wouldn't surprise me as it would be a major home run for them. and it fits in with their whole unification process.

See my experience from these forums is that, we the people you accuse of not believing those rumors, don't believe in any of the rumors until we have proof. However you have the other camp you absolutely believe every negative rumor but throw away all rumors like these.

I don't think it will run RT as it is on tablets, it might have a customised version but I don't think you will just be able to download any app designed for RT/Windows 8.

As such, maybe not. However, I believe that would be more of an artificial limitation. Most likely it "could" run any RT app, but it will have it own App Store. And when you submit an RTapp you choose if it goes to the WinRT store, the Xbox RT store or both. But I suspect it will have the full framework, maybe with some extras for the pad, which could get back ported to Windows RT.

I think they were pretty much re-compiling games for 360 IIRC so BC was available as long as the game was re-compiled. (I might be completely wrong though)

I don't think 360 SoC will be cheap enough to be included as standard :/ it has to be an add on.

Surprise, surprise.

This is why internet forums can't have serious debates, because if you mentioned that as a solution to a group to engineers on how to support BC on the 360. You would of got fired for not having a clue what you're on about.

You can't just "re-compile" a game for different CPU architecture, thats a insane statement. A game engine would have to re-wrote with all new instruction sets to work with a new CPU architecture. Memory handling would have to be re-wrote... the list goes on.

The 360 had an emulator, which was built by MS that could emulate Xbox 1 games on the 360. The only games which were supported on this emulator were the games which we're tested properly with the correct engineering work to ensure the game would be stable, since all are different.

To be on topic, I can't believe people believed the always-on rumour. Has anyone even thought of emerging markets? They'd essentially slash their market by a boat ton.

EDIT: Sorry about the tone of the reply. Commenting on forums doesn't usually align with work.

I don't know why you guys thought they really would go ahead with 'always online'

I knew the minute those rumors flooded twitter that it wouldn't happen, it was way too obvious that they used this to garner attention for their console release. Especially considering how MS didn't give confirmation if these rumors were true.

If the system is supposed to be x86, why would they port the ARM version of windows to it?

ugh... RT as in the pure non desktop modern UI version of windows, or rather apps. the point is the rumor is it runs modern apps.

I don't know why you guys thought they really would go ahead with 'always online'

I knew the minute those rumors flooded twitter that it wouldn't happen, it was way too obvious that they used this to garner attention for their console release. Especially considering how MS didn't give confirmation if these rumors were true.

This is just a rumour contradicting another rumour. Essentially, we are back where we all started: we don't know anything either way.

  • Like 4

This is just a rumour contradicting another rumour. Essentially, we are back where we all started: we don't know anything either way.

Yep, exactly

It's really clever marketing to get people suckered into the hype of the machine.

You can't just "re-compile" a game for different CPU architecture, thats a insane statement. A game engine would have to re-wrote with all new instruction sets to work with a new CPU architecture. Memory handling would have to be re-wrote... the list goes on.

The 360 had an emulator, which was built by MS that could emulate Xbox 1 games on the 360. The only games which were supported on this emulator were the games which we're tested properly with the correct engineering work to ensure the game would be stable, since all are different.

well, actually, if you use an intermediate layer you don't have to recompile, you like a Just In Time Compiler do it for you.... that's how .NET works, which is why you can "compile" for Any CPU as long as you have the JIT compiler for it's architecture... now if you wanted low level functions, yeah you will be doing that at the machine code level and be machine specific... but the whole point of a framework like XNA was that you could port .NET games easily to PPC or ARM or X86

This is why internet forums can't have serious debates, because if you mentioned that as a solution to a group to engineers on how to support BC on the 360. You would of got fired for not having a clue what you're on about.

You can't just "re-compile" a game for different CPU architecture, thats a insane statement. A game engine would have to re-wrote with all new instruction sets to work with a new CPU architecture. Memory handling would have to be re-wrote... the list goes on.

The 360 had an emulator, which was built by MS that could emulate Xbox 1 games on the 360. The only games which were supported on this emulator were the games which we're tested properly with the correct engineering work to ensure the game would be stable, since all are different.

To be on topic, I can't believe people believed the always-on rumour. Has anyone even thought of emerging markets? They'd essentially slash their market by a boat ton.

EDIT: Sorry about the tone of the reply. Commenting on forums doesn't usually align with work.

I am well aware of that you can't "just compile" and I never meant it that way. I mentioned it in my post that I could be wrong (and I was apparently).

wait, what? "This means it?ll be running the new WinRT framework" WinRT is the OS for ARM, Windows RunTime is a framework..... of which even XBOX360 ran a version of (XNA was a version of it in the past)

Windows Run Time is abbreviated as WinRT. Windows RT is the OS for ARM. Yes, Microsoft is a genius at branding.

This is just a rumour contradicting another rumour. Essentially, we are back where we all started: we don't know anything either way.

This rumor was also not denied by Microsoft so it must be true?

/s

I don't think it will run RT as it is on tablets, it might have a customised version but I don't think you will just be able to download any app designed for RT/Windows 8.

hey Mart what are you doing here? I remember seeing you after at a PS4 thread gunning down an xbox supporter (I think it was hawkman) for being in the PS4 thread. so let me ask you, since you're a die hard PS fan what are you doing here?

This is why internet forums can't have serious debates, because if you mentioned that as a solution to a group to engineers on how to support BC on the 360. You would of got fired for not having a clue what you're on about.

You can't just "re-compile" a game for different CPU architecture, thats a insane statement. A game engine would have to re-wrote with all new instruction sets to work with a new CPU architecture. Memory handling would have to be re-wrote... the list goes on.

The 360 had an emulator, which was built by MS that could emulate Xbox 1 games on the 360. The only games which were supported on this emulator were the games which we're tested properly with the correct engineering work to ensure the game would be stable, since all are different.

To be on topic, I can't believe people believed the always-on rumour. Has anyone even thought of emerging markets? They'd essentially slash their market by a boat ton.

EDIT: Sorry about the tone of the reply. Commenting on forums doesn't usually align with work.

all the backward compatibility talk me thinking, how did Microsoft do BC from the original xbox (intel x86 based) to the xbox360 (IBM PowerPC based) without having to recompile but only download a "software patch" for the games? it could've been done through an emulator, I believe Durango has enough power to do so just like the x360 had enough power to do it with the original xbox games.

well, actually, if you use an intermediate layer you don't have to recompile, you like a Just In Time Compiler do it for you.... that's how .NET works, which is why you can "compile" for Any CPU as long as you have the JIT compiler for it's architecture... now if you wanted low level functions, yeah you will be doing that at the machine code level and be machine specific... but the whole point of a framework like XNA was that you could port .NET games easily to PPC or ARM or X86

I love those languages for that exact reason, XNA was awesome for that sort of stuff. Too bad they've ditched it and gone down the web route. XNA was a good platform! Unfortunately, the majority of code you'll see in consoles will be native and sit quite low. Vendors actually encourage this due to the speed improvements the lower you go, but can't be re-compiled without a re-write and re architect.

I am well aware of that you can't "just compile" and I never meant it that way. I mentioned it in my post that I could be wrong (and I was apparently).

Sorry, I wasn't really targeting you, I was having a rant.

all the backward compatibility talk me thinking, how did Microsoft do BC from the original xbox (intel x86 based) to the xbox360 (IBM PowerPC based) without having to recompile but only download a "software patch" for the games? it could've been done through an emulator, I believe Durango has enough power to do so just like the x360 had enough power to do it with the original xbox games.

It was exactly through an emulator. The patches you see were the specifics which ensured the games ran stable with the emulator. Although, if the specs are true, the Durango won't have enough power to emulate a triple core Power PC cpu. Unfortunately it just won't happen. That's why they'll be looking at SoC. It'll be a far cheaper solution which'll give the engineers less headaches.

I missed that WinRT line. That means something doesn't add up! The WinRT Framework is not the metro aspect of W8, thats the ModernUI. The WinRT Framework is the instruction sets in the Windows Kernal to work with ARM. Which means the new Xbox would be ARM. I actually call BS on this.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      228
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      161
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!