When is a shadow, too much of a shadow?


Recommended Posts

Alright folks!

I was wondering, when shooting events, you know like weddings, parties, etc, how much of a shadow behind the subject is acceptable?

I've been taking photos at wedding (just casually as a guest), but am very conscious about the shots I've got so far and if the way I'm using my flash (gun with diffuser) is, well, the right way. I do the usual and bounce the light from the ceiling when necessary to reduce the shadow behind; however there is always a faint, but noticable shadow behind the person (s).

When I get home I'll post an example of a couple of different picture I've taken as a comparison. Want to get feedback, criticism (constructive), etc.

Cheers!

Well i'm against harsh shadows, however like noted above, a picture would help give better pointers. I found this image while googling wedding photography, its a good example of a harsh shadow done right, but then again, this probably wasnt a "spur of the moment" during the wedding.

IMG_4565.jpg

Wow, that's just, wow.

It doesn't look like a spur of the moment thing that one. Looks like the photographer placed a flash gun mounted under an umbrella behind the bride and groom to get that effect. I think that's a stunning photo!

I'm more talking about things like this. Also, please ignore the quality of the images, remember I was just a guest/relative taking these photos and now using them as an example.

The first one is what I'm talking about; there's a shadow, but it's not took strong, almost bordering on acceptable. Could be easily shopped out.

The second one is what I would class as a crappy shadow, just shouldn't be there.

I prefer the second picture though, just need to crop my wife out from the right and would have been nice to have the light behind the bride & groom off, or not there at all, but sure :)

post-130223-0-60119500-1366451429.jpg

post-130223-0-85416100-1366451451.jpg

  • Like 1

I'm more talking about things like this. Also, please ignore the quality of the images, remember I was just a guest/relative taking these photos and now using them as an example.

The first one is what I'm talking about; there's a shadow, but it's not took strong, almost bordering on acceptable. Could be easily shopped out.

The second one is what I would class as a crappy shadow, just shouldn't be there.

I prefer the second picture though, just need to crop my wife out from the right and would have been nice to have the light behind the bride & groom off, or not there at all, but sure :)

Pretty good example!

It depends how serious you want to be about this.

If its just for the memories then I wouldn't get to bogged down about this, as pictures they are fine. They aren't going to win any awards but i'm sure they captured the moment that you want to remember.

I would say on the first one the shadow is fine but IMO I would say the picture is a tad under exposed, seems quite dark.

The seconds one, again imo the more distracting thing about this is the light behind them rather than the shadow.

I am no professional and never aim to be so don't take what I am saying with any factual experience behind it, these are just my opinions. Exposing yourself to criticism in your pictures is however the best way to improve, hopefully someone can come in with some actual advice on how to ease your shadow problem in a candid environment.

I am no professional and never aim to be so don't take what I am saying with any factual experience behind it, these are just my opinions. Exposing yourself to criticism in your pictures is however the best way to improve, hopefully someone can come in with some actual advice on how to ease your shadow problem in a candid environment.

Agreed, "Blank" the other day got offended by our suggestions, but I whole heartedly agree, the only way to improve, is to get actual feedback, good or bad!

Best way to difuse is either, bounce to ceiling ( at a right angle), use a proper diffuser ( those DIY are easily made), use an umbrella, bounce card, etc. though i'm sure someone will chip in and give more proper advice.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KillerPDF 1.6.0 by Razvan Serea KillerPDF is a lightweight, portable PDF editor for Windows built for users who want full control without subscriptions, installers, or telemetry. It runs as a single executable, making it ideal for USB use and field work. You can view PDFs with smooth PDFium rendering, navigate quickly with thumbnails, zoom, and shortcuts, and reorganize pages using drag-and-drop. It supports merging multiple PDFs, splitting documents, and extracting selected pages. KillerPDF also allows inline text editing with font matching to preserve the original layout, plus annotations like text boxes, freehand drawing, highlights, and reusable signatures. You can search full text, copy content easily, and print documents with flattened annotations. Designed as a free and open alternative to bloated PDF tools, it works fully offline on Windows 10/11 x64. No runtimes install. Everything needed is inside the EXE (targets .NET Framework 4.8, which ships with every supported Windows release). KillerPDF key features: High-quality PDF rendering via PDFium Edit PDF text inline (double-click to modify text) Page thumbnails and fast navigation with zoom and shortcuts Merge multiple PDFs into one Split PDFs and extract selected pages Drag-and-drop page reordering Font matching to preserve original document appearance Text boxes for notes Freehand drawing tools Highlight overlays with adjustable color, size, opacity Undo actions and clear per-page annotations Create, draw, and save reusable signatures Click-to-place signatures anywhere Full-text search with highlighted results Drag-select or Ctrl+A to copy text Print with annotations flattened Portable single-file app (~15 MB) No installer, no admin rights required No account, no telemetry KillerPDF 1.6.0 changelog: A big release: major new features, a full visual refresh, and an internal rewrite. New Tabbed documents - open several PDFs at once, each restoring its page, zoom, and view OCR built into the exe (Tesseract) - OCR a page or dragged region to the clipboard, make a scan searchable, or extract all text; extra languages download on demand Digital signatures with a cloud certificate (Certum SimplySign), reusable signatures, and click-to-sign form fields Transform tool - rotate, scale, flip, and straighten a crooked scan, with live preview Edit existing text by double-clicking a line (the original is cleanly covered) Line tool, refreshed draw/highlight bars, resizable word-wrapping text boxes, and a full RGB color picker with eyedropper Print options (scale, position, margins, two-sided), page-number stamping, folder/.zip import, Document Info (F12), and recent files with file-type icons Translations: Bengali, Turkish, Simplified Chinese, German, French. Changed New logo, icons, fonts, and colors throughout Six themes with per-theme accent colors; sidebar docks left or right; toolbar style picker Internal rewrite: the ~15,000-line main window split into ~40 focused files (no behavior change) Fixed True 300 DPI printing, encrypted/damaged PDFs open on a background thread with a repair fallback, form fields render in every view mode, and undo is one item per press Download: KillerPDF 1.6.0 | 14.6 MB (Open Source) Link: KillerPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • They'll get cheaper RAM but they won't drop the prices.
    • Did you go into settings > engines and switch some more stuff on. The more you enable the slower it will get but the better the results will be
    • SpaceX took its largest step yet toward becoming a retail wireless carrier on Friday when President and COO Gwynne Shotwell told investors at the company's IPO roadshow that SpaceX is considering launching a Starlink-branded mobile phone service for US consumers.............. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319177/20260627/starlink-mobile-coming-t-verizon-spacex-has-spectrum-still-needs-towers.htm  
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      221
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!