Will Apple bring back the ethernet port on the next rMBP revision?


Recommended Posts

I'm glad they did it. No, they'll never bring it back.

Technology goes forward and if this is no good for you, get the old, thick Macbook Pro and you'll have your old ethernet with no adaptor.

There's no miracle.

They won't. However, I have not bought and do expect to buy a laptop that does not have an Ethernet port, so their move meant that I won't consider looking in the Apple garden in the future.

Actually it means eventually you will be forced into buying something that you don't want since within a decade no laptop will have them built in as a standard feature. They will go the way of the floppy disk as they should.

Screw your wireless voodoo. Wire is the way to go.

There's really no comparison to wired and ethernet. Wired really makes all the difference.

If apple added more usb ports I probably wouldn't have a problem with this since they do include an adapter. Looking back at it now, I probably won't mind the adapter In my situation where I come home from campus where that's the only means for a wired connection anyway

There's really no comparison to wired and ethernet. Wired really makes all the difference.

If apple added more usb ports I probably wouldn't have a problem with this since they do include an adapter. Looking back at it now, I probably won't mind the adapter In my situation where I come home from campus where that's the only means for a wired connection anyway

How about this or something like it. Then you dont even have to connect/disconnect physically.

http://www.engadget.com/2006/08/16/dtechs-bt0032-bluetooth-3-port-usb-hub/

Actually it means eventually you will be forced into buying something that you don't want since within a decade no laptop will have them built in as a standard feature. They will go the way of the floppy disk as they should.

Wrong on the first part and bad comparison on the second part. Floppy disks are outdated and useless, ethernet is not.

  • Like 2

Actually it means eventually you will be forced into buying something that you don't want since within a decade no laptop will have them built in as a standard feature. They will go the way of the floppy disk as they should.

Some people use them in corporate environments and need a way to image them. I don't see how you think they "should" go away, especially when they don't really affect much. We got an Asus X202E in and it has a hnged cover for the ethernet port. therefore, the plug can fit in, without needing to be full sized. It's a pretty slick solution, IMHO.

Actually it means eventually you will be forced into buying something that you don't want since within a decade no laptop will have them built in as a standard feature. They will go the way of the floppy disk as they should.

I very much doubt that Ethernet socket will disappear within a decade, if at all. Slim-form laptops and netbooks are bound to sacrifice it, which is fine with me, because I get serious work done on my machine. Having both wired and wireless connectivity is obviously better than just one. And what do you do when a new piece of equipment in the server room needs an external IP address, subnet mask and DNS info configured and the only way to do so is to connect to it using an RJ45 cable and go to its internal IP? A laptop with just wireless, unless you get an Ethernet-to-USB adapter, is useless in this scenario.

whats wrong with an adapter? if youre moving it around you should be using a case anyway. therefore you can leave it in the case. if you only need it for one situation buy the adapter and leave it at the office plugged in and then you would just plug that in as needed same as ethernet.

  • Like 2

I don't really see what the big deal is about using an adapter. If you know there will be ethernet ports AND cables for you to use EVERYWHERE you go, then fine: you have every right to complain about no ethernet port.

For me, I want to have an ethernet hookup at home and at work. I'll just get two adapters, one for each location. TBH, I don't really need one at home because my WiFi is decent enough for my needs...

Everywhere else, I use WiFi like any normal person would.

If you already carry a small ethernet patch cable to take advantage of ethernet wherever you go, then adding an adapter to the end of that patch cable shouldn't be an issue. I do agree with the sentiment that if they are not going to include an ethernet port, there should be more USB ports.

whats wrong with an adapter? if youre moving it around you should be using a case anyway. therefore you can leave it in the case. if you only need it for one situation buy the adapter and leave it at the office plugged in and then you would just plug that in as needed same as ethernet.

Exactly... Maybe some folks have A LOT of ethernet hook-up locations that all have easily accessible patch cables in the vicinity. Can't see that being possible, but maybe it is for some of these folks.

Will some laptops still have ethernet ports in 10 years? Sure. My 2yo Thinkpad came with a modem! Weird.

I'm glad they did it. No, they'll never bring it back.

Technology goes forward and if this is no good for you, get the old, thick Macbook Pro and you'll have your old ethernet with no adaptor.

There's no miracle.

Wait what... Existing Wireless technology is still not as fast as Ethernet from 5+ years ago... 802.11ac is theoretically supposed to offer us Gigabit WiFi while Gigabit wired offers that today. 10GbE (10 Gigabit Ethernet) is already in use in businesses and will make its way down to consumers soon. So, to say Ethernet is somehow outdated and useless only makes you look foolish...

Especially since Wireless still can't match the speeds it offers. Lets not even talk about the latency issues that wireless introduces...

  • Like 2

Actually it means eventually you will be forced into buying something that you don't want since within a decade no laptop will have them built in as a standard feature. They will go the way of the floppy disk as they should.

sorry but...

LOL

  • Like 4

Wait what... Existing Wireless technology is still not as fast as Ethernet from 5+ years ago... 802.11ac is theoretically supposed to offer us Gigabit WiFi while Gigabit wired offers that today. 10GbE (10 Gigabit Ethernet) is already in use in businesses and will make its way down to consumers soon. So, to say Ethernet is somehow outdated and useless only makes you look foolish...

Especially since Wireless still can't match the speeds it offers. Lets not even talk about the latency issues that wireless introduces...

Where exactly am I saying that Ethernet is useless? If you want to expose your ideas you should do it without quoting my post, regarding this subject, as I didn't say that.

First, I have an adaptor for my rMBP because I use it as a desktop replacement, even though I have Wifi for other uses.

The point is that Apple ditched the ethernet port to keep the design thin and that is a great choice, because there's an adaptor for that and thunderbolt is thin and allows you to have whatever port you want. If you guys don't like that, you can choose whatever thick and ugly laptop you want. Also, if you want more USB ports, you can also choose a dock or go for an old PC style.

If it was not for Apple's (and Intel's) courage to push new hardware and ditch the crappy old, we would still have bulky laptops with CD-ROM, floppy-disks, hard drives, ethernet and firewire ports.

I'm glad they did it. No, they'll never bring it back.

Technology goes forward and if this is no good for you, get the old, thick Macbook Pro and you'll have your old ethernet with no adaptor.

There's no miracle.

The rMBP is thick enough to have a minimal ethernet port on it, but it would not have been as "pretty" as the line of ports that they currently have. The only reason they don't is because they don't need too; people willing to pay for the rMBP will pay for the ethernet adapter if they need it, and they will use wireless when they do not need it.

Ethernet is very far from a dead technology. It is kind of unfortunate that it has such a large head though.

I own a 15", 2011 MBP, and I love it, but I am thankful that I have all of my precious ports. The problem with using an adapter is that it removes the given port for use for something else. Not to mention, $30 for a USB to Ethernet adapter will slow down a fast ethernet connection (gigabit), and it's a ridiculous price.

Now, with all of that said, I do look forward to expanded use of Thunderbolt on monitors. I am waiting for the next generation of monitor technology to kick in (4K TVs and high DPI tablets/laptops currently skipping the love for desktop monitors) before diving in, but I look forward to using a monitor like the Apple 27" one that has everything connected to it rather than requiring a separate dock for laptops. Though, I have read that there are consistent problems with using Apple's monitor on a PC, so I hope someone else jumps on the Thunderbolt monitor + dock bandwagon.

I think it was a misguided idea to remove the ethernet port in order to make the rMBP thinner.

Carrying adapters isn't my style either

But everyone buying masses of $30 adaptors is Apples style :rofl:

Where exactly am I saying that Ethernet is useless? If you want to expose your ideas you should do it without quoting my post, regarding this subject, as I didn't say that.

First, I have an adaptor for my rMBP because I use it as a desktop replacement, even though I have Wifi for other uses.

You didn't say that it was useless. You effectively said that it was old-and-dead technology.

The point is that Apple ditched the ethernet port to keep the design thin and that is a great choice, because there's an adaptor for that and thunderbolt is thin and allows you to have whatever port you want. If you guys don't like that, you can choose whatever thick and ugly laptop you want. Also, if you want more USB ports, you can also choose a dock or go for an old PC style.

If it was not for Apple's (and Intel's) courage to push new hardware and ditch the crappy old, we would still have bulky laptops with CD-ROM, floppy-disks, hard drives, ethernet and firewire ports.

You are confused about what LogicalApex and I are taking issue with in your posts. I think he owns a MBP like myself; we appreciate some of Apple's decisions.

Both of our points is that ethernet is not a crappy and old technology. Saying that is, is simply wrong. Ethernet is not completely replaceable by WiFi, particularly not on a "Pro" level device working with large data sets. The decision to remove ethernet from the rMBP was much more likely related to pushing adapters and keeping the line of ports pretty.

As an example: I live in a neighborhood with a lot of close neighbors. This is a problem for WiFi. Using 802.11ac will help to fix that, but eventually everyone will upgrade to that and repeat the problem. On the other hand, ethernet can only collide the signal across the wire, and it's almost always going to be faster to boot without a wall causing a signal issue (granted, the wire must go through that wall).

I'm glad they did it. No, they'll never bring it back.

Technology goes forward and if this is no good for you, get the old, thick Macbook Pro and you'll have your old ethernet with no adaptor.

There's no miracle.

Wireless is currently not "forward" since it's almost always slower than a wired option.

...

Everywhere else, I use WiFi like any normal person would.

...

Are you implying that if you are not using WiFi, you are not normal?

If it was not for Apple's (and Intel's) courage to push new hardware and ditch the crappy old, we would still have bulky laptops with CD-ROM, floppy-disks, hard drives, ethernet and firewire ports.

There is nothing crappy or old about Ethernet. It is a mature, evolving technology. It may not be "cool" according to Apple, but most of their profits come from devices that rely solely on wireless technologies for data connectivity, so no surprise there.

  • Like 2

The rMBP is thick enough to have a minimal ethernet port on it, but it would not have been as "pretty" as the line of ports that they currently have. The only reason they don't is because they don't need too; people willing to pay for the rMBP will pay for the ethernet adapter if they need it, and they will use wireless when they do not need it.

Ethernet is very far from a dead technology. It is kind of unfortunate that it has such a large head though.

I own a 15", 2011 MBP, and I love it, but I am thankful that I have all of my precious ports. The problem with using an adapter is that it removes the given port for use for something else. Not to mention, $30 for a USB to Ethernet adapter will slow down a fast ethernet connection (gigabit), and it's a ridiculous price.

Now, with all of that said, I do look forward to expanded use of Thunderbolt on monitors. I am waiting for the next generation of monitor technology to kick in (4K TVs and high DPI tablets/laptops currently skipping the love for desktop monitors) before diving in, but I look forward to using a monitor like the Apple 27" one that has everything connected to it rather than requiring a separate dock for laptops. Though, I have read that there are consistent problems with using Apple's monitor on a PC, so I hope someone else jumps on the Thunderbolt monitor + dock bandwagon.

You clearly don't know the size of the ethernet port vs. the rMBP sides. lol

USB ports hardly fit on the sides of the rMBP, now you can imagine double that size.

Some company has to push new technology and some people are willing to pay for cutting-edge tech. That's how new standards are created.

By pushing old ethernet cables out, they may develop thunderbolt or even USB ethernet.

BTW, ethernet is from 1980... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet

Pretty new, huh? Were you already born in 1980? lol

BTW, ethernet is from 1980... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethernet

Pretty new, huh? Were you already born in 1980? lol

What's your point? TCP/IP is from 1974 yet without it the Internet wouldn't work on anything. I get it though, you think it would be a "cool" thing to scrap TCP/IP because it is from the 70s. If it wasn't created last year then it serves no place...

Luckily for those of us who live in reality you're stuck on a forum spouting nonsense instead of actually mucking up real technological innovation.

Nothing is replaced for the sake of replacing it. Things are replaced when something better actually comes along. Wireless isn't better than Wired. It offers convenience and that convenience is fine due to most people not needing the full power of Gigabit Ethernet. Both technologies will co-exist for a long time, possibly forever. It has nothing to do with what is "older" or not.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The fact that memory in general is so high I have to take a loan out to build a computer now is just beyond stupid. Who's really to blame here? Low supply or high demand?
    • Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 by Razvan Serea Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) is a utility for completely removing AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL graphics drivers and related packages from your system, attempting to eliminate all leftovers (including registry entries, folders and files, driver store). Though AMD/NVIDIA/INTEL drivers can usually be removed via the Windows Control Panel, this uninstaller tool was created for situations where standard uninstall fails, or when you need to fully remove NVIDIA or ATI graphics card drivers. After using this driver cleaner, your system will behave as though it’s the first time you’re installing a new driver—similar to a fresh Windows installation. As with all such tools, we recommend creating a restore point beforehand, allowing you to undo changes if issues arise. If you're having trouble installing an older or newer driver, try it—there are reports that it resolves such problems. Recommended usage: The tool can be used in Normal mode but for absolute stability when using DDU, Safemode is always the best. Make a backup or a system restore (but it should normally be pretty safe). It is best to exclude the DDU folder completely from any security software to avoid issues. You do NOT need to uninstall the driver prior using DDU. Requirements: .NET Framework 4.8 Compatible with Windows 7, 8, 8.1, 10, and 11 (32-bit or 64-bit) Note: Using on Insider Preview builds is at your own risk. Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 changelog: Added 'Reset to recommended' button for the Options. General fixes and improvements. Download: Display Driver Uninstaller (DDU) 18.1.5.5 | 1.7 MB (Freeware) Download: DDU Portable | 1.2 MB Links: Display Driver Uninstaller Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      526
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      146
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      55
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!