Recommended Posts

As much as I'd love to read that wall of text, I'm not going to. I scanned it and your point seems to be "conspiracies can totally happen". I never suggested they can't and/or don't happen. I was trying to decipher a comment made in this thread.

I wanted to know what it is the "beginning of". Stupid teachers/admin overreacting to kids playing with imagery guns is just that: stupid. Not an Obama, left wing, socialist plot take your guns. Or an attempt at re-education. Or anything else of the sort.

Ok, I'll cut my wall of text down to something more readable then:

What is your thought process to come to this conclusion - how are you so sure you are correct ?

Why cant it be something else of that sort, how can it be so easily dismissed without further thought or investigation ?

Is it just a feeling, or are you working with something more tangible - i.e. you have the inside track to the inner workings of educational and government policy ?

That should get around your "I cant prove a negative" response.

No not really I want it to be its own person and understand my mistakes. Its not my child it would be the child I created its not my property to mould If I had one. As for soldiers a lot of reason but more so with the idea that no solider wants war travialised

I hope you don't have any children until you fully understand parenthood. Who calls their child "it", or say the child they created is not theirs? Your child is yours and your property until they are 18.

I hope you don't have any children until you fully understand parenthood. Who calls their child "it", or say the child they created is not theirs? Your child is yours and your property until they are 18.

Children are NOT your property. You're responsible for them, but you do not own them. You clearly don't have any kids, or if you do, you're a dreadful parent to have that kind of attitude.

  • Like 2

she said... Kids don't think about 'Cowboys and Indians' anymore, they think about drive-by shootings and murders and everything they see on television news every day."

Oh my freaking goodness.

This is insane and ignorant. We, as adults choose to allow our children to be coddled while bombarding them with the world's crap. When I grew up, there were world conflicts, cold wars, people killing each other downtown, and other assorted nasty stuff, yet I survived, and STILL played cops and robbers and gasp, soldiers.

I wish for once, adults would stop trying to foist their adult ridden morals and viewpoints on children... for heaven's sake, they are bloody kids and are meant to grow up and have 'fun' while doing it... it's called life. Stop trying to make ridgid rules that lack common sense, and stop breeding a tattle-tale world, where you are encouraged to turn little kids in for pencil pointing.

People... I dislike them.

This is ridiculous. How could you punish a kid for being a kid? A simple "knock it off, please" would have sufficed.

THIS!!

These cookie cutter 'Zero Tolerance' rules, and their screwball interpretations, are straight out of PC Hell and need to stop. Their sole purpose is to relieve school staff from making individualized tough decisions and takeing responsibility for them. They can then just point to the discipline cookbook and say "it's school Zero Tolerance policy." Chickens**ts.

  • Like 3

No not really I want it to be its own person and understand my mistakes. Its not my child it would be the child I created its not my property to mould If I had one. As for soldiers a lot of reason but more so with the idea that no solider wants war travialised

That's just sad but then school is for leaning not socialising but id allow it.

kids are going to be cold jacked up criminals with a parent who treats children as equal to a pet rat.

Today we mourn the passing of a beloved old friend, Common Sense, who has been with us for many years.

No one knows for sure how old he was, since his birth records were long ago

lost in bureaucratic red tape.

He will be remembered as having cultivated such valuable lessons as:

- Knowing when to come in out of the rain;

- Why the early bird gets the worm;

- Life isn't always fair;

- and maybe it was my fault.

Common Sense lived by simple , sound financial policies (don't spend more

than you earn)

and reliable strategies (adults, not children, are in charge).

His health began to deteriorate rapidly when well-intentioned but

overbearing regulations were set in place.

Reports of a 6-year-old boy charged with sexual harassment for kissing a

schoolmate;

teens suspended from school for using mouthwash after lunch; and a teacher

fired for reprimanding an unruly student.

Only worsened his condition.

Common Sense lost ground when parents attacked teachers for doing the job

that they

themselves had failed to do in disciplining their unruly children.

It declined even further when schools were required to get parental consent

to administer sun-lotion

or an aspirin to a student; but could not inform parents when a student

became pregnant and wanted to have an abortion.

Common Sense took a beating when you couldn't defend yourself from a

burglar in your own home and the burglar could sue

you for assault.

Common Sense finally gave up the will to live, after a woman failed to

realize that a steaming cup of coffee was hot. Shejn

spilled a little in her lap, and was promptly awarded a huge settlement.

Common Sense was preceded in Death, by his parents, Truth and Trust, by his

wife, Discretion,

by his daughter, Responsibility, and by his son, reason.

He is survived by his 4 stepbrothers;

I know my rights

I want it now

Someone else is to blame

I'm a Victim

Not many attended his funeral because so few realized he was gone.

If you still remember him, pass this on. If not join the majority and do

nothing.

  • Like 3

Im with the school the kid shouldn't be emulating his dad even if he is a solider.... im sure the dad would agree. If I was a soldier and I never will be, I would not want my kid glorifying it, Plus someone could have got hurt with the pencils.

You've had a very sad and lonely life, haven't you?

I hope you don't have any children until you fully understand parenthood. Who calls their child "it", or say the child they created is not theirs? Your child is yours and your property until they are 18.

No I don't but that fact combined with my reading on radical parenting and the faults of convention makes be unbiased. I call it it since I don't know if my first child would be a she or he. The child would be "mine" legally but not my property to boss around mould and control.

Children are NOT your property. You're responsible for them, but you do not own them. You clearly don't have any kids, or if you do, you're a dreadful parent to have that kind of attitude.

Thank you this!

kids are going to be cold jacked up criminals with a parent who treats children as equal to a pet rat.

Not sure whos if it mine yes of course the children of authority driven parents are treated like rats, hell parents enforce there religion on children.

You've had a very sad and lonely life, haven't you?

Whats this got to do with anything.

Children are NOT your property. You're responsible for them, but you do not own them. You clearly don't have any kids, or if you do, you're a dreadful parent to have that kind of attitude.

You own your child until they are 18 years old unless they graduate at 17 and go to college. If you can tell your child what to do, how to do it, reward them or punish them, that makes them your property. Sure, if you go off the definition term then no they are not your property.

No I don't but that fact combined with my reading on radical parenting and the faults of convention makes be unbiased. I call it it since I don't know if my first child would be a she or he. The child would be "mine" legally but not my property to boss around mould and control.

Or you can use the term child instead of using the term it.

It's obvious you don't understand parenthood still, you mold and control your child until their 18 years old.

Or you can use the term child instead of using the term it.

It's obvious you don't understand parenthood still, you mold and control your child until their 18 years old. Please, show me where in the parenthood handbook that a child is not my property, because if that's the case I will start popping out kids to get more tax refunds.

People do that ya know, they have kids so they can live off the state.

WE MUST HAVE MORE PENCIL CONTROL!!

*No more than 6 pencils per pack!

*More background checks when making any pencil purchase!

*Ban on all pencils larger than 1/2 inch in diameter and longer than 8 inches!

  • Like 1

WE MUST HAVE MORE PENCIL CONTROL!!

*No more than 6 pencils per pack!

*More background checks when making any pencil purchase!

*Ban on all pencils larger than 1/2 inch in diameter and longer than 8 inches!

Better ban those assault pencils lol.

You got to be kidding right? When you were young you never played cowboy and indian, or you acted out one of your favorite cartoon shows like GI Joe or Thundercats?

Boys do this all the time.

And the fact that you come from a country with no gun culture has nothing to do with it.

When they pointed at me and made noises, I stuck up my thumb, aimed my index finger and shot back :)

That would be the more sensible thing to do if you really would have an issue with boys being boys

I was thinking the same thing. Every young boy plays cops and robbers, or cowboys and indians. It isn't a precursor to violent behavior as they get older, LOL. It is little kids playing.

Better ban those assault pencils lol.

You mean mechanical pencils? Yeah. Or ban how much pencil lead they can hold :D

kids are going to be cold jacked up criminals with a parent who treats children as equal to a pet rat.

They are equally jacked up if they are treated as equal to an adult. There has to be some balance. Either extreme makes for a problem child.

  • Like 2

Ok, I'll cut my wall of text down to something more readable then:

What is your thought process to come to this conclusion - how are you so sure you are correct ?

Why cant it be something else of that sort, how can it be so easily dismissed without further thought or investigation ?

Is it just a feeling, or are you working with something more tangible - i.e. you have the inside track to the inner workings of educational and government policy ?

That should get around your "I cant prove a negative" response.

There is nothing to corroborate (Verb: confirm or give support to) that this is anything more than stupidity on the part of the school administration.

I can't believe I am actually arguing that this isn't an example of some oppressive government plot. You think it is? Offer relevant evidence.

Im with the school the kid shouldn't be emulating his dad even if he is a solider.... im sure the dad would agree. If I was a soldier and I never will be, I would not want my kid glorifying it, Plus someone could have got hurt with the pencils.

We used to play "cops and robbers" at recess.

You own your child until they are 18 years old unless they graduate at 17 and go to college. If you can tell your child what to do, how to do it, reward them or punish them, that makes them your property. Sure, if you go off the definition term then no they are not your property.

No you don't, and no amount of your clearly screwed up reasoning makes it so. You're responsible for their upbringing, and you have certain rights in proscribing their behaviour to acceptable standards, but you do no, and never will, own them. They are people, and people are not property.

No you don't, and no amount of your clearly screwed up reasoning makes it so. You're responsible for their upbringing, and you have certain rights in proscribing their behaviour to acceptable standards, but you do no, and never will, own them. They are people, and people are not property.

Alright, guess I'll start having children, and then let CPS take them after I claim them for a year.

Alright, guess I'll start having children, and then let CPS take them after I claim them for a year.

There is a world of difference between owning and being responsible for. You do not own your children, you're responsible for them. And no, with an attitude like that, don't have children. You're the type that should't breed, ever.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!