Recommended Posts

http://i.medicalxpress.com/news/2013-05-cocaine-vaccine-key-hurdle.html

Researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College have successfully tested their novel anti-cocaine vaccine in primates, bringing them closer to launching human clinical trials. Their study, published online by the journal Neuropsychopharmacology, used a radiological technique to demonstrate that the anti-cocaine vaccine prevented the drug from reaching the brain and producing a dopamine-induced high.

"The vaccine eats up the cocaine in the blood like a little Pac-man before it can reach the brain," says the study's lead investigator, Dr. Ronald G. Crystal, chairman of the Department of Genetic Medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College.

"We believe this strategy is a win-win for those individuals, among the estimated 1.4 million cocaine users in the United States, who are committed to breaking their addiction to the drug," he says. "Even if a person who receives the anti-cocaine vaccine falls off the wagon, cocaine will have no effect."

Dr. Crystal says he expects to begin human testing of the anti-cocaine vaccine within a year.

Cocaine, a tiny molecule drug, works to produce feelings of pleasure because it blocks the recycling of dopamine?the so-called "pleasure" neurotransmitter?in two areas of the brain, the putamen in the forebrain and the caudate nucleus in the brain's center. When dopamine accumulates at the nerve endings, "you get this massive flooding of dopamine and that is the feel good part of the cocaine high," says Dr. Crystal.

The novel vaccine Dr. Crystal and his colleagues developed combines bits of the common cold virus with a particle that mimics the structure of cocaine. When the vaccine is injected into an animal, its body "sees" the cold virus and mounts an immune response against both the virus and the cocaine impersonator that is hooked to it. "The immune system learns to see cocaine as an intruder," says Dr. Crystal. "Once immune cells are educated to regard cocaine as the enemy, it produces antibodies, from that moment on, against cocaine the moment the drug enters the body."

>

This seams like a great idea. I wonder how many of the 1.4 million are actually committed enough to use this. Most people "fall of the wagon" because they never wanted to give up in the first place.

The statistics after this will be interesting, how many of the 1.4 million take up a different drug after the cocaine no longer works.

Anyone who is arrested for cocaine use/trafficking should be forced to take this for a year period.

Should this work, herion and meth should also be able to be removed from the body using the same technique to inhibit their high.

And let me go out on a limb here, but if its 'eaten up' by the antibodies, then a user has NO ability to overdose from it, correct?

Anyone who is arrested for cocaine use/trafficking should be forced to take this for a year period.

It concerns me that you think it's appropriate to force such a treatment upon somebody. Forced medical treatment violates human rights and centuries of medical practice. However, such a vaccine could be offered in exchange for reduced criminal sentences and should be offered for free to anybody addicted to cocaine. Portugal has demonstrated that decriminalisation can reduce drug usage and increase the number seeking medical treatment for addiction and that is something that other countries should seriously consider, especially the US with it's incredibly draconian and racially biased drug laws.

Portugal has demonstrated that decriminalisation can reduce drug usage and increase the number seeking medical treatment for addiction and that is something that other countries should seriously consider, especially the US with it's incredibly draconian and racially biased drug laws.

I have never understood how that works. You would think decriminalization and having more access to drugs would bring about more drug usage.

This seams like a great idea. I wonder how many of the 1.4 million are actually committed enough to use this. Most people "fall of the wagon" because they never wanted to give up in the first place.

The statistics after this will be interesting, how many of the 1.4 million take up a different drug after the cocaine no longer works.

Commitment? It's a vaccine. You dose once or a couple times, and it programs the immune system to take out cocaine.

I have never understood how that works. You would think decriminalization and having more access to drugs would bring about more drug usage.

Same thing as alcohol, 'sorry you can`t have this until you`re 21' = most under 21 year olds want it.

I wonder how this would affect people that could need codine based pain killers in the future

In the US cocaine is mainly been used for lacrimal duct and nasal surgery, and it's still available but not often used because of its such a strong vasoconstrictor and the risk of cardiovascular toxicity. Proparacaine, benzocaine, tetracaine, lidocaine, lignocaine, xylocaine etc. etc. are the main substitutes and they work well. IF for some reason vasoconstriction is needed diluted epinephrine can be used with them.

Kick it to the kerb.

As said before its a vaccine not a drug you need to take continually.

I like the idea, and it would be great if it could be replicated to other substances. Some people would benefit from this greatly, some people have definite issues with addictive substances.

As for the legalization argument, if you are going to legalize it, it needs to be controlled. Supply chains need to be controlled by the government until it is under control, but most of the people who are in favor of legalization will not accept government control.

  • Like 1

decriminalization will removes the 'cool' effect & bragging right of using it,

this more rooted to human psychology than reasons, and yes decriminalization of drugs would usually lower its price.

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/20/133086356/Mixed-Results-For-Portugals-Great-Drug-Experiment

When Portugal decriminalized all illegal drugs in 2000, officials hoped to reduce addiction rates and drug-related violence. Today, more users are in rehab, but drug use is on the rise, and reporter Keith O'Brien says the policy has made the problem worse.

When Portugal decriminalized all illegal drugs in 2000, officials hoped to reduce addiction rates and drug-related violence. Today, more users are in rehab, but drug use is on the rise, and reporter Keith O'Brien says the policy has made the problem worse.

Journalist Keith O'Brien describes what happened in a piece titled "Drug Experiment" of The Boston Globe, and he joins us now from member station WWNO in New Orleans. Nice to have you with us today.

Mr. KEITH O'BRIEN (Freelance Writer): Thank you, Neal. Good to be here.

CONAN: And you described Portugal's result as really a Rorschach Test -it depends who's looking.

>

CONAN: So that seems to be a pretty good argument, saying, hey, this has all worked. What's on the other side of the argument?

Mr. O'BRIEN: Well, people on the other side of the argument say that, in fact, there has been an increase, and the data bears that out. In -those reporting drug use, personal drug use over the course of their lifetime has gone up about 40 to 50 percent in the last decade.

The - people reporting the use of cannabis, cocaine, heroin, amphetamines, ecstasy, you name it, it's all gone up. At the same time, there has been an increase in drug-related deaths in Portugal. So there's an argument to be made there.

>

It concerns me that you think it's appropriate to force such a treatment upon somebody. Forced medical treatment violates human rights and centuries of medical practice. However, such a vaccine could be offered in exchange for reduced criminal sentences and should be offered for free to anybody addicted to cocaine. Portugal has demonstrated that decriminalisation can reduce drug usage and increase the number seeking medical treatment for addiction and that is something that other countries should seriously consider, especially the US with it's incredibly draconian and racially biased drug laws.

I work in addictions, Ive seen the screwed up stuff this particular drug can lead to. Drive-bys in broad daylight in outside a childrens hospital for instance... Im not talking about forcing this on the guy who has 1 conviction of possessing an 8-ball in the past 5 years... Im talking about the repeat offenders who demonstrated have no regard for human welfare, blowing their government support cheques at the dealers in addition to doing petty crimes/snatching purses/B&E, and are abusing the healthcare system to avoid jailtime by claiming 'drugs made them do it' and you know its BS.. you can smell their BS a mile away and wish you could track them when they leave as you are certain nothing you done helped and they are going directly to their dealers after their mandatory 7-day rehabilitation.

I guess forced was the wrong word, heavily weighted option may be better. long jail term or 'drugs will never get you high again" Even if that was an option I know people would still take hard time over a shot ever month or 2 + probation...

just get this stuff into their arms and make cocaine useless for them is the only way you'll curb the hold this has on some people. Its death by debt or death by OD..

long jail term

First off, thank you for being a strong individual for working with rehab patients.. That is a tough job and takes a strong person to help them..

I think jail sentences for drugs is horrible.. It cost taxpayers too much money and doesn't really solve the problem.

I work in addictions, Ive seen the screwed up stuff this particular drug can lead to. Drive-bys in broad daylight in outside a childrens hospital for instance... Im not talking about forcing this on the guy who has 1 conviction of possessing an 8-ball in the past 5 years... Im talking about the repeat offenders who demonstrated have no regard for human welfare, blowing their government support cheques at the dealers in addition to doing petty crimes/snatching purses/B&E, and are abusing the healthcare system to avoid jailtime by claiming 'drugs made them do it' and you know its BS.. you can smell their BS a mile away and wish you could track them when they leave as you are certain nothing you done helped and they are going directly to their dealers after their mandatory 7-day rehabilitation.

If people pose a danger to society then they should be in jail; if not they should be free to live their lives. As for drug addicts, many want to be free from addiction but don't have the willpower to do so - those are the sort of people who would jump at the chance to take a vaccine for addiction. The rest simply don't want helping.

I appreciate that what some of these people do is horrific and abhorrent but I am still a firm believer in the freedom of individuals to choose their own destiny - that means honouring Do Not Resuscitate orders; letting Jehovah's Witnesses die if they choose to refuse surgery or blood transplants; letting people starve themselves to death in protest (Suffragettes, Guantanamo Bay prisoners, etc); and not forcing vaccines likes this on people who do not want them. As I said, it is far better to weight the system to make people choose to do so of their own accord - however, sentencing must still be rational. For instance, it's not appropriate to threaten the death penalty or life in prison if they refuse the vaccine.

PS - Here's an article on Portugal's decriminalisation of drugs. It's by no means a perfect solution but the reality is the war on drugs isn't working and that money would be better spent benefiting society.

  • Like 2

First off, thank you for being a strong individual for working with rehab patients.. That is a tough job and takes a strong person to help them..

I think jail sentences for drugs is horrible.. It cost taxpayers too much money and doesn't really solve the problem.

It don't, especially when the system is setup to provide help to everyone regardless of what happened (appointed attorneys, transport, food, clothes, etc). It hammers down on alcoholics that they need a $2200 interlock system installed, yet a drug user who beats a old woman into a coma for $50 is considered sick/ill from the drugs rather than a criminal, and can continue to use that same excuse to exploit the system setup to help those who really want it. It disgusts me to see the same faces over and over. in for the same thing over and over. just to repeat over and over and waste the resources. Beds are full and you find out someone who has never been in before OD'd because they couldn't get in, due to this court ordered dick whos only there to shave time off his sentence.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!