Congress asks Google CEO if Glass infringes 'on user privacy


Recommended Posts

For all that's been said about the tremendous innovations of Google Glass, privacy concerns have only grown louder since the project's introduction last year. As Google's Explorer Edition continues its staggered rollout, Congress is finally seeking answers. The Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus today wrote a letter to CEO Larry Page asking the CEO to clear up once and for all "whether this new technology could infringe on the privacy of the average American."

"Because Google Glass has not yet been released and we are uncertain of Google's plans to incorporate privacy protections into the device," the letter reads, "there are still a number of unanswered questions that we share." The first question revolves around a sore spot in Google's history: the unauthorized collection of personal data from Wi-Fi networks by the company's Street View cars ? which led to an $7 million settlement with US states and fines overseas. The caucus asks Page "how Google plans to prevent Google Glass from unintentionally collecting data about the user" without permission. Non-Glass wearers (i.e. those in the camera's path) are also addressed; Rep. Joe Barton and his colleagues request information on any "proactive" steps Google is taking to guard their right to privacy.

Potential facial recognition capabilities are also a concern; the congressmen want to know if Glass is (or will be) capable of recognizing individuals and whether the public will have a way of opting out of such analysis. Further, the caucus asks Google to detail the types of user information it's pulling in from Glass, along with any changes to Google's privacy policy that have been considered as Glass evolves into a consumer-facing product. Information pertaining to data protection and developer guidelines are also requested. Page has been asked to provide his response to the inquiry no later than June 14th.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/16/4338104/congress-asks-larry-page-if-google-glass-infringes-on-privacy

Really dont see the problem here. Glass gets is connectivity from the phone and cell phones are everywhere. Really no different from a cell phone and its obvious you are wearing a camera on your head.

And please keep the topic clean. TY.

http://www.theverge....nges-on-privacy

Really dont see the problem here. Glass gets is connectivity from the phone and cell phones are everywhere. Really no different from a cell phone and its obvious you are wearing a camera on your head.

And please keep the topic clean. TY.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

You mean rooting...and the same thing can and does happen to phones and cameras. People get caught taking up skirt shots and shots of women in private areas. Nothing new.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

You have that already with camera phones...and I'm pretty sure those are much easier to use (for the purpose you posted) than Google Glasses.

As to Congresses question: no, this does not infringe on privacy.

You have that already with camera phones...and I'm pretty sure those are much easier to use (for the purpose you posted) than Google Glasses.

As to Congresses question: no, this does not infringe on privacy.

umm wearing glasses you point and shoot! phone you need to make sure you don't look like your taking a photo!

What's to stop people buying things like this?

http://www.amazon.co...&pf_rd_i=468294

People are making a huge deal out of nothing.

umm wearing glasses you point and shoot! phone you need to make sure you don't look like your taking a photo!

http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/category/safety+and+security/spy+glasses.do

http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/810113446/2013_China_shenzhen_wireless_camera_hidden.html

And how do you propose you are going to get an upskirt shot with Google Glasses, as opposed to a camera phone...?

Im not talking about Upskirts! im talking about photo shots in general. Say people wear the glasses at the beach, lots of pretty girls laying around in there outfits! oh what about the local waterpark.

http://betabeat.com/2012/10/creepshots-reemerges-under-the-guise-of-a-fashion-police-subreddit/

Im not talking about Upskirts! im talking about photo shots in general. Say people wear the glasses at the beach, lots of pretty girls laying around in there outfits! oh what about the local waterpark.

http://betabeat.com/...lice-subreddit/

Cameras in glasses are nothing new. They have been around for a long time. And most other ones, the camera is tiny and hidden. It is quite obvious you re wearing Google Glasses.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

If you're wearing Google Glass on your face, your head will have to be turned so that you're staring at the woman's cleavage, or at the man's ****. There's nothing stealthy about it.

You can buy cheaper spy equipment that would be way more effective and less easily noticed.

I do not see Google Glass being any different than any one having a cell phone just quicker to get to taking a picture rather than having to pull your device out.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

I can buy many things now that can do that...nothing new

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

It's going to be a bit obvious people are doing that when they start sticking their heads up ladies skirts...

Also, for the consumer version, just put an external LED on it that lights up when recording.

I agree. If you are out in public you lose your privacy.

That argument is not valid, there is no such thing as "public" in the sense that people here keep describing it. All land can essentially be considered private, it just has a different owner. What you consider "public land" is actually "government land", and if congress (government) wants people on government land (public) to have privacy, then we should be happy with that. I sure am.

Disclosure: I am undecided on Google Glass, but I think it these are important discussions to have.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!