Congress asks Google CEO if Glass infringes 'on user privacy


Recommended Posts

For all that's been said about the tremendous innovations of Google Glass, privacy concerns have only grown louder since the project's introduction last year. As Google's Explorer Edition continues its staggered rollout, Congress is finally seeking answers. The Congressional Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus today wrote a letter to CEO Larry Page asking the CEO to clear up once and for all "whether this new technology could infringe on the privacy of the average American."

"Because Google Glass has not yet been released and we are uncertain of Google's plans to incorporate privacy protections into the device," the letter reads, "there are still a number of unanswered questions that we share." The first question revolves around a sore spot in Google's history: the unauthorized collection of personal data from Wi-Fi networks by the company's Street View cars ? which led to an $7 million settlement with US states and fines overseas. The caucus asks Page "how Google plans to prevent Google Glass from unintentionally collecting data about the user" without permission. Non-Glass wearers (i.e. those in the camera's path) are also addressed; Rep. Joe Barton and his colleagues request information on any "proactive" steps Google is taking to guard their right to privacy.

Potential facial recognition capabilities are also a concern; the congressmen want to know if Glass is (or will be) capable of recognizing individuals and whether the public will have a way of opting out of such analysis. Further, the caucus asks Google to detail the types of user information it's pulling in from Glass, along with any changes to Google's privacy policy that have been considered as Glass evolves into a consumer-facing product. Information pertaining to data protection and developer guidelines are also requested. Page has been asked to provide his response to the inquiry no later than June 14th.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/16/4338104/congress-asks-larry-page-if-google-glass-infringes-on-privacy

Really dont see the problem here. Glass gets is connectivity from the phone and cell phones are everywhere. Really no different from a cell phone and its obvious you are wearing a camera on your head.

And please keep the topic clean. TY.

http://www.theverge....nges-on-privacy

Really dont see the problem here. Glass gets is connectivity from the phone and cell phones are everywhere. Really no different from a cell phone and its obvious you are wearing a camera on your head.

And please keep the topic clean. TY.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

You mean rooting...and the same thing can and does happen to phones and cameras. People get caught taking up skirt shots and shots of women in private areas. Nothing new.

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

You have that already with camera phones...and I'm pretty sure those are much easier to use (for the purpose you posted) than Google Glasses.

As to Congresses question: no, this does not infringe on privacy.

You have that already with camera phones...and I'm pretty sure those are much easier to use (for the purpose you posted) than Google Glasses.

As to Congresses question: no, this does not infringe on privacy.

umm wearing glasses you point and shoot! phone you need to make sure you don't look like your taking a photo!

What's to stop people buying things like this?

http://www.amazon.co...&pf_rd_i=468294

People are making a huge deal out of nothing.

umm wearing glasses you point and shoot! phone you need to make sure you don't look like your taking a photo!

http://www.brickhousesecurity.com/category/safety+and+security/spy+glasses.do

http://www.alibaba.com/product-gs/810113446/2013_China_shenzhen_wireless_camera_hidden.html

And how do you propose you are going to get an upskirt shot with Google Glasses, as opposed to a camera phone...?

Im not talking about Upskirts! im talking about photo shots in general. Say people wear the glasses at the beach, lots of pretty girls laying around in there outfits! oh what about the local waterpark.

http://betabeat.com/2012/10/creepshots-reemerges-under-the-guise-of-a-fashion-police-subreddit/

Im not talking about Upskirts! im talking about photo shots in general. Say people wear the glasses at the beach, lots of pretty girls laying around in there outfits! oh what about the local waterpark.

http://betabeat.com/...lice-subreddit/

Cameras in glasses are nothing new. They have been around for a long time. And most other ones, the camera is tiny and hidden. It is quite obvious you re wearing Google Glasses.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

If you're wearing Google Glass on your face, your head will have to be turned so that you're staring at the woman's cleavage, or at the man's ****. There's nothing stealthy about it.

You can buy cheaper spy equipment that would be way more effective and less easily noticed.

I do not see Google Glass being any different than any one having a cell phone just quicker to get to taking a picture rather than having to pull your device out.

Probably. You have some creep in a store or restaurant with Google Glass pointing it at women's cleavages then uploading photos to the web.

Or. Men's bathrooms. Creeps walking in wearing Google Glass video recording of guys taking a leak right next to them - which they do now too but have to hide the phones etc.

I can buy many things now that can do that...nothing new

Google glasses get jailbroken, custom app install, now you have some nut job taking photos of women and uploading them onto r\creepshot. While i think they are amazing and great, im a bit 50/50 on them.

It's going to be a bit obvious people are doing that when they start sticking their heads up ladies skirts...

Also, for the consumer version, just put an external LED on it that lights up when recording.

I agree. If you are out in public you lose your privacy.

That argument is not valid, there is no such thing as "public" in the sense that people here keep describing it. All land can essentially be considered private, it just has a different owner. What you consider "public land" is actually "government land", and if congress (government) wants people on government land (public) to have privacy, then we should be happy with that. I sure am.

Disclosure: I am undecided on Google Glass, but I think it these are important discussions to have.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
    • Microsoft details new Edge for Business security features, including AI-powered scareware detection So Edge is adding a "scarecrow." Will it be animated?
    • I have this one and it's great, also paired with a Mac. I like the white back aesthetics of it and ability to have all your wireless usb peripherals under a clean lid. 4K @ 120 Hz and 65W usb-c charging is not bad even at its typical price point. The U series is probably better for commercial photo work though; IIRC one reason this one is priced in a different bracket is because it's not calibrated and verified for optimal color accuracy. Not something I think of in daily use, coding, and light gaming though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Snow Day Calculator Alert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      250
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!