• 0

USB Pen drive partitioner


Question

Hey guys, I've spent hours searching for a program that will let me split a usb pen into two drives, so two seperate drive letters, for the purpose of creating 1 usb pen with multiple applications, so I can have one partition with W8 on it and another with WXP and another I can have portable apps or Hirens boot cd (so I don't have to carry around a million USB pens with me.

is there any such app? I've tried... mini tool partition wizard 7, usbdlm, bootice, u3-tool and a few others to no avail.

anybody got any suggestions?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1153500-usb-pen-drive-partitioner/
Share on other sites

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

While I have not verified this with Windows 8, previous versions of Windows were only capable of mounting the first partition on a flash drive (at least automatically). I exploited this caveat on a multiboot flash drive image I developed at work: the first partition (the only partition Windows would mount) contained utilities for use within Windows while the second contained bootable disc images and GRUB. Even if a machine tried to infect the executables on the first partition, the information on the second was always safe. For the record, I did not create the image in Windows. I recommend that you download GParted Live or an Ubuntu image to partition and populate your flash drive.

  • 0

I figured this and only went with xp/windows 8 on the pen, however doe Yumi not construct a boot screen with options?

If you are interested in having bootable Windows Vista, 7, and 8 installation images on your flash drive simultaneously, you should read this thread. The procedure is a little involved, but it works very well.

  • 0

YUMI works well. The only caveat I found is that you can only put one Vista/7/8 iso on a drive. However putting XP and 8 should be fine.

This is why I created a Windows 7 AIO image to overcome this. Seems pretty easy to make too, only need both of x86 & x64 of any edition you have. After that I added it to my YUMI key

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      561
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      78
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!