Recommended Posts

Foolish

Oh yes because a child can't have it's own views on anything.

A 9 year old with these views? No. Or at least she can't be taken seriously, I won't. It's none of her business what I eat and when I eat it. If I wanted to eat more healthy I would but I don't want to, that's it.

I might be drunk right now, but as a kid I never really thought about food being bad or good for me... see the thing is as a kid I had no say in what I ate, it was put in front of me and I ate it or I was told to eat it.... I think what i'm trying to articulate is 21st century parents need to grow some balls

A 9 year old with these views? No. Or at least she can't be taken seriously, I won't. It's none of her business what I eat and when I eat it. If I wanted to eat more healthy I would but I don't want to, that's it.

Very ageist. Are all Americans so selfish?

actually people have every right to be stupid... and to manage their own health how they see fit.

See above.

So very true! :)

I might be drunk right now, but as a kid I never really thought about food being bad or good for me... see the thing is as a kid I had no say in what I ate, it was put in front of me and I ate it or I was told to eat it.... I think what i'm trying to articulate is 21st century parents need to grow some balls

Likewise as a kid I ate what's in front of me, parents in this century get nagged or our too lazy to cook your child being overweight for a non medical reason should not be within the freedom of a parent.

Very ageist. Are all Americans so selfish?

See above.

Likewise as a kid I ate what's in front of me, parents in this century get nagged or our too lazy to cook your child being overweight for a non medical reason should not be within the freedom of a parent.

I'm not sure if you're trolling or just playing stupid. I'm not even American, what are you on about? And yes I am ageist, 9 year olds have no business talking about stuff like this, they are kids and should stay like that. Have a problem with that? Go complain to someone who cares.

I hate when people attack a business like this,if you don't want your child to eat it then don't let them,Mcdonalds is not forcing you to buy their product.

Why what are businesses doing for you? They exist to make profit not to make your life better its a minor side effect/consideration. Ever heard of advertising and social pressure?

of course children don't have the right to be taken seriously. They lack experience, they lack knowlege, and their brains aren't even at their full size or potential. I'm nearly 30 years old now and i look back when i was even 18, twice this kids age a legal adult, and i'm embarrassed by how woefully ignorant of the way the real world works back then. A nine year old has exactly ZERO credibility.

of course children don't have the right to be taken seriously. They lack experience, they lack knowlege, and their brains aren't even at their full size or potential. I'm nearly 30 years old now and i look back when i was even 18, twice this kids age a legal adult, and i'm embarrassed by how woefully ignorant of the way the real world works back then. A nine year old has exactly ZERO credibility.

History will judge you. You lack experience and knowledge and your brain isn't at its full potential in comparison to a 60 year old. The way the real world works I'm 21 and I see how it works now why would my opinion change. Dear god you middle aged people are werid you sack off a major part of the human race as supid.

History will judge you. You lack experience and knowledge and your brain isn't at its full potential in comparison to a 60 year old. The way the real world works I'm 21 and I see how it works now why would my opinion change. Dear god you middle aged people are werid you sack off a major part of the human race as supid.

I'm not even 30 and you're calling me middle aged? You've got alot of the same arrogance i had at that age. You're so sure that you know everything. I've come to the conclusion that even with as much as i know now that there are many aspects of life that i'm completely ignorant on. We should ignore our children's opinions because they are informed by extremely limited experience and thoughts and opinions of adults who may or may-not have an agenda. These kids don't think for themselves. They think as they are told to think. There's no critical thinking that goes into it. Critical thinking is what is going on in this thread where we're able to pick apart this kid's opinion piece by piece and crticize it for being as laughable as it is. This is almost certainly not this kids own opinion. You couldn't sit this kid down next to a lean chicken breast and some chicken mcnuggets and have him explain which is healthier and why.

The very premise of this kid's comlaint accuses children of being stupid.

"Something that I don't think is fair is when big companies try to trick kids into eating food that isn't good for them by using toys and cartoon characters,"

suggests that kid's are so stupid that they can be convinced to trade their health for cheap plastic toys and cartoons.. which i totally agree with. Kids can be convinced of a lot of stupid things. That's why they have things called "parents" who are supposed to know better on the behalf of their children. If the parents are "being tricked" by toys and cartoons than society is ****ed beyond fixing.

Be it the childs view or the parents it doesnt make it any less valid a point and as for dont eat the product, much like any multinational they spend litteraly millions every year coaxing people to buy their product over others.Again much like any multinational food provider they will introduce a "green" or a "low calorie" or a "healthy" alternative but only because of peer pressure not through direct choice and again it provides a good company image for when the press or a ten year old girl, has you backed in the corner during live meetings.

Be it the childs view or the parents it doesnt make it any less valid a point and as for dont eat the product, much like any multinational they spend litteraly millions every year coaxing people to buy their product over others.Again much like any multinational food provider they will introduce a "green" or a "low calorie" or a "healthy" alternative but only because of peer pressure not through direct choice and again it provides a good company image for when the press or a ten year old girl, has you backed in the corner during live meetings.

yeah, how dare companies advertise their products and services. it's almost as if they want to stay in business. Shame on them.

I'm not even 30 and you're calling me middle aged? You've got alot of the same arrogance i had at that age. You're so sure that you know everything. I've come to the conclusion that even with as much as i know now that there are many aspects of life that i'm completely ignorant on. We should ignore our children's opinions because they are informed by extremely limited experience and thoughts and opinions of adults who may or may-not have an agenda. These kids don't think for themselves. They think as they are told to think. There's no critical thinking that goes into it. Critical thinking is what is going on in this thread where we're able to pick apart this kid's opinion piece by piece and crticize it for being as laughable as it is. This is almost certainly not this kids own opinion. You couldn't sit this kid down next to a lean chicken breast and some chicken mcnuggets and have him explain which is healthier and why.

The very premise of this kid's comlaint accuses children of being stupid.

suggests that kid's are so stupid that they can be convinced to trade their health for cheap plastic toys and cartoons.. which i totally agree with. Kids can be convinced of a lot of stupid things. That's why they have things called "parents" who are supposed to know better on the behalf of their children. If the parents are "being tricked" by toys and cartoons than society is ****ed beyond fixing.

Middle aged by my point of view but ill grant it was an underhand comment I withdraw it. Arrogance if so thank you. I speak my mind, know my mind, feel my mind, and speak my mind. Experience isn't everything, kids actually have brains and are capable of critical thinking. Ill take you up on that bet one day how much you gonna bet that I can't teach a child the different between a happy meal and real food? Typical "experienceism" being older doesn't have to make you wiser. I genuinely hope one day children have the vote. As for the premise well yes in a way it does, but the question you with your advanced comparative age should ask is why are Mc Donalds trying to trick kids in the first place. As for parents I hold them guilty as charged for being weak. Parents are being indirectly tricked. I hereby call for radical action BAN ALL CHILLDREN FROM FAST FOOD. Since parents can be too weak.

And re the conversation that went on while I was writing this YES SHAME ON THEM. Why how would you know what to eat or where to get it without advertising? Sarcasm btw.

I'm 29 and quite healthy. I eat McDonald's a few times a month because sometimes I just want to grab something quick and it tastes good. Anyone that suggests that we shut down McDonald's because if you eat nothing but McDonald's you'll get fat (a silly notion - I could easily eat nothing but McDonald's and lose weight at the same time) can get lost.

The only ones to blame for kids getting fat off McDonald's are the parents, plain and simple.

Middle aged by my point of view but ill grant it was an underhand comment I withdraw it. Arrogance if so thank you. I speak my mind, know my mind, feel my mind, and speak my mind. Experience isn't everything, kids actually have brains and are capable of critical thinking. Ill take you up on that bet one day how much you gonna bet that I can't teach a child the different between a happy meal and real food? Typical "experienceism" being older doesn't have to make you wiser. I genuinely hope one day children have the vote. As for the premise well yes in a way it does, but the question you with your advanced comparative age should ask is why are Mc Donalds trying to trick kids in the first place. As for parents I hold them guilty as charged for being weak. Parents are being indirectly tricked. I hereby call for radical action BAN ALL CHILLDREN FROM FAST FOOD. Since parents can be too weak.

And re the conversation that went on while I was writing this YES SHAME ON THEM. Why how would you know what to eat or where to get it without advertising? Sarcasm btw.

by banning all children from fast food you're saying that children ARE too dumb to make their own choices(which should invalidate your opinon that kids should get the vote) AND that parents are incapable of making correct choices for their children.

Which leads me to video games. They are filled with violence and sex. If you're to ban children from fast food and not allow parents to exercize their natural power of choice over their own children then is Jack Thompson correct on video games? Tell me, is there any government regulation that you didn't like? Is there any power of the individual that you don't hope to crush. Has their been any collectivist notion you haven't agreed with?

yeah, how dare companies advertise their products and services. it's almost as if they want to stay in business. Shame on them.

Ive nothing against companys turning a profit but I expect them to advertise with a tad of morals and not hide behind the issue that the vast majority of their menu is intentionally laced with fat and sugars to make it more palatable.

by banning all children from fast food you're saying that children ARE too dumb to make their own choices(which should invalidate your opinon that kids should get the vote) AND that parents are incapable of making correct choices for their children.

Which leads me to video games. They are filled with violence and sex. If you're to ban children from fast food and not allow parents to exercize their natural power of choice over their own children then is Jack Thompson correct on video games? Tell me, is there any government regulation that you didn't like? Is there any power of the individual that you don't hope to crush. Has their been any collectivist notion you haven't agreed with?

Let me be clear lady, ideally Id have children make the food decisions but Mc Doanlds MUST answer for its profit making targeted to children. It is odd one should say that since I am a Communitarian. Deal with the fact that people need regulation in their lives.

Communitarian prevails end profit making for selfish people and end the tyranny of advertising! Communitarianism prevails "Raises Fist to the sky"

Ive nothing against companys turning a profit but I expect them to advertise with a tad of morals and not hide behind the issue that the vast majority of their menu is intentionally laced with fat and sugars to make it more palatable.

Why make profit when you can make communities but im with you brother

You know I have just decided I withdraw ill my previous comments on this thread re fast food out of a crisis of conviction i.e. I just realised people live longer today eating Mc Donalds than people did in times without it. Communitarianism Prevails!

Let me be clear lady, ideally Id have children make the food decisions but Mc Doanlds MUST answer for its profit making targeted to children. It is odd one should say that since I am a Communitarian. Deal with the fact that people need regulation in their lives.

Communitarian prevails end profit making for selfish people and end the tyranny of advertising! Communitarianism prevails "Raises Fist to the sky"

Why make profit when you can make communities but im with you brother

What is considered "community" is usually highly localized to neighborhoods or to specific subsections of a society. What you're asking for is an authoritarian government to make all decisions on behalf of the individual. It doesn't take a village to raise a child. It takes two good and dedicated parents.

What is considered "community" is usually highly localized to neighborhoods or to specific subsections of a society. What you're asking for is an authoritarian government to make all decisions on behalf of the individual. It doesn't take a village to raise a child. It takes two good and dedicated parents.

Please see above. I see you know it was tired in Israel then? Where I live good lady I see failing parents every day. I rather a village raised some of them. Parents aren't always best Communitarianism Prevails!

Oh hell now i'm a laughing stock.... just realised you a GUY.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!