Xbox One beating PS4 in Amazon pre-orders ahead of E3


Recommended Posts

Have you read the article? The numbers are from Amazon UK.

And yes, you can pre-order PS4 from Amazon UK: http://www.amazon.co.../dp/B00BE4HOIM/

No, I did not click on the article, and I only skimmed through the quote. However I did go by the thread title, and that says Amazon, not Amazon UK.

Consoles have had DRM for the last 15 years,

I'm not talking about region locking or "copies don't work" drm. I'm talking Steam-style locked to an account and "I'm sorry, Dave. I can't let you do that." DRM. I have always been able to freely trade, lend, buy and sell games for consoles. My point still stands.

don't worry,its going to be funny when the DRM news on ps4 finally hits them. its a unified experience on xbox one,where Microsoft made a system to sync licenses once a day,whereas on the ps4,its going to be one huge cluster**** free for all,with publishers having you register and managing all your games and licenses yourself with each of them. fun times ahead.

How will that be funny? Yes yes, let's all laugh as the consumer gets screwed over. That's totally fun.

What a joke.

Am I seeing this right... the games seem to be $99 each.

Likely an error because if that's true, I won't be buying any gaming console. :ermm:

Wait and see when the Wii U beats the PS4 and the Xbox One in sales. As much as that seems funny, weird things do happen. :p

How will that be funny? Yes yes, let's all laugh as the consumer gets screwed over. That's totally fun.

What a joke.

what will be funny is not the actual DRM, but seeing the reaction of delusional sony fans who think there will only be game DRM on xbox and everything on ps4 will be sunshine and roses,with game developers begging them to play their games with no restrictions,and sony pricing their console so low and losing a ton of money, just to put smiles on peoples faces............... barf

Xbox One games are ?49.99 for all games on Zavvi except fifa (which is ?54.99). Amazon is charging ?54.99 for ALL games. I would save ?50 is a decent price for launch games BUT you probably can't sell them without travelling to a game retailer and can only get a price that they or microsoft decide which will be really low.

When you sell a ?40 game currently to retailers they may give you ?20 and then sell it for ?35, but if you sell your game on ebay you may get ?32. We games are going to lose out on a lot of money as a result of Microsoft doing this. Lets hope sony is keeping the traditional model.

perhaps Amazon is waiting for Sony to give a firm price?

You mean Amazon US, right? :laugh:

Yeah, i think they are taking the responsible approach. Right on the Amazon UK page it says...

Important Information:

achtung._V383186732_.jpg

Please note that Sony has yet to announce cost prices for PlayStation 4 products. The price stated above is therefore liable to change prior to the release date. With our Pre-order Price Guarantee, you can order now and if the Amazon.co.uk price decreases between the time you place your order and the release date, you'll be charged the lowest price. For more on PlayStation 4, click here.

? See more product promotions

So I think the people who run the US site are either waiting for the official announcement or waiting to know they will have stock.

And people are not preordering an item that does not have an official release date or an official price yet. Big shocker. And the article states that the XBox One is being preordered by 2.6% more.

It is a sensationalist article title making something out of nothing trying to get traffic to their website and supplying fanboys fuel for their fire to fight again.

Apparently it has worked.

Nevermind the fact I was curious how one could find this information out, so I started looking at the product pages for each item that the Amazon website itself tells a COMPLETELY different story.

Screenshot #1 of PS4 Place In Video Game Sales

PS4_1.PNG

Taken from here...

And screenshot #2 Of XBox Ones Place in Video Game Sales

XBoxONE_AMAZON.PNG

Taken from here...

So yeah, the Amazon website itself tells a very different story than this article does it not???

in fact, the PS4 is currently in 8th place and the 360 in 14th.

PS4_360_Amazon.PNG

5 minutes of investigative journalism proved this story wrong I think no? Link for above screenshot.

Considering you currently can't preorder the PS4 from Amazon, yeah... The numbers will be higher. :s

OMG, it's been stated multiple times already that isn't Amazon UK, where you have been able to pre-order both consoles.

No, but maybe they should read the OP or the article in it before they reply ?

btw, this is he first line of the quote in the OP

The fanboy rivalry is still strong with the new generation of console gaming, as Amazon UK reports almost neck-and-neck pre-orders for the Xbox One and PS4.

investigative journalism? :rolleyes: the best seller list doesn't tell you total sales. its the work of some algorithms that do take total sales into account but that isn't all. and by the way, these are not updated in real time anyways. my advice? journalism isn't for you

Oh really? What other numbers does it take into account?

And it still shows the PS4 ahead. Does it not??

And their site CLEARLY states sales.

Amazon Best Sellers

Our most popular products based on sales. Updated hourly.

And maybe not real time. But once an hour.

Nevermind the fact I put I did 5 minutes of investigative journalism to in fact point out yes, I barely spent any time at all. It was said lightly, hence the 5 minutes.

My advice to you. Stop being a butthurt fanboy.

EDIT - Also, look at that. The XBox One is now in spot #11. But oh yeah, it does not update in "real time," only once an hour.

Seriously, grow up.

I believe that list is based on recent sales not total sales though. When they release official numbers like this, those are the correct ones more so than the auto generated ones.

Really? They seem to track the Last 100 Days????

And who exactly released official numbers? I see them nowhere in the source article???

And I just showed, the One jumped 3 spots since I posted. How much more accurate do you guys need???

AGAIN, this is exactly what I said in the other thread. You guys just straight out deny the facts and make up excuses. Who even cares which one is selling more???

For me it is the premise that people stand behind fictitious numbers. Numbers Amazon themselves seem to contradict.

Why would they even bother changing the numbers and listing last 100 days if they are not accurate???

All the article says as far as a source is...

as Amazon UK reports almost neck-and-neck pre-orders for the Xbox One and PS4.

Things continue to get interesting though: Amazon says pre-orders for the Xbox One are already 20 per cent higher than they were before the launch of the Xbox 360 in 2005.

So I am the wrong and crazy one for taking the numbers Amazon displays, the ones that have actually changed since this article started, over an article that just says "Amazon says?"

Really? They seem to track the Last 100 Days????

And who exactly released official numbers? I see them nowhere in the source article???

And I just showed, the One jumped 3 spots since I posted. How much more accurate do you guys need???

AGAIN, this is exactly what I said in the other thread. You guys just straight out deny the facts and make up excuses. Who even cares which one is selling more???

For me it is the premise that people stand behind fictitious numbers. Numbers Amazon themselves seem to contradict.

Why would they even bother changing the numbers and listing last 100 days if they are not accurate???

All the article says as far as a source is...

So I am the wrong and crazy one for taking the numbers Amazon displays, the ones that have actually changed since this article started, over an article that just says "Amazon says?"

As I understood it the pre-order difference was released directly from Amazon UK

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!