Microsoft E3 - Xbox: A new Generation of Games Revealed


  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you be watching/reading live?

  2. 2. What is your general impression pre-conference?

    • Waiting for E3
    • Like what I've seen/heard so far
    • Don't like what I've seen/heard
  3. 3. What is your general impression post-conference?

    • Buying on day 1
    • Like it but won't buy on day 1
    • Don't like it but may buy eventually
    • Hate it


Recommended Posts

If the people complaining about DRM were honest then they wouldn't use lots of things sold today. Smartphones? DRM Lock-in. Media services? Not like you can sell the content you get from those digital stores can you? The PC? Unless you want to pirate everything then there's nothing but DRM on it. This whole consumer rights thing is overblown on the X1, can I sell my games to a retailer? Yes. Can I buy a used game from a retailer? Yes. Considering we're talking about digital copies, installed to your hdd with the disc just being a install path, I'd say that's a step up from before. Share with people I know? Yes. Access my games on any X1? Yes.

So there's a internet check, sure I don't agree with that bit fully, I think it needs rethinking. Game rentals are the last bit we don't know about yet, but we do know that they're working on it so it's going to happen as well.

Xbox One is for people who like the Xbox exclusives. Playstation 4 is for people who like the Playstation exclusives.

If you like both games on both consoles, get both.

Dunno why people are arguing. Its personal choice, always has been.

If the people complaining about DRM were honest then they wouldn't use lots of things sold today. Smartphones? DRM Lock-in. Media services? Not like you can sell the content you get from those digital stores can you? The PC? Unless you want to pirate everything then there's nothing but DRM on it. This whole consumer rights thing is overblown on the X1, can I sell my games to a retailer? Yes. Can I buy a used game from a retailer? Yes. Considering we're talking about digital copies, installed to your hdd with the disc just being a install path, I'd say that's a step up from before. Share with people I know? Yes. Access my games on any X1? Yes.

So there's a internet check, sure I don't agree with that bit fully, I think it needs rethinking. Game rentals are the last bit we don't know about yet, but we do know that they're working on it so it's going to happen as well.

PS4 proves you don't need that kind of DRM.

I rip my own Blu-Rays to store on my NAS and keep the originals in a safe place, smartphone apps are a quid/dollar or less.

Xbox One is for people who like the Xbox exclusives. Playstation 4 is for people who like the Playstation exclusives.

If you like both games on both consoles, get both.

Dunno why people are arguing. Its personal choice, always has been.

Because it's human nature I guess, fans of one have to argue with fans of another and so on.

When did people forget that Sony lost millions of millions of passwords and CC details? Seriously when did that happen? When did people loose their stable internet connections in their homes? Why do people want to buy all these new shiny games on console and then lend them out to their freaking friends which will also have the same games?

**** me, the internet.

What you will find my friend is that people have very very short memories- particularly fanboys on the internet. Yes may I remind all reading that Sony's servers were hacked and pretty much out of action for a month. During that period, who knows how many bank account, email and email derived services were hacked.

Yes, yes, its always one side vs the other. Ignoring the fact that I owned an Xbox from launch till 2011. I was prepared to get both but not with the DRM.

What you will find my friend is that people have very very short memories- particularly fanboys on the internet. Yes may I remind all reading that Sony's servers were hacked and pretty much out of action for a month. During that period, who knows how many bank account, email and email derived services were hacked.

They were hacked and made up for it with their pro-consumer stance and now pro-developer stance. Just because someone has messed up doesn't mean you sh*tcan them for eternity, that's just petty.

PS4 proves you don't need that kind of DRM.

I rip my own Blu-Rays to store on my NAS and keep the originals in a safe place, smartphone apps are a quid/dollar or less.

And the PS4 is still tied to a disc like the PS3 it seems. When you buy them digitally, and they're not tied to a disc anymore then what? Isn't it back to the same old DRM? You're stuck with them, can you sell those digital copies now?

And sure, you rip your movies, that's fine, but do you rip and then get rid of your disc copy? Sure you can but then you can't have that backup on your NAS.

Ok, smartphone apps and games are cheap, that's just a excuse to me. You're justifying the DRM getting put on you because the price is less, even though you don't own those either. All the smartphone platforms can come in and remote wipe an app or game you paid for if they wanted to. Or a app or game gets pulled from the store and then you can never redownload it again even if you paid for it. All you're really doing is accepting the lock-in because it's cheap, it's still DRM to a extreme level.

If the people complaining about DRM were honest then they wouldn't use lots of things sold today. Smartphones? DRM Lock-in. Media services? Not like you can sell the content you get from those digital stores can you? The PC? Unless you want to pirate everything then there's nothing but DRM on it. This whole consumer rights thing is overblown on the X1, can I sell my games to a retailer? Yes. Can I buy a used game from a retailer? Yes. Considering we're talking about digital copies, installed to your hdd with the disc just being a install path, I'd say that's a step up from before. Share with people I know? Yes. Access my games on any X1? Yes.

So there's a internet check, sure I don't agree with that bit fully, I think it needs rethinking. Game rentals are the last bit we don't know about yet, but we do know that they're working on it so it's going to happen as well.

Ooops I guess you missed the little snippet that Microsoft released quietly:

Some games not transferable and have no resale value; restrictions on games usage apply.

Ooops I guess you missed the little snippet that Microsoft released quietly:

Some games not transferable and have no resale value; restrictions on games usage apply.

Which could mean your pure arcade type games, those have always been that way. But even if you want to think it means any game, they also said it's up to the developer, so did Sony. Sony won't stop a developer from requiring their game to have a "online element" that then you need to connect to. From that point the two systems are no different.

They were hacked and made up for it with their pro-consumer stance and now pro-developer stance. Just because someone has messed up doesn't mean you sh*tcan them for eternity, that's just petty.

Pro-consumer stance? Don't revel on what is simply called marketing. They are simply gloating on something which portrays a general negative opinion within consumers and turning into a bitch fest. When have MS ever said one bad thing about Sony?

Right, so a company looses millions of peoples financial information that could of potentially ruin lives of normal people and make them financially unstable. Then you're saying that I can't hold a grudge against them? Yet, when a company holds some policies against games to try and create a solution which builds cloud connectivity and the future of gaming people hold them to ransom?

The always-online requirement is based upon the games you've seen like Forza, Titanfall, Sunset Overdrive.

Logic, internet.

EDIT: You already can see the favoritism of the publishers towards the Xbox. Count the exclusives and look at EA. EA was pretty much noshing MS off this year. Do you see why?

Credit card details weren't lost, there would be millions of fraud attempts reported if they were.

PS3 account info and passwords were.

But hey say whatever you want to if it makes you feel the Xbox has better consumer rights.

  • Like 1

Credit card details weren't lost, there would be millions of fraud attempts reported if they were.

PS3 account info and passwords were.

But hey say whatever you want to if it makes you feel the Xbox has better consumer rights.

I don't know about you, but I heard many fraud reports and Sony never clarified what was actually lost. They just said, "Sorry, free game?".

For a company to store their customer information is clear text is a terrible practice. As a guy who works in IT and infrastructure, its shocking, honestly. I love how you just say customer information and passwords, like it makes it any better.

The fact of the matter is, MS simply showed more breathtaking games. I was took away by Ryse, it made me laugh how people thought it was running on a PC. The Sony conference was full of multi-platforms and Destiny looked like a boring Halo.

The Xbox is a more advanced gaming machine in terms of its hardware and architecture. How its overall OS works is unprecedented, the new Kinect is ridiculously accurate and they have a massive server haul which developers use to support games.

Don't get me wrong, the PS4 is a stunning machine. I really like its design, the OS features look nice but I wished they changed the design a little. I just don't see why Sony have won for literally posting a video of a guy handing a game to another guy? Its childish and you can do the same with the Xbox, but you can have another 9 people there all using the same games... in the cloud.

Pro-consumer stance? Don't revel on what is simply called marketing. They are simply gloating on something which portrays a general negative opinion within consumers and turning into a bitch fest. When have MS ever said one bad thing about Sony?

Awww pooor lil micwosoft I feel so sorry for them. Big mean Sony picking on them. Get a grip.

Right, so a company looses millions of peoples financial information that could of potentially ruin lives of normal people and make them financially unstable. Then you're saying that I can't hold a grudge against them? Yet, when a company holds some policies against games to try and create a solution which builds cloud connectivity and the future of gaming people hold them to ransom?

Because Microsoft have never been hacked. Right?......

The always-online requirement is based upon the games you've seen like Forza, Titanfall, Sunset Overdrive.

No its not. Its DRM pure and simple.

Logic, internet.

EDIT: You already can see the favoritism of the publishers towards the Xbox. Count the exclusives and look at EA. EA was pretty much noshing MS off this year. Do you see why?

Microsoft have thrown money around to get publishers to show their multiplats as Xbox one games. I can guarantee there is no publisher favourtism and all theses EA games will come out on the PS4 just the same.

I don't know about you, but I heard many fraud reports and Sony never clarified what was actually lost. They just said, "Sorry, free game?".

For a company to store their customer information is clear text is a terrible practice. As a guy who works in IT and infrastructure, its shocking, honestly. I love how you just say customer information and passwords, like it makes it any better.

The fact of the matter is, MS simply showed more breathtaking games. I was took away by Ryse, it made me laugh how people thought it was running on a PC. The Sony conference was full of multi-platforms and Destiny looked like a boring Halo.

The Xbox is a more advanced gaming machine in terms of its hardware and architecture. How its overall OS works is unprecedented, the new Kinect is ridiculously accurate and they have a massive server haul which developers use to support games.

Don't get me wrong, the PS4 is a stunning machine. I really like its design, the OS features look nice but I wished they changed the design a little. I just don't see why Sony have won for literally posting a video of a guy handing a game to another guy? Its childish and you can do the same with the Xbox, but you can have another 9 people there all using the same games... in the cloud.

You should post those fraud reports then, here is my proof

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13231307

You sir, have literally just defined what I mean.

Its called competitor respect, you saw it alot between MS, Apple and Google back in the day. Fighting in the same market, but the leaders respected their competitors move to help build the industry they was in. Without the Xbox, we wouldn't be at a state we was today. The presentation they made was childish and disrespectful. Could they even run a enterprise service like Azure? No. It'd get hacked.

In a matter of fact, no they have NEVER been hacked. There has never been a technological breach of XBL.

Its DRM? Don't you think the developers and hardware engineers aren't gamers too? I bet there was a massive internal voice about the always on-line and where it was heading.

Forza races with AI from the cloud which learn. If the game was offline, you'd be racing by yourself.

Titanfall offloads physics and AI in the cloud, without a connection, you have a lack of functionality and no AI.

Sunset Overdrive is a open-world online game which changes dynamically from the cloud. Hence it always needs to stay online.

Obviously it has DRM points to it, I'm not denying that. The model of games being linked to accounts is for piracy, and used-games. Its simply business. If a publisher has more control of their revenue with one ecosystem, who are they more inclined to put their game on if they get more revenue and control? FUT for FIFA 14, BF4 being shown on the One for SP and MP.

They will of thrown money at them, don't get me wrong, but there will of been a lot of talk around the policies and how that supports their business. The fact of the matter is, not all the money is purely in game sales now. Its around the online infrastructure around the games and thats where MS excel at. They have the expertise and the resource to pull it off. Enough said.

Every game ran at 60fps in the MS conference. At the PS4's there was no mention of any of that, and you could see clearly the games stuttering on video.

You should post those fraud reports then, here is my proof

http://m.bbc.co.uk/n...nology-13231307

Just because it was 'encrypted' doesn't mean it wasn't easy to get that information out. It literally could be as simple as putting it in the right decryption online.

I love how you're trying to defend the millions of customer records being lost. It makes it better that there was less of a risk that credit cards got taken, but there's still the sensitive information of millions being lost, and your defending that.

You sir, have literally just defined what I mean.

Its called competitor respect, you saw it alot between MS, Apple and Google back in the day. Fighting in the same market, but the leaders respected their competitors move to help build the industry they was in. Without the Xbox, we wouldn't be at a state we was today. The presentation they made was childish and disrespectful. Could they even run a enterprise service like Azure? No. It'd get hacked.

In a matter of fact, no they have NEVER been hacked. There has never been a technological breach of XBL.

Its DRM matter of fact? Don't you think the developers and hardware engineers aren't gamers too? I bet there was a massive internal voice about the always on-line and where it was heading.

Forza races with AI from the cloud which learn. If the game was offline, you'd be racing by yourself.

Titanfall offloads physics and AI in the cloud, without a connection, you have a lack of functionality and no AI.

Sunset Overdrive is a open-world online game which changes dynamically from the cloud. Hence it always needs to stay online.

Obviously it has DRM points to it, I'm not denying that. The model of games being linked to accounts is for piracy, and used-games. Its simply business. If a publisher has more control of their revenue with one ecosystem, who are they more inclined to put their game on if they get more revenue and control? FUT for FIFA 14, BF4 being shown on the 360 for SP and MP.

They will of thrown money at them, don't get me wrong, but there will of been a lot of talk around the policies and how that supports their business. The fact of the matter is, not all the money is purely in game sales now. Its around the online infrastructure around the games and thats where MS excel at. They have the expertise and the resource to pull it off. Enough said.

Every game ran at 60fps in the MS conference. At the PS4's there was no mention of any of that, and you could see clearly the games stuttering on video.

Just because it was 'encrypted' doesn't mean it wasn't easy to get that information out. It literally could be as simple as putting it in the right decryption online.

I love how you're trying to defend the millions of customer records being lost. It makes it better that there was less of a risk that credit cards got taken, but there's still the sensitive information of millions being lost, and your defending that.

I'm correcting, not defending. Why not aid someone in their misinformation? I seen you were saying millions of credit card details lost and I thought hey, there is overwhelming evidence to suggest otherwise, I better share this information with this forum member to help them out.

I'm correcting, not defending. Why not aid someone in their misinformation? I seen you were saying millions of credit card details lost and I thought hey, there is overwhelming evidence to suggest otherwise, I better share this information with this forum member to help them out.

I apologise. I just don't understand how people can be so negative regarding new technology.

The Destiny presentation was pretty meh, but the game itself looked interesting. I'll definitely be picking up a copy (Hopefully on PC if Bungie haven't forgotten how to make a PC game)

It looked pretty uninspired to me. Bungie was whining about wanting to expand beyond Halo so once they are on their own the make a "Gears of Halo" game.

*sigh*

I still get that if I buy my games from PSN, not as comprehensive as Microsoft but I have the best of both worlds.

My friends and family pay for their own games, I don't need to set up some elaborate 10 user permissions to access my games, I can download from PSN if I want and don't need to carry disks around and more importantly there is no 24 hour check, no game tying, don't need to be on or have someone on my friends list for 30 days before I can sell a game and I can rent from day one.

Did I mention the console is $100 cheaper?

The best of both worlds would be having digital games, that can be shared between all of your family and loaned to friends, can be played on all my consoles without remembering to bring the disk. You know all the advantages of a disk without the drawbacks.

kind of reminds of of something... oh yeah. MS' system.

Also how do you know you can rent form day one. you can't rent until the license holders sell the rent shops disks with rent licenses, they can't rent out regular store bought game disks, they need a special license. Last I checked a month or so ago, I couldn't rent Wii U games form OnePlay yet.

The best of both worlds would be having digital games, that can be shared between all of your family and loaned to friends, can be played on all my consoles without remembering to bring the disk. You know all the advantages of a disk without the drawbacks.

kind of reminds of of something... oh yeah. MS' system.

In order for something to be the best of both worlds it generally needs to have good benefits for both. You know, like physical discs as well. Its hardly the best of both worlds if all the advantages are only digital based.

MS said no rentals at launch BTW http://www.examiner.com/article/xbox-one-microsoft-details-used-games-no-game-rentals-at-launch

The best of both worlds would be having digital games, that can be shared between all of your family and loaned to friends, can be played on all my consoles without remembering to bring the disk. You know all the advantages of a disk without the drawbacks.

kind of reminds of of something... oh yeah. MS' system.

Also how do you know you can rent form day one. you can't rent until the license holders sell the rent shops disks with rent licenses, they can't rent out regular store bought game disks, they need a special license. Last I checked a month or so ago, I couldn't rent Wii U games form OnePlay yet.

I can rent from day one because Sony said it would be HOW IT WAS WITH PS3.

UK rental places don't need special rental disks, they just buy retail copies. I rented Wii U games the day it launched in the UK.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!