Microsoft E3 - Xbox: A new Generation of Games Revealed


  

69 members have voted

  1. 1. Will you be watching/reading live?

  2. 2. What is your general impression pre-conference?

    • Waiting for E3
    • Like what I've seen/heard so far
    • Don't like what I've seen/heard
  3. 3. What is your general impression post-conference?

    • Buying on day 1
    • Like it but won't buy on day 1
    • Don't like it but may buy eventually
    • Hate it


Recommended Posts

It is true, everything CBoaT said was true, World of Tanks coming to 360, Mirrors Edge 2 would be revealed, PS4 would have no DRM, Microsoft would not mention DRM, every multiplatform game at the conference never even mentioned PS4, even MGS5 one of the biggest PLAYSTATION franchises neglected to mention.

So how much did Sony pay to Bungie, Activision, Ubisoft for not mentioning XBox 360/One at the Sony conference?

Anyway, did you guys see the Halo 5 teaser? Holy crap, I'm stoked. John made Cortana's data chip into a necklace. :D

That was unexpected...emo John, lol. :laugh:

Generally underwhelmed by both. I think my plan stands. I have an xbox, with gold expired, I'll buy a discount PS3 superslim and adapter to use xbox controller with it, but games I want to play at discount (Uncharted series, Last of Us, Jak Daxter Series, GoW series) and let my PC be next gen for a couple years.

Any thoughts of next gen owning PCs can be dismissed now. Don't do much multiplayer but as long as I can use Netflix on PS3 for free I'm good.

The most exciting game for me was the Indie Abe's Odyssey HD remake which is coming to all platforms. First on PS4, but I'll wait for the PC version.

Well, they said they believe in their current model, were they actually don't use any kind of limitation for their games, it's up to the publisher to put DRM (and the consumer to buy or not to buy that) note how DIFFERENT is this from the current approach of xbox 1, were the public would indeed buy and still wouldn't avoid the limitation on used games.

Because it's human nature I guess, fans of one have to argue with fans of another and so on.

NO. Because people are on a limited budget and can't afford both! Not everyone can get both. For many, it's either Xbox or PS but can't both!

The Xbox One exclusives right now are NOT really that awesome, plain and simple! Unlike their glory old days!

I don't know what games some of you liked, but they are too derivative, not good games at all!

NO. Because people are on a limited budget and can't afford both! Not everyone can get both. For many, it's either Xbox or PS but can't both!

The Xbox One exclusives right now are NOT really that awesome, plain and simple! Unlike their glory old days!

I don't know what games some of you liked, but they are too derivative, not good games at all!

Yet again you are stating your opinion as fact. If you don't think the Xbox exclusives look awesome, that's fine, but that doesn't mean that other people can't possibly think they are awesome. Get real.

Wait, where did you hear about FF and KH3? I know it was said the new FF14 MMO is just for PS4, not that I care about that at all though. But they didn't say anything about FF15 which left it open to be on Xbox as well. I thought KH3 was exclusive to PS4 though?

"Fortunately we have a product for people who aren't able to stay connected; it's called Xbox 360" - Don Mattrick, Microsoft's President of Interactive Entertainment Business

This kind of arrogance is going to be their undoing.

Wait, where did you hear about FF and KH3? I know it was said the new FF14 MMO is just for PS4, not that I care about that at all though. But they didn't say anything about FF15 which left it open to be on Xbox as well. I thought KH3 was exclusive to PS4 though?

Here:

http://www.ign.com/a...mes-to-xbox-one

http://www.ign.com/a...ing-to-xbox-one

Sony tried to 'hint' and play that these games (including Destiny) was going to be Sony exclusive, but that wasn't the case.

"Fortunately we have a product for people who aren't able to stay connected; it's called Xbox 360" - Don Mattrick, Microsoft's President of Interactive Entertainment Business

This kind of arrogance is going to be their undoing.

And... I personally have no issue with what he said. You really hate MS don't you? Oh well, I'll still be getting one because they make great games like Halo. I'll get Sony because they made great games too. And I'll continue to play games on my PC.

By "hint", do you mean "showed off at their conference"?

Unless they said only on, or exclusively on then it is safe to assume it's not Playstation only.

by the way, I thought we were going to see the graphical prowess of your favorite console? things looked pretty underwhelming,with massive freezes and bad framerate issues.

  • Like 1

Well, once again it comes down to exclusives, with the new FF and KH3 also multiplatform I have a few less reasons to get a PS4 now though I still plan to later on. Seems all the good stuff is in 2014 anyways so no rush for it. I still plan on playing a number of current gen titles, new Assassins Creed, new Batman etc.

By "hint", do you mean "showed off at their conference"?

Unless they said only on, or exclusively on then it is safe to assume it's not Playstation only.

So when MS did it, that's basically "They said it was exclusive even though it wasn't". when Sony did the same thing it wasn't even a "hint" that it was exclusive. ;)

"Fortunately we have a product for people who aren't able to stay connected; it's called Xbox 360" - Don Mattrick, Microsoft's President of Interactive Entertainment Business

This kind of arrogance is going to be their undoing.

There is nothing arrogant about the way he put it out or said it. He pretty much said if you don't have online connectivity, don't buy Xbox One.

Wow freezes and framerate issues on games that aren't out till 2014?

XB1 frame rate wasn't exactly stable.

nice backpeddling. weren't ps4 games supposed to blow xbox one games out of the water,with its much more powerful hardware though? not only did the graphics not deliver, but the performance was sub par and still struggling. im only bringing this up because you guys were adamant that ps4 games were going to look and perform better. I guess we saw what happens when people speculate on performance based on max raw performance of certain components in a system, which like I had been saying all along,doesnt tell the whole story.

nice backpeddling. weren't ps4 games supposed to blow xbox one games out of the water,with its much more powerful hardware though? not only did the graphics not deliver, but the performance was sub par and still struggling. im only bringing this up because you guys were adamant that ps4 games were going to look and perform better. I guess we saw what happens when people speculate on performance based on max raw performance of certain components in a system, which like I had been saying all along,doesnt tell the whole story.

Don't worry, they can always get help from the cloud... Shuhei Yoshida says PS4 can offload calculations to cloud

...oh wait.

There is nothing arrogant about the way he put it out or said it. He pretty much said if you don't have online connectivity, don't buy Xbox One.

"If you don't like our product, you're welcome to buy something else."

The arrogance, it burns!

"If you don't like our product, you're welcome to buy something else."

The arrogance, it burns!

If you don't like our product, you're welcome to buy our other product. :p

p.s. Happy Birthday.

What really saddens me is that there is a really good lineup of games coming to the X1. This controversy online is just keeping us from simply enjoying all there is to enjoy about the games.

Killer Instinct for instance is shaping up to be excellent based on hands on previews. The devs are carting it around for people to play test it, and they are really passionate about the game and fighting game scene. They will be taking it to EVO and pushing it to be adopted in the tournaments. They even made sure they had connections within MS to make sure x1's can be provided to run the big tournaments that are stripped down to only what is needed for the tournament (i.e. no Kinect, etc)

But there are other games shaping up nicely as well. I really hope MS can do something to cool everyone off a bit and lay out reasonable plans between now and launch. I want to get back to debating which games are the best, not all this drm stuff. I guess I'm a frustrated gamer at the moment lol. MS messed up pr wise, but they can and should fix things over the next few months.

They laid out some good theories and shared some useful info.

The comment section, however, is a wasteland of insanity.

MS has to show how their services can be used. They need to keep their claims in check and just explain it to us. I find it hard to believe that MS invested all of the time and money creating this collection of servers and the interface with their console simple as a PR stunt or some last minute 'response' to Sony. You can't just whip this stuff together. Heck look at Sony, it will be well into 2014 before the basic Gakai services are up and running.

This tech has a purpose. MS need to show us all what is possible. It doesn't need to be some revolutionary feature, so just they just need to lay it out.

I think it'll mostly be used for stuff like The Division or Destiny, where you've got this open world drop in/out MP style where you have multiple people playing the game and then joining with other players. With a system where each group has it's own server you then need to manage handing off control when a new server joins (or such), having everything run over Azure would simplify that a great deal (And it can natively scale to demand, if nobody is playing a game they wouldn't run any server instances)

They've spoken about handing MP matches "in the cloud", it seems like a great fit.

I think it'll mostly be used for stuff like The Division or Destiny, where you've got this open world drop in/out MP style where you have multiple people playing the game and then joining with other players. With a system where each group has it's own server you then need to manage handing off control when a new server joins (or such), having everything run over Azure would simplify that a great deal (And it can natively scale to demand, if nobody is playing a game they wouldn't run any server instances)

They've spoken about handing MP matches "in the cloud", it seems like a great fit.

Doing MP on the cloud side is just the start. Basically with the XB1 all the MP in games now should be dedicated servers, no more Peer-to Peer hosting like with the 360. God I hate when the hosts connection dies in the middle of a match, now that won't be a problem. Other developers have said that they're going to offload AI to the cloud, that frees up the CPU to do other things. Also when more of the game world is online, on the server, then even more server side stuff can happen, they also said physics for example.

So how can this help SP? Well, with more and more games starting to have online elements/worlds even for SP (Destiny for example) then a developer could have new parts of the "world" be online, and other parts be local. Smaller levels can be local fully, where performance from the local hardware is fine for that smooth 60fps everyone likes to go on about. Then you can go into these larger open areas that could be online, on the cloud. Game is still SP though, from your point of view, it's just that now you switched to on online level that's maybe, 2-4x the scale with way more things going on in it without having any impact on your gaming experience because you don't notice any performance drop.

Sure when there is no internet connection then those parts of the "world" would be off limits, but I'd say overall, the idea behind this hybrid mixing of pure SP local levels + larger online yet still SP levels with added co-op/team drop-in/drop-out options would make for some very very good games.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      471
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!