DuckDuckGo receives record traffic following PRISM scandal

By Tk1917
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Enthusiast

Tk1917

Posted
Posted

This past week private search engine DuckDuckGo recorded their best week ever for traffic. The website, which does not record user?s clicks, provides a service for those who wish to browse the Internet away from the prying eyes of the government or Google...

http://thebackbencher.co.uk/duckduckgo-receives-record-traffic-following-prism-scandal/

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

People switching need to watch / listen to the latest episode of Security Now. (http://twit.tv/show/security-now/408)

The data collection isn't being made at Google's facilities. Using another search engine is pointless.

But google is directly involved as a 'supporting PRISM' along with Microsoft, where duckduckgo isn't. don't mean that what you are searching won't be logged, but its less likely and showing that people won't stand for such direct secret involvement.

This guy in the video is a quack too.. he's rambling about things he barely grasps. Near the end when he says hes' 'uncomfortable' with 128bit encryption I nearly lost it. Check out around 1h31 to contradict yourself. Its definitely being made at googles facilities, however its not being made 'in' google itself and they aren't affiliated and they can't talk about it either.

Mentor

_dandy_

Posted
Posted

This guy in the video is a quack too.. he's rambling about things he barely grasps.

You don't know much about Steve Gibson, do you?

I thought too years ago he was a quack...until I started listening to him on a regular basis. You don't need to listen to all 400+ podcasts to realize he knows his stuff.

Grand Master

techbeck

Posted
Posted

But google is directly involved as a 'supporting PRISM' along with Microsoft, where duckduckgo isn't. don't mean that what you are searching won't be logged, but its less likely and showing that people won't stand for such direct secret involvement.

 

Google and MS are not involved with PRISM.  They have issued statements to that effect as well as many other companies.  They do have to respond to legal requests tho...as would any company.

Mentor

_dandy_

Posted
Posted

Near the end when he says hes' 'uncomfortable' with 128bit encryption I nearly lost it.

Why? 128-bit encryption isn't what it used to be. MS themselves has stopped issuing certificates with less than 1024 bits almost a year ago. How strong encryption is doesn't remain fixed across time.

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

Google and MS are not involved with PRISM.  They have issued statements to that effect as well as many other companies.  They do have to respond to legal requests tho...as would any company.

They have 'fell victim to' I guess is a better way to word it, with digital taps on their upload servers. 

Why? 128-bit encryption isn't what it used to be. MS themselves has stopped issuing certificates with less than 1024 bits almost a year ago. How strong encryption is doesn't remain fixed across time.

Its blown open publicly last I knew. I'd be more than uncomfortable with it.. I'm referring to SSL/RC4 encryption, not AES or DES or any other non-common web security layer. Hell I read a few articles on how 256-bit can be severely weakened by predicting possible outcomes and prioritizing the method in brute-forcing it, example would be reducing 2356 years computer processing to around 25 on the same hardware. Theres NO encryption that is secure and there never will be. Its only a time-thing, you hope what you encrypted stays that way until its no longer relevant.

Grand Master

+Warwagon MVC

Posted
  • MVC
Posted

You don't know much about Steve Gibson, do you?

I thought too years ago he was a quack...until I started listening to him on a regular basis. You don't need to listen to all 400+ podcasts to realize he knows his stuff.

 

Likes

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

They have no direct access to their servers.  Whatever data is requested, they legally have to give.  But they provide the data.

 

Theres taps on all the upstreams of the major US data centers. Thats their order, and Snowden made this very obvious with his leaks including their timeline of involvement. Other than those huge data centers of microsoft, google, yahoo, apple, etc, its Tier1 providers, so basically where all the ISPs in the USA get their internet to sell... From a standpoint in the USA you might as well shut off your internet if you are choosing which evil to make your request at, you aren't going to anonymously make it without going through something like TOR. From outside the USA where Tier1 providers are not tapped - duckduckgo may be a wiser choice depending on how you hit their servers. Huge however tho, .com and .net addresses are part of VeriSign which is a US company, and so, they are USA redirected, so your request traffic, IP, times etc bounces off the NSA somewhere when you visit one regardless of where in the world you are.

Grand Master

The_Decryptor Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

DuckDuckGo has never given me good results, and if it gets popular you can bet they'll be getting their own fair share of NSL "requests", and like Google/Microsoft/Apple/Yahoo/etc. they'll probably lose if they try fighting them.

Grand Master

FlintyV

Posted
Posted

DuckDuckGo has never given me good results, and if it gets popular you can bet they'll be getting their own fair share of NSL "requests", and like Google/Microsoft/Apple/Yahoo/etc. they'll probably lose if they try fighting them.

 

They don't record user data so there would be nothing to give the authorities.

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

You don't know much about Steve Gibson, do you?

I thought too years ago he was a quack...until I started listening to him on a regular basis. You don't need to listen to all 400+ podcasts to realize he knows his stuff.

 

I know he wrote spinrite, software that saved my ass as well as continuing to save the ass of many of my friends, all for less than $100.

He knows what hes doing obviously, but hes one of those guys who can't summarize his knowledge into a digestible form. I found it hard to listen past 15 minutes of his 91 minute podcast, I can only imagine how he rambles in the other 400+ of them.

Grand Master

+M2Ys4U Subscriber¹

Posted
  • Subscriber¹
Posted

 Huge however tho, .com and .net addresses are part of VeriSign which is a US company, and so, they are USA redirected, so your request traffic, IP, times etc bounces off the NSA somewhere when you visit one regardless of where in the world you are.

 

What are you on about? That's not how things work at all!

Mentor

_dandy_

Posted
Posted

He knows what hes doing obviously, but hes one of those guys who can't summarize his knowledge into a digestible form. I found it hard to listen past 15 minutes of his 91 minute podcast, I can only imagine how he rambles in the other 400+ of them.

 

Well, ok, I'll grant you most people have a short attention span, and neither him or Leo pretend this is a podcast for the masses.

 

Which is really a shame, as typically the people who keep propagating the most outrageous claims on forums such as this one are those who would benefit the most from listening to what he has to say, as he's thorough in his research and won't say anything he can't back up.

Veteran

Luc2k

Posted
Posted

Well, ok, I'll grant you most people have a short attention span, and neither him or Leo pretend this is a podcast for the masses.

 

Which is really a shame, as typically the people who keep propagating the most outrageous claims on forums such as this one are those who would benefit the most from listening to what he has to say, as he's thorough in his research and won't say anything he can't back up.

Why don't you make a summary for the rest of us who suffer from ADD, or point out at what time he actually talks about PRISM.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo

      By excalpius · Posted

      I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By ShahinD · Posted

      It seems these features are for Business Profiles
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By Snake Doc · Posted

      Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen

      By WaltC · Posted

      Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo

      By Ccl Ncc · Posted

      Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!