PS4 grabs 95% of Consumer Votes after Amazon shuts poll down early


Recommended Posts

It's a license check, big ****ing deal.  It's similar to KMS activation with Windows.

 

Windows does it once. I can unplug my ethernet cable on my PC now and be done with it. So no, it's really not similar to Windows.

Wasn't it Amazon that announced record pre-orders for the XB1 as well? I smell a well paid rat.

 

 

"Great sales" as in special offers? How do you know Xbox One won't offer more of those?

 

Xbox One works offline too. Just like Steam, it needs to phone home periodically to see if required updates are available. We don't know yet what the ad experience will be like on Xbox One, but most Xbox dashboard ads are for games today.

 

They're similar internet-based digital distribution platforms for games. Of course people are going to compare them.

I ran Steam in offline mode for about 5 weeks when I was switching ISP's about 14 months back. Not once did it throw me out or demand I connect to the Internet to keep working.

Windows does it once. I can unplug my ethernet cable on my PC now and be done with it. So no, it's really not similar to Windows.

I said KMS ACTIVATION.  You aren't using KMS at home.

######, do you even read what people write?

I said KMS ACTIVATION.  You aren't using KMS at home.

****, do you even read what people write?

 

I clearly thought it was what the home user used, why would something a company use be of any relevance in a topic about DRM on a video games console? The majority use a games console at home, or at a home environment.

 

If you're getting that angry maybe you should avoid the GH for a while.

 

Wasn't it Amazon that announced record pre-orders for the XB1 as well? I smell a well paid rat.

 

 

I ran Steam in offline mode for about 5 weeks when I was switching ISP's about 14 months back. Not once did it throw me out or demand I connect to the Internet to keep working.

 

Paid rat who allowed 95% people to vote for PS4? yeah that makes sense... :/

Last time look at steam big sale, it was like 75% of most titles. Thats never going to happen with XboxLive. And xboxOne "offline" isnt really "offline" if you need to connect to the interent once a day. With steam when you go offline it can be for good! none of this once a day thing.

Steam sales are meaningless to people who don't have internet and your internet seems to be unreliable.

 

With hyperbole out of the way, what the ###### is with people and internet problems? Before all this ###### blew up, I have never seen so many people worried about internet connection. Do you guys still use postal service for posting on the neowin or what?

There are legitimate reasons for hating on XB1 but "BUT BUT my internet MAYBE down once in 10 years" isn't one of them. :/

 

(before anyone gets to it : don't like used/rental/loan blocks on XB1 and not buying it at launch)

"Great sales" as in special offers? How do you know Xbox One won't offer more of those?

 

Xbox One works offline too. Just like Steam, it needs to phone home periodically to see if required updates are available. We don't know yet what the ad experience will be like on Xbox One, but most Xbox dashboard ads are for games today.

 

They're similar internet-based digital distribution platforms for games. Of course people are going to compare them.

 

That's a bit weasel-y there. While obviously both services would need to check remotely for updates, the subtle implication that Steam has to "phone home" like the Xbone with it's 24-hour restriction is rather underhanded.

 

You're certainly right they're both internet-based DD platforms, but the simply fact is - Steam has competition and runs on the PC where DD rules. The Xbone has no competition, runs on consoles where physical media rules, and will continue to rule for the next few years.

It's far easier to rally people against something than for something these days.

 

Look how many people hate DRM!  Nevermind whether or not they actually play games, they might buy a PS4 because they hate DRM!  (I am not generalizing here, but I have seen examples of it.)

Yea so many people hate DRM, especially all the iTunes and steam users.

That's a bit weasel-y there. While obviously both services would need to check remotely for updates, the subtle implication that Steam has to "phone home" like the Xbone with it's 24-hour restriction is rather underhanded.

 

You're certainly right they're both internet-based DD platforms, but the simply fact is - Steam has competition and runs on the PC where DD rules. The Xbone has no competition, runs on consoles where physical media rules, and will continue to rule for the next few years.

 

And the current generation has lasted 8 years so far.  How long do you think the next one is going to last.  Microsoft is showing that they're ready now and that they've got the infrastructure and framework in place to fully support a DD world on the consoles (and are actively trying to move the industry towards that model).  People may not flock to it en masse (relative to PS4) at first, but Microsoft doesn't need them to.

Paid rat who allowed 95% people to vote for PS4? yeah that makes sense... :/

 

No, what I meant was Amazon generated the hype for the XB1 by claiming it had shown record level pre orders, and when this survey indicated that they might be telling fibs they seemed to pull it rather hurriedly.

And the current generation has lasted 8 years so far.  How long do you think the next one is going to last.  Microsoft is showing that they're ready now and that they've got the infrastructure and framework in place to fully support a DD world on the consoles (and are actively trying to move the industry towards that model).  People may not flock to it en masse (relative to PS4) at first, but Microsoft doesn't need them to.

 

However long the next generation lasts is irrelevant, the DD transition will occur naturally over time - just like it did for the PC.

 

You don't need any of these restrictions or other nonsense.

However long the next generation lasts is irrelevant, the DD transition will occur naturally over time - just like it did for the PC.

 

You don't need any of these restrictions or other nonsense.

 

There are a lot of parties involved in making something like this happen. Remember how iTunes started out with very strict DRM to appease the RIAA? And over time became far more relaxed? (or in the case of purchased tracks, is gone?)

 

This is a similar thing, though we're already talking about something far less draconian than how iTunes started out, with a lot more concessions to the consumer like trading, gifting, playing at a friend's house, etc. More importantly, the vast majority of players (i.e. the non-pirates) won't notice any new restrictions, but instead will benefit from a lot of awesome new features. No more discs needed to play. Instant switching between any games in your library, or instantly jump into any game when you get an invite while watching TV or movies. Play games at your friends' house without carrying discs around.

 

I think a lot of people are getting stuck in hypotheticals like if your internet connection goes down for a prolonged period of time and you want to play a single player game. Thing is, that's (rare for most people) error case which they haven't even yet discussed how it will be dealt with. How do you know there won't be something like what Steam does? Steam phones home regularly if a connection is available, even in "offline" mode, and will not let you play offline if there's an update. But if there is no connection at all, it will let you go longer. I wouldn't be surprised if MS ends up wit a system closer to that than what others have assumed will arrive.

There are a lot of parties involved in making something like this happen. Remember how iTunes started out with very strict DRM to appease the RIAA? And over time became far more relaxed? (or in the case of purchased tracks, is gone?)

 

This is a similar thing, though we're already talking about something far less draconian than how iTunes started out, with a lot more concessions to the consumer like trading, gifting, playing at a friend's house, etc. More importantly, the vast majority of players (i.e. the non-pirates) won't notice any new restrictions, but instead will benefit from a lot of awesome new features. No more discs needed to play. Instant switching between any games in your library, or instantly jump into any game when you get an invite while watching TV or movies. Play games at your friends' house without carrying discs around.

 

I think a lot of people are getting stuck in hypotheticals like if your internet connection goes down for a prolonged period of time and you want to play a single player game. Thing is, that's (rare for most people) error case which they haven't even yet discussed how it will be dealt with. How do you know there won't be something like what Steam does? Steam phones home regularly if a connection is available, even in "offline" mode, and will not let you play offline if there's an update. But if there is no connection at all, it will let you go longer. I wouldn't be surprised if MS ends up wit a system closer to that than what others have assumed will arrive.

 

As scummy as certain publishers are, they're still not comparable to the RIAA. Especially as they have to actually concern themselves with making sales, rather than leeching off the entire industry. So the comparison here falls rather flat.

 

As for Steam and updates, you can choose if you want Steam to autoupdate or not - a friend of mine does this with Dota 2 because Steampipe cripples his old PC, and he likes to play a lot of out-of-Steam F2P titles. It's probably also worth pointing out that the update "restriction" is more to do with a current inadequacy of the Steam client, rather than an explicit choice to prevent play.

I'm not surprised. The gaming communities flooded the poll. It's obviously not indicative of the actual market share each console will receive, much like some of the user ratings on Metacritic aren't indicative of all user opinions because they've been massively influenced.

 

Pretty sure the PS4 will still dominate the early sales period. If Microsoft has no solid reaction, it may well dominate the entire generation as well.

As scummy as certain publishers are, they're still not comparable to the RIAA. Especially as they have to actually concern themselves with making sales, rather than leeching off the entire industry. So the comparison here falls rather flat.

 

As for Steam and updates, you can choose if you want Steam to autoupdate or not - a friend of mine does this with Dota 2 because Steampipe cripples his old PC, and he likes to play a lot of out-of-Steam F2P titles. It's probably also worth pointing out that the update "restriction" is more to do with a current inadequacy of the Steam client, rather than an explicit choice to prevent play.

 

Publishers are just one of the parties I was referring to. There are also retailers. And with publishers trying things like Online Pass and the whole Sim City debacle, you don't think publishers are pushing for some of these restrictions? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you...

 

Steam enforces that updates be installed for Offline Mode to continue working so they can revise the offline policy or remediate hacks that give unauthorized access to games (i.e. piracy). In other (scarier) words, "DRM."

Publishers are just one of the parties I was referring to. There are also retailers. And with publishers trying things like Online Pass and the whole Sim City debacle, you don't think publishers are pushing for some of these restrictions? If you believe that, I have a bridge to sell you...

 

Steam enforces that updates be installed for Offline Mode to continue working so they can revise the offline policy or remediate hacks that give unauthorized access to games (i.e. piracy). In other (scarier) words, "DRM."

 

No, I think that publishers are quite content to sit back and watch how the situation unfolds. They obviously don't care enough since Sony has managed to continue the status quo. And seeing as retailers stand to lose the most over this, I don't think Microsoft really cares about their input.

 

As far as Steam goes, to my understanding when autoupdating is disabled per-game, checks are only made on launch - so if you enable offline mode beforehand you're fine.

There are a lot of parties involved in making something like this happen. Remember how iTunes started out with very strict DRM to appease the RIAA? And over time became far more relaxed? (or in the case of purchased tracks, is gone?)

 

This is a similar thing, though we're already talking about something far less draconian than how iTunes started out, with a lot more concessions to the consumer like trading, gifting, playing at a friend's house, etc.

Firstly, Apple was required to implement that DRM in order to get access to the music libraries of music publishers. That simply isn't the case with games publishers, as evidenced by the PS4's traditional disc-based approach. Secondly, the 24hr check-in required by the X1 certainly is more draconian than iTunes' DRM. If for any reason you cannot access the Microsoft servers then you lose access to your games and?as we've seen with Steam and Battle.net?server outages will happen. We mustn't forget that Sony was compromised by repeated DDOS attacks and it's likely that Microsoft will see similar attacks made against it.

 

The reality is that Microsoft has opted for this course of its own volition and many people are rightly concerned. Microsoft stated that one of the advantages of the DRM is the ability to offer lower prices but we already know that the company will be releasing games at the top end of the current price bracket. That's without other concerns, like the Kinect's always-on status when combined with hackers and intrusive governments (the US government being the obvious example).

 

Don't get me wrong, the digital distribution approach has many advantages and Steam is an obvious example of that. However, a lot of people don't trust Microsoft as the company has a long history of anti-competitive business practices. I don't think anyone believes for one minute that Microsoft is doing this for the best interests of gamers. This is a power play in order to cosy up with publishers at the expense of gamers. If I were a console gamer I'd be opting for the PS4 despite the impressive features offered by the X1.

 

The reality is that Microsoft has opted for this course of its own volition and many people are rightly concerned. Microsoft stated that one of the advantages of the DRM is the ability to offer lower prices but we already know that the company will be releasing games at the top end of the current price bracket. That's without other concerns, like the Kinect's always-on status when combined with hackers and intrusive governments (the US government being the obvious example).

Still on this?  Kinect is NOT always on.  MS has said this numerous times.

Still on this?  Kinect is NOT always on.  MS has said this numerous times.

 

Considering he explicitly mentioned hackers and spying I'm fairly certain he means always-connected.

 

I.e. It might not be always on normally, but that's irrelevant if someone gains access and activates it.

So Steam is a DRM ad service?

QUIT WITH THE F***ING STEAM COMPARISONS!  We are not comparing the new consoles to Steam, we are comparing to the previous gen consoles!  The Steam comparisons HAVE to be coming from Microsoft's "reputation managers", I see this comparison on EVERY comment thread discussing the XBone!  ENOUGH!

Still on this?  Kinect is NOT always on.  MS has said this numerous times.

It's on enough to listen to "xbox on", so it's on enough for PRISM or anyone else to turn it on remotely, without your knowledge!  Unless you are allowed to TOTALLY disconnect the device, you are going to be vunerable to SOMEONE being able to watch what you do...its SOFTWARE, people, and SOFTWARE can be exploited, hacked, or changed.  Your trust in Microsoft is misplaced.

I'm not surprised. The gaming communities flooded the poll. It's obviously not indicative of the actual market share each console will receive, much like some of the user ratings on Metacritic aren't indicative of all user opinions because they've been massively influenced.

 

Pretty sure the PS4 will still dominate the early sales period. If Microsoft has no solid reaction, it may well dominate the entire generation as well.

 

Yeah, what about the reports that the PS4 is outselling the Xbone TWO to ONE right now?

 

http://www.tapscape.com/ps4-outsells-xbox-amazon/

 

http://blog.games.com/2013/06/17/ps4-pre-orders-doubling-xbox-one-gamestop/

 

Still a bunch of 4Chan users skewing the polls?  I dont think so!

QUIT WITH THE F***ING STEAM COMPARISONS!  We are not comparing the new consoles to Steam, we are comparing to the previous gen consoles!  The Steam comparisons HAVE to be coming from Microsoft's "reputation managers", I see this comparison on EVERY comment thread discussing the XBone!  ENOUGH!

why not? :huh:  (if you can reply without exploding, *grabs protective gear*)

 

Yeah, what about the reports that the PS4 is outselling the Xbone TWO to ONE right now?

 

http://www.tapscape.com/ps4-outsells-xbox-amazon/

 

http://blog.games.com/2013/06/17/ps4-pre-orders-doubling-xbox-one-gamestop/

 

Still a bunch of 4Chan users skewing the polls?  I dont think so!

 

 

Yes.  If the Amazon poll was correct, the PS4 would be outselling the Xbox One 19 to 1.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day 2026: Best Dolby soundbar deals from Sony, Samsung, JBL, Polk, and more by Sayan Sen Yesterday we covered the JBL BAR 800 which is a 5.1.2 Dolby Atmos/Vision soundbar. The unit is on sale for its lowest ever price of just $800 making it a solid offer. However, there are many more options to choose from and in this article, we have made a compilation of the best deals including from Sony, Polk, Yamaha, Denon, Samsung and more. Sony's BAR models are currently at their lowest prices which makes them solid offerings. The company's BRAVIA Theatre Bar lineup is designed to suit different home cinema needs. The Bar 5 is an entry-level 3.1-channel soundbar with a wireless subwoofer, supporting Dolby Atmos®, DTS:X, S-Force PRO Front Surround, and Vertical Surround Engine for immersive audio with clear dialogue. The Bar 6 upgrades to a 3.1.2-channel configuration by adding dedicated up-firing speakers for more convincing overhead Atmos effects while retaining the wireless subwoofer. At the premium end, the Bar 7, Bar 8, and flagship Bar 9 are single-soundbar solutions featuring Sony’s 360 Spatial Sound Mapping technology, which creates phantom speakers for a wider surround field. Bar 7 includes nine speaker units, Bar 8 increases this to eleven, and Bar 9 offers thirteen speaker driver units promising the most expansive soundstage and acoustic performance. All models should integrate seamlessly with compatible BRAVIA TVs and support the BRAVIA Connect app for setup and control. Get them at the links below: Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 9 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $998.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $1498) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 8 Soundbar (HT-A9000): $798.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 7 Soundbar (HT-A7100): $618.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $768) Sony BRAVIA Theater System 6: $548.00 | Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 6: $448.00 Sony BRAVIA Theater Bar 5 (HT-B500): $278.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $348) Sony HT-S400 2.1 soundbar: $198.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $248) Aside from those, we also have more discounts including from Samsung, Polk Audio, and more: Samsung Q-Series Soundbar HW-QS90H 7.1.2: $797.99 (Amazon US) (Was: $998) Polk Audio Signa S4: $336.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $449) Hisense AX3120Q: $229.00 (Amazon US) (Was: $259) Check out more soundbar deals that you may like at this link. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!