PS4 grabs 95% of Consumer Votes after Amazon shuts poll down early


Recommended Posts

Seeing as they're sold out most places, how is it getting obliterated?

All I can say is I canned my preorder when they canned the new setup just now.  I still don't intend to get a PS4, but I did just get a PS3 for somethin different.

It's mentioned here: http://www.howtogeek.com/117424/how-to-make-steams-offline-mode-work/ and I saw it before on one of the steam pages.

 

They weren't pointless restrictions, either. They were perfectly sensible if you thought of all games as digital downloads, with discs just being the "sneaker net" connectivity option to avoid the multi-GB download. I think Steam games work this exact same way. Heck, apparently they sometimes actually download the game anyway even though you have the disc!

 

Camera and microphone absolutely are mandatory on iPads, iPhones, and countless other devices you haven't complained about. So you still haven't answered the question about how those are different. I am unaware of any of those devices ever having their webcams or microphones hacked in the way you suggest (i.e. the device is asleep and someone remotely hijacks it and turns it on and starts spying on you). Asking for a statement that something is "not possible" is a cop-out. Lots of things are hypothetically "possible" but not practically so.

 

My quick skim of that article reveals nothing more than the blinding obvious, i.e. you have to wait for in-progress updates to finish before engaging offline mode. As I said, if you disable auto-updating that should be a non-issue.

 

They were very much pointless restrictions, the fact they've been nuked compounds this. Microsoft are/were fully capable of pursuing sharing features and etc on the digital side without enforcing restrictions on physical media. Really, I don't get why people have a hard time comprehending this. If you want the status quo, buy a disc - if you want next-gen, buy digitally. Everyone wins, everyone is happy.

 

Not only are the devices you mention portable (Stuff it in a drawer), but none of them make those components mandatory to the function of the device.

My quick skim of that article reveals nothing more than the blinding obvious, i.e. you have to wait for in-progress updates to finish before engaging offline mode. As I said, if you disable auto-updating that should be a non-issue.

 

They were very much pointless restrictions, the fact they've been nuked compounds this. Microsoft are/were fully capable of pursuing sharing features and etc on the digital side without enforcing restrictions on physical media. Really, I don't get why people have a hard time comprehending this. If you want the status quo, buy a disc - if you want next-gen, buy digitally. Everyone wins, everyone is happy.

 

Not only are the devices you mention portable (Stuff it in a drawer), but none of them make those components mandatory to the function of the device.

Is it too hard to understand that sharing would be possible by publishers getting a cut from used games sales? They don't get their cut and we don't get sharing. Simple.

My quick skim of that article reveals nothing more than the blinding obvious, i.e. you have to wait for in-progress updates to finish before engaging offline mode. As I said, if you disable auto-updating that should be a non-issue.

 

They were very much pointless restrictions, the fact they've been nuked compounds this. Microsoft are/were fully capable of pursuing sharing features and etc on the digital side without enforcing restrictions on physical media. Really, I don't get why people have a hard time comprehending this. If you want the status quo, buy a disc - if you want next-gen, buy digitally. Everyone wins, everyone is happy.

 

Not only are the devices you mention portable (Stuff it in a drawer), but none of them make those components mandatory to the function of the device.

 

From the article: "These steps won?t help if games aren?t fully updated or there?s an update for Steam available."

 

Steam's website also says apps need to be up-to-date, though the other page I'd seen made it sound like it was just the Steam client. Could be it's changed a few times and some web pages are outdated.

 

It is obvious from today that they were not pointless restrictions. At the very least they were simplifying assumptions. There's a lot they didn't have to build in the world of discs as little more than download vouchers for a fully digital distribution system. Now they have to go build that, which is why they cut so many previously announced features to make it happen. Then there are the things they just can't do with this model without publishers being on board. For example, you now need the disc in the system to play games. That sucks. That is a huge loss for many of us today. I can't help but wonder if a small but vocal minority (and clickbaiting tech media, and Sony fanboys who won't buy it anyway) just ruined that for the majority of players. My Twitter and Facebook feeds are filled with people who are ###### about today's changes, with that being the most griped about one.

So yeah, thanks for that.

You can put your phone in a drawer but not your Kinect? What the hell kind of argument is that? Never mind that Xbox/Kinect doesn't have a battery, just unplug it if you're tinfoil-hat-paranoid. And a webcam + microphone are absolutely, 100% mandatory components on each of those devices I listed. You cannot remove them. You can disable them to exactly the same extent you can disable Kinect. Well, maybe less so, since you can't unplug it and the batteries on those aren't removable. You have no ground to stand on with this argument, why persist?

 

actually it would be nice to have ability to point kinect to any other direction at ease you know like your smartphone camera?

perhaps somebody could make creative games, based on that "ability".

heck a portable kinect might be nice too, it can act like reporter' camera, good idea don't you think?

Instead of kinect watching me, I prefer if i can order the kinect to watch anything at MY direction.

Just wondering...did xbox one had this feature? or still do?

Koller: "The difference between an eight hour download and a 15-minute drive to retail?retail is winning that every time...Solving that with PlayGo... is a big win for the digital side of the business."


Well said..

"Some gamers will always prefer to get their games on disc. They like to hold a game in their hands. They like to feel as if they possess it and aren't just getting a license to some bits. As long as games are multiple Gigabytes and online connection speeds aren't fast enough to pipe those files through quickly, then discs will stick around. Safe assumption. Well, sorta safe."

 

 

 

This comment is a WIN!

 

As humans, we hate to be told to do something, but eventually we evolve to a point where we'll usually just start doing it anyway. PC makers worked really hard to ditch the 3.5" floppy, but until optical media and USB storage because cheaper and easier to use, it was a losing battle, because the 3.5" floppy stuck around for a long, long time.

Sony won big at E3 because they came out and said, "Hey, you know what, we have these options. We're the pioneers of Day One Digital on consoles for retail games, but we're not going to force that on you. We'll let you decide when it's right for you." while MS came out and said, "Hey, do this, and if you don't want to, buy an XBox 360, we ran the numbers and we'll be fine without you."

So far the majority of people seem to not like being told what to do

Just wondering...did xbox one had this feature? or still do?

Koller: "The difference between an eight hour download and a 15-minute drive to retail?retail is winning that every time...Solving that with PlayGo... is a big win for the digital side of the business."

Well said..

"Some gamers will always prefer to get their games on disc. They like to hold a game in their hands. They like to feel as if they possess it and aren't just getting a license to some bits. As long as games are multiple Gigabytes and online connection speeds aren't fast enough to pipe those files through quickly, then discs will stick around. Safe assumption. Well, sorta safe."

 

 

 

This comment is a WIN!

 

As humans, we hate to be told to do something, but eventually we evolve to a point where we'll usually just start doing it anyway. PC makers worked really hard to ditch the 3.5" floppy, but until optical media and USB storage because cheaper and easier to use, it was a losing battle, because the 3.5" floppy stuck around for a long, long time.

Sony won big at E3 because they came out and said, "Hey, you know what, we have these options. We're the pioneers of Day One Digital on consoles for retail games, but we're not going to force that on you. We'll let you decide when it's right for you." while MS came out and said, "Hey, do this, and if you don't want to, buy an XBox 360, we ran the numbers and we'll be fine without you."

So far the majority of people seem to not like being told what to do

What? That quote is stupid. Microsoft's problem wasn't that they were forcing everyone to download games. That is just...ignorant comment.

What? That quote is stupid. Microsoft's problem wasn't that they were forcing everyone to download games. That is just...ignorant comment.

I already know that but look at this in a different perspective. That's how most people felt even if that wasn't the case.

Is it too hard to understand that sharing would be possible by publishers getting a cut from used games sales? They don't get their cut and we don't get sharing. Simple.

 

Engage brain please. There is nothing stopping sharing from being applied to DD-based releases. If Valve can do it with Steam in a matter of weeks, so can Microsoft.

 

From the article: "These steps won?t help if games aren?t fully updated or there?s an update for Steam available."

 

Steam's website also says apps need to be up-to-date, though the other page I'd seen made it sound like it was just the Steam client. Could be it's changed a few times and some web pages are outdated.

 

It is obvious from today that they were not pointless restrictions. At the very least they were simplifying assumptions. There's a lot they didn't have to build in the world of discs as little more than download vouchers for a fully digital distribution system. Now they have to go build that, which is why they cut so many previously announced features to make it happen. Then there are the things they just can't do with this model without publishers being on board. For example, you now need the disc in the system to play games. That sucks. That is a huge loss for many of us today. I can't help but wonder if a small but vocal minority (and clickbaiting tech media, and Sony fanboys who won't buy it anyway) just ruined that for the majority of players. My Twitter and Facebook feeds are filled with people who are ****ed about today's changes, with that being the most griped about one.

So yeah, thanks for that.

You can put your phone in a drawer but not your Kinect? What the hell kind of argument is that? Never mind that Xbox/Kinect doesn't have a battery, just unplug it if you're tinfoil-hat-paranoid. And a webcam + microphone are absolutely, 100% mandatory components on each of those devices I listed. You cannot remove them. You can disable them to exactly the same extent you can disable Kinect. Well, maybe less so, since you can't unplug it and the batteries on those aren't removable. You have no ground to stand on with this argument, why persist?

 

This is like talking to a brick wall. It's fairly clear if you actually read the articles that what is being referred to is games that are currently in the process of being updated. I.e. games that have already received an update notification and are in the process of downloading the update. As I've said twice now, if you disable auto-updating on the relevant games that check will not be made.

 

The reality of what has happened is really quite simple, physical media retains the status quo and the next-gen stuff moves to the next-gen distribution method. Honestly, you and others keep whining about things not being "next-gen" anymore and yet you seem to have an odd obsession with the decidedly last-gen method of getting games. Buy digitally and stop buying discs.

 

And really now, blaming anyone but Microsoft for taking this move is pathetic. It was entirely their decision to make, and entirely their "fault" for making it.

 

And unplug it? How can you unplug it when the One makes it mandatory? That's the whole point.

Engage brain please. There is nothing stopping sharing from being applied to DD-based releases. If Valve can do it with Steam in a matter of weeks, so can Microsoft.

 

 

This is like talking to a brick wall. It's fairly clear if you actually read the articles that what is being referred to is games that are currently in the process of being updated. I.e. games that have already received an update notification and are in the process of downloading the update. As I've said twice now, if you disable auto-updating on the relevant games that check will not be made.

 

The reality of what has happened is really quite simple, physical media retains the status quo and the next-gen stuff moves to the next-gen distribution method. Honestly, you and others keep whining about things not being "next-gen" anymore and yet you seem to have an odd obsession with the decidedly last-gen method of getting games. Buy digitally and stop buying discs.

 

And really now, blaming anyone but Microsoft for taking this move is pathetic. It was entirely their decision to make, and entirely their "fault" for making it.

 

And unplug it? How can you unplug it when the One makes it mandatory? That's the whole point.

Let's engage our brains. When was the last time you were able to sell a game bought on Steam? It's not a technology problem.

Let's engage our brains. When was the last time you were able to sell a game bought on Steam? It's not a technology problem.

 

No resale and controlled resale are two different approaches that both solve the same "problem", either one works for publishers/developers.

 

Valve are implementing game sharing on Steam, so why can't Microsoft?

If Valve can do it with Steam in a matter of weeks, so can Microsoft.

 

Umm, what? That isn't how anything works in the world, anywhere. Never mind that Steam doesn't have game sharing and has announced no plans to do anything of the sort. Yeah, they can have a rumor in a matter of weeks. That's helpful.

Umm, what? That isn't how anything works in the world, anywhere. Never mind that Steam doesn't have game sharing and has announced no plans to do anything of the sort. Yeah, they can have a rumor in a matter of weeks. That's helpful.

 

They don't have to announce it when it's in their code.

 

http://hexus.net/gaming/news/industry/57013-steam-game-sharing-features-spotted-beta-code/

Umm, what? That isn't how anything works in the world, anywhere. Never mind that Steam doesn't have game sharing and has announced no plans to do anything of the sort. Yeah, they can have a rumor in a matter of weeks. That's helpful.

 

Are you telling me a multi-billion dollar megacorporation with far more developer time cannot crank out such a feature they originally announced in less time than their semi-competitor that got the idea from them in the first place? I understand that Microsoft is fraught with freeloading managers and corporate bureaucracy, but really now. 

 

I'm not sure where you've been reading your news, but the Steam implementation isn't a rumour, there are localisation strings that you yourself can verify in the Steam client beta under Public\steamui_english.txt, search for "SteamUI_JoinDialog_SharedLicense".

Are you telling me a multi-billion dollar megacorporation with far more developer time cannot crank out such a feature they originally announced in less time than their semi-competitor that got the idea from them in the first place? I understand that Microsoft is fraught with freeloading managers and corporate bureaucracy, but really now. 

 

I'm not sure where you've been reading your news, but the Steam implementation isn't a rumour, there are localisation strings that you yourself can verify in the Steam client beta under Public\steamui_english.txt, search for "SteamUI_JoinDialog_SharedLicense".

 

Sigh...

1) A string showing up in code doesn't mean it's ready for primetime or will be any time soon. Or ever will see the light of day.

2) You don't know how long they've been working on that. I find it highly unlikely they jammed it in there between the Xbox announcement and today. These things don't work that way in our industry.

3) The Xbox schedule is apparently super tight already. They don't even have time to have the software ready to be imaged on the machines, so they're requiring a day zero update before you can use the thing. Even then, they likely need to have the final launch day build signed off pretty darn soon, and the whole enable-disc-based-DRM thing is already a way complicated and risky DCR to take at this point in my estimation. It's not just about how long it takes to the write the code. It's also about risk, test resources, and revising the spec to fit into a drastically changed licensing/distribution model.

 

More likely, they punted those features to their next release. If it's anything like the 360, that could mean 6 months later. Or not, because they might change their update cadence. Nobody outside their team knows. Maybe they'll never do it. But it's ridiculous to say "Valve can do it in a few weeks" when they haven't done anything and when/if they do it won't be three weeks and probably won't be the same thing and probably was on Valve's schedule for a while (or at the very least, they didn't already have a fully booked schedule shipping a new console!).

Sigh...

1) A string showing up in code doesn't mean it's ready for primetime or will be any time soon. Or ever will see the light of day.

2) You don't know how long they've been working on that. I find it highly unlikely they jammed it in there between the Xbox announcement and today. These things don't work that way in our industry.

3) The Xbox schedule is apparently super tight already. They don't even have time to have the software ready to be imaged on the machines, so they're requiring a day zero update before you can use the thing. Even then, they likely need to have the final launch day build signed off pretty darn soon, and the whole enable-disc-based-DRM thing is already a way complicated and risky DCR to take at this point in my estimation.

 

More likely, they punted those features to their next release. If it's anything like the 360, that could mean 6 months later. Or not, because they might change their update cadence. Nobody outside their team knows. Maybe they'll never do it. But it's ridiculous to say "Valve can do it in a few weeks" when they haven't done anything and when/if they do it won't be three weeks and probably won't be the same thing and probably was on Valve's schedule for a while (or at the very least, they didn't already have a fully booked schedule shipping a new console!).

 

Did I ever say it was ready? No. The simple fact is it's there, it's being worked on, and it's not a rumour.

 

As for point 2, seeing as the strings only now turned up indicates it's a recent development - in line with how Valve does things. Take a gander at Dota 2 and Cyborgmatt's blog for reference.

 

I fully understand the schedule will inevitably be tight, (and it is for both companies) but this is not a new or additional feature we're talking about here, it's one that was already planned. All that has changed is it won't work with disc-based copies anymore.

Did I ever say it was ready? No. The simple fact is it's there, it's being worked on, and it's not a rumour.

 

As for point 2, seeing as the strings only now turned up indicates it's a recent development - in line with how Valve does things. Take a gander at Dota 2 and Cyborgmatt's blog for reference.

 

I fully understand the schedule will inevitably be tight, (and it is for both companies) but this is not a new or additional feature we're talking about here, it's one that was already planned. All that has changed is it won't work with disc-based copies anymore.

 

But as I've already said, enabling disc-based DRM (which requires disc-based OS updates and other things they didn't need before) is probably an even larger feature. Given a fixed schedule and fixed resources, that means other things had to be cut.

 

And you did say it was ready. You said Valve "did it" (i.e. completed it) in "a few weeks." It is not done, and when it is done it won't have been done in a few weeks.

I don't pay ?60 per game on Steam so it's lack of a game sharing feature doesn't concern me. If console game vendors got more realistic about their pricing perhaps the used games market wouldn't be such a big issue.

But as I've already said, enabling disc-based DRM (which requires disc-based OS updates and other things they didn't need before) is probably an even larger feature. Given a fixed schedule and fixed resources, that means other things had to be cut.

 

And you did say it was ready. You said Valve "did it" (i.e. completed it) in "a few weeks." It is not done, and when it is done it won't have been done in a few weeks.

 

What? I'm not talking about discs. I'm talking about digital copies. The disc related DRM is what enabled the sharing of disc copies on a business level, but none of that is needed on the digital side.

 

Completion and ready are two different things, nor does this line of discussion address the greater point - this feature was already planned and in development. To repeat myself again, all that has fundamentally changed is disc based copies can no longer be included.

My quick skim of that article reveals nothing more than the blinding obvious, i.e. you have to wait for in-progress updates to finish before engaging offline mode. As I said, if you disable auto-updating that should be a non-issue.

 

They were very much pointless restrictions, the fact they've been nuked compounds this. Microsoft are/were fully capable of pursuing sharing features and etc on the digital side without enforcing restrictions on physical media. Really, I don't get why people have a hard time comprehending this. If you want the status quo, buy a disc - if you want next-gen, buy digitally. Everyone wins, everyone is happy.

 

Not only are the devices you mention portable (Stuff it in a drawer), but none of them make those components mandatory to the function of the device.

Even Steam doesn't do that. No digital service does that. If I buy a copy of Mass Effect 3, I pretty much have to register it through Origin, and when I do the disc becomes useless. Same with BF3 and a number of other games on Steam.

I cannot understand why people are so ready to dismiss Steam as a comparison just because it gives sales. They are willing to die for it as a platform just becuase it sold you games at a 75% discount. Cause that makes it ok, right? Oh, and only Steam can ever give you sales, other digital services can't (Origin with it's 50% - 75% off sales that nobody talks about).

Even Steam doesn't do that. No digital service does that. If I buy a copy of Mass Effect 3, I pretty much have to register it through Origin, and when I do the disc becomes useless. Same with BF3 and a number of other games on Steam.

I cannot understand why people are so ready to dismiss Steam as a comparison just because it gives sales. They are willing to die for it as a platform just becuase it sold you games at a 75% discount. Cause that makes it ok, right? Oh, and only Steam can ever give you sales, other digital services can't (Origin with it's 50% - 75% off sales that nobody talks about).

 

Whatever nonsense you're rambling on about isn't relevant to the point I was making.

 

Microsoft are perfectly capable of continuing to pursue their sharing plans on titles acquired digitally, all that has changed is physically acquired titles will maintain the status quo.

 

If Microsoft are smart, they will use the advantages of digital distribution to add value to titles acquired via that method (luring in customers from the latter), and let ye olde physical media slowly sail off into retirement.

There's a difference between being able to do something and do something.

 

If MS adds the family sharing etc. for digitally bought games(which I hope), they can easily get bad PR just like they did with DRM and that's probably why they removed it.

You need to remember that PEOPLE ARE STUPID. If some rules like family sharing were available, they would certainly focus on it in their advertising. No matter how many disclaimer lines etc. you have in an advertisement, Averge Joe would not read it and MS would get complaints and bad PR because people bought a physical game and it didn't work as they'd expected.

 

That's what happend with the drm and family sharing etc. People got confused by all the rules, so MS removed it to keep everything simple. By adding the family sharing etc. back for digital only, things would get complicated again...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!