Recommended Posts

A former McDonald's worker in Pennsylvania is suing a franchiser owner saying she was required to receive her wages through a debit card that charged fees, resulting in some hourly employees receiving less than minimum wage.

Natalie Gunshannon, a single mother, 27, said she and other workers were paid through a JPMorgan Chase Payroll Card, which has a $1.50 fee for ATM withdrawals, a $10 inactivity fee after 90 days, and a 75 cent online payment fee per transaction and other fees.

Gunshannon, who filed a lawsuit in the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas, is hoping to have her case certified as a class action on behalf of the other employees who were paid with the Payroll card.

"It's a violation of the law," said Gunshannon's attorney, Michael Cefalo. "They're entitled to a choice to be paid in cash or check. Fees connected to this debit card which employees have to pay to get their wages which is unfair."

Gunshannon said she asked her employer if she could receive her wages through direct deposit at her credit union, which she said did not accept payments through the payroll card. She is suing under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Act for unjust enrichment.

Franchisees Albert and Carol Mueller provided a statement to ABC News, which read: "We value our employees and everything they do for our organization. We are committed to providing them the best possible work environment so they can deliver the fast, reliable service that our customers expect. We are aware of this matter. But at this time, we have not seen a copy of the complaint. For this reason, it would be inappropriate for us to comment further."

Suzanne Martindale, staff attorney with Consumers Union, said some employers are motivated to pay wages with these payroll cards to cut the cost of distributing paper checks.

"Employers are always looking for ways to cut costs," she said. "There is incentive for employers to offer these cards but in some cases, they don't negotiate with the payroll card provider over fees."

Gunshannon, who studied massage therapy, began working as an hourly employee at a McDonald's in Shavertown, Pa., on April 24 after she was unable to find jobs in her preferred field.

"There are no jobs in Luzerne County," she said.

She was paid about $7.44 an hour and worked 30 to 37 hours as a part-time worker.

Pennsylvania's basic minimum rate is $7.25 an hour.

 After she was issued a JP Morgan Chase Payroll card, she requested a paper check from her employer.

A manager allegedly told her, "If you don't activate the card, there is no way for us to pay you," according to the court complaint.

McDonald's managers and assistant managers "have the option to receive wage compensation by way of direct deposit, thus avoiding fees," the complaint states.

"McDonald's does not provide a choice for hourly employees to receive their justly earned wages through a bank check, cash or direct deposit," the lawsuit said.

 Gunshannon said the people with whom she worked were "nice" but she quit after three weeks for not receiving her wages as requested. Gunshannon said she is looking for jobs at other restaurants or home health work.

"This isn't something personal. I would just like to be paid for my work," she said.

However, some people say payroll debit cards can be beneficial to the unbanked or underbanked.

"Payroll debit cards offer real benefits for workers who are accustomed to cashing paychecks at check cashers, including meaningful cost savings, greater security and the convenience of an electronic payment option," said Timothy Flacke, executive director of the nonprofit Doorways to Dreams (D2D) Fund, which makes financial products for low- and moderate-income consumers. "Of course, many people do not like to have a product chosen for them, especially when there are fees involved."

A growing number of employers use payroll cards to pay some of their employers, but it violates both state and federal law to pay by payroll card alone, according to Lauren Saunders, managing attorney with the National Consumer Law Center.

"Employees should always have the choice of direct deposit to their own bank account and also the choice of a check or cash," she said. "Depending on the particular card, for unbanked employees, a payroll card can be a safer, faster, more convenient and cheaper way of receiving wages than paying to cash a paper check. But payroll cards vary widely and some charge too many fees. Some payroll cards even have expensive overdraft fees, which are completely inappropriate on payroll cards or any other form of prepaid card."

source

Those are not mandated by any employer I've known in PA or CT, they are an option for those that either don't have checking accounts or those that refuse to have one for whatever paranoid reasons, she could have simply opened a checking account and had her pay DDd into her checking account

  • Like 1

I'm sorry, but can you read z0phi3l, or did you just glance at it and fail to understand the words on the screen?  Right in the article is says:

 

Gunshannon said she asked her employer if she could receive her wages through direct deposit at her credit union, which she said did not accept payments through the payroll card. She is suing under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Act for unjust enrichment.

 

So, this is a failure of the business owners, and not of their workers.

  • Like 3

Sounds like she owes them since it would save her check cashing costs.... to me anyways.

 

quote: "There are no jobs in Luzerne County," she said.

 

A lawsuit is NOT the way to keep your job.

 

quote: $1.50 fee for ATM withdrawals,a 75 cent online payment fee per transaction

 

Heck, the manager could have gave a the few bucks it costs out of his own wallet for her not to go all crazy. I know I would have.


I'm sorry, but can you read z0phi3l, or did you just glance at it and fail to understand the words on the screen?  Right in the article is says:

 

Gunshannon said she asked her employer if she could receive her wages through direct deposit at her credit union, which she said did not accept payments through the payroll card. She is suing under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Act for unjust enrichment.

 

So, this is a failure of the business owners, and not of their workers (even more likely just ignored what options she was told she had)

 

 

Quote: A manager allegedly told her, "If you don't activate the card, there is no way for us to pay you," according to the court complaint.

 

I would wager a bet that she just didn't understand what she was being told.

Sounds like she owes them since it would save her check cashing costs.... to me anyways.

 

quote: "There are no jobs in Luzerne County," she said.

 

A lawsuit is NOT the way to keep your job.

 

quote: $1.50 fee for ATM withdrawals,a 75 cent online payment fee per transaction

 

Heck, the manager could have gave a the few bucks it costs out of his own wallet for her not to go all crazy. I know I would have.

Quote: A manager allegedly told her, "If you don't activate the card, there is no way for us to pay you," according to the court complaint.

 

I would wager a bet that she just didn't understand what she was being told.

Check cashing costs? I can go to my bank and cash my check free of charge so implying she "owes them" is absurd.

 

I worked as a manager in food service in my teens and became privy to the schemes that certain franchisees will incorporate to save some cash. It saves the employers a TON of money to not issue printed checks and direct deposit is NOT free.

 

In short, the management took the cheap and easy way out; I hope the courts show them the error of their ways.

Check cashing costs? I can go to my bank and cash my check free of charge so implying she "owes them" is absurd.

 

I worked as a manager in food service in my teens and became privy to the schemes that certain franchisees will incorporate to save some cash. It saves the employers a TON of money to not issue printed checks and direct deposit is NOT free.

 

In short, the management took the cheap and easy way out; I hope the courts show them the error of their ways.

yes, check cashing costs... its clear to me she doesn't have a bank account otherwise she would have settle for Direct Deposit... so check cashing is typically $3 fee + 3% of the check (places may vary)

Those are not mandated by any employer I've known in PA or CT, they are an option for those that either don't have checking accounts or those that refuse to have one for whatever paranoid reasons, she could have simply opened a checking account and had her pay DDd into her checking account

Try reading all of the article, instead of just the headline.

Just go to the ATM and get your paycheck in cash with the card. You are only out a small one time fee.

Why should you have to pay a fee for your wages?

Is this how you talk to people in real life, ranmas?

 

Here's a novel idea. Be respectful.

There was nothing disrespectful in his post, at all.

Well why can't she just get her own bank account and let McDonalds direct deposit her wages on there? That's how it always works in Belgium, for example (it really is the only way) and it works well.

 

Aren't there any banks that offer free service? I know that almost all Belgian banks require a yearly cost (about ?30 usually) and nothing more, no transaction fees, nothing.

Well why can't she just get her own bank account and let McDonalds direct deposit her wages on there? That's how it always works in Belgium, for example (it really is the only way) and it works well.

 

Aren't there any banks that offer free service? I know that almost all Belgian banks require a yearly cost (about ?30 usually) and nothing more, no transaction fees, nothing.

 

I guess you didn't bother to read the article either...

 

Gunshannon said she asked her employer if she could receive her wages through direct deposit at her credit union, which she said did not accept payments through the payroll card. She is suing under the Pennsylvania Wage Payment and Collection Act for unjust enrichment.

Oh ok, sorry, must have missed it. And I also don't really know what a credit union is? If it's just another bank account the employer really needs to change their policy, it's ridiculous.

Oh ok, sorry, must have missed it. And I also don't really know what a credit union is? If it's just another bank account the employer really needs to change their policy, it's ridiculous.

 

I guess you haven't also bothered to google "credit union", either.

Well sorry, I don't Google every single word I read that I don't know the exact meaning of.

"credit union" is a 'member-owned' bank.

 

Easier to borrow money, lower interest rate, more friendly -- usually.

Personally if the manager cannot do direct deposit with the employee then write a check.  How expensive is it to write a check?  There's gotta be some cost involved setting up these debt cards or getting some type of perks from the bank.

I never got why people just cant get a darn checking account to start with.... most anymore more have a very low balance requirement... I've seen them as low as $10 minimum balance in Pennsylvania.... not saying that is the case here since she had a credit union account... but I've seen people get cards like this pay the fees and complain, just get a darn account and don't be scammed...

 

btw she had a choice in this case, but for some reason her choice wasn't accepted to get checks, the first story I read about this (a different site) said she choose to get checks put into her credit union account but the franchiser didn't listen and forced her to take the cards even though they gave her a choice

You aren't really paying a fee on your wages, but a fee for using the debit card.

If you're forced to take your wages on a wage card, and there's a fee to take money from that wage card, it boils down to a fee on your wages.  That's fundamentally unfair.

  • Like 1

If you're forced to take your wages on a wage card, and there's a fee to take money from that wage card, it boils down to a fee on your wages.  That's fundamentally unfair.

 

Oh I agree but it happens a lot. My wife's employer requires direct deposit and yet our bank is now  trying to install debit card charges, so she is in essence having to do the same thing.

Oh I agree but it happens a lot. My wife's employer requires direct deposit and yet our bank is now  trying to install debit card charges, so she is in essence having to do the same thing.

 

Vote with your feet then! Move to a bank who are less arsey.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Simple answer is yes, you will still get the Windows updates and as long as browser is up to date, you will be good. Only thing secure boot does is protect you against boot level threats and make it harder to install other OS's. I've been looking into this pretty thoroughly lately myself as wifes computer has secure boot disabled plus my other, older computers that run Linux, don't have secure boot enabled. Have seen all kinds of questions about this on the Linux Mint and MX Linux forums. Just don't suddenly enable secure boot now.
    • How many other companies will follow Ford's lead? Or, have they already gotten lazy and become enslaved to AI--and now can't figure out how to get out of that mess.
    • Why would any self-respecting intelligent person follow any recommendation by Donald's GOP administration? With almost two years of fabrications, deceit, and blatantly illegal behavior, why believe them now? They had best be gone after the November 2026 election, so we'll wait and see.
    • AltSendme 0.4.1 by Razvan Serea AltSendme is a minimal, cross-platform application designed for fast, secure, and private peer-to-peer file transfers. It allows users to send files or entire directories directly between devices without relying on cloud servers, accounts, or any personal information. Everything is encrypted end-to-end using modern protocols like QUIC and TLS 1.3, ensuring both strong security and low-latency performance. Transfers are verified with BLAKE3 for data integrity, and interrupted downloads automatically resume, making the experience reliable even on unstable connections. You can transfer anything—images, videos, documents, and more. Integrity checks are performed on both ends, so your files are automatically verified for correctness during both sending and receiving. AltSendme works seamlessly across local networks or long-distance links, capable of saturating multi-gigabit connections for extremely fast delivery. With built-in NAT traversal and encrypted relay fallback, it connects devices almost anywhere. The app integrates with the Sendme CLI and will soon support mobile and web platforms. Fully free and open-source, AltSendme offers a lightweight, privacy-first alternative to traditional cloud-based services, removing size limits, upload costs, and unnecessary data exposure. AltSendme 0.4.1 changelog: Release Highlights Self-hosted relays: Run your own iroh relay so transfers don't rely on public infrastructure. Includes a full deployment template in deploy/relay/ with Docker Compose for a VPS and configuration examples for production use. Fly.io support: One-click deploy template for Fly.io, including a quick-start config (fly.dev.toml) for testing without a custom domain, plus production setup with Let's Encrypt and your own hostname. Relay settings UI: New Settings → Network panel to choose how AltSendme connects: automatic public relays, custom self-hosted URLs (with optional auth token), or disabled. Test connections, verify latency, and see live relay status in the footer. Disable relays: Turn off relay servers entirely when you only need same-network transfers (e.g. LAN). Direct connections only. No relay hop required when devices can reach each other. Android graduates from beta: Android is now part of the regular release cycle alongside desktop. APKs ship with each version (universal, arm64, and armv7). Other improvements Private relay access control via shared auth token Relay fallback notifications when a custom relay is unreachable Broadcast mode toggle in sharing settings Android release build fixes (split-per-ABI APKs, universal APK preservation) UI polish: mobile safe-area insets, dropzone layout, transfer progress animation Bug fixes for minification-related serialization issues and system tray icon loading What's Changed feat(relay): add relay status functionality and settings UI (a120cdf) feat(relay): implement custom relay server configuration and verification (51276c7) feat(relay): add configuration for private relay access and enhance observability features (48fbabf) feat(relay): enhance relay URL validation, display connection status (d4fffa0) feat(relay): add RelayChangeGuard component and enhance relay-related translations (16ba514) feat(broadcast): add toggle setting for broadcast mode in sharing UI (ca6d977) fix(relay): correct QUIC discovery port, pin image, templatize fly.dev (52a2ba5) fix: More broken serialization due to minification (67491a9) fix(android): preserve true universal APK across per-ABI builds (e9f256f) fix(ui): conditional safe-area insets padding on mobile (1182f0e) refactor(transfer): CircularRing component animation fix (944572b) chore(android): drop x86 and x86_64 release APKs, keep universal+arm64+armv7 (34ada0b) Download: AltSendme 0.4.1 | ARM64 | ~9.0 MB (Open Source) Download: AltSendme for MacOS | Android Links: AltSendme Home Page | GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • You are mostly right about the ephemeral nature of it. As I mention in the article, if you dont add a second device or take a backup of your account before uninstalling it, then yes you will lose access to your account. That said, in terms of actual user experience when you sync multiple devices your message history carries across and there's also a Saved Messages chat like there is on Telegram to send messages and attachments between your installs. But yh, what you point out are correct and its not trying to emulate Messenger or Telegram.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      495
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!