Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33


Recommended Posts

Reporter Michael Hastings dies at 33

 

Award-winning journalist Michael Hastings, who wrote the Rolling Stone profile that led to Gen. Stanley McChrystal's resignation, died in a car accident early Tuesday in Los Angeles, according to his employers at Buzzfeed and Rolling Stone. He was 33.

 

"We are shocked and devastated by the news that Michael Hastings is gone," Buzzfeed Editor-in-Chief Ben Smith wrote. "Michael was a great, fearless journalist with an incredible instinct for the story, and a gift for finding ways to make his readers care about anything he covered from wars to politicians. He wrote stories that would otherwise have gone unwritten, and without him there are great stories that will go untold."

 

Hastings is perhaps best known for "Runaway General," the 2010 Rolling Stone blockbuster story on Gen. Stanley McChrystal, who commanded the U.S. forces in Afghanistan until President Obama urged him to resign in the days after the report.

 

Hastings has also authored several books, including: The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America's War in Afghanistan, which stemmed from his story on McChrystal; I Lost My Love in Baghdad: A Modern War Story, written after his then-fiance, an aide worker, was killed in a car bombing while he was covering the Iraq war for Newsweek; and a book on the election for Buzzfeed, Panic 2012.

 

His colleagues at Rolling Stone remembered him as a fearless reporter who refused to "cozy up to power."

Matt Farwell, who recently worked with Hastings, said the journalist was not only great at his job, but was a great friend.

 

"Looking back on the past ten years is tough for anyone, but looking back on Michael's past ten years and you begin to understand how passionate and dedicated to this work he was, a passion that was only equaled by his dedication to his family and friends, and how much more he lived in thirty-three years than most people live in a lifetime," Farwall wrote.

 

Hastings is survived by his wife, Elise.

 

 

  • 4 weeks later...

this-was-not-an-accident.jpg

 

VIDEO: Was Journalist Michael Hastings Murdered? Police and Firefighters on the Scene Told not to Comment

 

 

Mercedes Benz debunks the theory that the car of Wikileaking journalist Michael Hastings ?just blew up? upon impact. Journalists have consulted leading University Physics professors in the Los Angeles area, who all agreed that the placement of the engine defied expectations of a normal crash scenario.

 

Police and reporters on the scene confirm there were NO skid marks, both explaining the videos of the speeding car. (Gag order issued for Police and Firefighters responders to scene of Wikileaking Journalist assassination,  The Political Blind Spot July 11, 2013)

 

The crime scene has made investigative journalists as well as former military doubt Hastings? car crash was an accident and claim that Michael Hasting?s car could have been manipulated through remote control. Adding to the murder suspicions is an email Hastings wrote to his coworkers only a few hours before he died:

 

Subject: FBI Investigation, re: NSA Hey (redacted names) ? the Feds are interviewing my ?close friends and associates.? Perhaps if the authorities arrive ?BuzzFeed GQ,? er HQ, may be wise to immediately request legal counsel before any conversations or interviews about our news-gathering practices or related journalism issues.

 

Also: I?m onto a big story, and need to go off the rada[r] for a bit.

 

All the best, and hope to see you all soon. (Melissa Jeltsen,  Michael Hastings Sent Email About FBI Probe Hours Before Death, Huffington Post, June 23, 2013)

 

WhoWhatWhy published a lengthy article on July 14 in which author Michael Krikorian quotes ?Terry Hopkins, a former U.S. Navy military policeman who served in Afghanistan?:

 

?I?ve never seen an explosion like that? I?ve seen military vehicles explode, but never quite like that. Look, here?s a reporter who brought down a general. He?s sending out emails saying he?s being watched. It?s four in the morning and his car explodes? Come on, you have to be na?ve not to at least consider it wasn?t an accident.? (Michael Krikorian and David J. Krajicek, The Michael Hastings Wreck?Video Evidence Only Deepens the Mystery, WhoWhatWhy, July 14, 2013)

 

The crime scene has made investigative journalists as well as former military doubt Hastings? car crash was an accident and claim that Michael Hasting?s car could have been manipulated through remote control. Adding to the murder suspicions is an email Hastings wrote to his coworkers only a few hours before he died:

 

wow strong engineering.

 

anyone aware?

Occam's Razor says the latter.

I've seen (way too many) burned car crash victims over the years, and the vast majority aren't much more than a (very smelly) collection of charred bones & jerky with a bit of flesh in the middle - if you're lucky. Using the term "autopsy" for the examination is just formal bureaucratese. A sample of flesh, if any, gets sent out for toxicology, the teeth are compared to dental records, and the rest is often in such bad shape it should be cremated for shipment - which the car has already 90% completed anyhow.

The tree won, move on

  • 2 weeks later...

 

 

 

Mercedes Benz debunks the theory that the car of Wikileaking journalist Michael Hastings ?just blew up? upon impact. Journalists have consulted leading University Physics professors in the Los Angeles area, who all agreed that the placement of the engine defied expectations of a normal crash scenario.

 

Police and reporters on the scene confirm there were NO skid marks, both explaining the videos of the speeding car. (Gag order issued for Police and Firefighters responders to scene of Wikileaking Journalist assassination,  The Political Blind Spot July 11, 2013)

 

 

 

 

 

Where is this Mercedes Benz debunked info? As for the crash itself, here is the "supposed" video though not confirmed. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNgTtIaP8Bs

 

 

FYI cars can explode on impact, though rare, it does happen. 

 

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sj9yTWP1fA'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyUwo7x9D5Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIsdSeL0-sA&feature=youtu.be&t=6s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvFPa4VO2RE&feature=youtu.be&t=1m23s

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!