Why no company will acquire Nokia right now


Recommended Posts

nokia-sign-green.jpg?w=618

 

Huawei, which recently became the No.3 smartphone brand in the world, may be considering a Nokia acquisition. Wall Street reacted violently, prompting an 8% spike in Nokia?s share price. This speculation is part of an annual summertime ritual. In July, we?ll get the rumor about Lenovo buying Nokia and in August, some British brokerage will speculate about Cisco executives flying to Helsinki. However, there is a very specific problem with the idea of any of these companies buying Nokia right now.
 
All of them might be interested in buying a smartphone vendor. But Nokia is not a smartphone company. It?s still a feature phone company.
 
In the latest quarter, Nokia?s feature phone volume totaled  56 million units and smartphone shipments stood at 6 million units. On the revenue front, feature phones outpaced smartphones by 1.6 billion euros vs. 1.2 billion euros.
 
But even that is not the biggest obstacle for a possible acquisition. Here is the problem: year-on-year, feature phone revenue declined by -31% in the March quarter? while smartphone revenue declined by -32%. Nokia?s transition from a feature phone company to a smartphone company is hard to map out at the moment.
 
Here is one way to put the forecasting challenge in perspective. In both Q2 2012 and Q3 2012, Nokia delivered sequential growth in feature phone sales of 3 million units per quarter. This shocked Wall Street and the handset industry, because nearly everyone had expected sequential declines. The best research houses in the business, including the legendary GfK, were blindsided by the Indian Summer had by Nokia?s feature phone business. But as soon as experts had revised their growth expectations upwards, the trend reversed. Christmas-quarter feature phone shipments missed expectations and in Q1 2013, Nokia delivered a stunning 24 million-unit sequential decline.
 
There are reasons for the wild swings in Nokia?s feature phone business. Most of them have to do with the competitiveness of its Asha devices against low-end Android rivals in Africa and Asia. But the upshot is that nobody really saw the scale of  Nokia?s shocking feature phone performance last summer ? or the underperformance over the winter.
 
Nokia missed the feature phone volume estimates issued by many analysts by 10 million units in Q1 2013. This is a company that is still selling more than 55 million feature phones per quarter. Is that going to drop to 50 million units by Q1 2014? Or 40 million? Or 30 million?  Right now, nobody knows.
 
The industry experts have demonstrated they are out to lunch when it comes to the weird fluctuations in feature phone demand over the past year. But this is an issue of great importance for Nokia?s profitability and its ability to maintain scale and presence in emerging markets. The slow decline of feature phone sales would enable Nokia to transition relatively painlessly into being a smartphone vendor; a sharp plunge could trigger a massive cash burn.
 
No company is going to buy Nokia until people get a better grasp on whether the sudden deterioration of its feature phone division this past winter was an anomaly or a sign of accelerating decay.

 

 

http://bgr.com/2013/06/19/nokia-acquisition-analysis-no-deal/

A lot of people here will disagree but one problem I see is Nokia's reliance on Windows phones for their smartphone sales. WP is not as popular as Android and iOS, and may never be. Nokia needs to diversify. 

 

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

Of course nobody would buy Nokia.  MS have them pretty much over a barrel these days, whoy would anyone buy into that position.

 

Sure, if sales were spectacular, then maybe, but they're not.  And if they were, MS would probably have first refusal anyhow.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Maybe. I keep hoping so because competition is a good thing. However, I'm not holding my breath.

^ Indeed. Also, Microsoft just cannot afford the risk of someone buying out Nokia and dropping WP; they're just about the only OEM making WP devices!  If it came to that, MS would either buy Nokia themselves, or give them a crapton of money to keep the wolves at bay, like they did Apple back in the 90's.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

 

I will have to disagree about the part where the market is near its maturity. We have no idea what the future holds for us. No one would guess 10 years ago that this is the way cell phones would go and same can be said about basically anything and everything. 

 

One huge innovation from MS/Nokia can change everything or a new OEM/OS for that matter.

 

Technology is growing and growing fast. Anything can happen.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Yeah, with Samsung owning so much of the Android market, I think more companies are going to have to look at alternatives to Android to be honest.  All of the manufacturers can't give you the same product and expect people to want their products over someone elses...

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

 

 

This is MS's weakness. in niche markets or any market, MS has shown a pinache to simply buy a company within that market just to get a "mature" company in that market. I use the skype example alot. MS will be a part of it's own downfall because of this.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Yeah, with Samsung owning so much of the Android market, I think more companies are going to have to look at alternatives to Android to be honest.  All of the manufacturers can't give you the same product and expect people to want their products over someone elses...

I will have to disagree about the part where the market is near its maturity. We have no idea what the future holds for us. No one would guess 10 years ago that this is the way cell phones would go and same can be said about basically anything and everything. 

 

One huge innovation from MS/Nokia can change everything or a new OEM/OS for that matter.

 

Technology is growing and growing fast. Anything can happen.

 

I could be wrong about the smartphone industry nearing its maturity, however, just looking around me, I can see that the majority of the people I've come across own some kind of smartphone, thus leading me to surmise that even if we're not yet near the peak of the market, but it's certainly fast approaching.  If Microsoft doesn't innovate fast or significantly refine an old idea, then their window of credibly competing with Android and iOS will get smaller and smaller.

I could be wrong about the smartphone industry nearing its maturity, however, just looking around me, I can see that the majority of the people I've come across own some kind of smartphone, thus leading me to surmise that even if we're not yet near the peak of the market, but it's certainly fast approaching.  If Microsoft doesn't innovate fast or significantly refine an old idea, then their window of credibly competing with Android and iOS will get smaller and smaller.

I actually think that Apple will have a big part of what will happen next. I know a good amount of people (personally and from what i read on the net) that are waiting to see what Apple will do next. Depending on that they will decided of stay with apple, move to apple or look for something new.

 

iOS 7 for example was a disappointment for a lot of people. If the next iPhone will disappoint people as well i can see a big move from Apple to something else and something else can mean WP as well.

A lot of people here will disagree but one problem I see is Nokia's reliance on Windows phones for their smartphone sales. WP is not as popular as Android and iOS, and may never be. Nokia needs to diversify. 

 

Diversify into what? A flooded deadbeat market? Why the hell should they be spending money right now expanding into markets which they'll never capture? That would be money going out the door, never to come back. Nokia doesn't need to diversify, it's settled into a market and has a positive image in the marketplace. People know Nokia, and thanks to that, are getting to know Windows Phone. They're focused providing the best experience for WP users, and on a clear path to recovery, why ruin that?

I actually think that Apple will have a big part of what will happen next. I know a good amount of people (personally and from what i read on the net) that are waiting to see what Apple will do next. Depending on that they will decided of stay with apple, move to apple or look for something new.

 

iOS 7 for example was a disappointment for a lot of people. If the next iPhone will disappoint people as well i can see a big move from Apple to something else and something else can mean WP as well.

 

That's a very good point you brought up about people waiting to see more from what Apple has to offer in iOS 7.  This is a good opportunity for Microsoft to eat into the smartphone market share if they can convince the average smartphone users.  If Apple does disappoint, then it'll most likely be geeks like us who'll shun Apple and look for other platforms like WP or Android.  The average smartphone users probably aren't as sensitive to minor to moderate changes in the way the OS looks/function as much as the technology enthusiasts.  There may be changes in the flow of users to different platforms, but I don't think it'll be anything earth shattering.  Then again, any positive change for the WP platform is always a good thing, especially for competition, a key driving force in innovation  :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!