Why no company will acquire Nokia right now


Recommended Posts

nokia-sign-green.jpg?w=618

 

Huawei, which recently became the No.3 smartphone brand in the world, may be considering a Nokia acquisition. Wall Street reacted violently, prompting an 8% spike in Nokia?s share price. This speculation is part of an annual summertime ritual. In July, we?ll get the rumor about Lenovo buying Nokia and in August, some British brokerage will speculate about Cisco executives flying to Helsinki. However, there is a very specific problem with the idea of any of these companies buying Nokia right now.
 
All of them might be interested in buying a smartphone vendor. But Nokia is not a smartphone company. It?s still a feature phone company.
 
In the latest quarter, Nokia?s feature phone volume totaled  56 million units and smartphone shipments stood at 6 million units. On the revenue front, feature phones outpaced smartphones by 1.6 billion euros vs. 1.2 billion euros.
 
But even that is not the biggest obstacle for a possible acquisition. Here is the problem: year-on-year, feature phone revenue declined by -31% in the March quarter? while smartphone revenue declined by -32%. Nokia?s transition from a feature phone company to a smartphone company is hard to map out at the moment.
 
Here is one way to put the forecasting challenge in perspective. In both Q2 2012 and Q3 2012, Nokia delivered sequential growth in feature phone sales of 3 million units per quarter. This shocked Wall Street and the handset industry, because nearly everyone had expected sequential declines. The best research houses in the business, including the legendary GfK, were blindsided by the Indian Summer had by Nokia?s feature phone business. But as soon as experts had revised their growth expectations upwards, the trend reversed. Christmas-quarter feature phone shipments missed expectations and in Q1 2013, Nokia delivered a stunning 24 million-unit sequential decline.
 
There are reasons for the wild swings in Nokia?s feature phone business. Most of them have to do with the competitiveness of its Asha devices against low-end Android rivals in Africa and Asia. But the upshot is that nobody really saw the scale of  Nokia?s shocking feature phone performance last summer ? or the underperformance over the winter.
 
Nokia missed the feature phone volume estimates issued by many analysts by 10 million units in Q1 2013. This is a company that is still selling more than 55 million feature phones per quarter. Is that going to drop to 50 million units by Q1 2014? Or 40 million? Or 30 million?  Right now, nobody knows.
 
The industry experts have demonstrated they are out to lunch when it comes to the weird fluctuations in feature phone demand over the past year. But this is an issue of great importance for Nokia?s profitability and its ability to maintain scale and presence in emerging markets. The slow decline of feature phone sales would enable Nokia to transition relatively painlessly into being a smartphone vendor; a sharp plunge could trigger a massive cash burn.
 
No company is going to buy Nokia until people get a better grasp on whether the sudden deterioration of its feature phone division this past winter was an anomaly or a sign of accelerating decay.

 

 

http://bgr.com/2013/06/19/nokia-acquisition-analysis-no-deal/

A lot of people here will disagree but one problem I see is Nokia's reliance on Windows phones for their smartphone sales. WP is not as popular as Android and iOS, and may never be. Nokia needs to diversify. 

 

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

Of course nobody would buy Nokia.  MS have them pretty much over a barrel these days, whoy would anyone buy into that position.

 

Sure, if sales were spectacular, then maybe, but they're not.  And if they were, MS would probably have first refusal anyhow.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Maybe. I keep hoping so because competition is a good thing. However, I'm not holding my breath.

^ Indeed. Also, Microsoft just cannot afford the risk of someone buying out Nokia and dropping WP; they're just about the only OEM making WP devices!  If it came to that, MS would either buy Nokia themselves, or give them a crapton of money to keep the wolves at bay, like they did Apple back in the 90's.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

 

I will have to disagree about the part where the market is near its maturity. We have no idea what the future holds for us. No one would guess 10 years ago that this is the way cell phones would go and same can be said about basically anything and everything. 

 

One huge innovation from MS/Nokia can change everything or a new OEM/OS for that matter.

 

Technology is growing and growing fast. Anything can happen.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Yeah, with Samsung owning so much of the Android market, I think more companies are going to have to look at alternatives to Android to be honest.  All of the manufacturers can't give you the same product and expect people to want their products over someone elses...

I doubt that WP will ever become as popular as the other two platforms.  The reason, I think, is that the smartphone market may be already be near its maturity.  The people who now own smartphones have invested their money into apps on the platform they're currently using, and may be discouraged by the need to have to spend more money for the same/similar apps on top of having to relearn a new OS.

 

Of course, you'll always have people switching back and forth between platforms, but IMO, the numbers aren't going to be significant, unless one of the three platforms (WP, iOS and Android) innovates enough to drive another revolution in the industry.

 

Basically, the way I see it, unless Microsoft can outperform the other two platforms through something innovative and compelling, and continue to rely on old ideas that have already been implemented, they may never be able to make any significant intrusion into the smartphone market, but that's just my opinion.

 

 

This is MS's weakness. in niche markets or any market, MS has shown a pinache to simply buy a company within that market just to get a "mature" company in that market. I use the skype example alot. MS will be a part of it's own downfall because of this.

I kinda agree with you but you can always say that in the past Android wasnt that popular like iOS and they still made it.

Maybe same can happen with Nokia and Windows.

 

Yeah, with Samsung owning so much of the Android market, I think more companies are going to have to look at alternatives to Android to be honest.  All of the manufacturers can't give you the same product and expect people to want their products over someone elses...

I will have to disagree about the part where the market is near its maturity. We have no idea what the future holds for us. No one would guess 10 years ago that this is the way cell phones would go and same can be said about basically anything and everything. 

 

One huge innovation from MS/Nokia can change everything or a new OEM/OS for that matter.

 

Technology is growing and growing fast. Anything can happen.

 

I could be wrong about the smartphone industry nearing its maturity, however, just looking around me, I can see that the majority of the people I've come across own some kind of smartphone, thus leading me to surmise that even if we're not yet near the peak of the market, but it's certainly fast approaching.  If Microsoft doesn't innovate fast or significantly refine an old idea, then their window of credibly competing with Android and iOS will get smaller and smaller.

I could be wrong about the smartphone industry nearing its maturity, however, just looking around me, I can see that the majority of the people I've come across own some kind of smartphone, thus leading me to surmise that even if we're not yet near the peak of the market, but it's certainly fast approaching.  If Microsoft doesn't innovate fast or significantly refine an old idea, then their window of credibly competing with Android and iOS will get smaller and smaller.

I actually think that Apple will have a big part of what will happen next. I know a good amount of people (personally and from what i read on the net) that are waiting to see what Apple will do next. Depending on that they will decided of stay with apple, move to apple or look for something new.

 

iOS 7 for example was a disappointment for a lot of people. If the next iPhone will disappoint people as well i can see a big move from Apple to something else and something else can mean WP as well.

A lot of people here will disagree but one problem I see is Nokia's reliance on Windows phones for their smartphone sales. WP is not as popular as Android and iOS, and may never be. Nokia needs to diversify. 

 

Diversify into what? A flooded deadbeat market? Why the hell should they be spending money right now expanding into markets which they'll never capture? That would be money going out the door, never to come back. Nokia doesn't need to diversify, it's settled into a market and has a positive image in the marketplace. People know Nokia, and thanks to that, are getting to know Windows Phone. They're focused providing the best experience for WP users, and on a clear path to recovery, why ruin that?

I actually think that Apple will have a big part of what will happen next. I know a good amount of people (personally and from what i read on the net) that are waiting to see what Apple will do next. Depending on that they will decided of stay with apple, move to apple or look for something new.

 

iOS 7 for example was a disappointment for a lot of people. If the next iPhone will disappoint people as well i can see a big move from Apple to something else and something else can mean WP as well.

 

That's a very good point you brought up about people waiting to see more from what Apple has to offer in iOS 7.  This is a good opportunity for Microsoft to eat into the smartphone market share if they can convince the average smartphone users.  If Apple does disappoint, then it'll most likely be geeks like us who'll shun Apple and look for other platforms like WP or Android.  The average smartphone users probably aren't as sensitive to minor to moderate changes in the way the OS looks/function as much as the technology enthusiasts.  There may be changes in the flow of users to different platforms, but I don't think it'll be anything earth shattering.  Then again, any positive change for the WP platform is always a good thing, especially for competition, a key driving force in innovation  :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!