Xbox One: No Games DRM or "Always Online"


Recommended Posts

snip

 

lol @ this response. That guy is so out of touch with gaming I'm actually glad he left Epic now.

 

He'd have you believe that consumers are the reason the industry is struggling, rather than his own ex-colleagues failing to come up with better ideas than "hats/tacked on MP". If that's the best he has to offer, then he doesn't belong in gaming any more.

We're shortsighted? You'll be thanking us in 10 years time when you want to revisit one of your favourite Xbox One games & don't have to worry about the authentication servers being offline.

 

And again, like others have said, you haven't lost the ability to share. Xbox One's DRM would have stopped you. Now you can lend your games to as many people as you like, as often as you like.

 

Games will still probably be installed to the HDD, so discs will not be damaged & if people are too lazy to switch a disc then they have more pressing issues in their life quite frankly.

  

Once again it's not about cant get up to go change a disc in the drive. I'm sure I'm more fit than you are (anyway that's against the point). I've already explained that currently the way how we switch games is the same as how we used to switch 45 vinyl records in the 1980s, here we were moving to a new way like how we play our mp3 songs today......and the whole slew of people who couldn't see this didn't make it happen.

Getting some serious lulz out of you tonight. Your nick is spot on. Waiting for your to rage quit at any moment. :laugh:

No rage quit. I wanted to put that sig as my sig too but this blasted iPad can't drag and drop, nor can my note 2 even in multi window. My windows tablet is in for repair screen broke and not around a computer right now.

In retrospect, I think what Microsoft was trying to do was a good idea. However, people were not ready yet for the digital game model Microsoft was aiming for.  I think Xbox One was a 2020 console trying to be released in 2013!

You're kidding right?

 

I have a bunch of family members and friends that play xbox. You know how amazing it would be to play their games and vice versa at anytime? 

 

So you don't mail your games across the world today? Therefore you haven't lost anything like I said.

 

Hell, you know the solution? PayPal your friend/family member to go rent the damn game for a few days & the problem is solved. You get to keep your copy and they get to try out a game for free. Everyone's happy.

I don't disagree that having the sharing thing would be a bonus, but I see it as just lube, for the big DRM dick.

 

It was far to restrictive, and an outright assault on our consumer rights. So if losing those features is what it takes, then so be it.

 

But workable solutions have been presented, and my well me implemented, so all this arguing right now could be for nothing.

So you don't mail your games across the world today? Therefore you haven't lost anything like I said.

 

Hell, you know the solution? PayPal your friend/family member to go rent the damn game for a few days & the problem is solved. You get to keep your copy and they get to try out a game for free. Everyone's happy.

...

 

Everyone can see how amazing the feature would have been. Sharing games online with nine other people would have been awesome. 

So you don't mail your games across the world today? Therefore you haven't lost anything like I said.

 

Hell, you know the solution? PayPal your friend/family member to go rent the damn game for a few days & the problem is solved. You get to keep your copy and they get to try out a game for free. Everyone's happy.

 

That's a ridiculous workaround and you know it.  We had a great, industry-changing feature lined up and Microsoft took it away. That's what happened and you can't say otherwise.

Was never gonna happen, the console is region locked.

 

My gamertag is and will always be a UK account, I'd only buy digitally from the UK store, this was never an issue even though I lived in australia. They would have gained access to my games from the UK digital library

I am not sure the sharing features would work in the way people think they would. People in this thread are saying they would let up to 10 people share their collection across the world, with no restrictions?? How would this work?? 1 person buys a game then 10 people automatically have full access to it?? How would publishers put up with this?? they would be losing out on the other 9 sales, exactly what they are trying to get rid of.

FYI - not region locked anymore

A few people have pointed that out now. That is a bonus. Not sure how or why that changed, especially if you listen to Major Nelsons reasoning, but it's cool none the less. :)

Once again it's not about cant get up to go change a disc in the drive. I'm sure I'm more fit than you are (anyway that's against the point). I've already explained that currently the way how we switch games is the same as how we used to switch 45 vinyl records in the 1980s, here we were moving to a new way like how we play our mp3 songs today......and the whole slew of people who couldn't see this didn't make it happen.

 

You're right, it is against the point, so why make it? You don't know a thing about me or my physical fitness. Oh wait, an attempt to troll maybe? Try harder :rofl:

 

As for your analogy of MP3s vs games, the day a song last 10+ hours I'll listen to your agrument. Until then it holds no merit.

I can only laugh at DRM "backers" here acting like they know that in the next 5-7 years they won't be able to download games digitally if they want to.

There's plenty of full digital games availble right now on XBL and I'm not talking XBLA mini games.

 

It takes me about 7-8 minutes to dl a full XBOX360 game (had 120Mbps since forever) and I still love the choice of owning a physical copy. it's not about the bs of "being connected", it's owning something. I'll sell you a picture of a Lamborghini I got for $1000.

...

 

Everyone can see how amazing the feature would have been. Sharing games online with nine other people would have been awesome. 

 

 

Would it though? It was never properly outlined what you could/couldn't do. I think you've let your imagination run wild thinking you could have 9 friends share your games and cut your costs by 10x.

 

Hell, I'm not even against the idea of it. I'm excited by the rumour of Steam allowing it today. But it's not going to be the solution you are expecting & it certainly won't give you the freedom you think it will.

Just putting this in here. Seems appropriate

 

 

The Xbox One Just Got Way Worse, And It's Our Fault

Microsoft just announced that its much-maligned DRM policies won't look at all like they originally had originally been described. They're going to more relaxed, sort of like the PS3's. Good news, you say? No. Bad news. The Xbox One just got worse.

But what? Isn't all DRM bad and anti-consumer? No. Often it is, sure. If applied in the ways that gaming culture has been anxious about for the past few weeks, it would be disastrous. But that's not what was really at stake.

 

http://gizmodo.com/the-xbox-one-just-got-way-worse-and-its-our-fault-514411905

  • Like 2

This seems more influenced by the Military factor in addition to what Sony are doing rather than "What the internet said"

 

I'm pretty sure MS has a "contract" with the military (UK RAF/MOD) especially for the UAV's which I've seen first hand controlled by 360 controllers so maybe have some influence factor there, also, many countries now have more public respect and admiration for their service personnel (not saying they didn't before this war on terror, however its more in the public domain so public support is seen more often) so why would MS want to annoy these guys by limiting the console to online only?

 

I'm sure that post launch, digital copies will have added features to entice people to give up physical media.

 

MS want to have a digital system so start off with what we have now, introduce digital downloads with more incentives and that way it won't be a massive shock.

 

Can you image (pre policy change) parents trying to set up the console for their kids and trying to explain why they can't play this game or that game that a friend has?

 

I'm hoping that its normal for launch, then moves steadily and with encouragement towards a digital environment.

 

My 2 pennies.

So family sharing and disc-less disc-based games dissapeared.

 

I'd like to officially thank all you f*ckers for ruining the best features of Xbox One for me. I'll bet 90% of the whiners already pre-ordered the PS4 and won't go back to Xbox. So congratulations, you've just ruined the Xbox for the rest of us WITH internet.

No one ruined Xbox but Microsoft. Get over yourself.

I've not preordered either console, but i'll tell you right now, i'm more inclined to buy both consoles now that MS dropped the DRM.

Just putting this in here. Seems appropriate

 

 

http://gizmodo.com/the-xbox-one-just-got-way-worse-and-its-our-fault-514411905

Just countering with a more reasoned view...

 

 

Some day, far down the road, we'll be sitting with our grandchildren at our feet. As we rock in our holochairs watching the virtual sunset in our Googlezon immersi-room, we'll get all nostalgic. We'll look back on the period of May to June 2013 fondly, remembering all those memes we posted and those angry diatribes we wrote. We'll look down fondly at those tiny children, busy killing zombies in ActiBethesdaValve-Blizzard's Portal to World of Call of Fallout 6, and we'll say something like the following:

"Little Jimmy, did I ever tell you about the days when I fought and won in the great Microsoft used-game/Internet check-in battle of '13?"

 

http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2013/06/xbox-one-eighty-microsoft-fails-to-sell-the-future-retreats-to-the-past/

You're right, it is against the point, so why make it? You don't know a thing about me or my physical fitness. Oh wait, an attempt to troll maybe? Try harder :rofl:

 

As for your analogy of MP3s vs games, the day a song last 10+ hours I'll listen to your agrument. Until then it holds no merit.

I don't need to know anything about you. And it's a guarantee that I am more fit than you are.

And about your comment that the day when a song lasts 10+ hours?? In that single statement you've showed your inability to see the larger picture and how narrow minded you really are because you've completely missed the true benefit of what was offered.

Sigh to narrow minded people. Smh

A few people have pointed that out now. That is a bonus. Not sure how or why that changed, especially if you listen to Major Nelsons reasoning, but it's cool none the less. :)

 

The fact region lock was removed in the same sweep leads me to believe the whole digital distribution, sharing with family and trading games was also limited in this fashion, I'm glad this was removed, it'll allow me to buy an xbox locally here in NZ and still be able to get games shipped in from back home in Canada.

 

And while it would have been nice to be able to share games with family back in Canada, I suspect in situations such as mine, the regional locks would

have prevented it.

Fast game switching and sharing were progress in my opinion. Making you get up and change the disk or jump on a train to give it to a friend is not. Progress is about making life easier and that's what the XB1 offered up until now.

 

Fast game switching for those that switch games a lot (I say not that many) is progress, and I'm sure it will come if there is demand, in a way that doesn't restrict more than it progresses for many. I'm not sure about the sharing, I think what was lost was too high of a cost with regards to game renting and used games, and simply giving a game away, etc.

 

They need to find a better way to do those things. Probably the biggest is fast game switching but I don't  think anything lost outweighs what was gained by dropping the restrictive policies.

 

I'm not sure why fast game switching has to go away with regards to digital purchases and even digital purchases and a game on physical media. And sharing digital downloads, I'm not sure why that has to go away.

 

If there's enough demand, software updates can return these features.

I really don't think you can say Sony won anythig with BR. In fact MS pulled out of the "HD War" very early because their bet is and always has been on digital. Sony still haven't reached the success they had with DVD/PS2, nor made the money back on it last I heard.

 

No, HD-DVD lost. Went on fire-sale, and never returned. Developers were stripping content and textures to fit on DVD9 for Xbox. Blu-ray won the HD-War and the console media war for now. Let's hope all next-gen games utilize as much of that as possible.

No, HD-DVD lost. Went on fire-sale, and never returned. Developers were stripping content and textures to fit on DVD9 for Xbox. Blu-ray won the HD-War and the console media war for now. Let's hope all next-gen games utilize as much of that as possible.

 

Agree to disagree.

 

HD DVD was superior in many ways compared to BR, but Microsoft were the ones who decided to pull the plug in the end. They could have continued the fight if they didn't have XBLM. And with the gift of hindsight we have now, they've managed to achieve far more with apps (Netflix/HBO etc), on X360 than Sony have with BRs, which aren't really a selling point outside of PS3 exclusives.

I like that Microsoft changed their stance. But I think those of you who are angry they removed it are thinking about it all wrong. Family-sharing, fast game-switching, sans-disc gaming, and all of the other features that this DRM "allowed" can be done without a mandatory 24 hour brick-check.

 

In my opinion, this shift in policies by Microsoft did not permanently remove these cool features. It merely delayed them. And now we can look forward to Microsoft implementing them in a way that is fair to everyone. So we have to wait a little while for those features? That's fine. In the meantime, we get better digital distribution, cloud functionality, and it's gaming as usual. And I am totally fine with that.

 

To think that this change completely removed these things from the Xbone for its entire lifespan is kind of ridiculous. The 360 is completely different today than it was when it first came out. Anyone remember the blade UI or the days prior to Netflix integration? I don't see why it would be any different with the upcoming generation.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
    • 38% off a super insane price is still an INSANE price.
    • 1TB Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSDs are now selling at great prices by Fiza Ali Amazon is now offering the 1TB variant of Samsung T9 and Samsung 9100 PRO SSD at great prices with limited-time 38% and 39% discounts, respectively, so you may want to check them out if you have been looking to upgrade your storage solution. The Samsung T9 connects via a USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 (20Gbps) interface and delivers sequential read speeds of up to 2,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,950MB/s, making it suitable for transferring large files, backing up data, and handling high-resolution media content. When it comes to the security features, the SSD includes AES 256-bit hardware encryption to help protect sensitive data. Designed for portability, the drive is reportedly resistant to drops from heights of up to 3 metres. Furthermore, it operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 60°C and can be stored at temperatures between -40°C and 85°C. Samsung Magician Software is included for drive management, firmware updates, performance optimisation, and health monitoring. Finally, the T9 is certified to multiple international standards, including CE, FCC, UL, UKCA, and RoHS 2 compliance, and is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 1TB Samsung T9 SSD: $179.99 (Amazon US) - 38% off The Samsung 9100 PRO uses the M.2 2280 form factor and connects through a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface with NVMe 2.0 support. Built with Samsung V-NAND TLC flash memory, an in-house controller, and 1GB of low-power DDR4X cache memory, the 9100 PRO is engineered for high-performance computing and gaming workloads. Furthermore, the SSD delivers sequential read speeds of up to 14,700MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 13,300MB/s. Random performance is rated at up to 1,850,000 IOPS for reads and up to 2,600,000 IOPS for writes, depending on system hardware and configuration. The drive supports TRIM, S.M.A.R.T monitoring, automatic garbage collection, and device sleep mode to help maintain performance and efficiency over time. In terms of security features, it includes AES 256-bit encryption, TCG Opal support, and IEEE 1667 compliance. The 9100 PRO operates within a temperature range of 0°C to 70°C, is rated for 1.5 million hours MTBF, and can reportedly withstand shocks of up to 1,500G for 0.5 milliseconds. Finally, Samsung Magician Software is also included for firmware updates, performance monitoring, drive management, and optimisation. 1TB Samsung 9100 PRO SSD: $206.99 (Amazon US) - 39% off Alternatively, you can also check out other SSD deals here. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!