Kim Dotcom fumes as Megaupload user data gets erased


Recommended Posts

santa_dotcom.png?w=618

 

Kim Dotcom?s old file-hosting website Megaupload has been wiped from the Internet. The website was shut down by the Department of Justice in January of 2012, and Dotcom was arrested and charged with racketeering and money laundering. The data for millions of Megaupload users, however, remained stored on hosting company LeaseWeb?s servers. It was revealed on Wednesday that LeaseWeb wiped its servers in February, effectively erasing Megaupload and its data from the Internet.
 
Dotcom blasted the company on Twitter, claiming that LeaseWeb?s actions resulted in the ?largest data massacre in the history of the Internet.? LeaseWeb?s senior lawyer Alex de Joode explained in a statement to The Verge that it was hosting Megauload?s files for free on 630 servers. After numerous attempts to notify Dotcom, the hosting company repurposed the servers to make them available to paying customers. Dotcom claims that no one from his legal team was notified about the deletion until today.

 

 

http://bgr.com/2013/06/19/megaupload-data-deleted/

 

LeaseWeb?s senior lawyer Alex de Joode explained in a statement to The Verge that it was hosting Megauload?s files for free on 630 servers. After numerous attempts to notify Dotcom, the hosting company repurposed the servers to make them available to paying customers.

Nothing to see here, move along.

  • Like 3

"Millions of personal #Megaupload files, petabytes of pictures, backups, personal & business property forever destroyed by #LeaseWeb," Dotcom wrote on Twitter. "This is the largest data massacre in the history of the internet caused by the US government, the Department of Justice & #LeaseWeb."

"petabytes of pictures, backups, personal & business property"  :laugh:, I think he means petabytes of warez. Surely nobody actually hosted files they cared about on MegaUpload, it was so full of warez it was obviously going to be shut down sooner or later.

 

Official response from LeaseWeb:

 

When Megaupload was taken offline, 60 servers owned by MegaUpload were directly confiscated by the FIOD and transported to the US. Next to that, MegaUpload still had 630 rented dedicated servers with LeaseWeb. For clarity, these servers were not owned by MegaUpload, they were owned by LeaseWeb. For over a year these servers were being stored and preserved by LeaseWeb, at its own costs. So for over one whole year LeaseWeb kept 630 servers available, without any request to do so and without any compensation.

 

More: http://blog.leaseweb.com/2013/06/19/statement-on-former-client-megaupload/

"petabytes of pictures, backups, personal & business property"  :laugh:, I think he means petabytes of warez. Surely nobody actually hosted files they cared about on MegaUpload, it was so full of warez it was obviously going to be shut down sooner or later.

 

 

On every site like that there are actually legitimate stuff on it. It's probably mostly warez, but not all of it is. I've downloaded free programs from developers that couldn't afford the bandwidth. A friend of mine stores his family photos on one such service.

On every site like that there are actually legitimate stuff on it. It's probably mostly warez, but not all of it is. I've downloaded free programs from developers that couldn't afford the bandwidth. A friend of mine stores his family photos on one such service.

 

 

yep same here

of course they delete it,

both Kim & U.S. Govt being stingy and refuse to pay.

Exactly. If he was concerned about the data, he should have personally made sure the server were being paid for. Obviously he's not making money from that data so he wouldn't want to pay for it. He is a moron to expect LeaseWeb to continue to foot the bill.

Exactly. If he was concerned about the data, he should have personally made sure the server were being paid for. Obviously he's not making money from that data so he wouldn't want to pay for it. He is a moron to expect LeaseWeb to continue to foot the bill.

how exactly do you expect Kim to pay for it when the US government siezed all his assets?

how exactly do you expect Kim to pay for it when the US government siezed all his assets?

The courts won the right to give back quite a bit to Kim, one of the things they didn't fight for was funds to pay LeaseWeb.. they kept them for a year and a half, commendable if you ask me. 

  • Like 3

how exactly do you expect Kim to pay for it when the US government siezed all his assets?

Probably the same way he was able to fund his new venture "Mega".

 

Also he should have enough connections and clout in that part of the business world to be able to convince someone that it would be worth investing money into keeping the data saved. I mean what, Megaupload was worth 39 million dollars when it was taken down. If he REALLY wanted to, I expect he would have found a way.

 

Hell, he had some of this money unfrozen for living expenses and legal fees. I doubt it would have been difficult to argue that they needed the money unfrozen to keep the data saved on the servers, citing that it is supposed to be evidence against him.

 

All in all he is a resourceful guy. If he wanted that data to be kept, he would have found a way.

  • Like 2

the DJ (O'Grady) actually want the MegaUpload data to be preserved, at least last year:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57413693-93/judge-wants-megaupload-user-data-preserved-for-now/

and to do that the involved hosting companies request financial relief.

 

"Since then, MegaUpload has been unable to keep up the payments to Carpathia Hosting.

Instead of destroying the user data, Carpathia has preserved MegaUpload's servers at its own expense.

Carpathia has asked the court for financial relief in the form of a protective order.

The parties were in court to determine what should be done with the MegaUpload's data."

But it was Govt lawyer persuading the DJ denies the hosting funds

 

"While O'Grady was sympathetic to Carpathia's financial burden,

the government's lawyers told the judge that the company was no babe in the woods.

They said that the company generated $35 million from working with MegaUpload

and suggested that Carpathia may bear some of the responsibility

for the copyright infringement that allegedly occurred at MegaUpload.

They told the judge there's a chance that Carpathia will face a civil suit.

The government's lawyers said Carpathia just wants to "get out" of the servers

but that doesn't mean U.S. taxpayers have to ride to the rescue."

Its clear that U.S. Govt unwilling to pay for severs upkeep cost, they even threat the hosting companies will possibility of "civil suit".

But theres more:

"Ira Rothken, MegaUpload's lead attorney, had tried to buy the servers from Carpathia but the government nixed the deal.

MegaUpload says it needs the servers to help prove its innocence."

At least on Kim side, since they know that they will unable to pay the server leasing for longer duration without income, they opt to buy them instead,

so perhaps Kim could able to keep the revenues flowing and keep the exsiting data, but it was U.S. Govt that prevent this.

So yeah, LeaseWeb decision can't be fully blamed on Kim, U.S. Govt got their shares of blames too.

Other hosting companies that still hold MegaUpload data, might as well followsuit.

Dotcom Reveals Megaupload Data Massacre Emails, Plans to Sue LeaseWeb

 

Kim Dotcom and his legal team have published an email revealing that they asked LeaseWeb to preserve the data stored on 630 servers that were recently wiped. The email contradicts an earlier statement from the hosting company which claimed that for a year nobody showed interest in the servers. Adding to the controversy, Dotcom informs TorrentFreak that his legal team is contemplating litigation against the former host over their actions.

 

More...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!