Windows RT facing pressure from being isolated


Recommended Posts

Why are you regularly performing factory resets? You shouldn't be.

 

We deal with large scale FIM and BYOD deployments.  Trust me, when you are coding complex meta-agents and device profiling, you need to make sure any changes are done on factory fresh machines.

 

ok, yeah, most people won't be factory resetting as much as us.....this was just ONE annoyance I was trying to highlight with MS and their 'tablet' OS

 

When it's more like a laptop in a tablet formfactor, that's good and bad

I think more people think you're lying about doing an iOS factory reset in a few minutes. I usually walk away and go watch a movie if I have to do that. :laugh:

 

I have to say that the last time I did that on an iPhone 5, it didn't take very long.  Last time on an iPad was about a year ago and can't remember the exact time (im sure it wasn't anywhere near 2 hours though).

 

Actually my wife has an ipad, but not sure she would appreciate me wiping her device  to do a youtube comparison video :D

 

HOWEVER!!  What I will say is that after I factory reset using MY dism'ed wim the app updates have never crashed.  Maybe it's because it already contains this

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2808380

 

because im such a good guy, if anyone wants it for their XPS 10 let me know.  Trust me, it really does save HOURS!

We deal with large scale FIM and BYOD deployments.  Trust me, when you are coding complex meta-agents and device profiling, you need to make sure any changes are done on factory fresh machines.

 

ok, yeah, most people won't be factory resetting as much as us.....this was just ONE annoyance I was trying to highlight with MS and their 'tablet' OS

 

When it's more like a laptop in a tablet formfactor, that's good and bad

 

Then why not use System Restore?

 

Factory reset > Install updates > Create restore point > Do your thing > Revert to restore point > Install updates as needed > Create additional restore points as updates are installed > Do your thing > Rise, lather, and repeat

Then why not use System Restore?

 

the project would never get signed off.  Some we can, but mostly we factory reset.  That's a side issue though, why we do this is not important.  Once configmgr 2012 R2 is out we shall more than likely just put a capture task sequence in and grab the image from a pre configured machine.  IF these can PXE boot all the better, else we'll have to use USB sticks again.

 

That doesn't get around the fact that factory resetting the machine looses any and all updates.  Can't understand why people think differently.  I'm not lying....trust me I wish I were.  Thinking about it, if MS extracted the WIM to the recovery partition and injected the updates simultaneously to the machine and the recovery partition together....that could work.

 

Sorry I kinda feel I've taken the thread off in another direction :blush:

the project would never get signed off.  Some we can, but mostly we factory reset.  That's a side issue though, why we do this is not important.

 

That doesn't get around the fact that factory resetting the machine looses any and all updates.  Can't understand why people think differently.  I'm not lying....trust me I wish I were.  Thinking about it, if MS extracted the WIM to the recovery partition and injected the updates simultaneously to the machine and the recovery partition together....that could work.

It's a factory reset!!  It's not like it automatically dumps patches/updates into the factory WIM.  Geez. :s

Stop trying to create solutions and actually understand his criticism for once.  Compared to other slates, RT has a lot more legacy 'PC' maint baggage.  You can't argue your way around that. 

 

I'm pleased someone understands

 

Personally, work aside, I tried to install the Sky news app onto my own tablet.  It didn't work, just did nothing.  Rebooted (windows is installing update 1 of 39).

Then when it booted back up it started configuring updates.  Then when I finally got it, tried again and the app installed fine.

 

I think certain apps won't work if there are updates pending installation.

 

I was ok with it because I understand this stuff, but if MS wants greater market penetration with their offerings they really have to do better.

I have to say that the last time I did that on an iPhone 5, it didn't take very long.  Last time on an iPad was about a year ago and can't remember the exact time (im sure it wasn't anywhere near 2 hours though).

 

Actually my wife has an ipad, but not sure she would appreciate me wiping her device  to do a youtube comparison video :D

 

HOWEVER!!  What I will say is that after I factory reset using MY dism'ed wim the app updates have never crashed.  Maybe it's because it already contains this

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2808380

 

because im such a good guy, if anyone wants it for their XPS 10 let me know.  Trust me, it really does save HOURS!

 

 

you do realize you can't comapre the ipad installing full version revisions in the rom to windows' rolling updates right ? 

 

when 8.1 comes out, it might be treated as a full "service Pack" or new release and the recovery version will get updated, but it might not. it's not really it's purpose, the recovery image is there to be able to ALWAYS bring you back to a working factory OS, hence "factory" reset.  

 

remember windows 8 has two methods to reset. one that brings you all the back to factory, and one that just refreshes everything and removes everything that's been installed. 

 

in any case, even in your "special" BYOD environment, I don't see why you would be factory resetting all the time. something seems wrong there. Especially on windows RT there should be NO reason to keep factory resetting no matter what the environment you're in. 

I liked the Samsung Ativ Tab. But then they decided not to release a keyboard dock or type cover for it, so I skipped it.

The Surface RT didn't have GPS, which I find very useful, so I skipped it.

 

Surface RT 2 will probably be released in the near future (rumors) so I hope that has GPS (and 3G/4G if possible) integrated.

I personally would never use RT. The main reason to use Windows for me is the x86/x64 apps.

I'd take it over iPad or Android because of the integration - HomeGroups and the multiarch stuff I already own on Windows Store for examples.  My Nexus 7 didn't even know what a local network WAS, much less try to connect me to it.

 

But then, I don't think I'd get one unless it was really cheap., and since they seem hell bent on that Office inclusion I doubt that'll happen.

I personally would never use RT. The main reason to use Windows for me is the x86/x64 apps.

Exactly, nothing gets stuff done more than Windows, but rt makes for a good in-bed-before-sleep solution (damn i really need to get used to this split screen keyboard)

The only reason some OEMs didn't make windows phone devices was because of software fees. 

 

I believe Windows 8 and RT should get inspired by windows phone and release an OS with perfectly Optimized Windows Phone features for Tablet and Desktop PCs. And Take down software fees for the 3 Windows OSes! maybe they will do well

I love the fact you can RDP to your win8 PC and use all the gestures as if you actually have full 8 Pro on it.

 

Unfortunately due to DRM, Silverlight doesn't stream over RDP (so no Lovefilm on RT).....and the Hulu site seems to stutter (Flash issue?) no matter if you select Low, Medium, High or HD

well considering the wim file NEVER changes during a factory reset I think you'll find I am correct!

 

You can try it yourself.  Perform a factory reset.  Then do all the windows updates (which takes 4 reboots).  Then do all the app updates.

Now factory reset again and see if you need to update again.  YES YOU WILL!

 

If anyone can tell me how to factory reset an RT tablet whilst keeping all the updates I'll be VERY happy.  Will save my Infrastructure team hours whilst onsite at clients.

 

Example...

 

When iOS 7 is released you will perform the upgrade which installs into ROM.  Say you then factory reset.  You still got iOS7 :-)

 

When MS releases Windows 8.1 you will get it either from the store or via windows updates.  Say you then factory reset.  Because the wim file hasn't changed you will be restoring 8.0.  Which means you then have to install 8.1 again.  This is the point I'm trying to get across with windows updates.  They are NOT dismed into the wim

 

That's one of the core differences between MS tablet OSes and ios / android devices.  Hence me saying win8 is a double edge sword.  It has both pros and cons.

 

Monthly patches and the new OS update are entirely different things. You have no idea what the factory reset story is for a Surface RT with 8.1 installed.

Stop trying to create solutions and actually understand his criticism for once.  Compared to other slates, RT has a lot more legacy 'PC' maint baggage.  You can't argue your way around that. 

 

Yes you can. The iPad used to take a long time to do a factory restore (I'm going on the assumption that he's correct it's changed recently, but I'm skeptical). That has nothing to do with "PC baggage" of any kind. They're just different approaches. The iPad requires you to be plugged into a PC to restore it, so it would use the latest image iTunes had downloaded. The Surface includes the full restore image on a recovery partition. The advantage is you can always restore it without a disk or tethering to a machine (or an internet connection and the patience to download the whole thing). A disadvantage of the implementation is that the image doesn't include monthly updates. This isn't legacy, this is an entire feature that was built just for Windows 8/RT devices. It was just built with different priorities and requirements in mind than the iPad's solution of tethering to iTunes.

 

 

I still think he's not talking about doing a restore operation on the iPad and is just talking about the "reset to factory settings" option, which is nothing like doing a full reimage of the device.

I still think he's not talking about doing a restore operation on the iPad and is just talking about the "reset to factory settings" option, which is nothing like doing a full reimage of the device.

 

Isn't that exactly the point right there?  That there isn't an equivalent action for what he is asking? On competing devices, you get a reset to factory settings which RT doesn't have.  It only give the option of a refresh, which isn't profile destructive, or the full PC-reinstall, which is more than just dropping the latest image 'on' the device.

 

Do you disagree that even the conception of 'monthly patches' is anathema to the competition's firmware type updates, which is really his point?

 

Sure, its a different approach, just like squashing 'down' Windows for slates instead of 'growing up' WP is a different approach (and hence the need to tether or not).  That still isn't a denial of what is factually true - RT is clearly more PC like (pro and con) than the competition or WP in the 'post-PC' world.

 

So my question to you is, if unification is the M.O. MS has adopted, why do they treat phones differently?  Why wasn't RT developed with them in mind and not just slates/desktops?

Yes you can. The iPad used to take a long time to do a factory restore (I'm going on the assumption that he's correct it's changed recently, but I'm skeptical). That has nothing to do with "PC baggage" of any kind. They're just different approaches. The iPad requires you to be plugged into a PC to restore it, so it would use the latest image iTunes had downloaded. The Surface includes the full restore image on a recovery partition. The advantage is you can always restore it without a disk or tethering to a machine (or an internet connection and the patience to download the whole thing). A disadvantage of the implementation is that the image doesn't include monthly updates. This isn't legacy, this is an entire feature that was built just for Windows 8/RT devices. It was just built with different priorities and requirements in mind than the iPad's solution of tethering to iTunes.

 

 

I still think he's not talking about doing a restore operation on the iPad and is just talking about the "reset to factory settings" option, which is nothing like doing a full reimage of the device.

 

But it does carry that baggage.

 

For instance, the mount system of Linux made the update process for Android a lot smoother to do for Google. They have a clean separation between all user data and the OS data. Windows doesn't have a similar mount system so it is next to impossible to separate the OS from the user application and modifications in a live system. If this baggage didn't exist Microsoft could similarly update the "OS" partition as soon as an update is installed while ensuring that the user could clean the system of all of their changes without having to also wipe that OS partition.

 

This is the core of his complaint and to claim that the architectural decisions of Windows that Windows RT inherited don't contribute to the problem is an error I wouldn't expect you to make.

 

As he mentioned, there are pros and cons to this like all things that exist in our universe.

 

 

Isn't that exactly the point right there?  That there isn't an equivalent action for what he is asking? On competing devices, you get a reset to factory settings which RT doesn't have.  It only give the option of a refresh, which isn't profile destructive, or the full PC-reinstall, which is more than just dropping the latest image 'on' the device.

 

Do you disagree that even the conception of 'monthly patches' is anathema to the competition's firmware type updates, which is really his point?

 

Sure, its a different approach, just like squashing 'down' Windows for slates instead of 'growing up' WP is a different approach (and hence the need to tether or not).  That still isn't a denial of what is factually true - RT is clearly more PC like (pro and con) than the competition or WP in the 'post-PC' world.

 

So my question to you is, if unification is the M.O. MS has adopted, why do they treat phones differently?  Why wasn't RT developed with them in mind and not just slates/desktops?

 

This has confused me to no end regarding what Microsoft did with Windows 8. Their decision to pull Windows desktop down to the tablet and not to follow Apple's lead and pull the phone OS up to the tablet will forever confuse me. I think this was the major reason Windows RT has had as much trouble in the market as it has had. The tablet and the phone has far more in common than the desktop does at present. It would have been far better for them to pull the phone OS up and to build great connections between the shared phone + tablet OS with the desktop.

 

Sadly, it seems MS bet wrongly that by throwing the full Windows user base at developers they would gain some serious traction. We now know that hasn't happened. There are apps continuing to be released for Windows RT/Metro/Whatever the name is, but  we don't see it as the #1 or even #2 platform for new mobile app development.

Isn't that exactly the point right there?  That there isn't an equivalent action for what he is asking? On competing devices, you get a reset to factory settings which RT doesn't have.  It only give the option of a refresh, which isn't profile destructive, or the full PC-reinstall, which is more than just dropping the latest image 'on' the device.

 

Do you disagree that even the conception of 'monthly patches' is anathema to the competition's firmware type updates, which is really his point?

 

Sure, its a different approach, just like squashing 'down' Windows for slates instead of 'growing up' WP is a different approach (and hence the need to tether or not).  That still isn't a denial of what is factually true - RT is clearly more PC like (pro and con) than the competition or WP in the 'post-PC' world.

 

So my question to you is, if unification is the M.O. MS has adopted, why do they treat phones differently?  Why wasn't RT developed with them in mind and not just slates/desktops?

 

There may not be an identical option, but then Windows has a lot of options for which the iPad doesn't have an identical equivalent. Those differences aren't due to "legacy" on either platform (hell, iOS has older parts in it than Windows RT does!). They're just the result of different design and engineering teams building them.

 

I can't fathom at all how you can say that monthly updates is "anathema" to anything Apple does. Apple does monthly updates to iOS.

 

The update approach used by Windows is exactly what Microsoft would build if it built a brand new OS from scratch just for a tablet, or scaled up Windows Phone for a tablet. In fact, the latter is already what's there. Windows Phone uses Windows Update. Anyone on the servicing team will tell you that Microsoft's approach is vastly superior and more mature than what Apple has. But one reason for that is that Windows has far more complex requirements placed upon it, partly as a result of the wider customer base. There's a lot about the way Windows Update works that is designed to support things Apple doesn't have to worry about:

1) Different PC manufacturers (each shipping different driver and firmware updates through WU).

2) Different component manufacturers shipping drivers across vendors.

3) Enterprise manageability.

4) Other parties like wireless carriers being in the mix.

5) Handling updates for a wide variety of optional components and non-OS software (i.e. Office and other MS products).

 

It is very, very easy to argue that the complex requirements met by that system and its maturity (and its scale, way beyond anything Apple has conceived of) is a virtue. Especially when the end result is functionally equivalent or superior for the vast majority of tablet customers.

 

There is no "post-PC" world. There's just a "post 'PCs as they were ten years ago'" world.

 

Phones are a different screen size. That dictates a different UI both for the OS and the apps, among other important differences. That's why iOS has different versions with different ship schedules between iPhone and iPad, for example. Similar thing with Windows. iOS has better API unification there, but Windows and Windows Phone are doing better at that with each release. And Windows has perfect API unification across tablets and other PC form factors. Apple has next to none, though they're taking baby steps toward that each year.

 

And keep in mind, just because both parties lack complete unification across all three (sometimes arbitrary) delineations, doesn't mean they aren't all going to end up there. They're just approaching it from different directions and sometimes at a different pace.

 

What's ridiculous is to say that Windows RT suffers because of "legacy" it carries and that iOS on the iPad doesn't. The iPad clearly suffers from legacy baggage from its iPhone roots, and both carry a lot of legacy from Mac OS/Darwin/Mach/etc. Hell, the input system in iOS is clearly deficient when compared to what Windows RT has, which was hugely re-engineered for 8/RT. My iPad Mini stutters when panning web pages loading a lot of content, or running heavy javascript. That's not possible on Windows because of the architecture (everything about panning is handled on a separate thread, both input and UI). It's easy to argue that the iOS way of handling input (processed on the UI thread, with message pump filters to kind of sort of mitigate busy app UI code) is legacy from its roots in the pre-touch and composition based GUI era. In addition to stuttering it has annoying side effects, like blocking the app UI thread while panning, which is why if you pan past the bottom of what it's rendered you'll see blank (or checkerboard) forever until you lift your finger. That won't happen on Windows because it has independent panning. Exactly the sort of modern, non-legacy thing I expect on a touch OS in 2013 :-)

Im soooo tired of retarded articles like this...as soon as I see this uninformed garbage I move on

You did not move on but you read this article and cared to reply. By the way your fanboyism to support RT can not help its demise.

But it does carry that baggage.

 

For instance, the mount system of Linux made the update process for Android a lot smoother to do for Google. They have a clean separation between all user data and the OS data. Windows doesn't have a similar mount system so it is next to impossible to separate the OS from the user application and modifications in a live system. If this baggage didn't exist Microsoft could similarly update the "OS" partition as soon as an update is installed while ensuring that the user could clean the system of all of their changes without having to also wipe that OS partition.

 

This is the core of his complaint and to claim that the architectural decisions of Windows that Windows RT inherited don't contribute to the problem is an error I wouldn't expect you to make.

 

As he mentioned, there are pros and cons to this like all things that exist in our universe.

 

 

 

This has confused me to no end regarding what Microsoft did with Windows 8. Their decision to pull Windows desktop down to the tablet and not to follow Apple's lead and pull the phone OS up to the tablet will forever confuse me. I think this was the major reason Windows RT has had as much trouble in the market as it has had. The tablet and the phone has far more in common than the desktop does at present. It would have been far better for them to pull the phone OS up and to build great connections between the shared phone + tablet OS with the desktop.

 

Sadly, it seems MS bet wrongly that by throwing the full Windows user base at developers they would gain some serious traction. We now know that hasn't happened. There are apps continuing to be released for Windows RT/Metro/Whatever the name is, but  we don't see it as the #1 or even #2 platform for new mobile app development.

 

I didn't follow any of this. So Linux baggage is good but Windows baggage is bad? And your example is weird. Windows supports drive mounting exactly as Linux does (okay, maybe with more options). In neither case does the "mount" architecture or its results have any effect on either system's ability to handle updates. So yeah, I have no idea what you were getting at there. Also, on Windows RT apps have absolutely no ability to put anything anywhere that Windows doesn't carefully manage. Again, nothing to do with "mount" - it's a feature of the sandboxed permission model.

 

Pulling the Phone OS up to tablets would've been suicide for Microsoft, and a hugely wasteful and wrongheaded approach. I honestly can't imagine anyone making even a slightly convincing argument for going that path, for innumerable reasons.

 

The platform isn't even a year old yet, and it's growing at a far faster pace than either iOS or Android did their first years. Way too early to be making any calls about its success or failure.

 

Tablets and laptops have way more in common than phones and tablets. The vastly different screen size being the most important differentiation. There's a reason Apple doesn't ship the same OS on iPhone and iPad (they may call it the same, but the different release schedules betray the truth). Tablet screen sizes facility things like physical keyboard use, multi-tasking, and of course result in very different requirements for UI design. All of which is also exactly the same for laptops and to a large extent for desktops (which only push those aspects further).

 

Never mind that it's bizarre to say Windows should've "grown the phone up" when the phone started out as a shrunken down Windows!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Micron reveals AI companies are spending billions to lock up its memory years in advance by Karthik Mudaliar The demand for more memory is far from over, and Micron is turning the AI-driven memory shortage into a much more predictable business. The company has revealed that it has signed 16 strategic supply agreements backed by roughly $22 billion in customer deposits and other financial commitments. The contracts cover DRAM and NAND deliveries over several years, with some running through 2030. With the AI boom, demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) has grown so quickly that large customers are now prepared to help finance future production in exchange for a guaranteed supply. According to Micron’s latest financial results, the company received commitments worth about $22 billion across its new agreements. Around $18 billion is expected to arrive as cash deposits, while the rest will come through other financial arrangements. Micron says the agreements could generate approximately $100 billion in future contracted obligations. They cover around 20% of its expected DRAM shipments and one-third of its NAND shipments during their respective terms. It should be noted that although AI infrastructure is the main force behind the current shortage, not all 16 agreements with Micron involve AI companies. Micron said the customers also include consumer electronics and automotive businesses, two sectors that increasingly compete with data centers for the same manufacturing capacity. HBM is consuming an increasing share of that supply. Unlike conventional desktop or server RAM, HBM stacks multiple memory dies vertically and places them close to an AI accelerator. This gives GPUs and other AI chips access to data at much higher speeds, but it also requires more complicated manufacturing and packaging. Micron says its 12-layer HBM4 memory is now shipping in high volume for a lead customer, with samples also supplied to other companies. The chipmaker has already generated more than $1 billion in HBM4 revenue and says the product is ramping twice as quickly as its earlier HBM3E generation. Samsung has similarly warned that the memory shortage could continue into 2027 and beyond. Consumer memory companies have also had to address sharp increases in DDR5 pricing, suggesting the effects are already reaching beyond the data center. For consumers, that could mean the AI memory crunch lasts longer than expected, even as manufacturers invest heavily in new production.
    • XnConvert 1.112 by Razvan Serea  XnConvert is a cross-platform batch image-converter and resizer with a powerful and ease of use experience. All common picture and graphics formats are supported (i.e. JPG, PNG, TIFF, GIF, Camera RAW, JPEG2000, WebP, OpenEXR) as well as supporting over 500 other image formats. Also available within the batch operations include rotating, adding of watermarks, adding of text along with many image-adjustment features such as brightness, shadows and more. Among the features included are: Batch adding of files and folders Support for drag and drop of files Batch rotating, cropping, resizing and more Adding of photo masks Preserving or removing image metadata in conversions Multipage image file support (i.e animated GIF, APNG, TIFF) Command line integration via NConvert Filters - such as 'Blur', 'Gaussian Blur', 'Emboss', "Sharpen' and much more Effects - such as 'Old camera' and much more Download: XnConvert 64-bit | Standalone | ~30.0 MB (Freeware) Download: XnConvert 32-bit | Standalone Links: XnConvert Website | Screenshot | Release Announcement Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft updates Visual Studio Code with chat cost tracking and multi-agent chats by Paul Hill Microsoft has just launched Visual Studio Code 1.126, its latest weekly release. This time, the company has focused on letting you see the total cost of chat sessions to spot expensive conversations; enabling multiple chats per session that run side-by-side in one agent host Copilot session; and letting you browse new folders safely in restricted mode. We have now reached the stage where free AI in IDEs is coming to an end. To help you keep track of your costs, VS Code now lets you see the entire cost of a chat session, rather than just individual turns. This should give you more transparency about which sessions consume the most credits, so you can better manage your usage over time and spend less. For those of you using the Agents window, you know it is possible to run and manage multiple agent sessions at once. In this update, a Copilot session started from an agent host can hold several chats at once. Explaining how this feature works, Microsoft writes: Finally, from this update forward, Microsoft will remove the pop-up when opening an untrusted folder. When you open a new folder now, it will automatically open in Restricted Mode. You will see a banner that lets you manage the trust level of the folder. Microsoft has made this change so that it’s easier to start inspecting code without giving it trust right away. If you have VS Code, you can check for updates within the app now to get this new version. Otherwise, you can download it from the Visual Studio Code website.
    • Anthropic accuses Alibaba of using 25,000 fake accounts to copy Claude's capabilities by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic has accused Alibaba of using nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to extract capabilities from Claude on a huge scale. According to a report from Reuters, Anthropic told US lawmakers that operators linked to Alibaba and the company’s Qwen AI team generated 28.8 million exchanges with Claude between April 22 and June 5, 2026. That is a lot of Claude conversations, but Anthropic says this was not ordinary chatbot use. The company believes the accounts were part of a coordinated effort to collect answers that could help train or improve rival AI systems. The alleged campaign reportedly focused on some of Claude’s most valuable skills, including software development, multi-step reasoning, and agentic tasks. In practical terms, that means getting an AI model to plan and complete work across several stages rather than simply answering a single question. This is called 'distillation,' where AI companies use outputs from a larger model to train a smaller and cheaper one. The smaller model learns to imitate useful parts of the more capable system without needing the same amount of computing power. The distillation process isn't automatically suspicious, but the problem comes when one company gathers another provider's outputs without permission and at an industrial scale. Also, this does not mean Alibaba obtained Claude’s source code, model weights, or original training data. Instead, Anthropic claims the accounts repeatedly asked Claude carefully designed questions and collected the answers. Those answers could then be used as training material for another model. Anthropic has made similar accusations against DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax earlier this year. As Neowin previously reported, Anthropic said those three companies collectively generated more than 16 million Claude exchanges through roughly 24,000 accounts. Anthropic says the new campaign produced almost twice as many exchanges in a matter of weeks. Anthropic reportedly told lawmakers that the campaign could help Chinese AI developers approach the capabilities of its Mythos Preview model. Mythos is focused on advanced cybersecurity work, including finding and exploiting complex software vulnerabilities. via Reuters | Photo via DepositPhotos.com
    • An Indian manufacturer that assembles roughly one-third of Apple's iPhones and supplies semiconductor components to Tesla confirmed Monday that attackers had stolen and publicly published a 630-gigabyte cache of confidential files — including engineering blueprints stamped "TRADE SECRET," a 52-page quality inspection document for iPhone circuit board components, and cryptographic certificates that security experts say could be weaponized in follow-on attacks. https://www.techtimes.com/articles/319019/20260624/apple-tesla-supplier-tata-electronics-confirms-630-gb-data-theft-iphone-specs-dark-web.htm
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      176
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      133
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!