Raspberry Pi power consumption?

By Daedroth
in Hardware Hangout

 Share

Recommended Posts

Veteran

Daedroth

Posted
Posted

I've been thinking about getting a Raspberry Pi to become a downloader/smart TV solution, given it's low price and low power consumption. Can anyone tell me how much power it will actually consume if plugged in and downloading via Ethernet? I don't understand all the power statistics that I've found on the Internet as they confuse me.

Can anyone tell me what the costs could be, or what the power consumption is compared to other electrical devices, such as a light bulb, router, homeplugs, etc?

Also, what's the normal power consumption for homeplugs and a normal router?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1160540-raspberry-pi-power-consumption/
Share on other sites
Grand Master

n_K

Posted
Posted

The official figures for the ORIGINAL 256MB model B one is 5 watts, it runs on 5v at about 1 amp, 5*1 = 5w.

The new 512MB one that allows a lot more power to passthru to the USB slots (model B) will probably use more depending on what's plugged in.

Original Model A from what I remember is 5v at 0.5a meaning 2.5w, not a clue about the new model A but it doesn't have ethernet anyway.

 

In theory the original RPi B uses half the power an 11w energy efficient light bulb uses, well that's the raspberry pi itself, the actual power depending upon the power supply you use, seeing as most plug-in USB power adapters are upto about 75% efficient.

 

Routers probably use a bit more power due to the multiple ethernet isolation transformers inside them, again it all depends upon the router, the manufacturer and other things.

Grand Master

ToneKnee

Posted
Posted

For 'SmartTV' functionality, I think you might be better off with a with an Android MiniPC like this one.  They use the same amount of power but is far more capable than the RaspPi (I have both btw).  I found out like most do about the RaspPi is that you run out of headroom fast when it comes to performance.

 

Also, the MK 809II is only a few pounds more expensive as well.

 

I've linked mine to my Google account where I have access to stuff like Plex which can stream movies and TV series straight off my server and it can handle 1080p content fine. :)

Grand Master

Ambroos

Posted
Posted

Remember that it's absolutely fine for streaming over ethernet, but very slow as a download box. IO over USB gets very slow very fast and the ethernet doesn't go that fast either.

 

I have mine as a tiny Tomcat web server now, runs remarkably well. Plan is to put XBMC on it (OpenELEC) when I get a new TV.

Veteran

Daedroth

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  On 23/06/2013 at 11:55, Ambroos said:

Remember that it's absolutely fine for streaming over ethernet, but very slow as a download box. IO over USB gets very slow very fast and the ethernet doesn't go that fast either.

 

I have mine as a tiny Tomcat web server now, runs remarkably well. Plan is to put XBMC on it (OpenELEC) when I get a new TV.

What does it equate to as a download box though? My broadband can only download at 1MB/s. I assume it'll be good enough for that?

Proficient

srbeen

Posted
Posted

I use a 5V 1.5A power supply (thats a max output of 7.5W) and it powers my raspberry pi with ethernet cable, as well as  750mA 2.5" HDD its using to improve throughput.

I can download/upload to the Pi around 20MB/s this way, opposed to around 4-5MB/s off SD, plus I have a TB of storage.

 

Highly suggest anyone who wants real throughput from the Pi follow this guide: http://zeroset.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/move-an-existing-raspbian-installation-from-memory-sd-card-to-usb-flash-drive-stick

 

My XBMC box runs from a 5V 1A supply without any problems, and if you use HDMI-CEC and have no need for a wifi adapter you can likely get away with a 5V 0.5A or 0.75A supply. Ensure you are using a stable quality supply and a good microUSB power cable. 90% of raspberry pi issues come from these 2 things.

 

Most routers use 24W (12V 2A) you can determine this by unplugging the AC adapter and reading it. You should see something labeled OUTPUT: 12V --- 05.A (should be a solid bar with dashes under it) this states it can supply 12Volts at 0.5Amps.

 

Power is Voltage multiplied by Amps, so just multiply them together and thats the MAX amount of power it can use under full load. In the case above, 12*0.5, it'd be 6W of power. Most devices operate at most in the 60-80% of their supplies rating, to prevent failure with power brownouts or spikes. For maths easy we assume it uses the MAX power all the time.

 

You can do a lot of stuff on them too. like running XBMC while downloading torrents and having an SSH VPN tunnel is just the tip of the iceberg.

Grand Master

Ambroos

Posted
Posted
  On 23/06/2013 at 11:57, Daedroth said:

What does it equate to as a download box though? My broadband can only download at 1MB/s. I assume it'll be good enough for that?

It'll do fine for that. My connection is 15MB/s and it starts to struggle at that point (very high CPU, especially with torrents).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Posts

    • Here's what iPhone models support iOS 26

      By Patrick888 · Posted

      Apple: lets take our inspiration from Windows 7/Vista and call it innovative
    • Here are the iPads that support iPadOS 26

      By Nas · Posted

      Nice! My $100 refurbished iPad 8 that I bought last year for a small project (and still runs like new cuz it's been mostly in storage the past several months) will get this v26 upgrade. I'm definitely gonna scope out OS26 on this device before upgrading my also-supported refurbished iPhone SE 3rd Gen (only got it for the 5G UW support).
    • Windows 11 Font Frustration!!!

      By goretsky · Posted

      Hello, The separate discussion about VLC has been moved to its own thread at  Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • Windows 11 Font Frustration!!!

      By goretsky · Posted

      Hello, I am guessing this is the result of using a third-party tweaking tool instead of changing things within Windows settings. Windows 11 has a decent set of configuration options for the display, but they tend to be scattered throughout the operating system due to fragmentation of product ownership/inconsistent standards being applied by Microsoft. There are a few places in Windows 11 where you can modify the various display settings in order to get them to your liking: Under Settings → System → Display you can stroll down to the Scale & layout section and change the Scale and Display resolution settings to whatever you prefer.  For the Scale option, you can click on the text box to choose between the various pre-populated settings.  If none of those are exactly what you are looking for, click on the caret ("") caret to open the Custom scaling setting (also available under Settings → Display → Custom scaling).  I would recommend this as an option of last resort as this can cause display issues in various programs. I strongly recommend using the screen's native Display resolution here; it should show up as the "(Recommended)" resolution.  If it does not, you may need to install your monitor's profile information file (basically, a device driver for your monitor) to get the correct setting. Another place to look at making changes to fonts is under Accessiblity → Text size.  There is a slider bar for changing the text size from 100% to 225% there. You can try making changes to the ClearType settings.  It's a little bit finer-grained than the others, but it may make the text easier to view on the display.  Run the ClearType Text Tuner (filename: CTTUNE.EXE) and go through the wizard. You may want to do this several times under different lighting conditions or times of the day to figure out what works best for you overall. Lastly, you may want to look into using a dedicated assistive screen technology program from a third-party.  Microsoft provides a Screen Magnifier and a Narrator for text-to-speech, but they provide only basic functionality, and you may find that a third-party program works a lot better.  The pros of this is that third-party assistive technology programs tend to work quite well under Windows; Microsoft has historically worked closely with third-party developers of assistive technologies.  The cons of this are that such tools tend to be on the expensive side, since they are often sold to schools, businesses, or paid for by insurance companies, not individuals. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • Windows 11 finally gets redesigned Start menu and more in builds 26200.5641 and 26120.4250

      By Travesty · Posted

      Totally agree with you. I think people, especially on tech sites, need to realize that they’re the minority. Microsoft isn’t going to waste time on things that, in the big picture, don’t matter to the majority.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      CHUNWEI went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Enthusiast
      the420kid went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      VicByrd earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      267
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      257
    4. 4
      Edouard
      203
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      178
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!