WikiLeaks' UFO Cables: More About Raelian Cult Than Alien Life


Recommended Posts

Somewhere along the lines, it would have leaked. Yet, after years and years, and years of "reports", there's nothing conclusive to say we're being visited. No photos (despite everyone having a camera on them today), no video, nothing to tell me otherwise. Somewhere, someone should have evidence, yet no one does.

Many, many things have leaked.

 

There are all kinds of photos and video.

 

If you are unaware of this, it is because you have not looked. ;)

 

It all comes down to what you choose to believe.

post-37120-0-33335800-1373503042.jpg

Many, many things have leaked.

 

There are all kinds of photos and video.

 

If you are unaware of this, it is because you have not looked. ;)

 

It all comes down to what you choose to believe.

 

 

 

I believe that looks pretty damn fake 

 

It all comes down to what you choose to believe.

 

 

People are free to choose to believe whatever they want. If you want anyone else to believe you, you might want to offer credible facts to back up your claims. Or at least don't get indignant when people ask for evidence, as if your word should be good enough ;)

Just thought you guys should watch this if you haven't already. I swear I feel like my mind leveled up a notch or two after watching. Mentioning this mostly due to the talks on beliefs in regards to alien life and such.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KeJoVeKSsyA

funny that in all the UFO photos and videos I've seen, there are cars more modern looking than them; doesn't aliens have any design sense? :laugh: :rofl:

 

 

Or basic appreciate of propulsion or aerodynamics? They can traverse the galaxy, but they'll only do so in the same sorts of vehicles which were popularized by fiction authors in the early 20th century. Coincidence? YOU DECIDE!

  • Like 2

Or basic appreciate of propulsion or aerodynamics? They can traverse the galaxy, but they'll only do so in the same sorts of vehicles which were popularized by fiction authors in the early 20th century. Coincidence? YOU DECIDE!

 

ROFLOL

funny that in all the UFO photos and videos I've seen, there are cars more modern looking than them; doesn't aliens have any design sense? :laugh: :rofl:

Many the aliens are smart enough to use designs that work. ;)

I don't believe that aliens have probably visited Earth...

 

But...

 

I do think it's extremely short sighted and unknowledgeable to say that they couldn't.

 

100 years ago, most rational people would have laughed at the idea of people on the moon. Today, most of us understand much, much better how drastically what we think we know can change in a short amount of time.

 

Many (if not most) well accredited scientists that study cosmology, astronomy, biophysics, and theoretical physics have come to the understanding that it is much more likely that life exists than doesn't on many of the 10-100 billion Earth like planets estimated to exist in our galaxy alone, let alone the hundreds of billions of other galaxies out there. An intelligent species on one (or many) of those planets could be thousands or even millions of years beyond us, and/or 100x as intelligent on average.

 

That said, I suspect most (if not all) legitimate UFOs are US military. Even the government's own investigations into UFOs said that a small percentage of them are completely unexplainable. Given what scientists have shown themselves to be capable of, and what has been proven to be possible, with the billions of dollars the military is capable of using to fund research, almost nothing they could be flying would really surprise me.

 

In the end, the UFO argument is akin to how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Those who are the most sure that they know the answer are the least credible.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!