Recommended Posts

The Boy Scouts of America?s new fitness standards for participating in the organization?s annual Jamboree are so rigorous they would not just exclude chubby tenderfoots ? they would even bar many NFL players.

All Scouts were required to have a physical exam in advance of the Jamboree and those with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or greater were barred from participating at this year?s gathering, which features strenuous activities such as hiking, rock climbing, rappelling and biking. Scouts with BMIs between 32 and 39.9 had to provide additional health information to take on the 1,000-plus acre Summit Bechtel Family National Scout Reserve in West Virginia. But critics said excluding obese Boy Scouts goes against the spirit of the organization.

Patricia Bannon, a registered dietician and author of ?Eat Right When Time Is Tight,? told FoxNews.com she found no issue with the guidelines, but said those who were excluded from the fitness competition should still be allowed to participate in some modified way.

more

of course it would bar many NFL players, a lot of them are FAT! littearly! they might have a lot of muscle weight, but they also have a ton of fat, hence why you want larger defense players... you need them larger to hold off the skinnier runners...

of course it would bar many NFL players, a lot of them are FAT! littearly! they might have a lot of muscle weight, but they also have a ton of fat, hence why you want larger defense players... you need them larger to hold off the skinnier runners...

 

Also most of those guys are in their late 20s. Also most of them have serious health problems by the time they're 40.

 

BMI is not a great measure of human obesity, but BMI + waist size will get you close enough to know who's fat and who is just muscular.

Overly obese, ey? Is there such a thing as overly obese? What's the line between regular obese and overly obese?

 

 

Exposing obese people to sudden amounts of exercise is dangerous. The first kid who collapses will have his parents suing the scouts. This might be more about liability than trying to exclude kids.

  • Like 3

The Boy Scouts of America?s new fitness standards for participating in the organization?s annual Jamboree are so rigorous they would not just exclude chubby tenderfoots ? they would even bar many NFL players.

All Scouts were required to have a physical exam in advance of the Jamboree and those with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 or greater were barred from participating at this year?s gathering, which features strenuous activities such as hiking, rock climbing, rappelling and biking. Scouts with BMIs between 32 and 39.9 had to provide additional health information to take on the 1,000-plus acre Summit Bechtel Family National Scout Reserve in West Virginia.

More ridiculous fearmongering from the Fox News Terror Network?.

 

The vast majority of NFL players would be able to provide additional health information to demonstrate that they are physically fit, allowing them to partake. Some NFL players would technically be barred under these rules but the reality is that you don't get children under the age of 18 looking like Michael Jasper?who is mentioned in the article?because their hormones don't support it; they haven't fully developed physically. Further, "athletes" like Michael Jasper are actually significantly overweight - they have a high muscle mass but their weight still isn't healthy. However, this isn't about professional athletes undergoing intense physical regimes with personal trainers. What this comes down to is physically unfit children being prevented from participating for health reasons, which is understandable.

 

Fox News has picked a ridiculous hypothetical and tried to use it to generate outrage when in reality the rule is perfectly reasonable. The BMI scale is far from perfect but it's suitable for the intended usage here.

You can also be barred from C.O.P.E. and other high adventure activities if you go over the limits. I weigh more than my height and the camp medic didn't question my forms because I was the only leader able to go with my Troop for half of a week of summer camp last week. But, I spoke up and said I wouldn't be doing anything strenuous, other than walking up hills with the Scouts to attend some of their classes.

The football player comparison is a bad anology. The fact is many kids, even athletes, have congenital a cardiac arrhythmia or other problems that, combined with obesity and many of those strenuous activities, could cause trouble or death. Look at how many outwardly "normal" kids drop dead doing sports. The vast majority had passed the required pre-athletics physical.

  • Like 2

of course it would bar many NFL players, a lot of them are FAT! littearly! they might have a lot of muscle weight, but they also have a ton of fat, hence why you want larger defense players... you need them larger to hold off the skinnier runners...

Its mostly OFFENSIVE linemen that are fat. Defensive Line is a lot more speed based.

of course it would bar many NFL players, a lot of them are FAT! littearly! they might have a lot of muscle weight, but they also have a ton of fat, hence why you want larger defense players... you need them larger to hold off the skinnier runners...

 

To bad BMI is an absolutely rubbish useless measurement who doesn't measure FAT, LITERALLY! :)

The football player comparison is a bad anology. The fact is many kids, even athletes, have congenital a cardiac arrhythmia or other problems that, combined with obesity and many of those strenuous activities, could cause trouble or death. Look at how many outwardly "normal" kids drop dead doing sports. The vast majority had passed the required pre-athletics physical.

 

incidentally being overweight doesn't make you un-healthy.

 

I'm overweights. yet. I don't have cholesterol, high or low blood pressure or any other condition(other than my non related Asthma from childhood). meanwhile a lot of thin/fit people are high cholesterol and blood pressure issues or other issues. Weight itself doesn't necessarily have any relation to health issues, though I'm not talking about the needs to bus seats type of fat here, which is getting very common over there. 

incidentally being overweight doesn't make you un-healthy.

 

I'm overweights. yet. I don't have cholesterol, high or low blood pressure or any other condition(other than my non related Asthma from childhood). meanwhile a lot of thin/fit people are high cholesterol and blood pressure issues or other issues. Weight itself doesn't necessarily have any relation to health issues, though I'm not talking about the needs to bus seats type of fat here, which is getting very common over there. 

 

It can potentially cause other issues in the future; i.e. bad knees, legs, shin splints, Plantar fasciitis, etc. I started training for a 5K earlier this year and had to stop because I tore my calf muscles. Doc said that the added weight put too much stress on the lower extremities. Still, I agree with you. My cholesterol and bp are normal despite being over 300 lbs

they should be allowed to participate... but if they cant keep up because of their obesity they should be left behind ... in the woods... without help ... 


It can potentially cause other issues in the future; i.e. bad knees, legs, shin splints, Plantar fasciitis, etc. I started training for a 5K earlier this year and had to stop because I tore my calf muscles. Doc said that the added weight put too much stress on the lower extremities. Still, I agree with you. My cholesterol and bp are normal despite being over 300 lbs

even with good bp and cholestrol you are still at massive risk from a heart attack being that size

incidentally being overweight doesn't make you un-healthy.

 

I'm overweights. yet. I don't have cholesterol, high or low blood pressure or any other condition(other than my non related Asthma from childhood). meanwhile a lot of thin/fit people are high cholesterol and blood pressure issues or other issues. Weight itself doesn't necessarily have any relation to health issues, though I'm not talking about the needs to bus seats type of fat here, which is getting very common over there. 

 

Of course it does. Literally everything you do is harder on your body if you're overweight. This is doubly true if you're obese.

 

Yes, sure, a lot of people can live like that into their 40s and 50s, but once you get older you're more likely to end up with things like joint pain and diabetes. And once you can move around as much due to other issues, you're more likely to have heart problems.

Of course it does. Literally everything you do is harder on your body if you're overweight. This is doubly true if you're obese.

 

Yes, sure, a lot of people can live like that into their 40s and 50s, but once you get older you're more likely to end up with things like joint pain and diabetes. And once you can move around as much due to other issues, you're more likely to have heart problems.

 

Except the medical community has declared years ago and still agrees that being over weight doesn't mean health risk. yes, of course if your American style obese of course it's really bad for you. but being over weight doesn't mean that. there are other things far more dangerous to you than being "healthy overweight".

 

Maybe we should ban sports to, it causes uncountable number of health issues each year, and deaths as well. and must like being morbidly obese, it also causes early damage to your joints and and heart. 

Except the medical community has declared years ago and still agrees that being over weight doesn't mean health risk. yes, of course if your American style obese of course it's really bad for you. but being over weight doesn't mean that. there are other things far more dangerous to you than being "healthy overweight".

 

Maybe we should ban sports to, it causes uncountable number of health issues each year, and deaths as well. and must like being morbidly obese, it also causes early damage to your joints and and heart. 

 

There are very few long term studies on weight. At best, there's an agreement that some small weight gain as you age is not an issue. I've never seen a single one that agrees that being overweight when young will have no issues over the course of your lifetime, and I highly doubt such a study has ever been conducted considering how recent of an issue childhood obesity is.

 

And yes, playing sports will give you more issues as you age. I'm sure if you looked at the life expectancy of NFL players, it's less than average. I'm not saying we should ban anything, nor would I argue that living to 120 stick thin and stuck in your house is anyway to live, but you also can't wave everything off as a non-issue.

The Boy Scouts of America is a really ######ed up organization.  They used to stand for something now they just seem to discriminate (anti-gay, obesity, etc).

 

When I was in Scouts (in Canada) growing up, we were just a bunch of kids and that's it.

The Boy Scouts of America is a really ****ed up organization.  They used to stand for something now they just seem to discriminate (anti-gay, obesity, etc).

 

When I was in Scouts (in Canada) growing up, we were just a bunch of kids and that's it.

 

I disagree. Been with the organization for some time. Just because it looks bad in selective media outlets (and yeah, all of the bad stories get shown vs. the good ones), it doesn't reflect everywhere else. Our Pack/Troop, District, and Council don't act like that.

 

I, too, never experienced problems as a young Scout in North Carolina.

Except the medical community has declared years ago and still agrees that being over weight doesn't mean health risk. yes, of course if your American style obese of course it's really bad for you. but being over weight doesn't mean that. there are other things far more dangerous to you than being "healthy overweight".

 

There are very few long term studies on weight. At best, there's an agreement that some small weight gain as you age is not an issue. I've never seen a single one that agrees that being overweight when young will have no issues over the course of your lifetime, and I highly doubt such a study has ever been conducted considering how recent of an issue childhood obesity is.

 

I would say studies like this tend to give a clear picture:

1851009_1471-2458-7-49-2.png

http://openi.nlm.nih.gov/detailedresult.php?img=1851009_1471-2458-7-49-2&req=4

 

Basically they compare the relative mortality rates of obese individuals as well as mortality rates for smokers to those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki radiation exposure victims. And the results seem to point toward a longer life expectancy for the radiation victims. So a high BMI (>30) does definitely indicate high risk factors for life-shortening conditions.

The Boy Scouts of America is a really ****ed up organization.  They used to stand for something now they just seem to discriminate (anti-gay, obesity, etc).

 

When I was in Scouts (in Canada) growing up, we were just a bunch of kids and that's it.

 

 

It seems, at least from a foreigners perspective, that the boy scouts are being used for other peoples' agendas in some cases. I think the gay issues would have been solved years ago if it wasn't for religious conservatives meddling in the issue. We see some churches cut funding and affiliation after the boy scouts dropped the policy covering gay scouts. As far as I know they still don't allow gay scout leaders. At least ones who are out.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!