Man of Steel sequel to feature Batman (and others) (2016)


Recommended Posts

They should do a straight up The Dark Knight Returns adaptation and ignore any continuity ties with Man of Steel, it sucked anyway. But Affleck is too young for that version of Batman, and they want to actually launch the extended universe with this, so I foresee a mess that will just try to cram in some TDKR in it, much like The Dark Knight Rises.

 

MoS was more entertaining than all 3 of Nolan's Batman movies. Yep, I said it.

MoS was more entertaining than all 3 of Nolan's Batman movies. Yep, I said it.

 

What exactly is entertaining about watching an hour of one city's systematic destruction? The action in that movie was so awfully paced I got numb to it midway through and almost fell asleep. It's visual excess with no stakes at all and a loose plot to keep it all together. Nolan's movies are overrated in certain aspects, but at least they had an actual story with proper characters, not a few excuses to watch Zack Snyder have a go at Transformers.

MoS was more entertaining than all 3 of Nolan's Batman movies. Yep, I said it.

I have to assume you're not being serious, as that's a ridiculous statement to make. It was a decidedly average film.

I'm dead serious. Also, no stakes? The Avengers had no stakes either. Rarely does a superhero movie have stakes. Any two year old can predict the exact outcome.

 

Predicting the outcome has nothing to do with keeping you invested in the characters. Sure, anyone could have predicted that Iron Man would get out of the wormhole in time -- the difference is that you cared about him. The action in Man of Steel was so mind-numbing that near the end I just prayed for the whole thing to be over.

  • Like 2

If they take out the fight in Smallville vs Faora and random tall krypton guy it would have a similar amount of action that other comic book movies have. And that scene was only 7-8 minutes. I'm glad they included it though because it has some incredible fight scenes, something you could only get in a Superman film. I would say this was a great starting film for Superman because it put Clark, who basically knows nothing at this point against a seemingly unbeatable foe. And instead of the idiotic movie/tv adaptations of the past 1. The villain actually did what he said he was going to and 2. They didn't let Superman find some stupid loophole to magically prevent any loss of life or destruction.

If they take out the fight in Smallville vs Faora and random tall krypton guy it would have a similar amount of action that other comic book movies have. And that scene was only 7-8 minutes. I'm glad they included it though because it has some incredible fight scenes, something you could only get in a Superman film.

The fight scenes were easily the weakest, least interesting part of the film. They were utterly gratuitous.

GwSEMMz.jpg

In the latest episode of his Hollywood Babble-On podcast, Kevin Smith spoke some more about the costume and how it compared to an early shot of the outfit that "Batman vs. Superman" director Zack Snyder showed him a while back:

"They put it on a fake rooftop, and they lit it up. But it was in color, and you could see every piece of detail...

So what the suit looks like, and I was always kind of keeping it quiet until they revealed it, but they've revealed it. And you can kind of see, and anybody that... you've seen some people take the picture and color it online.

If you want to see what this suit looks like, you just go to Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns, go to the third book, Hunt the Dark Knight... it's the exact outfit he's wearing. That?s why I hugged that guy all those months ago."

Source

1912539_243854022481852_4383854758247798

CAMERAS ROLL ON DIRECTOR ZACK SNYDER?S ?BATMAN V SUPERMAN: DAWN OF JUSTICE? FROM WARNER BROS. PICTURES

Principal photography is underway in Metro Detroit, Michigan

BURBANK, CA, May 21, 2014 ? Filming is underway on Warner Bros. Pictures? ?Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,? the highly anticipated action adventure from director Zack Snyder, starring Henry Cavill in the role of Clark Kent/Superman, and Ben Affleck as BruceWayne/Batman.

?Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice? also stars Gal Gadot as Diana Prince/Wonder Woman, with Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne and Diane Lane returning from ?Man of Steel,? Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor, Jeremy Irons as Alfred, and Holly Hunter in a role newly created for the film.

?Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice?is written by Chris Terrio, from a screenplay by David S. Goyer. Charles Roven and Deborah Snyder are producing, with Benjamin Melniker, Michael E. Uslan, Wesley Coller, David S. Goyer and Geoff Johns serving as executive producers.

Principal photography will take place on location at Michigan Motion Picture Studios and on location in and around Detroit, Michigan; Illinois; Africa; and the South Pacific.

Set to open worldwide on May 6, 2016, ?Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice? is based on Superman characters created by Jerry Siegel & Joe Shuster, Batman characters created by Bob Kane, and Wonder Woman created by William Moulton Marston, appearing in comic books published by DC Entertainment.

Source: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Yeah, most people will probably call it Batman v Superman since there'll be only 1 film like this for now. I see "Dawn of Justice" as a second title, what the movie will be about in that universe.

No question that they're hinting at this being used as the first step into the Justice League, the only way it could be more obvious is if they named it Superman v Batman :  A Justice League prequel.  :P

According to Flickering Myth, rumors have began to revolve around the look of the character in Wonder Woman #600 as a source of inspiration for the new look. This also served as the basis for the Amazonian Princess' costume in the Injustice: Gods Among Us videogame.

Wonder_Woman_Vol_1_600_Reprint-600x922.j

Source

Is this official ?

Has been for a week now :p I think it looks great, but not top quality for such a film. The idea of the logo is nice, but the bevel at the top op the Bat-symbol makes it look weird. At the bottom it looks like a real piece of metal, at the top it looks too fake.

I'm all for the WW outfit, if that's what they go with, no need to stick to the original and show so much skin just to have people screaming it's sexist or something. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!