Kevin Rose throws a raccoon down the stairs!


Recommended Posts

Are raccoons aggressive?  I always thought they were cute.  This is based solely on the Canadian cartoon from the late 80's.

Yeah they can be very aggressive

 

I was sorta joking.  Do you not recall the Raccoons cartoon series????

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

 

He used excessive force, which looks like it scared the raccoon.

To the people that have had raccoons as pets -- you should be ashamed. Wild animals are NOT pets. They are NOT supposed to be kept as pet. They're wild. You think you're looking out for the animals welfare by keeping a wild animal, but you're not.

 

And it's not just raccoons. *smh* People are so silly.

  • Like 3

He used excessive force, which looks like it scared the raccoon.

 

Considering a farmer might just as easily shoot anything messing with his animals, I certainly wouldn't call that excessive.

 

Furthermore, if it were a person attacking my dog, I'd probably have thrown his ass down the stairs as well. Not sure why I'd give preferential treatment to a raccoon. :ermm:

 

(and for the record, I've actually pet a raccoon before and love the little guys)

To the people that have had raccoons as pets -- you should be ashamed. Wild animals are NOT pets. They are NOT supposed to be kept as pet. They're wild. You think you're looking out for the animals welfare by keeping a wild animal, but you're not.

 

And it's not just raccoons. *smh* People are so silly.

 

I knew the feeling too. someone killed raccoon turn into fur for cap maybe I think.

Not sure why this is posted under "JOKES"   

 

did we not have a thread about it already.... and this is not fit for jokes

 

was it best decision? probably not. did it take balls and was it worth it to save your dog? most likely yes!

 

 

 

still.. not a jokes post

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

 

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

 

yeah, all this bull* comments...  grabbing a dog, and tossing his up the stairs???  are you kidding me??? it would open his to attack from the racoon.

acting on the racoon first was the only viable option!   and under the circumstances, it worked pretty well~!

yeah, all this bull* comments...  grabbing a dog, and tossing his up the stairs???  are you kidding me??? it would open his to attack from the racoon.

acting on the racoon first was the only viable option!   and under the circumstances, it worked pretty well~!

 

I do not know what people expected him to do and say it was a bad decision.  Was he just supposed to sit there and let them resolve it themselves (possible injuring the dog)?  Was he supposed to shoot (even if he had a gun) the raccoon (and possibly injuring the dog)?  Was he supposed to try to pry the raccoon by using a stick (possibly making the raccoon attack him instead of the dog)?  Was he supposed to take a few minutes and put on proper protective equipment (what if he doesn't have any?) and then try to resolve the situation (by then the raccoon could have severely injured the dog)?

  • Like 1

i always wanted a raccoon as a pet however, even though they are everywhere in ohio its illegal to keep one as a pet.

**** it, take one, paint it white and tell the cops it's an albino cat. :rofl:

Animal cruelty?  It was attacking his dog it gives him every right for him to that to the raccoon.  Yeah sure the second throw was too much but whatever not like he was getting off hurting the animal or else he would be harming his dog to like any sociopath.  I feel sorry for people who say this is animal cruelty because by the time he would have called animal control his dog could have gotten rabies or died from a raccoon bite.

Animal cruelty?  It was attacking his dog it gives him every right for him to that to the raccoon.  Yeah sure the second throw was too much but whatever not like he was getting off hurting the animal or else he would be harming his dog to like any sociopath.  I feel sorry for people who say this is animal cruelty because by the time he would have called animal control his dog could have gotten rabies or died from a raccoon bite.

 

damn people,  what is wrong with your perception?    there was no second throw!  its just second camera view!   come on! it should be obvious.

 

otherwise, i agree

damn people,  what is wrong with your perception?    there was no second throw!  its just second camera view!   come on! it should be obvious.

 

otherwise, i agree

 

Sorry, you are right just another different camera view showing him throw the raccoon no need to get mad, I made a mistake.

  • Like 1

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

 

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

 

 

It was at the moment situation, do you understand?  Kevin probably panicked and I am pretty sure he was freaked out by the raccoon himself also.  So what you are saying because he does not encourage violence towards animals he has no right to defend himself and his dog from a violent animal?  This sounds like Kevin was George Zimmerman and the raccoon was Treyvon Martin I guess you can never defend yourself even from a violent animal.  Sorry, but you need to understand the difference being cruel to a innocent animal or protecting yourself from a violent animal.

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

Does your imagination really suck that bad you can't put yourself in a panic state of mind?

Also, yes, raccoons do have opposable thumbs. Some people should really just stop being armchair judgementalists.

Not sure why this is posted under "JOKES"   

 

did we not have a thread about it already.... and this is not fit for jokes

 

was it best decision? probably not. did it take balls and was it worth it to save your dog? most likely yes!

 

 

 

still.. not a jokes post

 

Well, I do laugh out loud every time I watch it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!