Kevin Rose throws a raccoon down the stairs!


Recommended Posts

Are raccoons aggressive?  I always thought they were cute.  This is based solely on the Canadian cartoon from the late 80's.

Yeah they can be very aggressive

 

I was sorta joking.  Do you not recall the Raccoons cartoon series????

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

 

He used excessive force, which looks like it scared the raccoon.

To the people that have had raccoons as pets -- you should be ashamed. Wild animals are NOT pets. They are NOT supposed to be kept as pet. They're wild. You think you're looking out for the animals welfare by keeping a wild animal, but you're not.

 

And it's not just raccoons. *smh* People are so silly.

  • Like 3

He used excessive force, which looks like it scared the raccoon.

 

Considering a farmer might just as easily shoot anything messing with his animals, I certainly wouldn't call that excessive.

 

Furthermore, if it were a person attacking my dog, I'd probably have thrown his ass down the stairs as well. Not sure why I'd give preferential treatment to a raccoon. :ermm:

 

(and for the record, I've actually pet a raccoon before and love the little guys)

To the people that have had raccoons as pets -- you should be ashamed. Wild animals are NOT pets. They are NOT supposed to be kept as pet. They're wild. You think you're looking out for the animals welfare by keeping a wild animal, but you're not.

 

And it's not just raccoons. *smh* People are so silly.

 

I knew the feeling too. someone killed raccoon turn into fur for cap maybe I think.

Not sure why this is posted under "JOKES"   

 

did we not have a thread about it already.... and this is not fit for jokes

 

was it best decision? probably not. did it take balls and was it worth it to save your dog? most likely yes!

 

 

 

still.. not a jokes post

This guy risked getting bitten himself, and grabbing the animal increased the chances of that happening.

 

He could have grabbed his dog, tossed him up the stairs, and scared off the raccoon.

 

Barring that, it also would have been quicker to just toss the animal over the fence. He really had to wind up to throw it down the stairs, and that's more time for the animal to have scratched or bitten him.

 

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

 

yeah, all this bull* comments...  grabbing a dog, and tossing his up the stairs???  are you kidding me??? it would open his to attack from the racoon.

acting on the racoon first was the only viable option!   and under the circumstances, it worked pretty well~!

yeah, all this bull* comments...  grabbing a dog, and tossing his up the stairs???  are you kidding me??? it would open his to attack from the racoon.

acting on the racoon first was the only viable option!   and under the circumstances, it worked pretty well~!

 

I do not know what people expected him to do and say it was a bad decision.  Was he just supposed to sit there and let them resolve it themselves (possible injuring the dog)?  Was he supposed to shoot (even if he had a gun) the raccoon (and possibly injuring the dog)?  Was he supposed to try to pry the raccoon by using a stick (possibly making the raccoon attack him instead of the dog)?  Was he supposed to take a few minutes and put on proper protective equipment (what if he doesn't have any?) and then try to resolve the situation (by then the raccoon could have severely injured the dog)?

  • Like 1

i always wanted a raccoon as a pet however, even though they are everywhere in ohio its illegal to keep one as a pet.

**** it, take one, paint it white and tell the cops it's an albino cat. :rofl:

Animal cruelty?  It was attacking his dog it gives him every right for him to that to the raccoon.  Yeah sure the second throw was too much but whatever not like he was getting off hurting the animal or else he would be harming his dog to like any sociopath.  I feel sorry for people who say this is animal cruelty because by the time he would have called animal control his dog could have gotten rabies or died from a raccoon bite.

Animal cruelty?  It was attacking his dog it gives him every right for him to that to the raccoon.  Yeah sure the second throw was too much but whatever not like he was getting off hurting the animal or else he would be harming his dog to like any sociopath.  I feel sorry for people who say this is animal cruelty because by the time he would have called animal control his dog could have gotten rabies or died from a raccoon bite.

 

damn people,  what is wrong with your perception?    there was no second throw!  its just second camera view!   come on! it should be obvious.

 

otherwise, i agree

damn people,  what is wrong with your perception?    there was no second throw!  its just second camera view!   come on! it should be obvious.

 

otherwise, i agree

 

Sorry, you are right just another different camera view showing him throw the raccoon no need to get mad, I made a mistake.

  • Like 1

Or the raccoon would have bitten him as he was trying to free the dog.  

 

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

 

 

It was at the moment situation, do you understand?  Kevin probably panicked and I am pretty sure he was freaked out by the raccoon himself also.  So what you are saying because he does not encourage violence towards animals he has no right to defend himself and his dog from a violent animal?  This sounds like Kevin was George Zimmerman and the raccoon was Treyvon Martin I guess you can never defend yourself even from a violent animal.  Sorry, but you need to understand the difference being cruel to a innocent animal or protecting yourself from a violent animal.

Raccoons and dogs don't have opposable thumbs. There's not much to separating two small mammals. Lifting the raccoon easily separated the two animals, so he could have done the same picking up his dog and kicking the raccoon away simultaneously.

 

As you can also see from the second camera angle, there was an open gate to the left. That's how the raccoon entered that area in the first place. If anything, he could have easily thrown the animal to the left and then closed the gate. His throwing the raccoon down the stairs and then immediately running down the stairs shows an intent to kill the animal, despite his saying that he doesn't encourage animal violence.

Does your imagination really suck that bad you can't put yourself in a panic state of mind?

Also, yes, raccoons do have opposable thumbs. Some people should really just stop being armchair judgementalists.

Not sure why this is posted under "JOKES"   

 

did we not have a thread about it already.... and this is not fit for jokes

 

was it best decision? probably not. did it take balls and was it worth it to save your dog? most likely yes!

 

 

 

still.. not a jokes post

 

Well, I do laugh out loud every time I watch it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!