Recommended Posts

I think its a site for TV content like downloading series / episodes etc..

 

Anyhow can't believe virgin media already blocking it, that was fast..

Oh, ok.  Figured it was some fort of prOn site.  :-)

Kinda ironic that the UK government is struggling to get ISPs to block violent/child porn, yet they're very quick to block anything that aids copyright infringement.

 

I guess the copyright holders have more ?? to throw at the government/courts than the organisations campaigning for things that actually *should* be blocked to be blocked.

The difference is, blocks against sites like EZTV and Pirate Bay are the result of significant court action against specific sites that have to be evidenced etc, whereas the blocks they want against porn sites are generic ones that can be disabled.  Not even remotely the same thing.

  • Like 1

The difference is, blocks against sites like EZTV and Pirate Bay are the result of significant court action against specific sites that have to be evidenced etc, whereas the blocks they want against porn sites are generic ones that can be disabled.  Not even remotely the same thing.

 

 

Soon enough it won't matter as it will just all melt into the same pot.

  • 4 weeks later...

Why, for obeying the law and doing what a court has ordered them to do?

 

Just because it's the law doesn't always make it right.

 

I boycott Orange because of some miserable b***h on customer services, they obeyed the law but I still boycotted them :)

Just because it's the law doesn't always make it right.

 

I boycott Orange because of some miserable b***h on customer services, they obeyed the law but I still boycotted them :)

 

Eztv were making it possible for people to watch copyrighted content without paying the copyright holder for it, that's neither legal nor morally right.

Eztv were making it possible for people to watch copyrighted content without paying the copyright holder for it, that's neither legal nor morally right.

 

Oh, you're one of those types.

 

Way I see it, if the show airs on a channel I normally get anyway, what's the difference if I download it later?

  • Like 1

Now block Google and Bing. Thanks.

 

EZTV does not host material on their servers, they are a linking service, just like any search engine out there. 

 

Blocking sites is not the right way to go. Maybe the content holders should start thinking other ways to spread their material instead of the TV or $20 DVDs.

 

EDIT: Oh wait, EZTV does host some things on their servers, free movies (Actual free movies)

 

But I guess Floating also believes that HBO, Lionsgate etc have all the right to file a DMCA takedown notice on TPB-AFK movie which they have no right on and which Google is actively blocking from their engine? HBO has what right on another independent director film exactly? If I was that director Id go straight after HBO into court for that stuff.

Oh, you're one of those types.

 

Way I see it, if the show airs on a channel I normally get anyway, what's the difference if I download it later?

 

The way you see it doesn't cut the mustard. A TV channel pays for that show, and hosts adverts to recoup their costs and make a little money.  You're not seeing the ads which pay for the show, therefore you're seeing the content without paying for it (you pay by watching the adverts).  

 

Don't get me wrong, I do this too when I can't obtain the show another way; but I'm under NO illusion as to the legality of what I'm doing.  If people continue to do this, the people who make the shows are going to stop making them because they're not earning enough money to make it worth doing so.  I would gladly pay to download and watch the few shows I do grab, if I could.  The only shows I ever have zero guilt about downloading are BBC made shows, because as a TV licensee, I -have- paid for those shows.

 

Whilst EZTV aren't hosting the illegal content themselves, they ARE enabling people to access it much easier.  Therefore, whilst the site can't be shut down directly, they CAN take the route of making it harder for the average person to access it.

The way you see it doesn't cut the mustard. A TV channel pays for that show, and hosts adverts to recoup their costs and make a little money.  You're not seeing the ads which pay for the show, therefore you're seeing the content without paying for it (you pay by watching the adverts).  

 

Don't get me wrong, I do this too when I can't obtain the show another way; but I'm under NO illusion as to the legality of what I'm doing.  If people continue to do this, the people who make the shows are going to stop making them because they're not earning enough money to make it worth doing so.  I would gladly pay to download and watch the few shows I do grab, if I could.  The only shows I ever have zero guilt about downloading are BBC made shows, because as a TV licensee, I -have- paid for those shows.

 

Whilst EZTV aren't hosting the illegal content themselves, they ARE enabling people to access it much easier.  Therefore, whilst the site can't be shut down directly, they CAN take the route of making it harder for the average person to access it.

 

 

In theory there is no difference to downloading a TV show as there is recording it on SKY Plus 

 

as when recorded on SKY plus i skip the adverts then too lol

  • Like 2

In theory there is no difference to downloading a TV show as there is recording it on SKY Plus 

 

as when recorded on SKY plus i skip the adverts then too lol

 

You pay a subscription for Sky, which counts for most of the cost of the shows you're watching.  Also, Sky Plus records the adverts as well, you then choosing to skip them is up to you, but they were still recorded. Either way, as a subscriber, you've paid.

 

However, the "fee" you've paid doesn't grant you the rights to then distribute that content.

  • 2 months later...

Yeah i don't understand the people saying this is wrong, if you want to illegal gain access to copywrited media then that is your choice but don't slam a company for following a court order into protecting copywrited media. 

 

I remember when I cancelled my Sky Movies subscription, the women on the phone made a point in telling me that If I do this, then any recorded movies will also stop working as I am giving up my right to watch sky movies by unsubscribing. This just highlights this, just because you have the right to watch what is on through whatever service you have, doesn't mean you have the right to own that material. 

Kinda ironic that the UK government is struggling to get ISPs to block violent/child porn, yet they're very quick to block anything that aids copyright infringement.

 

I guess the copyright holders have more ?? to throw at the government/courts than the organisations campaigning for things that actually *should* be blocked to be blocked.

 

The government only care about 1 thing.. MONEY!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!