Christian Bale Reportedly Offered $50 Million To Reprise Batman


Recommended Posts

3Y8tc.png

According to a new ebook, ?Beyond Batman: The Unauthorized True Story of Christian Bale and His Dark Knight Dilemma? this may be the case.

The book cites sources close to Legendary Pictures that asserts Bale may have ?no choice? but to don the cowl at least one more time.

According to the publisher of ?Beyond Batman,? the Hollywood mega star likely won?t be able to refuse the potential $50 million payday that could come from playing Batman again.

Damn that is a lot of Bat bucks!

In my experience where there is smoke, there is fire. There is something in law called slander and no one would be stupid enough to put false information like this out there to make a quick profit and face a lawsuit no matter how many disclaimers the book has.

The book?s author Vince Russel says the following:

As the bat signal still glimmers with fervor above Bale?s Hollywood marquee, Christian Bale?s experience as the Batman of our generation is about to prove more inescapable than he expected. With three of the most successful Batman films in Hollywood history under his belt, Christian Bale is now facing extraordinary pressure to become The Dark Knight once again.

Could it be that Bale not sees the Batman films the way Robert Downey Jr sees the Iron Man films? The author adds:

?Although Downey has appeared as Tony Stark in four movies in less than a decade, he?s hardly typecast as Iron Man,? Russel says, ?Downey has balanced his action film escapades with other projects that have harnessed his talents and earned critical acclaim in the process. If Bale follows a similar formula, his box office glory days may not be behind him ? a reality that other men who have donned the black cape weren?t so fortunate to experience.?

The book at the end makes a ballsy claim. Christian Bale?s future success as a top Hollywood draw?

??may need Batman every bit as much as the Batman franchise still needs Christian Bale.?

I don?t know about that. Christian is after all an Oscar winner. What do you cool kids think? Is this guy right or wrong? Chime in below. I?m doing my rounds and you know I am all over this story. The minute I know who the Goddamn Batman is, Bale or no Bale, I will let you all know.

Here is the book?s summary:

?Beyond Batman? is the unauthorized true story of Christian Bale and his real life Dark Knight dilemma.

As the bat signal still glimmers with fervor above Bale?s Hollywood marquee, this compelling, first-of-its-kind work recounts Christian Bale?s inescapable experience as the Batman of our generation.

With three of the most successful Batman films in Hollywood history under his belt, Christian Bale is now facing extraordinary pressure to become The Dark Knight once more in the forthcoming Justice League film.

This compelling read exposes how sources close to Christian Bale have reportedly begun expressing their suspicions that Bale now views the Batman films in the same light that Robert Downey, Jr. views the Iron Man films.

Although Downey has appeared as Tony Stark in four movies in less than a decade, he?s hardly typecast as Iron Man. Downey has balanced his action film escapades with other projects that have harnessed his talents and earned critical acclaim in the process.

If Bale follows a similar formula, his box office glory days may not be behind him ? a reality that other men who have donned the black cape weren?t so fortunate to experience.

In the end, Christian Bale?s future success as a top Hollywood draw may need Batman every bit as much as the Batman franchise still needs Christian Bale.

http://latino-review.com/2013/08/christian-bale-reportedly-offered-50-million-to-reprise-batman-according-to-new-book/

  • Like 2

He did a good job as batman but the last one had him with a major leg issue that needed a "super brace". They drifted Robin into the mix but even with him and Robin together its just stupid to pit them against Superman as enemies. I can see them with ego issues behind the scenes as they battle a major enemy but not against each other...nope.

If this also means they're going to link "The Dark Knight" trilogy with the "Man Of Steel" films, than that would mean something bad would've happened in Gotham City for him to don the cape and cowl. That's why I at least want to see someone else play Batman because actually 'ended' his Batman run with The Dark Knight Rises. Robert Downey J. never had an ending to his Iron Man career in the movies so there wouldn't be a reason for him not to be Iron Man anymore storywise.

If there's no link between "The Dark Knight" trilogy and "Man Of Steel" than it would be weird to be to have Christian Bale playing Batman again. If they are going to link both franchises, than that would be pretty cool! Though if that is the case, they have to explain what happened with Gotham and Bruce and Bruce donning the cape and cowl again.

It would be awesome if he'd returned, but story-wise it would either ruin the ending of "The Dark Knight Rises" or they'll play off of it. If they are linking both franchises, that would also mean it's easier to make a Nightwing spin-off movie with Jason Gordon-Levitt.

It would be awesome if he'd returned, but story-wise it would either ruin the ending of "The Dark Knight Rises" or they'll play off of it. If they are linking both franchises, that would also mean it's easier to make a Nightwing spin-off movie with Jason Gordon-Levitt.

The Dark Knight Rises was a horrible letdown anyway.  Kind of like Highlander 2, I'm okay with pretending it never happened.

That's what you get for comparing it with "The Dark Knight" I guess. I liked "The Dark Knight Rises" a lot and I don't think it'll be ignored by anyone working on "Man of Steel". Unless they're not going to link the franchises, than they're going to ignore the whole trilogy.

That would also mean that Bale is going to be in the new Batman films which were meant to be a restart for the Justice League films. That's another reason why I'd rather see someone else playing Batman. I mean, Spider-Man's new films work because Tobey MaGuire wasn't cast as Spider-Man. They should follow that same idea for Batman if you ask me.

  • Like 1

As much as I'd love him to reprise his role as Batman, I hope he does not. Apart from ruining the end of the Dark Knight Rises he should leave while still on a high, not keep going till nobody cares anymore. We are ready for a new Batman, let Christian move on... 

I'd honestly rather see someone else in the role. As good as Bale was, I am kind of sick of that Batman.

 

And I certainly don't think of Superman existing in Nolan universe, so if this is for him to be in Superman/Batman mashup... no thank you!

  • Like 1

I'd honestly rather see someone else in the role. As good as Bale was, I am kind of sick of that Batman.

 

And I certainly don't think of Superman existing in Nolan universe, so if this is for him to be in Superman/Batman mashup... no thank you!

My thoughts exactly. They need to portray the Batman that he is; as a detective and strategist who cares about Gotham. Plotting is every move and being one step ahead of the enemy at all times. They've done the Dark version of Batman, if they want to keep it fresh they should give the movie version of Batman a fresh spin like how he is in the comics.

My thoughts exactly. They need to portray the Batman that he is; as a detective and strategist who cares about Gotham. Plotting is every move and being one step ahead of the enemy at all times. They've done the Dark version of Batman, if they want to keep it fresh they should give the movie version of Batman a fresh spin like how he is in the comics.

 

It would definatly be great to see more of the "detective" style Batman. I haven't read many of the comics, though I loved the animated series as a boy!

Not only would it be crazy to turn down that amount of money, but it'd be a bit of a snub to the fans who clearly love him in the role of Bruce Wayne and want him to come back and reprise it!

It would definatly be great to see more of the "detective" style Batman. I haven't read many of the comics, though I loved the animated series as a boy!

I wish more people saw it that way though, haha. I just can't see Bale coming back as Batman if they don't link both franchises. I mean, he isn't the only person who can play Batman. Everyone makes it seem like he's THE Batman. He was great in "The Dark Knight" trilogy, but there's much more to Batman than that version of Batman.

That's what you get for comparing it with "The Dark Knight" I guess.

Yes, The Dark Knight was awesome, and yes, it would have been impossible to top, even despite the replacement of Katie Holmes and the death of Harvey Dent bringing it down.  However, I don't give a damn how it compares to The Dark Knight.  On its own, as a Batman movie, it is complete and utter ######.  Everyone involved with writing that script should be hung.  Yes, they messed with mythology quite a bit in Batman Begins regarding Ra's al Ghul, but it worked for the story.  In TDKR they sodomized nearly every character's mythology for no apparent reason and certainly not to improve the story.  And Bruce's retirement at the end is about the least disappointing aspect of it, in case you think that I simply wasn't happy with the ending.  I'm wondering if you've ever read a Batman comic in your life.  So no, I'm not comparing it to The Dark Knight; I'm comparing it to Batman.

Yes, The Dark Knight was awesome, and yes, it would have been impossible to top, even despite the replacement of Katie Holmes and the death of Harvey Dent bringing it down.  However, I don't give a damn how it compares to The Dark Knight.  On its own, as a Batman movie, it is complete and utter ****.  Everyone involved with writing that script should be hung.  Yes, they messed with mythology quite a bit in Batman Begins regarding Ra's al Ghul, but it worked for the story.  In TDKR they sodomized nearly every character's mythology for no apparent reason and certainly not to improve the story.  And Bruce's retirement at the end is about the least disappointing aspect of it, in case you think that I simply wasn't happy with the ending.  I'm wondering if you've ever read a Batman comic in your life.  So no, I'm not comparing it to The Dark Knight; I'm comparing it to Batman.

Wow, calm down dude. Also, there's no reason to say that people need to die for a script you don't agree with. ######? Also, let me tell you that I did read a ton of Batman comics and I still am reading them. Just because I liked the Dark Knight Rises doesn't mean I don't read comics books and agree with how they changed everything. I knew right from Batman Begins that this would be Nolan's version of the Batman, so also his version of everything else. It's the movie-verse of DC Comics in which they follow the canon loosely. The movies aren't part of the comic-books either, they're stand alone. Sure, the "The Dark Knight Rises" didn't follow anything of the mythos, but have they ever stated that they'd literally follow everything from the comic books? Nope.

If you compare it to Batman than you agree that Batman is much more than just "The Dark Knight Trilogy" and that we should get another version of Batman in "Man of Steel".

No idea why you're getting so worked up and rude about what you quoted, but drop the attitude dude.

I don't care who you are, you don't turn down $50m.  Even if you want to be all "I don't need it" - fine, don't have it - setup a freaking charitable fund.  I mean, $50m man, that's a LOT...

Don't assume that I didn't like it just because it wasn't another The Dark Knight, then.

 

And no, I did not expect it to be a direct translation of the comics by any means.  It was clear in Batman Begins that they they were going to be taking several liberties with the mythos.  In TDK they diverged greatly from the comics as well.  However, aside rewriting the origins of the characters, the way the characters themselves were portrayed was spot on.  Except Ducard, who was little or nothing like Ducard, but he wouldn't be since he was rewritten to be the secret identity of Ra's.  In TDK nobody newly introduced was as they should have been.  The whole movie was like they had no idea where to go with the story so they decided to throw a bunch of characters together and completely disregard who those characters are supposed be, how they would react, what drives them to be who they are, tie them together with a really thin and ridiculous plot and then fill it in with a bunch of mediocre action sequences.  There were a few good elements I liked, like how they dealt with the physical toll being Batman would take on Bruce, but for the most part I thought the movie was crap on toast.  Where I was glued to the screen every moment of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight I had a hard time staying awake through The Dark Knight Rises.  And no,  I don't actually wish anybody dead; it's an expression, lighten up.  I'm not "worked up," I'm passionate about Batman and they ######ed it up big time.  If it hadn't been for the first two movies the third on its own would have probably halted any more Batman movies for some time to come.  If Bale comes back as Batman, great, so long as it's not the same Batman from Nolan's films.  Because of the confusion that would cause it's probably better if he doesn't reprise the role.

Don't assume that I didn't like it just because it wasn't another The Dark Knight, then.

 

And no, I did not expect it to be a direct translation of the comics by any means.  It was clear in Batman Begins that they they were going to be taking several liberties with the mythos.  In TDK they diverged greatly from the comics as well.  However, aside rewriting the origins of the characters, the way the characters themselves were portrayed was spot on.  Except Ducard, who was little or nothing like Ducard, but he wouldn't be since he was rewritten to be the secret identity of Ra's.  In TDK nobody newly introduced was as they should have been.  The whole movie was like they had no idea where to go with the story so they decided to throw a bunch of characters together and completely disregard who those characters are supposed be, how they would react, what drives them to be who they are, tie them together with a really thin and ridiculous plot and then fill it in with a bunch of mediocre action sequences.  There were a few good elements I liked, like how they dealt with the physical toll being Batman would take on Bruce, but for the most part I thought the movie was crap on toast.  Where I was glued to the screen every moment of Batman Begins and The Dark Knight I had a hard time staying awake through The Dark Knight Rises.  And no,  I don't actually wish anybody dead; it's an expression, lighten up.  I'm not "worked up," I'm passionate about Batman and they ****ed it up big time.  If it hadn't been for the first two movies the third on its own would have probably halted any more Batman movies for some time to come.  If Bale comes back as Batman, great, so long as it's not the same Batman from Nolan's films.  Because of the confusion that would cause it's probably better if he doesn't reprise the role.

Fair enough. For that same reason, don't assume I didn't read any Batman comic books :p

Anyway, I think I can agree with you on a few parts. I'm passionate about Batman myself but I was able to enjoy the film since I didn't expect them to uphold what was established for the characters in the comic books. I just think that Bale has had his run and that he's not THE Batman or the only person who can portray him on the big screen. I think they'd just repeat themselves if they'd cast Bale again. And it would also be kind of an easy way out for them since they know Bale can portray the darker Batman. But why not freshen it up with a new actor and go into another direction with Batman and his upcoming movies? I think that the audience will ultimately want something new as well. Otherwise it would turn out like Transformers; pushing out movies for the sake of money.

I don't particularly care for Bale over any other actor, either.  He did a good job as Batman, but he was a lousy Bruce.  Only Michael Keaton has done an outstanding job with both personas, despite not really looking like Bruce Wayne (but then, neither does any actor who has played Batman in the last 20 years).

^Yeah, that's why I've been judging the rumored actors based on if they look like Bruce Wayne. Anyone with the cowl on can say they're Batman, but they have to look like Bruce Wayne first imo. I didn't really see a Bruce Wayne in Bale either which kind bugged me. But I thought he was great at playing Batman.

I'm just hoping for a new actors since at the end of the day, they are going to use the same Batman in the reboots of Batman. And how would it be a reboot if the same actor plays the same role?

I don't particularly care for Bale over any other actor, either.  He did a good job as Batman, but he was a lousy Bruce.  Only Michael Keaton has done an outstanding job with both personas, despite not really looking like Bruce Wayne (but then, neither does any actor who has played Batman in the last 20 years).

 

Oh man, imagine they got Michael Keaton back as an older Bruce Wayne for Superman/Batman. :rofl:

So did he change the awful acting from "Dark Knight"? The growling was obnoxious.

That's way to early to tell since nothing is confirmed nor is there a script yet.
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I am not a US citizen nor a Trump fan. Respect to both left and right. But I will, for the sake of fun, predict something for my own. There will come a day when the US and China will collide like titans ( over Taiwan or anything else ). Then, on that day, some people in this comment section will realize how good an idea it was to become independent in areas like that. ( Or atleast try )
    • Microsoft Edge gets tons of security features, including AI model that can see your screen by Usama Jawad Microsoft Edge may not be the most popular browser out there, but it does receive quite frequent updates that sometimes bring surprising new features and axe others that are not as popular. Now, Microsoft has detailed some of the new security enhancements that it has introduced in Edge for Business, typically used by commercial customers. Microsoft has emphasized that security features are baked into Edge for Business and offer native integration with security and governance tools like Defender and Purview. Browser sessions are governed by default on managed devices but can also be governed through dedicated work profiles on unmanaged devices. An important aspect in this area is controlling the use of shadow AI. We have talked about this before, but it essentially restricts employees from using unsanctioned AI apps through data loss prevention (DLP) policies, with Edge redirecting them to trusted AI services like Microsoft 365 Copilot. This feature, available as a pay-as-you-go (PAYG) license, ensures that confidential data never exits AI boundaries set by your organization in Purview. Additionally, Microsoft also has strong DLP policies for contractors. Contractors leveraging a Entra ID-joined work profile provisioned by their contracting company on a device managed by their actual employer can be restricted from downloading files locally. In such scenarios, the file is saved on the contracting firm's OneDrive rather than being downloaded locally. Another useful Edge security feature disallows copying and pasting from unmanaged locations and apps. Similarly, DLP policies can be configured at a granular level to restrict screenshots or downloading of files from certain locations. In the same vein, IT admins can block the installation of extensions, hosted apps, themes and scripts, and control if users can install extensions from external locations. They can also enable the installation of specific extensions and allow users to request access to certain extensions, so that they can be managed on a case-by-case basis. Finally, Edge for Business now has an on-device AI model that uses computer vision to see what's on your screen and block potentially malicious content immediately. This does not rely on site reputation, as it simply monitors what is being displayed on your screen, which means that it is effective against malicious content that takes over your screen and employs scareware tactics. Since this is an on-device AI model, it does use your system's resources, so it's enabled by default only on devices with at least 2GB of RAM and four CPU cores. You can find more details in the Microsoft Mechanics video here.
    • Could you come up with a slightly less depressing background for Tux instead of that gray gradient? Doesn't have to be cheerful, just less of a downer...
    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Zeynel earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      248
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!