Christian Bale Reportedly Offered $50 Million To Reprise Batman


Recommended Posts

So did he change the awful acting from "Dark Knight"? The growling was obnoxious.

 

 

That's way to early to tell since nothing is confirmed nor is there a script yet.

His growling was actually computer modified :/  You'd have to see a version with "no effects" to understand.

I want new actors for a new "universe".

One of my biggest gripes with Man of Steel was it's supposed to take place in the Justice League universe- where there are a LOT of other superheroes around- but when the world itself is getting destroyed, none of them bother to show up. They'll need a damn good explanation for that... Which I can't see using the current Batman or Green Lantern movies.

His growling was actually computer modified :/  You'd have to see a version with "no effects" to understand.

Kinda like Bane's voice. His original voice sounded better for the film because I constantly could hear it was coming from my speakers instead of his mouth, if you know what I mean? It didn't sound as if the voice came through his mask.

I want new actors for a new "universe".

One of my biggest gripes with Man of Steel was it's supposed to take place in the Justice League universe- where there are a LOT of other superheroes around- but when the world itself is getting destroyed, none of them bother to show up. They'll need a damn good explanation for that... Which I can't see using the current Batman or Green Lantern movies.

But they didn't start being superheroes on the exact same day. Plus, they could say that Green Lantern was off-planet while dealing with Lantern stuff. Batman could've been dealing with his own stuff in Gotham as well. It happens a lot in the comics as well where you'd expect them to help each other out. But because it's their own story, they have to prevail on their own.

Kinda like Bane's voice. His original voice sounded better for the film because I constantly could hear it was coming from my speakers instead of his mouth, if you know what I mean? It didn't sound as if the voice came through his mask.

But they didn't start being superheroes on the exact same day. Plus, they could say that Green Lantern was off-planet while dealing with Lantern stuff. Batman could've been dealing with his own stuff in Gotham as well. It happens a lot in the comics as well where you'd expect them to help each other out. But because it's their own story, they have to prevail on their own.

Yeah Bane's voice was creepy 

Boy, I hope he takes it because he was the best Wayne/Batman ever. Nobody will ever top him. Plus turning down $50,000,000 is just plain stupid, artist or not lol.

Yeah, I mean it sounded great but you could just hear it was recorded in a studio.

Yeah I understood, most of the time it wasn't perfectly synced, but i'm guessing since you couldn't see mouth movements they deemed it alright ? :huh:

Yeah I understood, most of the time it wasn't perfectly synced, but i'm guessing since you couldn't see mouth movements they deemed it alright ? :huh:

I believe it was synced, it's just that his voice wasn't in the environment like everybody elses. Just look up "Banes original voice" on YouTube. He says things in a creepier way when they recorded in the studio.

Not sure how to explain it besides saying that his voice wasn't in the environment though :p Of course they had to record it in the studio since the original wasn't easy to understand at times.

To be honest some movies just get milked for too long. I have never been a massive fan of Batman and haven't even seen the third movie... Yet. I don't know his reasons but if its because he wants to quit while he is ahead, I hope he sticks to his guns and turns down any ridiculous sums of money on principal, I'd have a lot more respect for him if he did (not that I have a lack of respect anyway).

 

To be honest some movies just get milked for too long. I have never been a massive fan of Batman and haven't even seen the third movie... Yet. I don't know his reasons but if its because he wants to quit while he is ahead, I hope he sticks to his guns and turns down any ridiculous sums of money on principal, I'd have a lot more respect for him if he did (not that I have a lack of respect anyway).

 

Well, i'd throw my principes down for 50million + marketing earnings :P

Well, i'd throw my principles down for 50 million + marketing earnings :p

I would too, but I think the difference is, I doubt neither one of us have the kind of money he does. 

IMO if he was to sacrifice his own principles for money it says something about him as a person and the media will slate him for that. The next problem is that eventually the batman franchise in its current form will flop and when it does it will take his reputation with it.

He could get away with 50 million dollar cheques for another 3 movies, but does he want to risk the rest of his career for something like this? I honestly think if he does, and it does dive it will be the last we ever see of him in a AAA title.

I would too, but I think the difference is, I doubt neither one of us have the kind of money he does. 

IMO if he was to sacrifice his own principles for money it says something about him as a person and the media will slate him for that. The next problem is that eventually the batman franchise in its current form will flop and when it does it will take his reputation with it.

He could get away with 50 million dollar cheques for another 3 movies, but does he want to risk the rest of his career for something like this? I honestly think if he does, and it does dive it will be the last we ever see of him in a AAA title.

 

What principles? The guy was in a Batman movie, hardly something that will leave a mark in society. It's not like he came up with the cure for cancer and is now selling it to the highest bidder. There's simply no reason to refuse this kind of money, other than being physically and mentally torn out by it to the level of feeling your well being is in danger. And he can do incredibly great stuff with that amount of money (pursue his passion projects, help people out, make sure his future/offspring is financially secure, blah blah blah).

 

If the rumors are actually true, ultimately the decision's on him, but I think no one has the right to judge him if he decides to take up the role again. People have done worse things for less money. Not to mention he was great as Bruce/Batman.

What principles? The guy was in a Batman movie, hardly something that will leave a mark in society. It's not like he came up with the cure for cancer and is now selling it to the highest bidder. There's simply no reason to refuse this kind of money, other than being physically and mentally torn out by it to the level of feeling your well being is in danger. And he can do incredibly great stuff with that amount of money (pursue his passion projects, help people out, make sure his future/offspring is financially secure, blah blah blah).

 

If the rumors are actually true, ultimately the decision's on him, but I think no one has the right to judge him if he decides to take up the role again. People have done worse things for less money. Not to mention he was great as Bruce/Batman.

 

 

What principles?  Don't believe that his so-called decision to not do any more films is anything beyond part of the Hollywood game!

 

I was under the impression that he decided not to do anymore because he wanted something new and didn't want to milk the franchise dry sort of, quit while he was ahead.

 

maybe i'm just completely wrong on that!

I was under the impression that he decided not to do anymore because he wanted something new and didn't want to milk the franchise dry sort of, quit while he was ahead.

 

maybe i'm just completely wrong on that!

 

That's what he said, what we're discussing is that him "bending" his previous statements isn't the end of the world, especially if the rumored amount of money is true.

That's what he said, what we're discussing is that him "bending" his previous statements isn't the end of the world, especially if the rumored amount of money is true.

Well if that is the case then what I stand by what I said. Him "bending his previous statements" imo is going against his own principles for money, especially when it comes from someone who is worth millions of dollars anyway!

 

I think for the general public, depending on what it was you could maybe forgive them, but this guy could probably retire now and live very well for the rest of his life. In the grand scheme of things it really doesn't matter, it's just a movie but I like to see people stand by what they say and not be bought out by a pile of cash, especially when no-one is trying to buy me out!

After working with McG on Terminator, I don't think he would fall for working with another hack, Snyder.

 

Dark Knight Rises was pretty poor, Bale would be wise to continue leaving Batman in the past. It won't reach great heights any time soon.

Whether Christian Bale has or has not been offered $50 million to reprise his role as Batman in Man of Steel 2 remains a mystery. (He probably hasn?t.) But with the suit officially unoccupied ? as of now? the race is on to find a new Batman. But one name you can probably cross off your list? Castle star and generally geek-loved actor Nathan Fillion.

?I wonder if my throat could take it,? he said, joking that he doesn?t believe he has the vocal stamina to mimic Batman?s gravelly voice. ?I think I?d make an excellent Bruce Wayne; I think I?d make a terrible Batman.?

Fillion, who is no stranger to superheroes and recently voiced the Green Lantern in the straight-to-DVD animated movie Justice League: The Flashpoint Paradox, adds that he has not been approached in any way about the role. He also cautions fans who are currently stumping for certain actors to get the part ? even those stumping for him. ?If you wanted to see a particular person as Batman, I think one of the worst things you could do is shove it down someone?s throat as far as the new director of Batman or the new producers of Batman,? he says. ?Probably the worst thing you could do if there?s someone you want to be Batman is sort of rally.?

Batman or not, Fillion will soon (finally!) be back on the small screen when Castle returns Sept. 23 on ABC. For more on the show?s return, pick up EW?s Fall TV preview issue, out next month.

Source: Entertainment Weekly

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!