Recommended Posts

I don't have a clue of it works with folders, but try using forcedel.

http://www.codeguru.com/files/ForceDel.shtml

Not the comment at the bottom about possibly having to uncheck the 'Use indexing feature for this folder...' for the ones you want to delete.

I've had a /lot/ of problems with locked files and folders in the past with Windows XP - but I've always just been able to work around the problem from the dos prompt. O.o

  Toxikk said:
i have tried like every security option in there... nothing FXCKING WORKS
i know you're getting frustrated man, but try one more thing. highlight all of those folders, go back into the security tab. remove ALL user names/groups except your own. if system is in there, remove that too. then reboot.

it makes logical sense to me that if you remove permission for even the system to access the folder, that when you come back from a reboot, windows would not have the ability to load/lock those folders. since your login is the only one with access, you should then be able to delete them.

i dunno if it'll work for sure but it can't hurt

  Spyder said:
i know you're getting frustrated man, but try one more thing.  highlight all of those folders, go back into the security tab.  remove ALL user names/groups except your own.  if system is in there, remove that too.  then reboot.

it makes logical sense to me that if you remove permission for even the system to access the folder, that when you come back from a reboot, windows would not have the ability to load/lock those folders.  since your login is the only one with access, you should then be able to delete them.

i dunno if it'll work for sure but it can't hurt

use that and im not at home so im not sure but theres more info in security for authoring or owern something... where you have to repermission them all to your name and you check the tab under it... lol someone help me im not at home, but ive had to do this before to give myself permissions as another admin

FXCK YES. I GOT IT!!!!!!

HOT DAMN.

ok. what did i do? hehehe. here goes.

i selected all the files. right clicked, properties. security. i hit yes on the prompt if i wanted to reset all the perms. then i clicked advanced. went to the owner tab and doubleclicked my username and selected 'replace owner...' and then hit ok... it asked if i wanted to reset all those dir to me as the owner... i guess it was changing the perms for the dir but not for the update dir.

so the folders are gone. flish, if you want, i can write that up better and you can put it in the faq somewheres...

  Toxikk said:
FXCK YES.? I GOT IT!!!!!!

HOT DAMN.

ok.? what did i do?? hehehe.? here goes.

i selected all the files.? right clicked, properties.? security.? i hit yes on the prompt if i wanted to reset all the perms.? then i clicked advanced.? went to the owner tab and doubleclicked my username and selected 'replace owner...' and then hit ok... it asked if i wanted to reset all those dir to me as the owner... i guess it was changing the perms for the dir but not for the update dir.

so the folders are gone.? flish, if you want, i can write that up better and you can put it in the faq somewheres...

Whoo-hoo! Alright man! Good (Y)! (Y)

Yes, please write it up for me. I'll include it in the readme (along with the warning to those running HT enabled CPUs). I'm really glad you got that fixed!!

The funny thing is, Microsoft knows about the glitch, and actually has released two fixes to help it... but they only help two hotfixes. They haven't done it for t:no:est. :no:

  Toxikk said:
sounds like a plan.

/me sits back and cracks a bud

Have one on the house, you deserve it. :beer: That was very good work on fixin' the problem! (Y) Don't forget to write up how you did it (you can just PM it to me if you want) so I can include it in the Dec release. :)

  FlishFun said:
Hmmm... yes, I think that may work... according to Microsoft:
  Quote
SYMPTOMS

When you install certain Windows 2000 Server or Windows XP hotfixes on a computer with a high-speed hyper-threaded processor or multiple high-speed processors, a temporary folder may remain in the root folder of one of the computer's hard disks after the hotfix is installed.

CAUSE

This problem occurs as a result of a race condition (timing issue) in certain versions of the hotfix installer components. The affected hotfix packages contain installer components that have the following attributes (or earlier) that are listed in the following table:

Date ? ? ? ? Time ? Version ? ?Size ? ?File name
---------------------------------------------------
21-Sep-2002 ?20:44 ?5.2.32.0 ? 24,576 ?Xpsp1hfm.exe ? ? 
21-Sep-2002 ?20:44 ?5.2.42.0 ? 46,080 ?Spuninst.exe ? ? 
21-Sep-2002 ?20:44 ?5.2.42.0 ?273,408 ? Update.exe

RESOLUTION

This problem is resolved in hotfix packages that contain hotfix installer components with the following attributes or later that are listed in the following table:

Date ? ? ? ? Time ? Version ? ?Size ? ?File name

---------------------------------------------------

14-Nov-2002 ?18:01 ?5.3.10.0 ?409,088 ?Update.exe ? ? ?

17-Dec-2002 ?21:32 ?5.3.10.0 ? 87,040 ?Spuninst.exe ? ?

17-Dec-2002 ?21:32 ?5.3.5.0 ? ?24,576 ?Xpsp1hfm.exe[/code[b]WORKAROUND[/b]yle='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%'>WORKAROUND

To work around this problem delete the temporary folder after you install the hotfix, and then restart the computer.

So I'd say give it a shot... if it doesn't work, just try what I suggested earlier. But also, now I know to include a warning for those with Hyperthreading enable:ninja:ote] Which update is this? I think I have it :ninja:

  OptiPlex said:
Which update is this? I think I have it :ninja:

No no... you had 2 like it (they're included in the AP and they fixed two updates), but there are other updates with the same prob and they don't have fixes yet. :no:

  FlishFun said:
  OptiPlex said:
:cry: BAD NEWS!

KB number doesn't match :blink: :no:

I think it was a XP-HE only update that updates the hotfix installer for some odd reason :blink:

Well what does it do? Out of curiousity...

Q328213 prevents an error during uninstall I guess :whistle:
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft changes hit Teams Android devices: Disable Entra ID policy to restore sign-in by Paul Hill As part of its Secure Future Initiative, Microsoft has deployed a new Entra ID Conditional Access policy targeting Device Code Flow authentication. Unfortunately, it has led some Microsoft Teams-certified Android devices (Teams Rooms on Android, Teams Phones, Teams Panels, and Teams Displays) to be logged out and signing back in can be a bit fiddly so guidance has been shared. Microsoft said that it shared previous guidance which explained how to exclude Android devices, but it seems some admins didn’t catch this as many devices were not excluded and have been signed out. It’s important to realize that this is not a bug, it’s a security feature. However, the move could have been better communicated. To sign the devices back in, you can do so manually. However, if the devices are remote you’ll need to follow these steps: By disabling the “Block device code flow” policy in step 1, it will change everything back to how it was before Microsoft decided to enable it to boost security. This will allow you to get those affected Android devices logged back in again. Also pay special attention to step 2 which says you might need to reboot your device three times. Once you have your Android devices logged in again, it’s probably a good idea to follow Microsoft’s previous guidance and add these to an exclusion list before re-enabling the “Block device code flow” policy. Microsoft recommends only allowing DCF where it’s absolutely necessary and then blocking it elsewhere. The best thing to do is to add your Teams Android device to the exclusion list - this will allow these devices to operate normally, while boosting overall security. If you’re an admin and have been impacted by this, be sure to take proactive measures to avoid disruptions in the future.
    • Can someone help me with writing a batchfile using notepad to tell me to start a vpn plz? I would greatly appreciate any help  
    • Yeah define not catching up then to see the next part of this then
    • RoboForm 9.7.7 by Razvan Serea RoboForm is the top-rated Password Manager and Web Form Filler that completely automates password entering and form filling. RoboForm makes logging into Web sites and filling forms faster, easier, and more secure. RoboForm memorizes and securely stores each user name and password the first time you log into a site, then automatically supplies them when you return. RoboForm's powerful Logins feature eliminates the manual steps of logging into any online account. With just one click RoboForm will navigate to a Web site, enter your username and password and click the submit button for you. Completing long registration or checkout forms is also a breeze. Simply click on your RoboForm Identity and RoboForm fills-in the entire form for you. You no longer need to remember all your passwords. You remember one Master Password, and RoboForm remembers the rest. This allows you to use stronger passwords, making your online experience more secure. RoboForm uses strong AES encryption for complete data security. The all new RoboForm comes with Chrome and Safari browser support, iPhone/iPad and Android support, as well a brand new RoboForm Everywhere license for use on unlimited computers and mobile devices. RoboForm 9.7.7 changelog: Show RF Desktop unlock UI when user selects "Unlock" in RF Desktop UI. Fixed blank icon appeared in the Windows taskbar for RF Editor. Miscellaneous bug fixes. Download: RoboForm 9.7.7 | 42.2 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) View: RoboForm Website Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • LG G5 was the last memorable phone I had. The Samsung and Pixels and have had since have been disappointing and boring.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      SteveJaye earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Uranus_enjoyer earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Philsl earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Jaclidio hoy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      439
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      157
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      64
    5. 5
      +thexfile
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!