Recommended Posts

Job site Glassdoor.com provided Bloomberg Businessweek with employee reviews from their site for the 30 largest fast food chains. While protest organizers say workers are walking out of McDonald?s, Burger King, Wendy?s, and KFC, these employers actually received better reviews than other restaurants, according to Glassdoor. In their comments, employees cited complaints ranging from pay, to work atmosphere and management, to the customers.

 

For context, the average rating on Glassdoor.com is 3.2. What does that mean? A 1 rating means ?dissatisfied? and a 3 rating is considered ?okay.? According to Glassdoor spokesman Scott Dobroski, anything between 2.5 and 3.0 means employees are moderately satisfied and the company is still technically in ?okay? territory, but they?re teetering on dissatisfied. If a company receives a 3.6 or 3.7, employees are sufficiently satisfied.

 

Overall, many of the 30 largest chains posted average scores. The two largest fast food chains, Subway and McDonald?s, both had a 3.1. There are even a few companies where workers seem chipper. In-N-Out Burger, for instance, got a 4.1 rating. Chick-fil-A scored 3.7 and Starbucks had a 3.6.

 

That said, here are the lowest scoring fast food restaurants.

 

Carl?s Jr.
Rating: 2.5
Employee comment: ?Long grueling hours for little pay, angry and demanding customers, unreasonable expectations, lots of shift changes, unmotivated coworkers and not very supportive management.?

Little Caesar?s
Rating: 2.7
Employee comment: ?Low pay, no hours, little Caesar pay card deducts money every swipe.?

Jack in the Box
Rating: 2.8
Employee comment: ?Very stressful and very busy during lunch. Under staff[ed] at some shifts. Graveyard can be annoying because it is only the Shift Leader and cook. Rude Customers.?

Hardee?s
Rating: 2.8
Employee comment: ?Stoned coworkers?and managers. Actually, this didn?t matter. In fact, it made some of them much easier to deal with? Everything is covered in a layer of grime and grease, and always working around a hot broiler. A lot of yelling to move faster, and to always be doing something even when there is truly nothing to be done.?

 

more

I like the hardees comment: ?Stoned coworkers?and managers. Actually, this didn?t matter. In fact, it made some of them much easier to deal with? Everything is covered in a layer of grime and grease, and always working around a hot broiler. A lot of yelling to move faster, and to always be doing something even when there is truly nothing to be done.?

 

Sounds to me like there is something to be done :P

  • Like 3

I know a guy who works at Hardees on the weekends. From what he says I would never eat their again.

Works that way for any fast food joint.

 

I used to work at Pizza Hut.  The myth of workers spitting in your food if you ###### them off...isn't a myth.

I know a guy who works at Hardees on the weekends. From what he says I would never eat their again.

Our local Hardee's is kept fairly clean --and employes get a daily free meal, as long as the restaurant passes the monthly inspection.

I have worked for fast food before... not too bad, but not something that I would really want to do again. I can understand the comments that are being made, and can relate them to my current job as well (not fast food)

http://detnews.com/opinion/article?a=2013309020006&f=1218

Will robots replace fast food workers?

On Aug. 29th, labor-backed walkouts targeted fast food outlets in over a dozen major American cities from coast to coast, including Detroit. They were demanding a more-than-100 percent increase in the minimum wage to $15 an hour.

The protestors target their rhetoric at restaurant management. But this isn't accurate. In reality, the employees on the picket lines are fighting a war with price-conscious customers. If they get their way with a $15 minimum wage, they will only hasten the service industry's move toward automation and self-service, where the customer (or even a computer) performs a task that used to be part of an employee's job description.

The labor-aligned protesters are butting up against some basic economic realities of the service industry. Fast-food restaurants, along with other labor-intensive businesses such as grocery stores, gas stations, and retail outlets, keep just a few cents in profit from each sales dollar after paying for food, labor and other expenses. In other words, a $15 wage mandate -- which would add over $15,000 a year to the cost of each full-time minimum-wage employee -- can't just be absorbed.

This leaves employers with one of two unpleasant options: Raise prices, or reduce costs. But higher prices to offset a wage hike of this magnitude aren't realistic -- imagine how you'd respond if the 99-cent menu became the $2.99 menu. Instead, restaurant operators have to provide the same service with fewer employees.

This means that customers end up serving themselves instead of being served by an employee. For example: Today, we might bag our own groceries at a supermarket checkout or pump our own gas at the station (except in New Jersey and Oregon, where it's against the law). Even self-service soda refills at fast-food restaurants were developed as a labor-saving device.

In other cases, a robot can be "hired" to do the job instead of an employee. The technology is already here. San Francisco-based Momentum Machines recently announced a new robotic burger-flipper that does the work equivalent of three full-time kitchen employees. That's 360 burgers per hour, with no strikes, benefits or wage demands.

At current labor costs, Momentum's burger-flipper pays for itself within the first year. But at $15 an hour for an employee, the investment would pay off in a matter of months.

This trend toward automation doesn't just affect the kitchen. In 2011, McDonald's announced it was installing touch-screen ordering terminals at 7,000 European locations, where the minimum wage is higher -- making the cashier position effectively obsolete. California Pizza Kitchen, Chevys Fresh Mex and other table-service chains are experimenting with computer terminals that let customers order and pay at the table, with minimal service from a server required.

These changes don't become inevitable until the cost of service gets trumped by customers' desire for low prices. But once the jobs are automated, that's one less entry-level position for a less-skilled employee to work his or her way up the career ladder -- no small concern given that teen unemployment has been above 20 percent for the past five years.

Those teens, along with other entry-level employees, will be the first to feel the unintended consequences of a $15 minimum wage. However well-meaning the striking employees in Detroit and elsewhere are, the fact is that they're only fighting the laws of economics -- and that's a fight they can't win.

to be honest id rather have a robot cook my food and serve it to me, that way i wont have to worry about spit or thing else weird getting in my burger.  Ive worked fast food places before, I think it should be a right of passage into the job market lol. Give you a little motivation to better yourself and get out of those hell holes, that being said flipping burgers is one of the easiest jobs on the planet but the  pay sucks. I'd never work at a fast food place again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!