Recommended Posts

It's very likely, just like on the PS3.

Well why are people jumping from the hills and gloating that you can swap the HDD on the PS4 then? That like null and void's the whole argument.

Well why are people jumping from the hills and gloating that you can swap the HDD on the PS4? That like null and void's the whole argument.

 

Because what they say is incorrect. You can't swap the HDD to another console. It's copy protection, you can REPLACE your internal harddrive when defective or just put a new one in there if you want more space. I tried to do it once on the PS3 when a FAT died and the slim wouldn't allow me to read the data, so reformatting was necessary. If you want your data to transfer to another console, you'll need to backup on external media on the original console before putting it on the new console.

Doesn't swapping the internal HDD void such things as warranty? I could be wrong but I seem to remember the PS3 had a little seal over the HDD that stated if you broke it, it would void the warranty.

 

If that is true, I would imagine that External HDD's are much more preferable.

Doesn't swapping the internal HDD void such things as warranty? I could be wrong but I seem to remember the PS3 had a little seal over the HDD that stated if you broke it, it would void the warranty.

 

If that is true, I would imagine that External HDD's are much more preferable.

 

No, it does not void it on the PS3. But IMHO external drives are preferable if you have a lot of friends and go play on their console every now and then. You can just take your entire collection with you without the need to download or install anything. Just plug and play.

Because what they say is incorrect. You can't swap the HDD to another console. It's copy protection, you can REPLACE your internal harddrive when defective or just put a new one in there if you want more space. I tried to do it once on the PS3 when a FAT died and the slim wouldn't allow me to read the data, so reformatting was necessary. If you want your data to transfer to another console, you'll need to backup on external media on the original console before putting it on the new console.

We're not in the 90's, HDD's don't fail in consumer devices these days.

 

Why would you want to swap the internal HDD for extra space when you could just use an external HDD for cheaper which'll give you more space?

We're not in the 90's, HDD's don't fail in consumer devices these days.

 

Why would you want to swap the internal HDD for extra space when you could just use an external HDD for cheaper which'll give you more space?

The one in my old Xbox 360 did.

We're not in the 90's, HDD's don't fail in consumer devices these days.

 

Why would you want to swap the internal HDD for extra space when you could just use an external HDD for cheaper which'll give you more space?

 

I agree, but tell that to the PlayStation fans and try and convince them...I think what MS has done is a much more convenient way to allow you to go about with storage. The internal drive has a specific serialized file system, just like on the PlayStation, but backing everything up on external media is just much easier on Xbox and on the Xbox 360 you can easily stick that internal HDD into another 360 and the data will be readable as well, your license will just need to be updated.

I agree, but tell that to the PlayStation fans and try and convince them...I think what MS has done is a much more convenient way to allow you to go about with storage. The internal drive has a specific serialized file system, just like on the PlayStation, but backing everything up on external media is just much easier on Xbox.

Considering you could swap the HDD out on the 360, it makes sense about the discussions around the X1 HDD having a flash cache from the Bluray drive which is why it's non-replaceable. The external HDD method is just more convenient. I have a couple of thumb sticks which I use in the 360. 

That doesn't change that it's still a possibility.  I find it much less likely since the X1 won't have the heat issues the 360 did, but I'm not ruling anything out.

So the 3.5" drive doesn't advance in 8 years? The fail rates on mass-produced drives like that are extremely low. You'd pretty much have to do something to it ridiculous for it to break. Ofcourse you're going to get the situations where someones does break, I'm just mentioning how MS can be confident that it's not going to be a large issue as to failures on the X1. People should be more worried about the construction and failure rates of the APU's.

I highly doubt they use 3.5s.  I don't disagree that it'll be low, I just said it was still possible.   :p

They did actually, if you ripped a 360 HDD apart it was just a formatted 3.5 drive. Yeah, well hopefully it doesn't prove too problematic in the X1.

They did actually, if you ripped a 360 HDD apart it was just a formatted 3.5 drive. Yeah, well hopefully it doesn't prove too problematic in the X1.

 

The 360 and PS3 both use a standard a 2.5" SATA hard drive.

  • Like 1

I have a question guys....

 

I am hearing that the PS4 games have to be installed on the hard drive on the PS4.  If that is true, how are people without a desktop PC or an external interface for the hard drive going to be able to copy over the games on to the new hard drive?

Are they going to have to reinstall everything from disk or download everything again?

 

That would be horrible if true...

 

Source: http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-sony-details-final-ps4-spec

"Bearing in mind that the Blu-ray drive on both systems gives up to 50GB of potential storage for games and that installation is mandatory on both consoles, that hard drive could fill up very, very quickly."

I think I have found my answer and it's terrible... :(

https://twitter.com/antic604/status/372360213661114369

 

Basically, it goes like this on the PS4 according to that tweet.

 

1) If you use the Bluray disk to play your games, you cannot install on the hard drive at all.  Period.  You can ONLY play on the disk.

 

2) You can only install to your hard drive if you do digital downloads for the game.

 

What this means is that you have no choice if you buy the optical drive version, you are forced to play it off the disk and then if you do

digital downloads that is great but if you replace your hard drive in the PS4, you then have to redownload all that.

 

yeah dude not great at all.

 

The PS4 really sounds disappointing.  

 

1) Installing an external hard drive is superior in this case.  You don't lose your games, you add to them. 

2) The Xbox One has a compressed format that is downloaded in a compress form and installed in a compressed form on the hard drive, this means it's faster to download and it takes up a lot less space on your hard drive.

   

Installing to the hard drive allows there to be less load times and faster game play than running off of a bluray disk and also allows much quieter operation and allows the developer to easily make changes to the game on the hard drive.

I think I have found my answer and it's terrible... :(

https://twitter.com/antic604/status/372360213661114369

 

Basically, it goes like this on the PS4 according to that tweet.

 

1) If you use the Bluray disk to play your games, you cannot install on the hard drive at all.  Period.  You can ONLY play on the disk.

 

2) You can only install to your hard drive if you do digital downloads for the game.

 

What this means is that you have no choice if you buy the optical drive version, you are forced to play it off the disk and then if you do

digital downloads that is great but if you replace your hard drive in the PS4, you then have to redownload all that.

 

yeah dude not great at all.

 

The PS4 really sounds disappointing.  

 

1) Installing an external hard drive is superior in this case.  You don't lose your games, you add to them. 

2) The Xbox One has a compressed format that is downloaded in a compress form and installed in a compressed form on the hard drive, this means it's faster to download and it takes up a lot less space on your hard drive.

   

Installing to the hard drive allows there to be less load times and faster game play than running off of a bluray disk and also allows much quieter operation and allows the developer to easily make changes to the game on the hard drive.

I think you have it wrong, both PS4 and XB1 require HDD installs.

I don't see the big deal with upgradeable HD but at least PS4 has the option for more space on the PS4. Wait...so if you can't install games on a PS4, what's the point of having the ability to connect an external HD? Eh oh well.

Listen to music, watch movies and TV shows etc.

I can't install PS4 games to the HDD? 

 

I honestly think I'm retracting my PS4 purchase. Have they done anything other than boost the specs?

I couldn't believe it was true of the PS3 either when I just got my first a couple months ago o.o

 

I'd hope you can, but I haven't read up on it.

Surely loading data from a USB hard drive, even a USB 3.0 one, would be slow? Especially if it's a cheap drive/controller.

Purely the opposite, USB 3.0 is faster than the hard drive at 5Gbit/s.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!