Recommended Posts

The PS4 has a 2.5 laptop hard drive inside and how do you get away from breaking the warranty if you have to open the box and replace the hard drive.

Although it's not a hard thing to do, how many people outside of the hard core of the hard core gamers are going to know how to do this?

Well, if it's as easy as it is with the PS3...

 

 

No voiding of warranty. Starts 3 minutes in and he takes literally about 4 minutes to do the installation while talking and all.

  • Like 1

4 minutes total verses 2 seconds is still a savings in time and he never mentioned how to copy over games and media to that other one.  That is a big deal.

 

With having it external, it not only takes a shorter time to get up and running, but you can combine the contents of HDD Internal with the contents of HDD external and have both, which is much better.

On the PS4 you can't do external.

  • Like 2

Remember the rules,

- XB1 must support every feature that PS4 will have.

- PS4 doesn't need to support every feature that XB1 will have.

 

Keep those in mind and these threads will be easier to discuss.

 

 

Considering this whole internal/external HDD issue has been discussed on here already, and you participated in that thread, it seem your only motivation for making this thread was to incite bickering. Well done on that front, by the way.

 

4 minutes total verses 2 seconds is still a savings in time and he never mentioned how to copy over games and media to that other one.  That is a big deal.

 

With having it external, it not only takes a shorter time to get up and running, but you can combine the contents of HDD Internal with the contents of HDD external and have both, which is much better.

On the PS4 you can't do external.

 

There is a backup function on the PS3 but I rarely trust built-in backup utilities on anything.

 

 

 

It's also worth noting Xbox One has mandatory game installs so allowing people to use external drives for games actually might make more sense in that context.

External hard drives on 360 don't allow you to install games or save on them. 360 also didn't come standard with a HDD. That's why it was easy to replace. But you had to buy a Microsoft branded HDD inside a shell for 2-3 times the cost of the drive on Amazon or Newegg. You could use some third party tools to hack the drive to work in the 360 and some third party sellers did this and sold the drives for a small markup, but none of this is official. 

 

XB1 is internal and not user-replaceable. At least not without voiding your warranty. How easy it is to do it anyways is yet to be seen.

 

PS3 and PS4 both have internal HDDs but are easily user accessible behind a flap.  PS3 and PS4 OS fully support the user throwing in any SATA 2.5" HDD and will format it and configure it for you. 

 

What? I can install my games on the external drive on my Xbox 360 since last year. Really.

We're not in the 90's, HDD's don't fail in consumer devices these days.

 

Why would you want to swap the internal HDD for extra space when you could just use an external HDD for cheaper which'll give you more space?

My 3 year old laptop had a hdd failure.  HP had to send me a new one.  So yes.. HDD do fail in consumer devices.


lol @ the just announced Xbone not supporting externals on launch          

 

LOL @ How someone is going to fill it up at launch.  Even if you downloaded every game you won't be able to fill it up at launch. 

Also here is something for your brain to stew on, the games that are downloaded are compressed when you download them and they stay compressed on the HDD.

 

I feel sorry that I actually replied to this.  I feel filthy now and I feel like I lost some brain cells.

They probably want to minimize the avenues available to software pirates.  If this feature was enabled, somebody would figure out how to hook the external up to a PC and copy those game installs for others to use, or they would download copies from the pirate bay or something, drop them on the hard drive and then play them on their PS3.

 

Both options are good... But I am excited about external installs... If there is anything that happens to the hardware, I send in the Xbox One, not lose a bit of data (trying finding the motivation to grind again after hardware failure), get X1 back and it's like I never lost anything..

I'm not banking on hardware failure... But it's good to know that I don't have to start games over in case something does happen...

 

I thought the XBox 360 and the XBox One, like the PS3, had a cloud save feature?  I've gone to my brother's house, popped one of my games into his PS3, sync'd up my PSN account and picked up right where I left off, then came back home, logged in, and done the same thing, because of the cloud saving.

Considering this whole internal/external HDD issue has been discussed on here already, and you participated in that thread, it seem your only motivation for making this thread was to incite bickering. Well done on that front, by the way.

There is a backup function on the PS3 but I rarely trust built-in backup utilities on anything.

It's also worth noting Xbox One has mandatory game installs so allowing people to use external drives for games actually might make more sense in that context.

cry me a river. I just posted new information which is unrelated to that thread.

Don't shoot the messenger, isn't that the stance people like to take in the Xbox forums?

I am pretty neutral to this feature or swappable internal drive, still not sure how i caused anything.

p.s. Xbox One is not the only next gen console with mandatory installs.


No it's not, you're just trying to make a big fuss over nothing.

 

yeah, spending hours redownloading games you already have is nothing.  Reinstalling disks again wasting time is nothing.  yeah ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkay.

They probably want to minimize the avenues available to software pirates. If this feature was enabled, somebody would figure out how to hook the external up to a PC and copy those game installs for others to use, or they would download copies from the pirate bay or something, drop them on the hard drive and then play them on their PS3.

I thought the XBox 360 and the XBox One, like the PS3, had a cloud save feature? I've gone to my brother's house, popped one of my games into his PS3, sync'd up my PSN account and picked up right where I left off, then came back home, logged in, and done the same thing, because of the cloud saving.

I will be a digital downloader for Next Gen. If there is hardware failure, I won't have to re-download any of my games, just hook the external back up and I'm back to gaming.

Download while playing is a great backup plan as well... :-)

  • Like 2

yeah, spending hours redownloading games you already have is nothing.  Reinstalling disks again wasting time is nothing.  yeah ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkay.

You seem to be under the impression that this is going to happen on a frequent basis. It's not. Get over yourself.

 

I say that as a PC gamer who's had a terabyte hard drive for the longest time to work with, storing plenty of media coupled with games, applications, and so forth over the years.


You seem to be under the impression that this is going to happen on a frequent basis. It's not. Get over yourself.

 

I am not saying that at all.  I am saying that it's not a pro-consumer feature.  That is something that you should be able to agree with.

 

Most of the people that purchase the PS4 and a lot of games over time are going have to know how to deal with this and having the time to download all of the games again and installing the games from disk again.

Again, not very pro-consumer and not very well thought out.

My 3 year old laptop had a hdd failure.  HP had to send me a new one.  So yes.. HDD do fail in consumer devices.

To summarise, I never said HDD's don't fail because that would be silly. Also there's a large difference between a hard-drive failing in a PC rather than a consumer device like an Xbox.

 

What I said was that MS shouldn't be worried that there's going to be a large failure rate to an internal HDD that can't be swapped. 

 

On a side note, I can't believe this thread is still going.

To be honest with you, i think both systems do what they're supposed to pretty well.

 

Personally i prefer the Xbox One method because that's just how i prefer to do things but i'm not saying the PS4 is a bad method, just not so much my cup-of-tea.

I am not saying that at all.  I am saying that it's not a pro-consumer feature.  That is something that you should be able to agree with.

 

Most of the people that purchase the PS4 and a lot of games over time are going have to know how to deal with this and having the time to download all of the games again and installing the games from disk again.

Again, not very pro-consumer and not very well thought out.

 

Knowing Sony it's actually surprising and very "pro-consumer" (again from Sony's standard stance) that you can just easily swap the drive with any off-the-shelf HD rather than having to buy a specific proprietary and (for no good reason) expensive Sony drive.

 

As stated several times in this thread you don't have to re-download nor reinstall any of your games when swapping drives, though.

Knowing Sony

 

Don't ever say that as that makes you look like the ultimate fanboy, no offense. Sony have done enough wrong in the past, just like their competitors.

 

And yes, you can swap a harddrive fairly easily on the PS3 with another drive, but if you want your data from the previous other harddrive, you'll have to open it up to swap it out again and that's a hassle many don't want as they have their consoles stuck in position in a piece of television furniture (like me). Thus returning to the inconvenience of first having to back everything up on an external drive and recopying it back on the newer/larger installed drive to avoid that. With the Xbox One that is unnecessary as you just simply plug in an external drive, XFAT format it and then it's usable for all Xbox related stuff.

To summarise, I never said HDD's don't fail because that would be silly. Also there's a large difference between a hard-drive failing in a PC rather than a consumer device like an Xbox.

 

What I said was that MS shouldn't be worried that there's going to be a large failure rate to an internal HDD that can't be swapped. 

 

On a side note, I can't believe this thread is still going.

 

That is ridiculous.  Is there some advanced HDD tech in these consoles that are not available to computers?  When I had to replace my PS3 drive....YES it died so I decided to put a SSD in there....it had a standard Seagate drive in it.

 

Mechanical HDDs are Mechanical HDDs.  These consoles do not have some super awesome never failing HDDs tech because any form of HDDs can fail.  Any form of electronics can fail.  Just because you have HDDs from the year 2000 does not mean HDDs cannot fail.  I had one fail one month after purchasing, and I have one that is 10 years old.

That is ridiculous.  Is there some advanced HDD tech in these consoles that are not available to computers?  When I had to replace my PS3 drive....YES it died so I decided to put a SSD in there....it had a standard Seagate drive in it.

 

Mechanical HDDs are Mechanical HDDs.  These consoles do not have some super awesome never failing HDDs tech because any form of HDDs can fail.  Any form of electronics can fail.  Just because you have HDDs from the year 2000 does not mean HDDs cannot fail.  I had one fail one month after purchasing, and I have one that is 10 years old.

A PC always works from its HDD, a console does not.

Don't ever say that as that makes you look like the ultimate fanboy, no offense.

Fanboy of who exactly?  :huh: 

 

Sony have done enough wrong in the past, just like their competitors.

 

And that's exactly what I meant: knowing Sony (eg. their obnoxious proprietary memory sticks and UMD for the PSP) it's actually surprising and pro-consumer that they didn't play a similar stunt with the PS hard drive.

A PC always works from its HDD, a console does not.

 

It does not matter.  Any....ANY usage on the disk could make it fail.  There are hard drives that die one month after purchase, and there are hard drives that have lasted decades.  Even if they are used in PCs.  It does not matter.  A console is no different, no matter how little the disk IO is.

 

And what if you have all of your games downloaded on the drive?  Then it will operate like a PC because it is loading the game data from the disk.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!