Recommended Posts

The PS4 has a 2.5 laptop hard drive inside and how do you get away from breaking the warranty if you have to open the box and replace the hard drive.

Although it's not a hard thing to do, how many people outside of the hard core of the hard core gamers are going to know how to do this?

Well, if it's as easy as it is with the PS3...

 

 

No voiding of warranty. Starts 3 minutes in and he takes literally about 4 minutes to do the installation while talking and all.

  • Like 1

4 minutes total verses 2 seconds is still a savings in time and he never mentioned how to copy over games and media to that other one.  That is a big deal.

 

With having it external, it not only takes a shorter time to get up and running, but you can combine the contents of HDD Internal with the contents of HDD external and have both, which is much better.

On the PS4 you can't do external.

  • Like 2

Remember the rules,

- XB1 must support every feature that PS4 will have.

- PS4 doesn't need to support every feature that XB1 will have.

 

Keep those in mind and these threads will be easier to discuss.

 

 

Considering this whole internal/external HDD issue has been discussed on here already, and you participated in that thread, it seem your only motivation for making this thread was to incite bickering. Well done on that front, by the way.

 

4 minutes total verses 2 seconds is still a savings in time and he never mentioned how to copy over games and media to that other one.  That is a big deal.

 

With having it external, it not only takes a shorter time to get up and running, but you can combine the contents of HDD Internal with the contents of HDD external and have both, which is much better.

On the PS4 you can't do external.

 

There is a backup function on the PS3 but I rarely trust built-in backup utilities on anything.

 

 

 

It's also worth noting Xbox One has mandatory game installs so allowing people to use external drives for games actually might make more sense in that context.

External hard drives on 360 don't allow you to install games or save on them. 360 also didn't come standard with a HDD. That's why it was easy to replace. But you had to buy a Microsoft branded HDD inside a shell for 2-3 times the cost of the drive on Amazon or Newegg. You could use some third party tools to hack the drive to work in the 360 and some third party sellers did this and sold the drives for a small markup, but none of this is official. 

 

XB1 is internal and not user-replaceable. At least not without voiding your warranty. How easy it is to do it anyways is yet to be seen.

 

PS3 and PS4 both have internal HDDs but are easily user accessible behind a flap.  PS3 and PS4 OS fully support the user throwing in any SATA 2.5" HDD and will format it and configure it for you. 

 

What? I can install my games on the external drive on my Xbox 360 since last year. Really.

We're not in the 90's, HDD's don't fail in consumer devices these days.

 

Why would you want to swap the internal HDD for extra space when you could just use an external HDD for cheaper which'll give you more space?

My 3 year old laptop had a hdd failure.  HP had to send me a new one.  So yes.. HDD do fail in consumer devices.


lol @ the just announced Xbone not supporting externals on launch          

 

LOL @ How someone is going to fill it up at launch.  Even if you downloaded every game you won't be able to fill it up at launch. 

Also here is something for your brain to stew on, the games that are downloaded are compressed when you download them and they stay compressed on the HDD.

 

I feel sorry that I actually replied to this.  I feel filthy now and I feel like I lost some brain cells.

They probably want to minimize the avenues available to software pirates.  If this feature was enabled, somebody would figure out how to hook the external up to a PC and copy those game installs for others to use, or they would download copies from the pirate bay or something, drop them on the hard drive and then play them on their PS3.

 

Both options are good... But I am excited about external installs... If there is anything that happens to the hardware, I send in the Xbox One, not lose a bit of data (trying finding the motivation to grind again after hardware failure), get X1 back and it's like I never lost anything..

I'm not banking on hardware failure... But it's good to know that I don't have to start games over in case something does happen...

 

I thought the XBox 360 and the XBox One, like the PS3, had a cloud save feature?  I've gone to my brother's house, popped one of my games into his PS3, sync'd up my PSN account and picked up right where I left off, then came back home, logged in, and done the same thing, because of the cloud saving.

Considering this whole internal/external HDD issue has been discussed on here already, and you participated in that thread, it seem your only motivation for making this thread was to incite bickering. Well done on that front, by the way.

There is a backup function on the PS3 but I rarely trust built-in backup utilities on anything.

It's also worth noting Xbox One has mandatory game installs so allowing people to use external drives for games actually might make more sense in that context.

cry me a river. I just posted new information which is unrelated to that thread.

Don't shoot the messenger, isn't that the stance people like to take in the Xbox forums?

I am pretty neutral to this feature or swappable internal drive, still not sure how i caused anything.

p.s. Xbox One is not the only next gen console with mandatory installs.


No it's not, you're just trying to make a big fuss over nothing.

 

yeah, spending hours redownloading games you already have is nothing.  Reinstalling disks again wasting time is nothing.  yeah ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkay.

They probably want to minimize the avenues available to software pirates. If this feature was enabled, somebody would figure out how to hook the external up to a PC and copy those game installs for others to use, or they would download copies from the pirate bay or something, drop them on the hard drive and then play them on their PS3.

I thought the XBox 360 and the XBox One, like the PS3, had a cloud save feature? I've gone to my brother's house, popped one of my games into his PS3, sync'd up my PSN account and picked up right where I left off, then came back home, logged in, and done the same thing, because of the cloud saving.

I will be a digital downloader for Next Gen. If there is hardware failure, I won't have to re-download any of my games, just hook the external back up and I'm back to gaming.

Download while playing is a great backup plan as well... :-)

  • Like 2

yeah, spending hours redownloading games you already have is nothing.  Reinstalling disks again wasting time is nothing.  yeah ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhkay.

You seem to be under the impression that this is going to happen on a frequent basis. It's not. Get over yourself.

 

I say that as a PC gamer who's had a terabyte hard drive for the longest time to work with, storing plenty of media coupled with games, applications, and so forth over the years.


You seem to be under the impression that this is going to happen on a frequent basis. It's not. Get over yourself.

 

I am not saying that at all.  I am saying that it's not a pro-consumer feature.  That is something that you should be able to agree with.

 

Most of the people that purchase the PS4 and a lot of games over time are going have to know how to deal with this and having the time to download all of the games again and installing the games from disk again.

Again, not very pro-consumer and not very well thought out.

My 3 year old laptop had a hdd failure.  HP had to send me a new one.  So yes.. HDD do fail in consumer devices.

To summarise, I never said HDD's don't fail because that would be silly. Also there's a large difference between a hard-drive failing in a PC rather than a consumer device like an Xbox.

 

What I said was that MS shouldn't be worried that there's going to be a large failure rate to an internal HDD that can't be swapped. 

 

On a side note, I can't believe this thread is still going.

To be honest with you, i think both systems do what they're supposed to pretty well.

 

Personally i prefer the Xbox One method because that's just how i prefer to do things but i'm not saying the PS4 is a bad method, just not so much my cup-of-tea.

I am not saying that at all.  I am saying that it's not a pro-consumer feature.  That is something that you should be able to agree with.

 

Most of the people that purchase the PS4 and a lot of games over time are going have to know how to deal with this and having the time to download all of the games again and installing the games from disk again.

Again, not very pro-consumer and not very well thought out.

 

Knowing Sony it's actually surprising and very "pro-consumer" (again from Sony's standard stance) that you can just easily swap the drive with any off-the-shelf HD rather than having to buy a specific proprietary and (for no good reason) expensive Sony drive.

 

As stated several times in this thread you don't have to re-download nor reinstall any of your games when swapping drives, though.

Knowing Sony

 

Don't ever say that as that makes you look like the ultimate fanboy, no offense. Sony have done enough wrong in the past, just like their competitors.

 

And yes, you can swap a harddrive fairly easily on the PS3 with another drive, but if you want your data from the previous other harddrive, you'll have to open it up to swap it out again and that's a hassle many don't want as they have their consoles stuck in position in a piece of television furniture (like me). Thus returning to the inconvenience of first having to back everything up on an external drive and recopying it back on the newer/larger installed drive to avoid that. With the Xbox One that is unnecessary as you just simply plug in an external drive, XFAT format it and then it's usable for all Xbox related stuff.

To summarise, I never said HDD's don't fail because that would be silly. Also there's a large difference between a hard-drive failing in a PC rather than a consumer device like an Xbox.

 

What I said was that MS shouldn't be worried that there's going to be a large failure rate to an internal HDD that can't be swapped. 

 

On a side note, I can't believe this thread is still going.

 

That is ridiculous.  Is there some advanced HDD tech in these consoles that are not available to computers?  When I had to replace my PS3 drive....YES it died so I decided to put a SSD in there....it had a standard Seagate drive in it.

 

Mechanical HDDs are Mechanical HDDs.  These consoles do not have some super awesome never failing HDDs tech because any form of HDDs can fail.  Any form of electronics can fail.  Just because you have HDDs from the year 2000 does not mean HDDs cannot fail.  I had one fail one month after purchasing, and I have one that is 10 years old.

That is ridiculous.  Is there some advanced HDD tech in these consoles that are not available to computers?  When I had to replace my PS3 drive....YES it died so I decided to put a SSD in there....it had a standard Seagate drive in it.

 

Mechanical HDDs are Mechanical HDDs.  These consoles do not have some super awesome never failing HDDs tech because any form of HDDs can fail.  Any form of electronics can fail.  Just because you have HDDs from the year 2000 does not mean HDDs cannot fail.  I had one fail one month after purchasing, and I have one that is 10 years old.

A PC always works from its HDD, a console does not.

Don't ever say that as that makes you look like the ultimate fanboy, no offense.

Fanboy of who exactly?  :huh: 

 

Sony have done enough wrong in the past, just like their competitors.

 

And that's exactly what I meant: knowing Sony (eg. their obnoxious proprietary memory sticks and UMD for the PSP) it's actually surprising and pro-consumer that they didn't play a similar stunt with the PS hard drive.

A PC always works from its HDD, a console does not.

 

It does not matter.  Any....ANY usage on the disk could make it fail.  There are hard drives that die one month after purchase, and there are hard drives that have lasted decades.  Even if they are used in PCs.  It does not matter.  A console is no different, no matter how little the disk IO is.

 

And what if you have all of your games downloaded on the drive?  Then it will operate like a PC because it is loading the game data from the disk.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!