Recommended Posts

A Los Angeles woman is suing an area hospital and her anesthesiologist for allegedly putting a mustache and stickers on her face during surgery as part of a prank that she claims violated her dignity and endangered her health.

The unidentified woman, who worked as a surgical supply purchaser at the hospital, said her coworkers affixed a fake mustache above her lip and yellow tear drops below her left eye before a nurse snapped a photo, according to the suit.

"Perhaps the most vulnerable position any human being will ever endure in their life is a time when they are placed under full anesthesia," reads the lawsuit, which claims the woman was fully anesthetized rather than sedated "for the sole purpose of humiliating and embarrassing the patient."

The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos. Other coworkers avoided her, she claims.

She filed suit against Dr. Patrick Yang of Torrance Memorial Medical Center on August 15 in Los Angeles County Superior court.

 Torrance Memorial acknowledged the mustache photo incident in a statement to ABC News, saying the prank was "intended to be humorous in nature." And although the anesthesiologist and the nurse "demonstrated poor judgment," the hospital maintains that most of the woman's allegations are "factually inaccurate, grossly exaggerated or fabricated."

"While the breach of professionalism outlined above regrettably did occur, Torrance Memorial is vigorously defending this lawsuit and requesting its dismissal," the statement reads, stressing that anesthesiologist Yang and the patient were "friendly" and "had a good working relationship."

 The woman claims in the lawsuit that she was unable to return to work at the hospital because of "mental anguish" and "emotional and physical distress" prompted by the prank.

Beyond the "intentional infliction of emotional distress," she's accusing Yang and the hospital of defamation, invasion of privacy, negligence and civil conspiracy as well as battery and sexual harassment for "placing obscene images on her face" and positioning her neck "so that they could keep her mouth open in order to make a crude sexual joke."

more

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

  • Like 1

So she was put under and they pranked her? They should be sued and stripped of any right to practice medicine. You can't get any more unprofessional.


Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

 

It is a betrayal of trust and a total lack of respect. 

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.


The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos.

 

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

 

Did you read what you wrote before posting?

 

That is ludicrous.

 

That is like working at Fat Burger and an employee spits in your order.  Its ok, because you know...you work there.

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Prank was stupid in itself.

 

 

The real problem:

Goofing around in a hospital with a patient being prepped for surgery.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

 

 

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

 

Frankly this is an example of where suing seems entirely reasonable. Medical professionals are in a position of trust, that trust was entirely abused and treated with reckless abandon.

  • Like 1

There's a couple of things in this story: putting a mustache stickers on a anesthetized patient, while taking photos and moving the patients head simulating a sexual scene and distributing those photos among the colleagues? Not only it's wrong, unacceptable (because that person is vulnerable while unconscious) and violates the patients privacy but dangerous as well, since we don't know if those props were sterilized; it's a surgery after all.

 

Also i find incredible disgusting that, because that person worked there, it's OK to do this kind of things; saying it's poor judgement is a joke. She should be treated as a patient, not a co-worker. And i guess that she feels humiliated by working there again seeing the same coworkers.... :/

 

Also the article says that her co-workers didn't report this incident, the hospital attitude is very defensive and they find it's not a big deal because the physician had a good working relationship with the plaintiff...disgusting, to say the least.

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

 

I never said it was acceptable, I was saying that because she made a huge deal about it, that pic is going to circulate the internet and media outlets forever, she couldve just the same kept it between her, her lawyer, and the hospital's legal department.

at first i was thinking harmless, but after much thought, i too feel it would be extremly distasteful and looks incrediblely stupid on the professionals involved... these are not frat parties and these are not teens passed out from alcohol having fun....

Although, I will say, my colleagues and I play pranks on each other all the time. Maybe they thought she had more of a sense of humour. I'd probably laugh and start plotting my revenge. If this were a random patient, fine, but it's her friends having a bit of a laugh. No harm was done... I don't see the big deal. Worst that should happen is they realise she took it wrong, apologise, take her out for lunch or something. Suing? Putting careers in jeopardy? Please. I hate that we aren't allowed to have harmless fun anymore.

  • Like 1

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

I never said such behaviour was acceptable?clearly it isn't?but we're talking about a harmless prank here. People do all sorts of things to people who pass out drunk but that doesn't warrant a lawsuit for emotional damage. I stand by my previous statement. The charges made in the lawsuit are ridiculous and clearly not merited by what actually happened.

 

I have a feeling those that see no issue with this have never had surgery.

Nonsense. I've been in surgery and don't consider this to be a major issue. Would I have liked it to happen to me? No. Would I file a lawsuit and try to get the people involved fired? Absolutely not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!