Recommended Posts

A Los Angeles woman is suing an area hospital and her anesthesiologist for allegedly putting a mustache and stickers on her face during surgery as part of a prank that she claims violated her dignity and endangered her health.

The unidentified woman, who worked as a surgical supply purchaser at the hospital, said her coworkers affixed a fake mustache above her lip and yellow tear drops below her left eye before a nurse snapped a photo, according to the suit.

"Perhaps the most vulnerable position any human being will ever endure in their life is a time when they are placed under full anesthesia," reads the lawsuit, which claims the woman was fully anesthetized rather than sedated "for the sole purpose of humiliating and embarrassing the patient."

The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos. Other coworkers avoided her, she claims.

She filed suit against Dr. Patrick Yang of Torrance Memorial Medical Center on August 15 in Los Angeles County Superior court.

 Torrance Memorial acknowledged the mustache photo incident in a statement to ABC News, saying the prank was "intended to be humorous in nature." And although the anesthesiologist and the nurse "demonstrated poor judgment," the hospital maintains that most of the woman's allegations are "factually inaccurate, grossly exaggerated or fabricated."

"While the breach of professionalism outlined above regrettably did occur, Torrance Memorial is vigorously defending this lawsuit and requesting its dismissal," the statement reads, stressing that anesthesiologist Yang and the patient were "friendly" and "had a good working relationship."

 The woman claims in the lawsuit that she was unable to return to work at the hospital because of "mental anguish" and "emotional and physical distress" prompted by the prank.

Beyond the "intentional infliction of emotional distress," she's accusing Yang and the hospital of defamation, invasion of privacy, negligence and civil conspiracy as well as battery and sexual harassment for "placing obscene images on her face" and positioning her neck "so that they could keep her mouth open in order to make a crude sexual joke."

more

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

  • Like 1

So she was put under and they pranked her? They should be sued and stripped of any right to practice medicine. You can't get any more unprofessional.


Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

 

It is a betrayal of trust and a total lack of respect. 

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.


The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos.

 

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

 

Did you read what you wrote before posting?

 

That is ludicrous.

 

That is like working at Fat Burger and an employee spits in your order.  Its ok, because you know...you work there.

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Prank was stupid in itself.

 

 

The real problem:

Goofing around in a hospital with a patient being prepped for surgery.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

 

 

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

 

Frankly this is an example of where suing seems entirely reasonable. Medical professionals are in a position of trust, that trust was entirely abused and treated with reckless abandon.

  • Like 1

There's a couple of things in this story: putting a mustache stickers on a anesthetized patient, while taking photos and moving the patients head simulating a sexual scene and distributing those photos among the colleagues? Not only it's wrong, unacceptable (because that person is vulnerable while unconscious) and violates the patients privacy but dangerous as well, since we don't know if those props were sterilized; it's a surgery after all.

 

Also i find incredible disgusting that, because that person worked there, it's OK to do this kind of things; saying it's poor judgement is a joke. She should be treated as a patient, not a co-worker. And i guess that she feels humiliated by working there again seeing the same coworkers.... :/

 

Also the article says that her co-workers didn't report this incident, the hospital attitude is very defensive and they find it's not a big deal because the physician had a good working relationship with the plaintiff...disgusting, to say the least.

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

 

I never said it was acceptable, I was saying that because she made a huge deal about it, that pic is going to circulate the internet and media outlets forever, she couldve just the same kept it between her, her lawyer, and the hospital's legal department.

at first i was thinking harmless, but after much thought, i too feel it would be extremly distasteful and looks incrediblely stupid on the professionals involved... these are not frat parties and these are not teens passed out from alcohol having fun....

Although, I will say, my colleagues and I play pranks on each other all the time. Maybe they thought she had more of a sense of humour. I'd probably laugh and start plotting my revenge. If this were a random patient, fine, but it's her friends having a bit of a laugh. No harm was done... I don't see the big deal. Worst that should happen is they realise she took it wrong, apologise, take her out for lunch or something. Suing? Putting careers in jeopardy? Please. I hate that we aren't allowed to have harmless fun anymore.

  • Like 1

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

I never said such behaviour was acceptable?clearly it isn't?but we're talking about a harmless prank here. People do all sorts of things to people who pass out drunk but that doesn't warrant a lawsuit for emotional damage. I stand by my previous statement. The charges made in the lawsuit are ridiculous and clearly not merited by what actually happened.

 

I have a feeling those that see no issue with this have never had surgery.

Nonsense. I've been in surgery and don't consider this to be a major issue. Would I have liked it to happen to me? No. Would I file a lawsuit and try to get the people involved fired? Absolutely not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!