Recommended Posts

A Los Angeles woman is suing an area hospital and her anesthesiologist for allegedly putting a mustache and stickers on her face during surgery as part of a prank that she claims violated her dignity and endangered her health.

The unidentified woman, who worked as a surgical supply purchaser at the hospital, said her coworkers affixed a fake mustache above her lip and yellow tear drops below her left eye before a nurse snapped a photo, according to the suit.

"Perhaps the most vulnerable position any human being will ever endure in their life is a time when they are placed under full anesthesia," reads the lawsuit, which claims the woman was fully anesthetized rather than sedated "for the sole purpose of humiliating and embarrassing the patient."

The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos. Other coworkers avoided her, she claims.

She filed suit against Dr. Patrick Yang of Torrance Memorial Medical Center on August 15 in Los Angeles County Superior court.

 Torrance Memorial acknowledged the mustache photo incident in a statement to ABC News, saying the prank was "intended to be humorous in nature." And although the anesthesiologist and the nurse "demonstrated poor judgment," the hospital maintains that most of the woman's allegations are "factually inaccurate, grossly exaggerated or fabricated."

"While the breach of professionalism outlined above regrettably did occur, Torrance Memorial is vigorously defending this lawsuit and requesting its dismissal," the statement reads, stressing that anesthesiologist Yang and the patient were "friendly" and "had a good working relationship."

 The woman claims in the lawsuit that she was unable to return to work at the hospital because of "mental anguish" and "emotional and physical distress" prompted by the prank.

Beyond the "intentional infliction of emotional distress," she's accusing Yang and the hospital of defamation, invasion of privacy, negligence and civil conspiracy as well as battery and sexual harassment for "placing obscene images on her face" and positioning her neck "so that they could keep her mouth open in order to make a crude sexual joke."

more

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

  • Like 1

So she was put under and they pranked her? They should be sued and stripped of any right to practice medicine. You can't get any more unprofessional.


Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

Oh please, if she wouldve just had a sense of humor and sucked it up, this wouldnt be news, and now that pic is in full online circulation, it'll take years to forget about, but atleast its not a popular meme (yet...)

 

It is a betrayal of trust and a total lack of respect. 

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.


The woman said that she learned of the prank when she returned to work after the October 2011 surgery and was approached by some coworkers who had seen the photos.

 

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

 

Did you read what you wrote before posting?

 

That is ludicrous.

 

That is like working at Fat Burger and an employee spits in your order.  Its ok, because you know...you work there.

Omg, they did something that stupid and then posted photos of it. They should never be allowed to work in medicine again.

Prank was stupid in itself.

 

 

The real problem:

Goofing around in a hospital with a patient being prepped for surgery.

Let's be reasonable here. Was the prank done in poor taste? Absolutely. Does it warrant professional dismissal or a lawsuit? Of course not. This was not some random patient but somebody who worked at the hospital. The staff involved should be giving a warning and made to apologise but shouldn't face any further action unless there is evidence of further wrongdoing.

 

The lawsuit culture in the US is completely out of control and this is another example of that.

 

 

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

 

Frankly this is an example of where suing seems entirely reasonable. Medical professionals are in a position of trust, that trust was entirely abused and treated with reckless abandon.

  • Like 1

There's a couple of things in this story: putting a mustache stickers on a anesthetized patient, while taking photos and moving the patients head simulating a sexual scene and distributing those photos among the colleagues? Not only it's wrong, unacceptable (because that person is vulnerable while unconscious) and violates the patients privacy but dangerous as well, since we don't know if those props were sterilized; it's a surgery after all.

 

Also i find incredible disgusting that, because that person worked there, it's OK to do this kind of things; saying it's poor judgement is a joke. She should be treated as a patient, not a co-worker. And i guess that she feels humiliated by working there again seeing the same coworkers.... :/

 

Also the article says that her co-workers didn't report this incident, the hospital attitude is very defensive and they find it's not a big deal because the physician had a good working relationship with the plaintiff...disgusting, to say the least.

Oh, we should just be ok with this level of unprofessionalism on the part of medical staff?  No, this should be reported, and these people punished.  The surgeon's table is not a playhouse. 

 

I never said it was acceptable, I was saying that because she made a huge deal about it, that pic is going to circulate the internet and media outlets forever, she couldve just the same kept it between her, her lawyer, and the hospital's legal department.

at first i was thinking harmless, but after much thought, i too feel it would be extremly distasteful and looks incrediblely stupid on the professionals involved... these are not frat parties and these are not teens passed out from alcohol having fun....

Although, I will say, my colleagues and I play pranks on each other all the time. Maybe they thought she had more of a sense of humour. I'd probably laugh and start plotting my revenge. If this were a random patient, fine, but it's her friends having a bit of a laugh. No harm was done... I don't see the big deal. Worst that should happen is they realise she took it wrong, apologise, take her out for lunch or something. Suing? Putting careers in jeopardy? Please. I hate that we aren't allowed to have harmless fun anymore.

  • Like 1

So if you work at a hospital, you are subject to pranks while unconscious and its suddenly ok and acceptable because you are an employee?  Were those prank items sterilized and suitable for an operation?

Come on, dude. You ask us to be reasonable when we are discussing medical professionals using an unconscious human being as a play thing? This is unacceptable and I can't imagine if you were the victim of it you'd have such a happy-go-lucky attitude about it.

I never said such behaviour was acceptable?clearly it isn't?but we're talking about a harmless prank here. People do all sorts of things to people who pass out drunk but that doesn't warrant a lawsuit for emotional damage. I stand by my previous statement. The charges made in the lawsuit are ridiculous and clearly not merited by what actually happened.

 

I have a feeling those that see no issue with this have never had surgery.

Nonsense. I've been in surgery and don't consider this to be a major issue. Would I have liked it to happen to me? No. Would I file a lawsuit and try to get the people involved fired? Absolutely not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview by Razvan Serea WACUP (WinAmp Community Update Project) is a modern, enhanced version of the classic Winamp music player, designed for better stability, performance, and compatibility. Built for Windows, WACUP retains the familiar Winamp interface while adding 64-bit support, bug fixes, and new features like improved audio format support, customizable skins, and optimized playlist management. Unlike bloated alternatives, WACUP focuses on lightweight performance and regular updates, making it the best choice for fans of the classic Winamp experience. Basically, if you miss the good old days of Winamp and want a modern upgrade that doesn’t mess things up, WACUP is for you! WACUP key features: Classic Winamp Feel – Keeps the familiar interface and functionality. Bug Fixes & Stability – Fixes old Winamp issues and improves performance. 64-Bit Support – Works better on modern systems. More Formats & Plugins – Supports additional audio formats and third-party plugins. Customizable UI – Skins and tweaks for a personalized look. Better Library Management – Improved playlists, media organization, and search. No Bloat – Focuses on performance without unnecessary extras. Regular Updates – Community-driven development with new features and fixes. WACUP 1.99.51.24568 Preview changelog: Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when doing some of the drag + drop actions within the media library window Fixed a loading crash seen related to a problem with some of the artwork cache image files being restored which should now be better handled allowing for the bad image to be removed without it failing Fixed a deadlock seen from the recent crash reports when the internal metadata cache clearing is triggered which could block the main ui thread for too long with this now being moved to a background thread Fixed some performance issues with some of the methods related to determining artwork support which mainly affected the local library import / refresh (this is still slower for some compared to other players because there's more data & artwork aspects being checked for which means doing more processing on a single file despite the best of attempts to reduce duplicate / heavy processing where possible) Fixed a crash with the JTFE based missing files hotkey which no one seems to have used for an age for this to appear (maybe it's time to seriously consider stripping out features that aren't being used) Fixed how some of the file types which use extra information to reference their sub-songs is handled which was preventing some from being correctly resolved back to their base file (noticed fixing above) Fixed an issue with the handling of files with underscores in their filepath which wasn't being correctly handled causing some of the filename to be lost when shown as the title if title reading is delayed Fixed a few things that might be behind NotSoDirect not being stable for some setups though am still not certain that the changes done for this are going to fully resolve the problem from the crash reports Fixed the OS toast handling when there's no prior shortcut in the OS start menu to now create the shortcut (needed to allow the yes/no buttons for the new build / post-release toast) to be done as a hidden one so it's less likely to cause annoyance for those not wanting to see it whilst still allowing this less than ideal OS api implementation requirement to be met to avoid toasts without the needed buttons Fixed a regression when moving from taglib1 to taglib2 which broke some of the handling in place to allow for external programs to still access files when wacup has a held open cached instance of the file Everything else Updated cppwinrt (gen_win10shell.dll) to 3.0.260520.1 (26 May 2026) Updated libcurl (libcurl.dll) to 8.2.1 (24 Jun 2026) Updated Monkey's Audio (in_ape.dll) to 13.15 (28 Jun 2026) Updated mpg123 (mpg123.dll) to 1.33.6 (6 Jun 2026) Updated OpenSSL (libcurl.dll) to 3.5.7 (9 Jun 2026) Updated pugixml to 1.16 (16 Jun 2026) Updated taglib (tag2.dll) to 2.3.0 (11 May 2026) Updated vgmstream (in_vgmstream.dll) to the latest Git commit from 28 Jun 2026 Download: WACUP 64-bit | 9.6 MB (Freeware) Download: WACUP 32-bit View: WACUP Website | Screenshots Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • "over a thousand engineering hours" and started selling it but could not take a couple of minuets to send an AI email to ask permission. What an expensive lesson.
    • just tested it yesterday, a simple page with autoloading ADS takes 60mb....just 1 page for 60 megabytes.   poor people with a limited internet never will visit neolose
    • Tor Browser 15.0.17 by Razvan Serea Protect your privacy. Defend yourself against network surveillance and traffic analysis. Tor is a network of virtual tunnels that allows people and groups to improve their privacy and security on the Internet. The Tor software protects you by bouncing your communications around a distributed network of relays run by volunteers all around the world: it prevents somebody from watching your Internet connection and learning what sites you visit, it prevents the sites you visit from learning your physical location, and it lets you access sites which are blocked. The Tor Browser Bundle lets you use Tor on Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux without needing to install any software. It can run off a USB flash drive, comes with a pre-configured web browser to protect your anonymity, and is self-contained. Tor Browser 15.0.17 changelog: All Platforms Updated Tor to 0.4.9.11 Updated NoScript to 13.6.25.1984 Build System / All Platforms Bug tor-browser-build#41821: Update gpg subkeys for boklm Bug tor-browser-build#41827: Update morgan's keychain with renewed key Download: Tor Browser (64-bit) | Tor Browser (32-bit) | 109.0 MB (Open Source) View: Tor Browser Website | Other Operating Systems Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      530
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!