Once you go iOS 7, you never go back


Recommended Posts

bgr-ios-7-review-7.jpg?w=870

 

After three months of waiting, the public finally got its hands on Apple?s new iOS 7 software earlier this week. Surprisingly, since iOS 7 is such a severe change where the interface is concerned, the reception on social media has been overwhelmingly positive. There are definitely some people who aren?t very happy with iOS 7 though, and they?re not shy about it at all. Of course, iOS 7?s new design won?t be universally adored ? nothing ever is ? but there?s something important to keep in mind when updating to Apple?s new software and I?m not sure I stressed it enough in my iOS 7 review: Give it time.
 
When it comes to iOS 7, first impressions aren?t everything. In terms of the graphics that make up the user interface, every single line, shape, bar, button and color has been changed. Everything.
 
It?s a lot to take in for longtime iOS users and for many, it will take some time to get used to. But give it time.
 
For me, it took about three or four days before it clicked. For some, it will take longer and for others, it will happen right away. I didn?t dislike iOS 7 before then, but after about four days I looked at my iPhone and really knew there was no going back. Seriously, it?s almost painful to look at iOS 6 at this point.
 
Using an older version of iOS feels like driving last year?s S Class now that Mercedes has unveiled a new model that?s better in every way imaginable. There?s nothing wrong with the 2013 model per se, but the look that used to be sleek and the feel that used to be luxurious now both seem dated and outclassed. You might not have liked the more aggressive nose on the 2014 model or other aspects of the new styling at first. After spending some more time looking it over, however, you realized that it really is better in every possible way.
 
iOS 7 is a bold new look for Apple?s mobile platform and it?s a complete departure from iOS 6 in terms of colors, shapes and styling. It might take a little while to get used to but once it clicks, you?ll never want to go back.

 

 

 
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1177969-once-you-go-ios-7-you-never-go-back/
Share on other sites

Not so sure about updating my iPad 2 to this.  I think I'll stay on iOS6. I think iOS 7 looks absolutely awful. I'm sure it contains a number of improvements, but what else can it really offer for my casually used iPad that's worth enduring the terrible new UI? I think they'll tweak it a little over the next version or two. I'll wait for that, but by then they'll probably drop the iPad 2's support. :laugh:

Not so sure about updating my iPad 2 to this.  I think I'll stay on iOS6. I think iOS 7 looks absolutely awful. I'm sure it contains a number of improvements, but what else can it really offer for my casually used iPad that's worth enduring the terrible new UI? I think they'll tweak it a little over the next version or two. I'll wait for that, but by then they'll probably drop the iPad 2's support. :laugh:

My biggest mistake so far. I wish I didn't update my iPhone 5 and iPad 2 to iOS 7. It's... so ugly.

Not so sure about updating my iPad 2 to this.  I think I'll stay on iOS6. I think iOS 7 looks absolutely awful. I'm sure it contains a number of improvements, but what else can it really offer for my casually used iPad that's worth enduring the terrible new UI? I think they'll tweak it a little over the next version or two. I'll wait for that, but by then they'll probably drop the iPad 2's support. :laugh:

Oh come on, it's not that bad.  :laugh:   Some of the new icons are really stupid looking, but overall, the UI is a bit more "interesting" now (if that's the right word for it).  It's kind of like moving from XP to 7.  XP was rock solid, but 7 made it look more modern and organized things better.  That's basically the same way I feel going from iOS 6 to 7.

 

You're right though, that you probably won't gain anything on your iPad 2.  If anything, you might risk getting worse battery life from the added animations/effects.

Some have been successful in downgrading their iphones back to iOS6.

Everyone I know, seems to be happy with the new operating system. It does add some new features, although the display changes take some getting use to.

 

h**p://www.iphonehacks.com/2013/06/downgrade-ios-7-to-ios-6.html

h**p://www.iphonehacks.com/download-iphone-ios-firmware

 

Wouldn't mind seeing posts from those who were able to do this.

Oh come on, it's not that bad.  :laugh:   Some of the new icons are really stupid looking, but overall, the UI is a bit more "interesting" now (if that's the right word for it).  It's kind of like moving from XP to 7.  XP was rock solid, but 7 made it look more modern and organized things better.  That's basically the same way I feel going from iOS 6 to 7.

 

You're right though, that you probably won't gain anything on your iPad 2.  If anything, you might risk getting worse battery life from the added animations/effects.

I feel like the new bright pastel colors make it look like they are targeting the teenage female demographic, but then wait, we've got massive expanses of flat white over here, but then wait, we've got some awful looking gaussian blurred backgrounds over here. It's just so inconsistent to me, and I'm not really a fan of any of the styles. Granted I think it would look better on the device than in screenshots, but I'll have to look at it on someone else's device before I dive in on my own. Interesting is definitely a good word for it I'd say.

 

In the end though, it's just the UI I have the issue with which may be a little petty, but UI is a big deal to how much you enjoy using a device.

Using an older version of iOS feels like driving last year?s S Class now that Mercedes has unveiled a new model that?s better in every way imaginable. There?s nothing wrong with the 2013 model per se, but the look that used to be sleek and the feel that used to be luxurious now both seem dated and outclassed. You might not have liked the more aggressive nose on the 2014 model or other aspects of the new styling at first

 

 

 

very down to earth analogy there....

  • Like 3

iOS7 gives me the feeling that it will cause even more people to Jailbreak just to be able to change the theme  :rofl:

 

iOS7 has some great new features but the "overly" bright pastel-y theme just ruins it IMO

i will NOT go back to 6... 7 just brings too many great features which should have been included with 6 when it was released. Its smooth, good looking, and does things with a logical flow to it. I have already moved back to my iphone 4 from a nexus 4.

I feel like the new bright pastel colors make it look like they are targeting the teenage female demographic, but then wait, we've got massive expanses of flat white over here, but then wait, we've got some awful looking gaussian blurred backgrounds over here. It's just so inconsistent to me, and I'm not really a fan of any of the styles. Granted I think it would look better on the device than in screenshots, but I'll have to look at it on someone else's device before I dive in on my own. Interesting is definitely a good word for it I'd say.

 

In the end though, it's just the UI I have the issue with which may be a little petty, but UI is a big deal to how much you enjoy using a device.

Yeah some of the icons went way overboard with the kiddy pastel theme.  I hid a few of them in a folder since they were an eye soar.

But overall, they unified the menu backgrounds to be white-ish.  It would have been cool if there was an option to switch between a white or black theme, but oh well.  And they went with a more flat look, so the bubbly/shiny style is no more. And I agree, I've never liked any of the backgrounds they include, so I took a picture with my finger over the lens to create a black picture and use that for my background.  Looks nice, imo.  I did that back when I first got my 4S, which was iOS 5 I think. Otherwise there's too much color going on.  The color of the icons is enough for me.

iOS 7 is a bold new look for Apple?s mobile platform and it?s a complete departure from iOS 6 in terms of colors, shapes and styling. It might take a little while to get used to but once it clicks, you?ll never want to go back.

 

Disagree. I've been using it since Beta 2 and still hate the new design, I use the iPhone for development so I need iOS 7, but if I was a consumer and this was my primary phone I'd definitely downgrade back to iOS 6.

BGR though, so I wouldn't expect them to say anything other.

Swearing by iOS 7 so much I find excuses to be on my phone all the time. :p

 

About the slowness issue, if you jump into Accessibility and turn on "Increase Contrast" you gain a smoother experience at the minimal cost of turning off translucencies. The only noticeable change would be the Notification Center being completely black and the Control Center being grey, but the rest are subtle.

 

Absolutely like the rest of the OS though. The cleaner design of applications, the animations, the much improved Photos app, accessories accessible from the lock screen... list goes on.

Oh come on, it's not that bad.  :laugh:   Some of the new icons are really stupid looking, but overall, the UI is a bit more "interesting" now (if that's the right word for it).  It's kind of like moving from XP to 7.  XP was rock solid, but 7 made it look more modern and organized things better.  That's basically the same way I feel going from iOS 6 to 7.

 

You're right though, that you probably won't gain anything on your iPad 2.  If anything, you might risk getting worse battery life from the added animations/effects.

 

I haven't noticed any lower battery on my pad 2, but functionality is a lot better with 7. better multitasking, better infocenter, better settings and the control center and other little things. 

 

yeah some of the icons are a bit crap but overall I like the new UI. Safari is a bit white, and I like the black keyboard I get some places better than the white. but overall, it's better. 

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!