• 0

for loops, counting by 3's, and using /t in the print statement to prin


Question

I am seriously stuck.  I'm supposed to write a program that counts by 3's using a for loop with the increment clause either being 1 = i + 3 or i + = 3.  So far this is what i have, but it's not even close to working.  While it does not tell me that I have errors until the execution, once it runs i get a runtime error and must abort the program.  Am I over thinking this?  And how do you get the table (\t) function to work with the column headings and contents?  This is so confusing!  I've reread my book Deitel's C How to Program and looked up as much as I can on the web to find out more information on how to use it, but the book is vague with no examples, and the explanations that I found on the internet were very convoluted .

#include "stdio.h"

void main()
{
	int i;

	for(i = i + 3; i < 18; i++)
		{
			if (i % 3 == 0)
		printf("\t 'A'","%d",  &i);
			if (i % 3 != 0)
	continue;
			printf("\n");
	}

	for(i = i + 3; i < 20; i++)
	{ if (i % 3 == 0)
	printf("\t 'A+2", "%d", i);
	if (i % 3 != 0)
		continue;
	printf("\n");
	}
}

it should print out a table that looks like this :

 

post-505691-0-18091700-1379873055.png

15 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Your program is far more complicated than it needs to be. You already have the answer to the problem in your description. The iterator in your for loop should be i += 3 rather than i++ to use the loop to count by threes. Not only does that obviate your use of modulus, but it also eliminates the need for more than one for loop (assuming you actually needed more than one using the method you first attempted, which looks completely wrong).

 

I also get the impression that you don't completely understand the basic escape sequences in C. For example, '\t' is the escape sequence for horizontal tab, not table like you seem to suppose. Furthermore judging by your code I'm not entirely sure how you expected '\t' to generate a table anyway. Take a look at this page for a list of common escape sequences in C and C++. You can get a more complete picture by looking at the ASCII chart if you wish.

 

Despite its relatively short length I spotted a few more serious flaws in your code which I did not address above. I recommend that you completely throw it out, and start again based on your hopefully-more-thorough understanding of the problem.

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 18:10, Terabojin said:

I'm supposed to write a program that counts by 3's using a for loop with the increment clause either being 1 = i + 3 or i + = 3.  So far this is what i hav

The increment clause is the third and last clause of the for loop statement. You have mistaken it for the first clause. You initialize i to itself + 3, which means you use i before you initialize it. In C, this is undefined behavior, i.e. the value of i will be random garbage. No wonder your program is not behaving the way you wish.

 

You increment i by 1 instead of 3, but then you filter out the non-multiple of 3 values with if statements. This shows you misundertood the question. Increment i by 3 and remove the if (i % 3) statements.

 

I suggest you start by writing a program that prints the following with only a single for loop and a single printf (no if statements):

6
9
12
15
18

This will provide the correct basis for the rest of the program. Once you have that, figure out how to print the 3 other columns (hint: use an inner for loop). Once you have that, print the column labels (A - A+3).

 

Finally, how do you run your program? Simply running the compiled .exe from a command prompt will make it hard to understand your errors. It would very helpful for you to use an IDE and launch your program in the debugger (F5 in most IDEs). When an run-time error is detected, it'll show you exactly where and what the state of the program is at that point.

  • 0
#include "stdio.h"

void main()
{
	int i;

	for(i = i + 3; i < 18; i++)
		{
			if (i % 3 == 0)
		printf("\t 'A'", "%d");
			if (i % 3 != 0)
	continue;
			printf("\n");
	}
}
  On 22/09/2013 at 19:46, xorangekiller said:

Your program is far more complicated than it needs to be. You already have the answer to the problem in your description. The iterator in your for loop should be i += 3 rather than i++ to use the loop to count by threes. Not only does that obviate your use of modulus, but it also eliminates the need for more than one for loop (assuming you actually needed more than one using the method you first attempted, which looks completely wrong).

 

I also get the impression that you don't completely understand the basic escape sequences in C. For example, '\t' is the escape sequence for horizontal tab, not table like you seem to suppose. Furthermore judging by your code I'm not entirely sure how you expected '\t' to generate a table anyway. Take a look at this page for a list of common escape sequences in C and C++. You can get a more complete picture by looking at the ASCII chart if you wish.

 

Despite its relatively short length I spotted a few more serious flaws in your code which I did not address above. I recommend that you completely throw it out, and start again based on your hopefully-more-thorough understanding of the problem.

 +xorangekiller,

 

You are right, I do not really understand C, or rather programming in general....this is a learning experience for me and unfortunately it is coming at me faster than I am understanding it.  I understand that \t is a horizontal tab, I get that, but I'm not quite sure how to do this one.  I now am getting run time errors, so I'm closer to solving this puzzle than I was before, and for your insight I thank you.  Code is hard for me to understand, and honestly it has been a lot of trial and error, including completely restarting from scratch.  So far this is what I have, but I'm not understanding how to do the printf statement.

#include "stdio.h"

void main()
{
	int i;

	for(i = i + 3; i < 18; i+=3)
		{
			if (i % 3 == 0)
		printf("\t 'A'", "%d");
			if (i % 3 != 0)
	continue;
			printf("\n");
	}
}

And I tried to adjust the for statement with the i+=3, but it is still producing a run time error, which I assume is because of something later on in the code? 

  • 0

Okay,

 

Now I have no run time errors but this is my output and here is what I have.  I'm still not sure how to use the \t function....

#include "stdio.h"

void main()
{
	int i;

	for(i = 0; i < 18; i+=3)
		{
			if (i % 3 == 0)
		printf("\t 'A %d","\t 'A+2' %d", "\t 'A+3' %d", "\t 'A+4' %d", i,i,i,i);
			if (i % 3 != 0)
	continue;
			printf("\n");
	}
}

But at least now I'm getting some sort of a print out.  Do I need to use multiple printf statements to get the output in the correct format? 

post-505691-0-50087300-1379885002.png

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 21:36, notchinese said:

Also, since when does 18 + 3 = 22? (your table in the first post)

LOL!  I'm not sure what my professor was thinking when he made this assignment question to be honest.  I'm not following his logic very well let alone the logic of C.  I'm sorry to keep posting but I'm trying to work though this as much as possible.  So...with that being said this is what I have:


	int i;

	for(i = 0; i < 18; i+=3)
		{
			if (i % 3 == 0)
				printf("\t 'A' \t 'A+2' \t 'A+3' \t 'A+4'", i);
			printf("\n");
			continue;
			if (i % 3 != 0)
				printf("%d");
	
			printf("\n");
	}
}

And this is what it's doing:

 

At least now I'm getting somewhat of the formatting that is required.  I'm obviously not getting this at all unfortunately.  Just pretend that you're explaining this to a child, then maybe I'll understand this because I'm completely lost. 

 

Do I need to first initialize a printf statement before the first if statement to get the headers when I'm using the \t? 

post-505691-0-99653400-1379886042.png

  • 0

You are getting closer, but still missing some important concepts. Taking into account the advice in the posts above, you should be able to surmise the following algorithm:

PRINT_HEADER

FOR_LOOP
        PRINT A
        PRINT_TAB
        
        PRINT A + 2
        PRINT_TAB
        
        PRINT A + 3
        PRINT_TAB
        
        PRINT A + 4
        PRINT_NEWLINE

The proper algorithm will get you half way there. Your current issue seems to be evenly split between misunderstood syntax and faulty logic. I recommend that you read the printf() documentation in particular.

  • 0

OkIi used

printf("\t A \t A+2 \t A+3 \t A+4");
	printf("\n");

and it gave me the headers for the columns and I put it before the for loop.  Now I'm trying to get the printouts under those headers.  And now that I noticed the math is completely wrong, 6 + 4 != 12....hmmm.  Or am I reading the problem wrong?  Is each A+# the original number in A + whatever number is associated by A?

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 21:56, Terabojin said:

And now that I noticed the math is completely wrong, 6 + 4 != 12....hmmm.  Or am I reading the problem wrong?  Is each A+# the original number in A + whatever number is associated by A?

Based on your initial description I think you are supposed to be computing the result of the three latter columns (A + 2, A + 3, and A + 4) based on the contents of the multiple-of-three-number in the first column (referred to as A in your header and assigned to i in your loop). For example, if i=3 then A=3, A+2=5, A+3=6, and A+4=7.

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 22:05, xorangekiller said:

Based on your initial description I think you are supposed to be computing the result of the three latter columns (A + 2, A + 3, and A + 4) based on the contents of the multiple-of-three-number in the first column (referred to as A in your header and assigned to i in your loop). For example, if i=3 then A=3, A+2=5, A+3=6, and A+4=7.

 

 

Okay let me see if I'm understanding this correctly. 

 

Basically I should be doing:

 

if (A=i)

A+2=i, A+3=i, A+4=i;

correct?

 

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 22:07, Terabojin said:

Okay let me see if I'm understanding this correctly. 

 

Basically I should be doing:

 

if (A=i)

A+2=i, A+3=i, A+4=i;

correct?

 

 

What?! Where did you get that from? Isn't there a math prerequisite for your programming class?

 

If (A=i)

A+2=i+2, A+3=i+3, A+4=i+4

  • 0
  On 22/09/2013 at 22:11, xorangekiller said:

What?! Where did you get that from? Isn't there some math prerequisite for your programming class?

 

If (A=i)

A+2=i+2, A+3=i+3, A+4=i+4

Okay I missed that, sorry for the airheaded math...just been at this problem for a long time and obviously not thinking clearly.  I do apologize for the mathematical errors.  And again,thank you for all of your help.

  • 0

Testing for i to be a multiple of 3 is useless since you start i at 0 and increment by 3. You can (and should) write this program without ifs, continues, or breaks.

 

printf only ever takes one format string. The additional arguments must correspond to the format specifiers contained in the string (characters preceded by %).

  • 0

It's probably worth breaking down your problem into smaller chunks. Try these, all as smaller programs.

1: Print the header.

So the first thing that you're required to do is print the header. Now, the header only needs to be printed once, therefore we don't need to print the header inside a loop! Just print it once before you create a loop!

My Recommendation: write a program that prints ONLY the header, and only do it once.

2: Create a loop.

Next, have a go at creating the loop. So your for loop should start at a specific number, and increment in multiples of three (e.g. 6, 9, 12, 15, 18). You don't just have to use the "++" operator to increment your variable, you can do this too:

 

// Create a loop that increments by 10 every time...
int index;
for (index = 0; index <= 50; index += 10) {
    printf("%d", index);
}

// Output:
// "0"
// "10"
// "20"
// "30"
// "40"
// "50"
Do you see how the output was created? The variable "index" was passed into the printf function as a parameter, and the printf function replaced the "%d" with the value of "index".

See if you can just do this with a loop incrementing by three every time. Don't worry about any table data at the minute.

3: Print some output that accepts more than one number

Next, try to create a program that, like #1 above, only prints one line, but prints multiple numbers worked out using some variables. Remember how the loop program above used "%d" instead of a number, and then we passed the number in? The same concept applies for as many numbers as you like. So you can create a printf statement that looks like this:

 

int i = 1;
int j = 2;
int k = 4;
printf("%d %d %d", i, j, k);

// Output:
// 1 2 4
4: Put it all together

So now what do you have? You've got three little programs that do three things:

  • Prints a static line of text.
  • Prints a set of numbers in a loop.
  • Prints a line containing multiple numbers.
How you can put all this code together to solve your problem I'll leave as an exercise to you. Hopefully by the end of the third program you'll already know what you have to do.


If you're up for some constructive criticism, I've got a couple of pointers based on your initial code:

Tip #1: Indent your code correctly

I know it might seem a bit silly being strict on indenting your code, but it really helps you to read it later. Indenting code inside curly braces (i.e. { and }) allows you to see what block of code a function sits inside.

Check out how much easier it is to read your original code with better formatting:

 

#include "stdio.h"

void main()
{
    int i;

    for(i = i + 3; i < 18; i++)
    {
        if (i % 3 == 0)
            printf("\t 'A'","%d", &i);

        if (i % 3 != 0)
            continue;

        printf("\n");
    }

    for(i = i + 3; i < 20; i++)
    {
        if (i % 3 == 0)
            printf("\t 'A+2", "%d", i);

        if (i % 3 != 0)
            continue;

        printf("\n");
    }
}

Tip #2: Don't forget about 'else'

The else statement is your friend, don't forget to call him every now and then! You don't need to check if "i % 3 == 0" and then in the next line check if the opposite is true (i.e. "i % 3 != 0"), because you can just use an else...

// Do this if i is a multiple of three...
if (i % 3 == 0)
    printf("\t 'A+2", "%d", i);

// ... otherwise do this...
else
    continue;
Tip #3: Remember to initialize your variables!

In C, your numbers won't have a defined value by default, so there's no guarantee that your number will start at zero. Remember to set your variable to zero (or another appropriate value) before you start using it, otherwise, as Asik said, you'll run into undefined behaviour, and nobody wants that!

int i; // <-- BAD! i could be "0", but it could also be "12654151", because you haven't told it what to be!
int j = 0; // <-- GOOD! j will definitely be zero the first time you use it.
  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free Download Manager 6.28.1.6321 by Razvan Serea Free Download Manager is a powerful, easy-to-use and absolutely free download accelerator and manager. FDM accelerates downloads by splitting files into sections and then downloading them simultaneously. As a result download speed increases up to 600%, or even more! FDM can also resume broken downloads so you needn`t start downloading from the beginning after casual interruption. FDM lets you download files and whole web sites from any remote server via HTTP, HTTPS and FTP. You can also download files using BitTorrent protocol. In addition, Free Download Manager allows you to: adjust traffic usage; to organize and schedule downloads; download video from video sites; download whole web sites with HTML Spider; operate the program remotely, via the internet, and more! Free Download Manager is compatible with the most popular browsers Google Chrome, Firefox, Microsoft Edge, Internet Explorer and Safari. Free Download Manager 6.28.1.6321 changelog: Improved add-ons support. Improved M3U support. Fixed: crash bug in BitTorrent module. Fixed: minor bugs. Windows: a bit improved installer. Windows: Firefox bug workaround. Android: Qt updated to 6.9.1. Download: Free Download Manager (64-bit) | 45.8 MB (Freeware) Links: Home Page | Linux, Mac, Android | MS Store | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tariffs have nothing to do with this pricing. It was always intended to be slightly more expensive then the S25+
    • Hello, The static link still downloads 10.3.2040.0 from May 22, 2025. The 10.3.2412.0 version can be downloaded directly from emclient.com/dist/v10.3.2412/setup.msi. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Hello, Yes, and yes. More specifically, there are lots of features in Windows that I do not use--I cannot recall the last time I needed to run EUDCEDIT.EXE or ODBCAD32.EXE on a computer I own, but I'm sure that for some people they are useful, and for a smaller set of people they might even be indispensable. I don't begrudge Microsoft for including them as part of the standard Windows installation nor the people who need such tools; sometimes it is convenient to have some little utility or feature readily available. One thing I do begrudge is Microsoft's over-reliance on its own telemetry, and perhaps surpisingly on the flip side, customers who disable it. Collecting telemetry is generally a good thing, if it is done for good reasons and does not include any customer PII. However, how you interpret that telemetry is even more important, as that can lead to all sorts of disastrous decisions. On the customer side of things, telemetry is your "vote:" it's how you tell companies what features you use in the program, and lets them prioritize things appropriately. One glaring example is Windows 8, which shipped with the full-screen Start Screen because Microsoft's telemetry told them the average Windows user pressed the Windows key to bring up the Start Menu less than once a day. I have often wondered how many "power users" of previous versions of Windows (XP, Vista, and 7) that relied on the Start Menu disabled the telemetry that would have told Microsoft a difference story about its usage. More recently, I came across a young lady who had a problem with a third-party sync program on her computer running Windows 7. An update for the utility removed Windows 7 compatibility, and broke her backup process. Now, support for Windows 7 ended over 5 years ago in 2020, but there are ISVs who still support their software on it, but decisions about stuff like that are made, in part, by knowing what percentage of your customer base is on what operating system version. When I asked about that, she mentioned she had specifically disabled the telemetry from the sync program to its developers, which was optional to begin with. What made things even worse was that this was an open source utility, and its authors had a very clear, well-designed and scoped policy on the telemetry they collected, the pains they went through to avoid collecting any PII, and even other ancillary risks involving information disclosure (like just using of the software) because of the network connection made for the checks. Yet, she took herself out of telling the project maintainers "Hey, I use your software and I'm running Windows 7" by disabling the telemetry checks, which could have let them know they needed to continue supporting it. In a sense, sending telemetry is just like voting: Individually, you may not think it matters much, but it is often the basis for very important decisions. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • Hello, My thoughts on this are mixed. Microsoft has hosted malicious code in the Microsoft Update Catalog where third party device drivers are stored; I wrote about one such incident about fifteen years ago, so if there are any other old malicious drivers floating around in the catalog, this will be a good step towards preventing any infestations from reoccurring. Another thing, which surprisingly is not mentioned in Microsoft's announcement, is that this helps protect against BYOVD (Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver) attacks, where malware either comes with or downloads an older device drivers with vulnerabilities in it that can be exploited to gain access to kernel memory. Removing all those old device drivers from the Windows Update Catalog, potentially with all sorts of undisclosed vulnerabilities in them, means an attacker can no longer leisurely count on being able to download them from Microsoft's servers--something that may go unnoticed or ignored by security analysts. This makes the adversary attack a little more noisy, since they have to either include the device driver with the rest of their initial payload or download it from a third-party site at some point prior to beginning their BYOVD attack. On the other hand, it means that people who are looking for a specific version of an older device driver for whatever legitimate reasons, like compatibility, performance or stability, may end up going to dodgy third-party sites in search of older drivers, which increases the risk of exposure to everything from nuisance advertisements and unwanted software to actual malicious code. As for me, I have keeping copies of all the device drivers, firmware updates, etc. I have downloaded over the years, some dating back to DOS and Windows 3.x era, not just for hardware I won, but popular things like unified chipset and video card drivers, just in case I ever needed it. It might seem silly to collect such a thing, but the hardware drivers, firmware updates, and documentation are just about 2 TB in size. From my perspective, it is an inexpensive form of insurance, especially given that disk space is always getting cheaper over time. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
  • Recent Achievements

    • Contributor
      GravityDead went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Week One Done
      BlakeBringer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Helen Shafer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      660
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      266
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      235
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      164
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      149
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!