Impressions of Deus Ex: Invisible War Demo


Recommended Posts

Ok, so I know it?s only a demo (and *hopefully* not a reflection of the final product) but... was anyone else completely under-whelmed by it?

Here are just a few observations from my first play :-

1) The voice over?s sound almost amateur-ish

2) Even at what I would call low-ish settings (800x600, medium quality) my 2ghz machine with a GF4 TI4600 was barely getting 25fps

3) There is a distinct lack of customisable options on the menu (video & audio)

4) The HUD is very intrusive (even on minimal mode)

Like I said, I know it?s only a demo and the overall ?feel & flow? of the game won?t come through, but I still expected way more than this...

Well you've got a better impression then me... I can't even play it since my graphics card doesn't have Pixel Shaders. There is a very negative vibe about this demo spreading around the PC Gaming community, there is even a petition about it going around already. How dissapointing, shame I can't run it to make my own mind up! :crazy:

Well you've got a better impression then me... I can't even play it since my graphics card doesn't have Pixel Shaders. There is a very negative vibe about this demo spreading around the PC Gaming community

I didn't realise that it needs a GF3 and upwards to play (even at the lowest setttings)... that's a bit harsh me thinks. I'm all for advancing games to take into account newer technology, but that's going to cut a LOT of people out...

Just been over to Forum Planet and it get's a bit of a roasting there to.

I played it for 2 minutes and I threw it out the window. Well, not literally but you know what I mean. It runs like crud and I can't stand games that are choppy even at lowest settings. Well, lets see how the full version turns out, but I ain't gonna buy a $500 video card for just one game. I'd have to have a pretty damn good reason.

Loved the original, so this sequel has been on my wish list for years, but very disappointed with demo. With so little time left until full product is released, I'm afraid that what we see is what we get. Don't think they're gonna change much now...

As many others has pointed out, this plays and looks like a pure console port and it's amazing how "low quality" everything looks even on a high-end system.

I've decided to buy this one for XBox instead... there's absolutely no reason to get the PC version when it's so obvious that they haven't made _any_ effort to make it different than the console one.

As for the PC, I guess I'll have to install Deus Ex 1 and play it again... imho it actually looks and feels better than this new demo.

seriously though...i get better FPS in doom3 and half life2...other times my fps is high staring at the same thing...and then drops...and i see no change, needs a lot of fixing, seems like the worst demo ive ever come across, ninja turtles i got a few weeks ago was BETTER

am i not right in thinking that it auto has FSAA on either 1x/2x/4x and you cant disable it, hence giving crappy performance.

does on mine anyway, cant turn it off. not bothered with disabling in drivers cuz the game should allow disabling!

am i not right in thinking that it auto has FSAA on either 1x/2x/4x and you cant disable it, hence giving crappy performance.

does on mine anyway, cant turn it off. not bothered with disabling in drivers cuz the game should allow disabling!

Yeah, cant disable it in-game. Why did they not label it a beta or alpha? Aaahah, what a mess.

Some things to try. Taken from IONStorm Forums... I recommend a visit :) Seems like this game could get into shape with some simple tweaks.

First of all, disable Bloom in the video settings to get rid of that fugly glow filter.

I also run the game with vsynch disabled, FSAA set to "application preference" in catalyst, Multisample x 1 in game.

These other settings can be found in default.ini

The HUD is actually meant to be further at the edges on PC, by default it is at Xbox settings in the demo.

FOV__d=68

Then there is the "mouse lag" people have noticed.

MouseLagThreshold=0

Some other tweaks that gave me a boost in fps and quality.

DetailTextures=True

UseDirectDraw=True

Use32BitTextures=True

DetailedTextures=True

VolumetricLighting=True

Overbright=False (only if u want the lighting to be more... moody)

These settings at least made it smoother for me to play. I don't see any difference with the volumetriclighting, but some ppl say they do, so try it out. I used to have 15-20fps, but now I have constant 40-50... much more enjoyable :)

Deus Ex developer?

HAHAHA I was thinking the same thing...I downloaded it but I havent tried it...I keep hearing all this TERRIBLE stuff about it and after how awesome the 1st one was I dont want some crappily concieved demo to ruin my impression of it

I actually liked it.. Performance aside. If your computer cant run a game thats your problem, and its not as if the unreal warefare engine is made for budget line computers..

Onto actual gameplay hacking seemed to be far too easy, and I dont like the console style lack of mouse input menus but thats a small thing I could get used to.

Now the graphics thing is a funny one. At times the graphics look amazing, but then in the same second it can look horrible. Thats another thing you need to get used to.

I get the feeling its taken a step away from the recent nice but unrealistic looking games (ala GTA 3 + Vice City) and gone for a more real and gritty feel. Kind of like Max Payne without the photo textures (never liked it when people use those - seems like a cheap way to make a game look nice)

The demo is short though, and you dont really get a lot out of it. I think I like it though, but it doesnt seem to have the same depth or interaction that deus ex had, which is a shame. In the bar you cant use your guns, originally you could but it would get you into trouble and you would have to either run away or kill people.

I'm gonna play some more before I decide. Its not nearly as bad as some people are making out, but it doesnt feel like Deus Ex either..

We will see.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.
    • Aren`t "security features" and "AI model that can see your screen" a tad diametric!
    • Samsung, Amazon extend 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD deal beyond Prime Day 2026 by Sayan Sen Recently, we had Amazon's Prime Day 2026 sales wherein there were several great deals including on SSDs. One of those discounted components was the Samsung 990 PRO SSD as the 2TB variant of it was selling for $370, a very good price after a long time. Although that deal was supposed to expire today, Amazon has now extended that sale further (purchase link under the specs table down below). The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $400. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The technical specs of the Samsung 990 PRO 2TB are given in the table below: Specification Value Form Factor M.2 2280 Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 NAND Flash Samsung V-NAND TLC Controller Samsung In-house Controller Cache Memory Samsung 2GB Low Power DDR4 SDRAM Sequential Read Speed Up to 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write Speed Up to 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD32) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS Random Read (4KB, QD1) Up to 22,000 IOPS Random Write (4KB, QD1) Up to 80,000 IOPS Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Reliability (MTBF) 1.5 Million Hours Endurance 1,200 TBW (Total Bytes Written) Get it at the link below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB NVMe SSD (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Glad im on the right boat. Tidal has lots of issues in terms of app and music mix, its worst than spot but its honest. Spot algo is very tendentious and they pess less to artists, so im comfortable with the tidal errors, for now.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says by David Uzondu Image via Tidal Tidal has announced an AI policy aimed at protecting artists and their crafts, as AI music generation tools continue to improve both in speed and quality. According to the music streaming platform, AI-generated music will be accepted, but these tracks will be held to a "higher standard" of content integrity. Next month, the company plans to auto-identify and tag these uploads. Listeners will spot a special icon next to content that algorithms flag as 100% AI-generated starting mid-July, and the platform hopes to expand this tag to partially generated songs as detection tech improves. Any AI music that exploits an artist's voice or likeness will be taken down, and Tidal will immediately block tracks associated with fraudulent activity, which includes artificial streaming and deceptive content that interferes with real creators. And finally, music that's 100% AI-generated will not be monetized. Tidal said there is "ongoing debate" about whether certain licensed synthetic models deserve payouts, so it's possible that this part will change in the future. Streaming platforms are absolutely getting flooded with AI-generated music because of how easy it is to pump out endless tracks every minute. To give you an idea of how "bad" it is, Deezer alone reported that synthetic uploads now make up about 44% of its daily intake, which translates to roughly 75,000 automated tracks hitting its servers every single day. Interestingly, Deezer found most people cannot tell the difference between human and machine creations, with an Ipsos study revealing that 97% of listeners failed to spot the AI-generated tracks. Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music. The Swedish platform partnered with Universal Music Group to test "legal and controlled" generative AI tools that let subscribers remix songs with AI.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!